Chronic infections of the small intestine

Approach to the adult patient with chronic diarrhea: A literature review

Chronic diarrhea is defined by symptoms lasting longer than 4 weeks. It is a common problem that affects up to 5% of the adult population. Different pathophysiologic mechanisms involve numerous causes, including drug side effects, postoperative anatomic and physiologic alterations, intestinal and colonic wall abnormalities, inflammatory or malabsorption causes, pancreatobiliary diseases, and functional or gut-brain axis disorders associated with dysbiosis or gastrointestinal motility alterations. Due to such a broad differential diagnosis, it is important to categorize chronic diarrhea into five main groups: drug side effect, postoperative, postinfectious, malabsorptive, inflammatory, and functional. The present review is a narrative analysis of the diagnostic approach, emphasizing key aspects of the clinical history, the utility of biomarkers (in breath, stool, urine, and serology) and malabsorption and motility tests, the role of radiologic and endoscopic studies, and the most common histologic findings. A diagnostic algorithm aimed at determining etiology and personalizing therapy is also proposed.

Approach to the adult patient with chronic diarrhea: a literature review

Chronic diarrhea is defined by symptoms lasting longer than 4 weeks. It is a common problem that affects up to 5% of the adult population. Different pathophysiologic mechanisms involve numerous causes, including drug side effects, postoperative anatomic and physiologic alterations, intestinal and colonic wall abnormalities, inflammatory or malabsorption causes, pancreatobiliary diseases, and functional or gut-brain axis disorders associated with dysbiosis or gastrointestinal motility alterations. Due to such a broad differential diagnosis, it is important to categorize chronic diarrhea into five main groups: drug side effect, postoperative, postinfectious, malabsorptive, inflammatory, and functional. The present review is a narrative analysis of the diagnostic approach, emphasizing key aspects of the clinical history, the utility of biomarkers (in breath, stool, urine, and serology) and malabsorption and motility tests, the role of radiologic and endoscopic studies, and the most common histologic findings. A diagnostic algorithm aimed at determining etiology and personalizing therapy is also proposed.

Detection of Tropheryma whipplei in stool samples by one commercial and two in-house real-time PCR assays

OBJECTIVE

Tropheryma whipplei, the causative agent of Whipple's disease, can also be identified in stool samples of humans without systemic disease. It is much more frequently detected in human stool samples in tropical environments than in industrialized countries. PCR-screening has been applied for point prevalence studies and environmental assessments in tropical settings, but results depend on the applied assay. We compared one commercial qPCR kit with two well-described in-house assays for detection of T. whipplei from stool.

METHODS

Residual materials from nucleic acid extractions of stool samples from two groups with presumably different prevalences and increased likelihood of being colonized or infected by T. whipplei were tested. One group comprised 300 samples from study participants from western Africa (group 1); the second group was of 300 returnees from tropical deployments (group 2). Each sample was assessed with all three qPCR assays. Cycle threshold (C_t ) values were descriptively compared.

RESULTS

Based solely on mathematical modeling, the three PCR assays showed considerably different detection rates of T. whipplei DNA in stool samples (kappa 0.67 (95% confidence interval [0.60, 0.73])). Considering the calculated test characteristics, prevalence of 28.3% for group 1 and 5.0% for group 2 was estimated. Discordant test results were associated with later C_t values. The study did not validate the assays for the detection of T. whipplei in Whipple's disease and for diagnostic purposes since clinical specificity and sensitivity were not investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the observed diagnostic uncertainty, PCR-based screening approaches can be used for epidemiological purposes and environmental samples to define the source and reservoir in resource-limited tropical settings if prevalence is calculated using diagnostic accuracy-adjusted methods.