Microtransplantation: clinical applications and mechanisms

Mismatched donor cell infusion-related syndrome following microtransplant in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapies such as adoptive immune cell infusion and immune-modulating agents are widely used for cancer treatment, and the concomitant symptoms, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune-related adverse events (irAEs), are frequently reported. However, clinical manifestations induced by mismatched donor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cell (GPBMC) infusion in patients receiving microtransplant (MST) have not yet been well depicted.

METHODS

We analyzed 88 cycles of mismatched GPBMC infusion in patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving MST and 54 cycles of chemotherapy without GPBMC infusion as a comparison. Clinical symptoms and their correlation with clinical features, laboratory findings, and clinical response were explored.

RESULTS

Fever (58.0% [51/88]) and chills (43.2% [38/88]) were the significant early-onset symptoms after GPBMC infusion. Patients possessing less human leukocyte antigen-matching loci with the donor or those with unrelated donors experienced more chills (3 [2-5] loci vs. 5 [3-5] loci, P  = 0.043 and 66.7% [12/18] vs. 37.1% [26/70], P  = 0.024). On the other hand, those with decreased CD4 + /CD8 + T-cell ratio developed more fever (0.8 [0.7-1.2] vs. 1.4 [1.1-2.2], P  = 0.007). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that younger patients experienced more fever (odds ratio [OR] = 0.963, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.932-0.995, P  = 0.022), while patients with younger donors experienced more chills (OR = 0.915, 95% CI: 0.859-0.975, P  = 0.006). Elevated ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein levels in the absence of cytokine storm were observed following GPBMC infusion, which indicated mild and transient inflammatory response. Although no predictive value of infusion-related syndrome to leukemia burden change was found, the proportion of host pre-treatment activated T cells was positively correlated with leukemia control.

CONCLUSIONS

Mismatched GPBMC infusion in MST induced unique infusion-related symptoms and laboratory changes, which were associated with donor- or recipient-derived risk factors, with less safety and tolerance concerns than reported CRS or irAEs.

Immunotherapy for neuroblastoma by hematopoietic cell transplantation and post-transplant immunomodulation

Neuroblastoma represents a relatively common childhood tumor that imposes therapeutic difficulties. High risk neuroblastoma patients have poor prognosis, display limited response to radiochemotherapy and may be treated by hematopoietic cell transplantation. Allogeneic and haploidentical transplants have the distinct advantage of reinstitution of immune surveillance, reinforced by antigenic barriers. The key factors favorable to ignition of potent anti-tumor reactions are transition to adaptive immunity, recovery from lymphopenia and removal of inhibitory signals that inactivate immune cells at the local and systemic levels. Post-transplant immunomodulation may further foster anti-tumor reactivity, with positive but transient impact of infusions of lymphocytes and natural killer cells both from the donor, the recipient or third party. The most promising approaches include introduction of antigen-presenting cells in early post-transplant stages and neutralization of inhibitory signals. Further studies will likely shed light on the nature and actions of suppressor factors within tumor stroma and at the systemic level.

Expert consensus on microtransplant for acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients -report from the international microtransplant interest group

Recent studies have shown that microtransplant (MST) could improve outcome of patients with elderly acute myeloid leukemia (EAML). To further standardize the MST therapy and improve outcomes in EAML patients, based on analysis of the literature on MST, especially MST with EAML from January 1st, 2011 to November 30th, 2022, the International Microtransplant Interest Group provides recommendations and considerations for MST in the treatment of EAML. Four major issues related to MST for treating EAML were addressed: therapeutic principle of MST (1), candidates for MST (2), induction chemotherapy regimens (3), and post-remission therapy based on MST (4). Others included donor screening, infusion of donor cells, laboratory examinations, and complications of treatment.

New methods for the quantification of mixed chimerism in transplantation

Background

Quantification of chimerism showing the proportion of the donor in a recipient is essential for the follow-up of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but can also be useful to document an immune tolerance situation after solid organ transplantation. Historically, chimerism has been quantified from genomic DNA, but with technological advances, chimerism from donor-derived cell-free DNA seems particularly relevant in solid organ transplantation.

Methods

The reference method was until recently the short tandem repeat technique, but new innovative techniques as digital PCR (dPCR) and NGS, have revolutionized the quantification of chimerism, such as the so-called microchimerism analysis. After a short review of chimerism methods, a comparison of chimerism quantification data for two new digital PCR systems (QIAcuity™ dPCR (Qiagen^®) and QuantStudio Absolute Q (ThermoFisher^®) and two NGS-based chimerism quantification methods (AlloSeq HCT™ (CareDx^®) and NGStrack™ (GenDX^®)) was performed.

Results

These new methods were correlated and concordant to routinely methods (r²=0.9978 and r²=0.9974 for dPCR methods, r²=0.9978 and r²=0.9988 for NGS methods), and had similar high performance (sensitivity, reproductibility, linearity).

Conclusion

Finally, the choice of the innovative method of chimerism within the laboratory does not depend on the analytical performances because they are similar but mainly on the amount of activity and the access to instruments and computer services.

Current status and prospects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a highly effective and unique medical procedure for the treatment of most hematological malignancies. The first allogeneic transplantation was performed by E. Donnall Thomas in 1957. Since then, the field has evolved and expanded worldwide. The first successful allogenic HSCT (allo-HSCT) in China was conducted in 1981. Although the development of allo-HSCT in China lagged, China has since made considerable contributions to the process of HSCT worldwide, with more than 10,000 HSCTs performed annually. In particular, haploid HSCT (haplo-HSCT) technology represented in the Beijing Protocol has demonstrated similar efficacy to human leukocyte antigen-matched HSCT and has gradually become the pre-dominant choice for allo-HSCT in China. Currently, the number of haplo-HSCT procedures exceeds 5000 per year, and the Beijing Protocol has been greatly improved by implementing updated individualized strategies for controlling complications, relapse, and infection management. In addition, innovative haplo-HSCT technologies developed by different medical transplantation centers, such as Soochow, Zhejiang, Fujian, Chongqing, and Anhui, have emerged, providing inspiration for the refinement of global practice. This review will focus on the current activity in this field and highlight important trends that are vital in China's allo-HSCT process, examining the current viewpoint and future directions.

The clinical application of SNP-based next-generation sequencing (SNP-NGS) for evaluation of chimerism and microchimerism after HLA-mismatched stem cell microtransplantation

Genetic diagnostic methods for evaluation of chimerism after HSCT, such as STR-PCR and XY-FISH, have limited sensitivity. When donor chimerism is in the micro range (< 1%), deviations in the accuracy of assessment are the most significant disadvantage of these common methods. We developed a highly sensitive method that applies SNPs based on NGS in order to explore the value of donor cell microchimerism in microtransplantation (MST). This improved SNP-NGS approach has higher sensitivity (0.01–0.05%) and only requires a small amount of DNA (8–200 ng). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 48 patients with AML who received HLA-mismatched stem cell MST at our center to assess the impact of microchimerism on clinical prognosis. Patients whose duration of microchimerism was > 10.5 months (median) had a relapse rate of 26.1%, and had better 5-year LFS and OS (73.4% and 82.6%). In contrast, patients whose duration of microchimerism was < 10.5 months had a higher relapse rate (69.6%), and their 5-year LFS and OS were 30.4% and 43.5%. In conclusion, duration of donor chimerism is highly valuable for assessment of survival and prognosis in patients with AML who have received HLA-mismatched stem cell MST, especially the intermediate-risk group.

[Indications and management of hematologic microtransplantation: Recommendations of the French Society of Bone Marrow transplantation and cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

Microtransplantation (MT) is based on injection of HLA-mismatched G-CSF mobilized hematopoietic stem cells, in combination with chemotherapy but without use of conditioning regimen nor immunosuppressive drugs. As a result, a transient microchimerism is induced without engraftment. Its efficacy relies both on host immune system stimulation (recipient versus tumor) and on a graft versus tumor effect. Data are scarce and concern mostly Asian patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS). In comparison to conventional treatment without MT, higher complete remission rates and longer disease free survival and overall survival have been reported. Safety seems acceptable. The most frequent adverse event is non-severe cytokine release syndrome. Risk of GVHD remains very low. Here, we summarize the published data and detail the practical aspects of the procedure. Current data are not strong enough to provide recommendations on indications. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to propose MT to patients with AML or HR-MDS, regardless of age, presenting an indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation but ineligible for it. MT is still under investigation and rather be proposed within clinical trials.

Comparative study of micro-transplantation from HLA fully mismatched unrelated and partly matched related donors in acute myeloid leukemia

Micro-transplantation (MST) by chemotherapy, combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (GPBSC) infusion, from an HLA partial matched related donor has shown some encouraging effective therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the outcome of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) fully mismatched unrelated donor-derived MST in such patients is still unknown. In the present study, we compared the efficacy of HLA fully mismatched unrelated donor-derived MST, and partly matched related donor-derived MST, in AML of 126 patients from two centers in China, These patients, aged 16 to 65 years, were given three or four courses of MST, which consisted of a high dosage cytarabine followed by GPBSC from unrelated donor or related donor. There was a statistically significant difference in 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) between the unrelated and the related group. The non-treatment-related mortality (NRM) rates of patients, and other adverse complications, were no different in the two groups. In conclusion, unrelated donor-derived MST is believed to be a safe treatment, with efficacy similar to or higher than related donor-derived MST. This result provides support for the potential of MST for expanding the donor selection. However, the specific mechanism of action needs further study.

Current state of nonengrafting donor leukocyte infusion (focus on microtransplantation for acute myeloid leukemia)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Microtransplantation (or micro-stem cell transplantation, MST) is one permutation of alloreactive immunotherapy increasingly studied in clinical trials. It is most commonly applied to patients with myeloid malignancies who are not suitable candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. This review highlights the past 2 years of work on stem/progenitor cell products in the field of nonengrafting donor leukocyte infusion (NE-DLI), with a focus on applications of MST in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

RECENT FINDINGS

Assessing the utility of MST is hampered by lack of randomized controlled trials and by variability in donor selection algorithms, treatment timing, and unknown factors. The inherent complexity of the bidirectional alloreactive reactions, implicating many cell types, makes it challenging to move beyond correlative, population-level biology toward mechanistic explanations for MST's actions in any given patient-donor pair. Yet there are indicators that by stimulating a recipient-vs.-tumor effect, MST might substantially improve complete remission rates in AML and that it might find a role in postremission therapy.

SUMMARY

The mechanistic underpinnings of MST are gradually being disentangled and its clinical development remains in early stages.