Scalp reconstruction:

Scalp and Calvarium Reconstruction

Defects of the scalp and calvarium pose unique reconstructive challenges due to the importance of this area in protecting the brain and its distance from larger donor vessels for free flap transfer. The wide range and complexity of reconstructive options make this a broad topic because the simplest defects are often closed or managed in the outpatient setting and the most complex require multilayer closure in the operating room with a multidisciplinary team and intensive postoperative care. In hair-bearing individuals, the scalp is an esthetically important area due to the importance of hair to self-esteem and sexual attraction.

Use of xenografts and allografts in scalp reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Scalp reconstruction requires a full array of reconstructive options given the complex anatomy and protection of vital structures. Not all patients qualify for advanced reconstructive options and therefore rely on short, effective procedures with minimal morbidity. This review aims to focus on xenografts and allografts to achieve an adequate reconstruction while minimizing morbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although bovine xenografts have been used for many decades, there have been recent advances in porcine xenografts to aid in scalp defects. Similarly, new allogenic materials have emerged as additional tools in the armamentarium to promote wound healing.

SUMMARY

Both xenografts and allografts offer viable options for complex scalp reconstruction.

An algorithm for one-stage malignant oncologic scalp reconstruction

Background

Scalp reconstruction has always been a challenging problem after oncological resection. Advanced surgical techniques can reconstruct any defects, but there are a large number of patients who cannot benefit from surgery for immature strategies. The authors here describe an algorithm for selecting the best reconstructive categories and minimizing complications according to the surgical defect of scalp tumors.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective review was conducted that included 173 patients with scalp tumors treated with surgery followed by reconstruction. Patients were identified by tumor type and nature; the location of scalp defect, size, and depth; the types of reconstructions and surgical. A systematic algorithm was developed according to our findings and current literature.

Results

Small defects (≤4 cm²) could be closed by primary closure. Medium defects (4–30 cm²) were reconstructed by local flaps. We routinely used skin graft for significant surgical defects (30–90 cm²). And the tumor’s location did not have an impact on reconstructive categories of above three types of defects. Free flaps should reconstruct very large-sized defects (>90 cm²) in frontal, temporal, and vertex locations while pedicle flaps suited for occipital defects due to its anatomic vicinity. The reconstruction algorithm of recurrent disease was like the management in primary tumors except for the medium size defect in the occipital region that was primarily reconstructed by a skin graft. Multiple free flaps reconstruction is the best possibility for total scalp resection. Free flap reconstruction is used mainly for composite resection of the scalp, calvarium, and dura.

Conclusions

Successful scalp reconstruction requires careful preoperative assessment, flexible and precisely intraoperative management. The algorithm based on defect size, depth, and location can supply some degree of guidelines when considering choosing suitable reconstructive procedures.