Physical and virtual modelling of the head and neck for surgical simulation and training:

SimLife®: A New Dynamic Model for Head and Neck Surgical Oncology Simulation

The SimLife® model consists in a human cadaver dynamized by pulsatile vascularization. The objective was to evaluate the face, contents, and constructs validity of the SimLife® model in head and neck surgical oncology simulation. Head and neck surgical oncology simulation sessions on SimLife® models were organized with lateral neck dissection and total laryngectomy. Face and contents validity were addressed by questionnaires. Constructs validity was assessed by objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score. High realism was demonstrated for consistency of tissues (7.1 ± 1.4), color of arteries and veins (7.3 ± 1.9, 8.5 ± 1.1, respectively), and vein consistency (8.5 ± 1.2). The mean OSATS score was 19.7 ± 5.4 for residents and 32.7 ± 1.9 for senior surgeon (P = .0022). SimLife® is a hyperrealistic model for head and neck surgical oncology simulation and it might become a core component of the surgical resident curriculum.

Ex Vivo Ovine Model for Surgical and Microsurgical Training on Parotidectomy and Facial Nerve Reanimation: Proposal of Structured Training Program

INTRODUCTION

 Facial nerve palsy has a great physical and psychological impact on patients, so the avoidance of facial nerve damage during surgery and its reanimation are important for Otolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons. The acquisition of anatomical knowledge and surgical training regarding the parotid surgery and facial nerve is mandatory, but not easy to achieve. Surgical simulation is a reliable alternative to the on-the-job learning. In the study, we tested an ex vivo animal model to obtain the basic and advanced skills of parotid gland surgery and facial nerve reconstruction/reanimation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A prospective cohort study has been conducted on ovine head and neck specimen. A junior resident, a senior resident, and an expert surgeon were involved in a step-by-step preplanned dissection, divided in macroscopic and microscopic. Each procedure was recorded and evaluated by an expert surgeon following an adapted rating scale.

RESULTS

 A statistically significant improvement in terms of execution times and quality of the work was show in most of the surgical steps and for many quality items by the junior and senior residents, while the expert surgeon, as expected, did not show any improvement.

DISCUSSION

 Our ex vivo ovine model provided the trainee with close-to-real tissues in term of elastic resistance and consistency, to learn the skills requested in a head and neck surgery, on a reproducible environment. It is mandatory to have a feedback, which focuses on the quality of the work through valid and reliable assessment of technical skills. The judgment parameters should be reproducible and focused on the specific surgical procedure. Some limitations to this study are present, such as anatomical differences between ovine and human and the limited number of study participants.

CONCLUSION

 This proposal of training program on the ex vivo ovine model for the acquisition of skills needed in head and neck surgery proved to be feasible, effective, repeatable, and cheap.

Comparative Analysis of Simulated versus Live Patient-Based FAST (Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma) Training

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether simulated patient (SP)-based training has comparable efficacy as live patient (LP)-based training in teaching Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (FAST) knowledge and skill competencies to surgical residents.

DESIGN

A randomized pretest/intervention/posttest controlled study design was employed to compare the participants' performance in written and practical examinations regarding FAST examination after SP-based versus LP-based training.

SETTING

University-based general residency program at a single institution.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 29 general surgery residents of various training levels and sonographic experience were recruited by convenience sampling.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between subjects' baseline training level or sonographic experience with either the posttest-pretest score difference or the percentage of subjects getting all 4 windows with adequate quality. There was no significant difference between the improvement in written posttest-pretest scores for SP and LP group, which were 33 ± 9.6 and 31 ± 6.8 (p = 0.40), respectively. With regard to performance-based learning efficacy, a statistically higher proportion of subjects were able to obtain all 4 windows with adequate quality among the LP than the SP group (6/8 vs 1/8, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

SP- and LP-based FAST training for surgical residents were associated with similar knowledge-based competency acquisition, but residents receiving LP-based training were better at acquiring adequate FAST windows on live patients. Simulation training appeared to be a valid adjunct to LP practice but cannot replace LP training. Future investigations on how to improve simulation fidelity and its training efficacy for skill-based competencies are warranted.