Postoperative Crohn's disease management

Surgical and non-surgical risk factors affecting the insufficiency of ileocolic anastomosis after first-time surgery in Crohn’s disease patients

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) often necessitates surgical intervention, particularly when it manifests in the terminal ileum and ileocecal valve. Despite undergoing radical surgery, a subset of patients experiences recurrent inflammation at the anastomotic site, necessitating further medical attention.

AIM

To investigate the risk factors associated with anastomotic insufficiency following ileocecal resection in CD patients.

METHODS

This study enrolled 77 patients who underwent open ileocolic resection with primary stapled anastomosis. Patients were stratified into two groups: Group I comprised individuals without anastomotic insufficiency, while Group II included patients exhibiting advanced anastomotic destruction observed endoscopically or those requiring additional surgery during the follow-up period. Surgical and non-surgical factors potentially influencing anastomotic failure were evaluated in both cohorts.

RESULTS

Anastomotic insufficiency was detected in 12 patients (15.6%), with a mean time interval of 30 months between the initial surgery and recurrence. The predominant reasons for re-intervention included stenosis and excessive perianastomotic lesions. Factors associated with a heightened risk of anastomotic failure encompassed prolonged postoperative obstruction, anastomotic bleeding, and clinically confirmed micro-leakage. Additionally, patients in Group II exhibited preoperative malnutrition and early recurrence of symptoms related to CD.

CONCLUSION

Successful surgical outcomes hinge on the attainment of a fully functional anastomosis, optimal metabolic status, and clinical remission of the underlying disease. Vigilant endoscopic surveillance following primary resection facilitates the timely identification of anastomotic failure, thereby enabling noninvasive interventions.

Crohn's disease after surgery: Changes in post-operative management strategies over time and their impact on long-term re-operation rate-A retrospective multicentre real-world study

BACKGROUND

Few data are available addressing the impact of post-operative management of Crohn's disease (CD) on long-term clinical course.

AIM

To assess the evolution of post-operative management strategies over the last 40 years and their impact on the re-operation rate of CD.

METHODS

We included 657 patients with CD who had undergone their first radical ileo-caecal resection between 1980 and 2020. Three cohorts were defined according to year of surgery: cohort 1 (1980-1998; n = 198), cohort 2 (1999-2009; n = 218) and cohort 3 (2010-2020; n = 241). We estimated exposure to immunomodulators and anti-TNFα agents after surgery and rates of re-operation using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the association of clinical variables with time to re-operation.

RESULTS

Immunosuppressants, (IMMs) and anti-TNFα exposure within 5 years after surgery increased significantly from cohort 1 to cohort 2 and cohort 3 (IMMs: 1.6%, 38.2% and 28.0%, respectively, p < 0.001; anti-TNFα: 0.0%, 20.7% and 52.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference across cohorts regarding the cumulative probability of re-operation within 5 and 10 years. Multivariate analysis identified IMMs/anti-TNFα exposure before the first surgery (HR 9.15; 95% CI 2.77-30.21) and post-operatively (HR: 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.74) as variables associated with the risk of re-operation. However, these associations had a time-varying effect and become non-significant after 5 and 2 years after surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite increased post-operative use of IMMs and anti-TNFα agents in the last two decades, the impact of these strategies on the risk of long-term re-operation rate has been modest.

Impact of different anastomosis methods on post-recurrence after intestinal resection for Crohn's disease: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract, often requiring intestinal resection as a common treatment. However, recurrence after surgery is common. The anastomotic configuration after bowel resection appears to be associated with the recurrence of CD. Previous studies have suggested that the Kono-S anastomosis may help to reduce the recurrence rate. However, the results remain controversial. Therefore, evidence-based evidence is needed to prove the advantages of Kono-S anastomosis.

AIM

To measure the influence of anastomosis techniques on the long-term relapse rate of CD by conducting a meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched until October 8, 2023. Patients who underwent intestinal resection due to CD were included. The intervention measures included Kono-S anastomosis, whereas the control group received traditional anastomosis such as end-to-end, end-to-side, and side-to-side anastomosis. Only randomized clinical trials and observational studies were included. The primary outcome measures were hospital stay post-surgery, overall postoperative complication incidence, the proportion of Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher, overall postoperative recurrence rate, and Rutgeerts score.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2023, six articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results indicated that Kono-S anastomosis can reduce the hospital stay post-surgery of patients with CD [MD = -0.26, 95%CI: -0.42 to -0.10, P = 0.002] than other traditional anastomosis methods. Compared to other traditional anastomosis methods, Kono-S anastomosis can significantly reduce the total recurrence rate [MD = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.17 to 0.98, P = 0.05] and postoperative Rutgeerts score [MD = -0.81, 95%CI: -0.96 to -0.66, P < 0.001] in patients with CD. However, there is no significant disparity in the overall occurrence of postoperative complications and the proportion of Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa.

CONCLUSION

Kono-S anastomosis has the potential to expedite the recuperation of CD and diminish relapse hazards; however, additional larger trials are necessary to authenticate its effectiveness.

Anti-TNF Agents and New Biological Agents (Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab) in the Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Recurrence After Surgery in Crohn's Disease

Surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) is not curative, as postoperative recurrence (POR) after ileocolonic resection is the rule in the absence of prophylactic treatment. In the present article, we critically review available data on the role of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and new biologics (including vedolizumab and ustekinumab) in the prevention and treatment of POR after surgery in CD. Several studies (summarised in various meta-analyses) have confirmed the efficacy of anti-TNFs in the prevention of POR. We identified 37 studies, including 1863 CD patients, with mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 29%. Only few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have directly compared thiopurines and anti-TNFs, with controversial results, although the superiority of the latter is supported by several meta-analyses. Infliximab and adalimumab seem equally effective. The combination of anti-TNFs and immunosuppressives should be considered in patients previously exposed to anti-TNFs. Several studies have shown that anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. In fact, the use of the same anti-TNF before and after surgery might be effective for the prevention of POR. Prophylactic anti-TNF treatment, once started, should be continued long term. Anti-TNFs are also effective for the treatment of established POR. Retreatment with anti-TNFs for POR is a valid strategy even after their preoperative failure. In six studies (including 156 patients) evaluating vedolizumab, mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months was 41%. The non-randomised comparison of anti-TNFs and vedolizumab has provided controversial results. One placebo-controlled RCT confirmed that vedolizumab is quite effective in preventing POR in CD patients with increased risk of recurrence. Seven studies (including 162 patients) evaluated ustekinumab, with a mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 41%. The comparative efficacy of ustekinumab and anti-TNFs is still unclear. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab seem to be equally effective, although the experience is very limited. In conclusion, to date, anti-TNFs are the most effective agents in preventing and treating POR in CD. Anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. Vedolizumab seems to be quite effective in the prevention of POR in patients with increased risk of recurrence. Ustekinumab is probably also effective in the postoperative setting, although the comparative efficacy with anti-TNFs or vedolizumab is still unclear.

Rate and risk factors of postoperative endoscopic recurrence of moderate- to high-risk Crohn's disease patients - A real-world experience from a Middle Eastern cohort

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) frequently recurs after intestinal resection. Azathioprine (AZA) and biological therapies have shown efficacy in preventing postoperative recurrence (POR). Data on POR from Middle Eastern populations is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of endoscopic POR in a cohort of CD patients who underwent ileocecal resection (ICR), and to assess the effectiveness of AZA and biological therapies in reducing the risk of disease recurrence.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study on 105 CD patients followed at our center, who underwent ileal resection and were at moderate to high risk for POR. Clinical and laboratory data were collected; the primary endpoint was post ICR endoscopic recurrence at 24 months defined by Rutgeerts' score of i2 or more despite treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 105 patients with Crohn's disease met our inclusion criteria; 76.2% were in remission and did not have endoscopic POR at 24 months. Further, 41.9% were on biological therapy, and 34.3% were mainly on AZA. Out of the 28.2% who had POR, approximately 15% were on biological therapies. Penetrating phenotype was the only predictive factor for decreasing POR (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.98, P = 0.04) as identified in multiple logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of biological therapies post-surgery was not superior than AZA in reducing the endoscopic POR for mod- high risk CD patients. Only penetrating behavior of the CD was associated with significantly lower risk of endoscopic recurrence. This finding is worth further investigation in more robust study designs and among larger samples of patients.