1
|
Crispin P, Akers C, Brown K, Delaforce A, Keegan A, King F, Ormerod A, Verrall T. A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development. Vox Sang 2022; 117:761-768. [PMID: 35089600 DOI: 10.1111/vox.13254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guidelines may assist information technology (IT) developers, institutions and healthcare workforces to progress with shared goals. MATERIALS AND METHODS A narrative review of current clinical guidance, benefits and risks of electronic systems for clinical transfusion practice was combined with feedback from experienced transfusion practitioners. RESULTS There is opportunity to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of transfusion practice, particularly through decision support and better identification procedures, by incorporating transfusion practice into EMRs. However, these benefits should not be assumed, as poorly designed processes within the electronic systems and the critically important electronic-human process interfaces may increase risk while creating the impression of safety. CONCLUSION Guidelines should enable healthcare and IT industries to work constructively together so that each implementation provides assurance of safe practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Crispin
- Clinical Practice Improvement Committee of Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Haematology, Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia.,Australian National University Medical School, Acton, ACT, Australia
| | - Christine Akers
- Clinical Practice Improvement Committee of Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, Blood Matters Program, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kristen Brown
- Clinical Practice Improvement Committee of Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Medical Services, Murrumbidgee Area Health Service, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
| | - Alana Delaforce
- Clinical Practice Improvement Committee of Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Mater Research Institute-UQ, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Anastazia Keegan
- Clinical Practice Improvement Committee of Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Transfusion Policy and Education, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Haematology, Nepean Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fiona King
- Clinical Practice Improvement Committee of Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,New Zealand Blood Service, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Amanda Ormerod
- Clinical Practice Improvement Committee of Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Haematology, Latrobe Regional Health, Traralgon, Victoria, Australia
| | - Trudi Verrall
- Clinical Practice Improvement Committee of Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,BloodSafe eLearning, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohammad MK, Wooten MS, Maier CL, Hill CE, Guarner J, Roback JD, Winkler AM, Sullivan HC. Electronic charting of transfusion medicine consults: implementation, challenges and opportunities. Vox Sang 2020; 115:443-450. [PMID: 32196680 DOI: 10.1111/vox.12913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Joint Commission lists improving staff communication (handoffs) as part of several National Safety Goals. In this study, we developed an electronic web-based charting system for clinical pathology handoffs, which primarily consist of transfusion medicine calls, and evaluated the advantages over a paper-based handwritten call log. MATERIALS AND METHODS A secure online web browser application using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) was designed to document on-call pathology resident consults. A year after implementation, an online survey was administered to our pathology residents in order to evaluate and compare the usability of the electronic application (e-consults) to the previous handwritten call log, which was a notebook where trainees hand wrote different components of the consult. RESULTS The REDCap web-based application includes discrete fields for patients' information, requesting physician contact, type of consult, action items for follow-up and faculty responses, as well as other information. These components have eventually progressed to be an online consult call catalog. With approximately 1079 consults per year, transfusion medicine-related calls account for ~90% of the encounters, while clinical chemistry, microbiology and immunology calls constitute the remainder. The overall response rate of the survey was 96% (29 of 30 participants). Of the 16 respondents who experienced both call log systems, 100% responded that REDCap was an improvement over the handwritten call log (P < 0·0001). CONCLUSION E-consult documentation entered into a web-based application was a user-friendly, secure clinical information access and effective handoff system as compared to a paper-based handwritten call log.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad K Mohammad
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
| | - Melanie S Wooten
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Cheryl L Maier
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Charles E Hill
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jeannette Guarner
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - John D Roback
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Anne M Winkler
- Instrumentation Laboratory, A Werfen Company, Reagent R&D and Medical Affairs, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Harold C Sullivan
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Uljon SN, Simmons DP, Rudolf JW, Baron JM, Dutta S, McEvoy DS, Murali M, Dighe AS. Validation and Implementation of an Ordering Alert to Improve the Efficiency of Monoclonal Gammopathy Evaluation. Am J Clin Pathol 2020; 153:396-406. [PMID: 31776551 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the use of a provider ordering alert to improve laboratory efficiency and reduce costs. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study to assess the use of an institutional reflex panel for monoclonal gammopathy evaluation. We then created a clinical decision support (CDS) alert to educate and encourage providers to change their less-efficient orders to the reflex panel. RESULTS Our retrospective analysis demonstrated that an institutional reflex panel could be safely substituted for a less-efficient and higher-cost panel. The implemented CDS alert resulted in 79% of providers changing their high-cost order panel to an order panel based on the reflex algorithm. CONCLUSIONS The validated decision support alert demonstrated high levels of provider acceptance and directly led to operational and cost savings within the laboratory. Furthermore, these studies highlight the value of laboratory involvement with CDS efforts to provide agile and targeted provider ordering assistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sacha N Uljon
- Departments of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Daimon P Simmons
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Joseph W Rudolf
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis
| | - Jason M Baron
- Departments of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Sayon Dutta
- Departments of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | | | | | - Anand S Dighe
- Departments of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Laboratory tests are an integral part of the electronic health record (EHR). Providing clinical decision support (CDS) for the ordering, collection, reporting, viewing, and interpretation of laboratory testing is a fundamental function of the EHR. The implementation of a sustainable, effective laboratory CDS program requires a commitment to standardization and harmonization of the laboratory dictionaries that are the foundation of laboratory-based CDS. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the tools available within the EHR to improve decision making throughout the entire laboratory testing process, from test order to clinical action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph W Rudolf
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware Street Southeast, MMC 609 Mayo, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Anand S Dighe
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114-2696, USA.
| |
Collapse
|