Genotyping to prevent Rh disease: has the time come?

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Identification and management of fetal anemia due to hemolytic disease

INTRODUCTION

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a condition caused by maternal alloantibodies against fetal red blood cells (RBCs) that can cause severe morbidity and mortality in the fetus and newborn. Adequate screening programs allow for timely prevention and intervention resulting in significant reduction of the disease over the last decades. Nevertheless, HDFN still occurs and with current treatment having reached an optimum, focus shifts toward noninvasive therapy options.

AREAS COVERED

This review focusses on the timely identification of high risk cases and antenatal management. Furthermore, we elaborate on future perspectives including improvement of screening, identification of high risk cases and promising treatment options.

EXPERT OPINION

In high-income countries mortality and morbidity rates due to HDFN have drastically been reduced over the last decades, yet worldwide anti-D mediated HDFN still accounts for 160,000 perinatal deaths and 100,000 patients with disabilities every year. Much of these deaths and disabilities could have been avoided with proper identification and prophylaxis. By implementing sustainable prevention, screening, and disease treatment measures in all countries this will systemically reduce unnecessary perinatal deaths. There is a common responsibility to engage in this cause.

Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors.

RESULTS

In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.

The Significance of RHD Genotyping and Characteristic Analysis in Chinese RhD Variant Individuals

Background

RhD is the most important and complex blood group system because of its highly polymorphic and immunogenic nature. RhD variants can induce immune response by allogeneic transfusion, organ transplantation, and fetal immunity. The transfusion strategies are different for RhD variants formed by various alleles. Therefore, extensive investigation of the molecular mechanism underlying RhD variants is critical for preventing immune-related blood transfusion reactions and fetal immunity.

Methods

RhD variants were collected from donors and patients in Zhejiang Province, China. The phenotypes were classified using the serologic method. The full coding regions of RHD gene were analyzed using the PCR-SBT method. The multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay was used to analyze the genotype and gene copy number. SWISS-MODLE and PyMOL software were used to analyze 3D structures of RhD caused by the variant alleles. The effect of non-synonymous substitutions was predicted using Polymorphism Phenotyping algorithm (PolyPhen-2), Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT), and Protein Variation Effect Analyzer (PROVEAN) software.

Results

In the collected RhD variants, 28 distinct RHD variant alleles were identified, including three novel variant alleles. RH-MLPA assay is advantageous for determining the copy number of RHD gene. 3D homology modeling predicted that protein conformation was disrupted and may explain RhD epitope differential expression. A total of 14 non-synonymous mutations were determined to be detrimental to the protein structure.

Discussion

We revealed the diversity of RHD alleles present in eastern Chinese RhD variants. The bioinformatics of these variant alleles extended our knowledge of RhD variants, which was crucial for evaluating their impact to guide transfusion support and avoid immune-related blood transfusion reactions.

Laboratory Monitoring of Mother, Fetus, and Newborn in Hemolytic Disease of Fetus and Newborn

Background

Laboratory monitoring of mother, fetus, and newborn in hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN) aims to guide clinicians and the immunized women to focus on the most serious problems of alloimmunization and thus minimize the consequences of HDFN in general and of anti-D in particular. Here, we present the current approach of laboratory screening and testing for prevention and monitoring of HDFN at the Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark.

Summary

All pregnant women are typed and screened in the 1st trimester. This serves to identify the RhD-negative pregnant women who at gestational age (GA) of 25 weeks are offered a second screen test and a non-invasive fetal RhD prediction. At GA 29 weeks, and again after delivery, non-immunized RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus are offered Rh immunoglobulin. If the 1st trimester screen reveals an alloantibody, antenatal investigation is initiated. This also includes RhD-positive women with alloantibodies. Specificity and titer are determined, the fetal phenotype is predicted by non-invasive genotyping based on cell-free DNA (RhD, K, Rhc, RhC, RhE, ABO), and serial monitoring of titer commences. Based on titers and specificity, monitoring with serial peak systolic velocity measurements in the fetal middle cerebral artery to detect anemia will take place. Intrauterine transfusion is given when fetal anemia is suspected. Monitoring of the newborn by titer and survival of fetal red blood cells by flow cytometry will help predict the length of the recovery of the newborn.

Noninvasive Fetal RhD Blood Group Genotyping: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive fetal rhesus D (RhD) blood group genotyping may prevent unnecessary use of anti-D immunoglobulin (RhIG) in non-alloimmunized RhD-negative pregnancies and can guide management of alloimmunized pregnancies. We conducted a systematic review of the economic literature to determine the cost-effectiveness of this intervention over usual care.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic literature searches of bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane) until February 26, 2019, and auto-alerts until October 30, 2020, and of grey literature sources were performed to retrieve all English-language studies.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies done in serologically confirmed non-alloimmunized or alloimmunized RhD-negative pregnancies, comparing costs and effectiveness of the intervention versus usual care.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers extracted data from the eligible studies and assessed their methodological quality (risk of bias) using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) and Drummond tools. We narratively synthesized findings. Our review included 8 economic studies that evaluated non-invasive fetal RhD genotyping followed by targeted RhIG prophylaxis in non-alloimmunized pregnancies. Five studies further considered a subsequent alloimmunized pregnancy. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention versus usual care (e.g., universal RhIG or prophylaxis conditional on results of paternal testing) for non-alloiummunized pregnancies was inconsistent. Two studies indicated greater benefits and lower costs for the intervention, and another 2 suggested a trade-off. In 4 studies, the intervention was less effective and costlier than alternatives. Three studies were determined to be of high quality by both tools. Two of these studies favoured the intervention, and one assessed benefits in quality-adjusted life-years. No study clearly examined the cost-effectiveness of repetitive use of fetal genotyping in multiple non-alloimmunized or alloimmunized pregnancies. The cost of genotyping was the most influential parameter.

CONCLUSION

The cost-effectiveness of noninvasive fetal RhD genotyping for non-alloimmunized pregnancies varies between studies. Potential savings from targeted management of alloimmunized pregnancies requires further research.

Diagnostic performance of the noninvasive prenatal FetoGnost RhD assay for the prediction of the fetal RhD blood group status

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available test kit for noninvasive prenatal determination of the fetal RhD status (NIPT-RhD) with a focus on early gestation and multiple pregnancies.

Methods

The FetoGnost RhD assay (Ingenetix, Vienna, Austria) is routinely applied for clinical decision making either in woman with anti-D alloimmunization or to target the application of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) to women with a RhD positive fetus. Based on existing data in the laboratory information system the newborn’s serological RhD status was compared with NIPT RhD results.

Results

Since 2009 NIPT RhD was performed in 2968 pregnant women between weeks 5 + 6 and 40 + 0 of gestation (median 12 + 6) and conclusive results were obtained in 2888 (97.30%) cases. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated from those 2244 (77.70%) cases with the newborn’s serological RhD status reported. The sensitivity of the FetoGnost RhD assay was 99.93% (95% CI 99.61–99.99%) and the specificity was 99.61% (95% CI 98.86–99.87%). No false-positive or false-negative NIPT RhD result was observed in 203 multiple pregnancies.

Conclusion

NIPT RhD results are reliable when obtained with FetoGnost RhD assay. Targeted routine anti-D-prophylaxis can start as early as 11 + 0 weeks of gestation in singleton and multiple pregnancies.

Optimization of diagnostic strategy for non-invasive cell-free foetal RHD determination from maternal plasma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to optimize routine non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal RHD gene from plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women (the median of gestational age was 25 weeks, range 10-38) to detect RhD materno-fetal incompatibility and to avoid the redundant immunoprophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Initially only one exon of RHD gene (exon 10) was investigated in 281 plasma samples (144 verified after delivery), in the second phase three RHD exons (5, 7, 10) were analyzed in 246 samples of plasma and maternal genomic DNA (204 verified) by real-time PCR method. Detection of Y-chromosomal sequence DYS-14 and five X-chromosomal insertion/deletion polymorphisms was used to confirm the fetal cfDNA detectability in plasma. Specific polymorphisms in RHD gene were detected by sequence-specific primer PCR in nine samples.

RESULTS

When only the RHD exon 10 was tested, 2·8% of verified samples were false positive and 3·5% false negative. With three RHD exons (5, 7, 10) and maternal genomic DNA testing, only one case was false negative (0·5%). Nine samples were inconclusive due to RHD-positive results in maternal genomic DNA. These samples were analyzed for specific mutations in RHD gene. Combination of both methods for fetal cfDNA verification succeeded in 75% of tested group.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of analysis of three RHD exons and maternal genomic DNA to routine practice lowers dramatically the ratio of false positive and negative results. This method enables more accurate determination of fetal RHD status with the reduction of unnecessary medical care and RhD immunoprophylaxis.

Prenatal RHD genotyping in Croatia: preliminary results

OBJECTIVES

Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine (CITM) implemented non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping as a request for targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. The diagnostic performance of in-house RT-PCR method for fetal RHD genotyping and preliminary results are analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation included results of RHD genotyping for 205 RhD negative pregnant women, 12-36th week of gestation, whose samples were received in period between 2015 and 2020. QIAsymphony SP DSP Virus Midi Kit was used for cffDNA extraction on QIAsymphony SP platform (Qiagen, Germany). Fragments of RHD exons 7 and 10 and later exon 5 were RT-PCR amplified. As internal controls, amplification of SRY gene or RASSF1A fragment and β-actin genes digested with BsTUI were used.

RESULTS

We identified 70.72% (145/205) positive and 28.78% (59/205) negative fetal RHD genotypes. We had one inconclusive result (0.50%) due to the interference of maternal DNA with variant genotype RHD*09.02.00/01/*01N.01. When compared to newborns RhD phenotypes, no false negative and three false positive results (3/199, 1.50%) were observed. The test yielded 100% sensitivity and 95.08% specificity, while diagnostic accuracy was 98.48%. We were able to determine one case of fetal variant genotype RHD*04.04/*01N.01 inherited from the father. The negative and positive predictive test values were 100% and 97.86%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Automated cffDNA extraction and RT-PCR amplification of fetal RHD exons 5,7,10 and fragments of SRY, RASSF1A genes represents highly reliable system for determining fetal RHD status which enables targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. To obtain high specificity of cffDNA extraction, strict and thoroughly cleaning procedures are required.

Two Reliable Methodical Approaches for Non-Invasive RHD Genotyping of a Fetus from Maternal Plasma

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping is an important tool for predicting RhD incompatibility between a pregnant woman and a fetus. This study aimed to assess a methodological approach other than the commonly used one for noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping on a representative set of RhD-negative pregnant women. The methodology must be accurate, reliable, and broadly available for implementation into routine clinical practice. A total of 337 RhD-negative pregnant women from the Czech Republic region were tested in this study. The fetal RHD genotype was assessed using two methods: real-time PCR and endpoint quantitative fluorescent (QF) PCR. We used exon-7-specific primers from the RHD gene, along with internal controls. Plasma samples were analyzed and measured in four/two parallel reactions to determine the accuracy of the RHD genotyping. The RHD genotype was verified using DNA analysis from a newborn buccal swab. Both methods showed an excellent ability to predict the RHD genotype. Real-time PCR achieved its greatest accuracy of 98.6% (97.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity (95% CI)) if all four PCRs were positive/negative. The QF PCR method also achieved its greatest accuracy of 99.4% (100% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity (95% CI)) if all the measurements were positive/negative. Both real-time PCR and QF PCR were reliable methods for precisely assessing the fetal RHD allele from the plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women.

Impact of long-term storage of plasma and cell-free DNA on measured DNA quantity and fetal fraction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Optimal sample storage conditions are essential for non-invasive prenatal testing of cell-free fetal and total DNA. We investigated the effect of long-term storage of plasma samples and extracted cfDNA using qPCR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fetal and total cfDNA yield and fetal fraction were calculated before and after storage of plasma for 0-6 years at -25°C. Dilution experiments were performed to investigate PCR inhibition. Extraction with or without proteinase K was used to examine protein dissociation. Storage of extracted cfDNA was investigated by testing aliquots immediately, and after 18 months and 3 years of storage at -25°C.

RESULTS

We observed a marked increase in the levels of amplifiable fetal and total DNA in plasma stored for 2-3 years, and fetal fraction was slightly decreased after 3 years of storage. cfDNA detection was independent of proteinase K during DNA extraction in plasma samples stored >2 years, indicating a loss of proteins from DNA over time, which was likely to account for the observed increase in DNA yields. Measured fetal and total DNA quantities, as well as fetal fraction, increased in stored, extracted cfDNA.

CONCLUSION

Fetal and total cell-free DNA is readily detectable in plasma after long-term storage at -25°C. However, substantial variation in measured DNA quantities and fetal fraction means caution may be required when using stored plasma and extracted cfDNA for test development or validation purposes.

Next Generation Sequencing-Based Fetal ABO Blood Group Prediction by Analysis of Cell-Free DNA from Maternal Plasma

Introduction

ABO blood group incompatibility between a pregnant woman and her fetus as a cause of morbidity or mortality of the fetus or newborn remains an important, albeit rare, risk. When a pregnant woman has a high level of anti-A or anti-B IgG antibodies, the child may be at risk for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Performing a direct prenatal determination of the fetal ABO blood group can provide valuable clinical information.

Objective

Here, we report a next generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay for predicting the prenatal ABO blood group.

Materials and Methods

A total of 26 plasma samples from 26 pregnant women were tested from gestational weeks 12 to 35. Of these samples, 20 were clinical samples and 6 were test samples. Extracted cell-free DNA was PCR-amplified using 2 primer sets followed by NGS. NGS data were analyzed by 2 different methods, FASTQ analysis and a grep search, to ensure robust results. The fetal ABO prediction was compared with the known serological infant ABO type, which was available for 19 samples.

Results

There was concordance for 19 of 19 predictable samples where the phenotype information was available and when the analysis was done by the 2 methods. For immunized pregnant women (n = 20), the risk of HDFN was predicted for 12 fetuses, and no risk was predicted for 7 fetuses; one result of the clinical samples was indeterminable. Cloning and sequencing revealed a novel variant harboring the same single nucleotide variations as ABO*O.01.24 with an additional c.220C>T substitution. An additional indeterminable result was found among the 6 test samples and was caused by maternal heterozygosity. The 2 indeterminable samples demonstrated limitations to the assay due to hybrid ABO genes or maternal heterozygosity.

Conclusions

We pioneered an NGS-based fetal ABO prediction assay based on a cell-free DNA analysis from maternal plasma and demonstrated its application in a small number of samples. Based on the calculations of variant frequencies and ABO*O.01/ABO*O.02 heterozygote frequency, we estimate that we can assign a reliable fetal ABO type in approximately 95% of the forthcoming clinical samples of type O pregnant women. Despite the vast genetic variations underlying the ABO blood groups, many variants are rare, and prenatal ABO prediction is possible and adds valuable early information for the prevention of ABO HDFN.

Early and Accurate Sex Determination by qPCR of Y Chromosome Repetitive Sequence (YRS) In Cell-Free Fetal DNA from Maternal Plasma

BACKGROUND

Circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) provides the opportunity for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Early knowledge of the fetal sex is essential in cases with a risk of a sex-linked genetic disease. A reliable and highly sensitive sex determination test is required for first trimester testing because of the low amounts of cffDNA.

METHODS

First trimester blood samples from 326 pregnant women were analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for the presence of Y chromosome repetitive sequence (YRS). Blood samples were collected from gestational weeks 4-12. Fetal sex was predicted on the basis of results from the YRS assay of cffDNA extracted from maternal plasma. The predicted sex was compared with the phenotypic sex of the newborn baby (n = 294).

RESULTS

There was high concordance between the test results from the YRS assay and the actual sex at birth. There were no false-positive results, indicating agreement between male YRS results and male sex at birth. Two results were false negative (from gestational weeks 4 and 6) predicting female fetuses, when the actual sex at birth was male. Overall, the sensitivity of the YRS assay was 98.6% (95% CI, 95.1%-99.8%), specificity was 100% (95% CI, 97.5%-100%), and accuracy was 99.3% (95% CI, 97.5%-99.9%). From 7 weeks of gestation, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that qPCR can be used to detect and quantify repetitive DNA sequences from 0.3 genome equivalents per milliliter of plasma. Prenatal sex determination by qPCR of YRS in cffDNA from maternal plasma was reliable and robust with cffDNA extracted from 1 mL of nonhemolyzed plasma, with a plasma equivalent per PCR of 167 μL. The YRS assay can be used for early noninvasive prenatal sex determination from a gestational age of 7 weeks.

Amplicon Sequencing-Based Noninvasive Fetal Genotyping for RHD-Positive D Antigen-Negative Alleles

BACKGROUND

To avoid hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn resulting from maternal alloantibodies against fetal Rh antigens, anti-D immunoglobulin is routinely administered to RhD-negative pregnant women in Japan. Fetal RHD genotyping using cell-free DNA may prevent unnecessary antibody administration; however, current PCR-based methods, which detect RHD deletion, do not address the higher rates of RHD-positive D antigen-negative alleles in nonwhite populations without additional inspections.

METHODS

We developed an amplicon-sequencing method that could estimate the type of paternally inherited fetal RHD allele from 4 major RHD alleles in the Japanese population: the D antigen-positive allele (RHD*01, 92.9%) and 3 D antigen-negative alleles (RHD*01N.01, 6.6%; RHD*01EL.01, 0.3%; RHD*01N.04, 0.1%) using cell-free DNA obtained from the blood plasma of pregnant women.

RESULTS

The method correctly determined the fetal RhD type even when RhD-negative pregnant women possessed an RHD-positive D antigen-negative allele: RHD*01EL.01 or RHD*01N.04.

CONCLUSIONS

This method is a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping method for Japanese and other East Asian populations. The genotyping principle of amplifying 2 different regions using the same primer pair and distinguishing them by their sequence difference during the subsequent mapping procedure is also theoretically applicable to RHD-positive D antigen-negative alleles prevalent in Africans. Therefore, this method offers an opportunity to consider targeted administration of anti-D immunoglobulin to RhD-negative pregnant women in East Asian and African countries and to increase the specificity of the fetal RHD genotyping implemented nationwide in several European countries.

Do chorionic villus samplings (CVS) or amniocenteses (AC) induce RhD immunisation? An evaluation of a large Danish cohort with no routine administration of anti-D after invasive prenatal testing

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of inducing RhD immunisation in pregnancies of RhD-negative mothers with an RhD-positive fetus undergoing chorionic villus samplings (CVS) or amniocenteses (AC).

DESIGN, SETTING AND POPULATION

Registry-based study in a Danish cohort which has not been given rhesus prophylaxis.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from the Department of Clinical Immunology at Rigshospitalet. All RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus with screen test results from weeks 8-12 and weeks 25-29 were linked to data from the Danish Fetal Medicine Database. Data were divided into cases where no invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure was performed, cases that had AC performed, and cases that had CVS performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A comparison of the proportion of women who developed RhD immunisation between the two screen tests.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 10 085 women: 9353 had no invasive procedures performed, 189 had AC and 543 had CVS performed. No women were immunised spontaneously or due to the procedure between the first and second screen test in the group with no procedure performed, or in the AC group. One woman was immunised in the CVS group. When comparing the proportion of women who was immunised in the CVS group with the no invasive test group a non-significant difference was found (P = 0.055).

CONCLUSION

The RhD immunisation rate before gestational weeks 25-29 in RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus is very low, even in women undergoing prenatal invasive testing without rhesus prophylaxis.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

The RhD immunisation rate during pregnancy is very low even in women undergoing prenatal invasive testing.

Targeted Rhesus immunoglobulin for RhD-negative women undergoing an induced abortion: A clinical pilot study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this clinical pilot study was to examine the accuracy of noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping in early pregnancy (8⁺⁰  to 11⁺⁶  weeks) and to clarify whether targeted administration of Rhesus immunoglobulin (RhIg) is possible for women undergoing an induced abortion such that unnecessary injections can be avoided. The study examines the correlation between gestational age and the amount of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma, the fetal fraction of DNA and whether transportation time or body mass index affects these parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-two RhD-negative women undergoing a surgically induced abortion were included. A maternal blood sample was collected prior to the abortion and a tissue sample was collected from the placental part of the abortion material after the intervention. Fetal RhD type was determined by PCR analysis of cell-free fetal DNA extracted from maternal plasma and on DNA from the tissue sample, with the latter providing a reference standard. Copies of RHD/mL were determined on RHD-positive samples and the fetal fraction of DNA was calculated.

RESULTS

We demonstrated complete concordance between results from plasma and tissue, with 31 RhD-positive and 21 RhD-negative samples, corresponding to 40% being RhD-negative, specificity 100% [95% confidence interval (CI) 88.8-100] and sensitivity 100% (95% CI 83.9-100). We found no significant correlation between gestational age and the amount or the fraction of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma, nor did we find that transportation time or BMI significantly affected these factors in this setup.

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal RHD genotyping can be accurately performed from the 8th week of gestation and unnecessary injections of RhIg can be avoided for women undergoing an induced abortion. A larger study is needed to determine a more accurate sensitivity for the analysis early in pregnancy.

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping to guide targeted anti-D prophylaxis-an external quality assessment workshop

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Fetal RHD genotyping of cell-free fetal DNA from RhD-negative pregnant women can be used to guide targeted antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis for the prevention of RhD immunization. To assure the quality of clinical testing, we conducted an external quality assessment workshop with the participation of 28 laboratories.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aliquots of pooled maternal plasma were sent to each laboratory. One sample was positive, and the second sample was negative for fetal RHD, verified by pre-workshop testing using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis of RHD exons 4, 5, 7 and 10. Plasma samples were shipped at room temperature. A reporting scheme was supplied for data collection, including questions regarding the methodological setup, results and clinical recommendations. Different methodological approaches were used, all employing qPCR with a total of eight different combinations of RHD exon targets. The samples were tested blindly.

RESULTS

Fetal RHD genotyping was performed with no false-negative and no false-positive results. One inconclusive result was reported for the RHD-positive sample, and four inconclusive results were reported for the RHD-negative sample. All clinical conclusions were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

This external quality assessment workshop demonstrates that despite the different approaches taken to perform the clinical assays, fetal RHD genotyping is a reliable laboratory assay to guide targeted use of Rh prophylaxis in a clinical setting.

Prediction of fetal blood group and platelet antigens from maternal plasma using next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

Fetuses whose mothers have produced antibodies to red blood cell (RBC) or platelet antigens are at risk of being affected by hemolytic disease or alloimmune thrombocytopenia, respectively, only if they inherit the incompatible antigen. Noninvasive diagnosis of the fetal antigen is employed for management of immunized pregnancies, but the specific detection of SNPs, encoding the majority of antigens, in maternal plasma is still a challenge. We applied targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to predict the fetal antigen based on the detection of fetomaternal chimerism.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The DNA of 13 pregnant women (with anti-K [3] anti-k [1], anti-Fy^a [1], anti-D + C + Jk^a [1], anti-D + E + K [1], anti-HPA-1a [1], anti-HPA-3b [1], anti-HPA-5b [1], and nonimmunized [3]) was sequenced using primers for regions encoding RhD, RhC, Rhc, RhE/e, K/k, Fya/b, Jka/b, MN, Ss, and HPA-1, 2, 3, 5, 15, 4 X-polymorphisms on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

RESULTS

NGS results were in agreement with the phenotype/genotype of women and their neonates (except for the unsuccessful detection of MN and RhC). NGS determined fetal allele chimerism for K, k, Fya, Fyb, Jka, Jkb, S, RhE (from 0.42% to 6.08%); RhD, Rhc (100%); HPA-1a, -2b, -3a, 3b, -5b, -15a, 15b (from 0.23% to 4.11%). NGS revealed fetal chimerism for incompatible antigens (from 0.7% to 4.8%) in 7 immunized cases, excluded in 3 (with anti-K, anti-Fy^a , anti-HPA-3b).

CONCLUSION

The designed NGS predicts the fetal RBC and platelet antigen status universally in cases with various clinically significant antibodies as well as providing confirmation of the presence of fetal DNA. However, some improvement of the unsuccessful primers is required.

Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization in the Pregnant Patient

Alloimmunization to red blood cell (RBC) antigens represents a challenge for physicians caring for women of child bearing potential. Exposure to non-self RBC antigens may occur during transfusion or pregnancy leading to the development of antibodies. If a subsequent fetus bears that antigen, maternal antibodies may attack the fetal red blood cells causing red cell destruction and clinically significant hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). In the most severe cases, HDFN may result in intrauterine fetal demise due to high output cardiac failure, effusions and ascites, known as "hydrops fetalis". This article reviews strategies for management and prevention of RBC alloimmunization in women of child bearing potential.

Next-generation sequencing and the impact on prenatal diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

The advent of affordable and rapid next-generation sequencing has been transformative for prenatal diagnosis. Sequencing of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has enabled the development of not only a highly sensitive screening test for fetal aneuploidies, but now definitive noninvasive prenatal diagnosis for monogenic disorders at an early gestation. Sequencing of fetal exomes offers broad diagnostic capability for pregnancies with unexpected fetal anomalies, improving the yield and accuracy of diagnoses and allowing better counseling for parents. The challenge now is to translate these approaches into mainstream use in the clinic. Areas covered: Here, the authors review the current literature to describe the technologies available and how these have evolved. The opportunities and challenges at hand, including considerations for service delivery, counseling, and development of ethical guidelines, are discussed. Expert commentary: As technology continues to advance, future developments may be toward noninvasive fetal whole exome or whole genome sequencing and a universal method for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis without the need to sequence both parents or an affected proband. Expansion of cell-free fetal DNA analysis to include the transcriptome and the methylome is likely to yield clinical benefits for monitoring other pregnancy-related pathologies such as preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction.