Contemporary management of frontal sinus fractures

Patient satisfaction after conservative treatment of anterior wall frontal sinus fractures

This study aims to determine patient forehead aesthetics satisfaction after conservative treatment of non-dislocated and dislocated anterior wall frontal sinus fractures. Prospectively, patients older than 15 years of age with a frontal sinus fracture, treated conservatively between the period of 2010-2020, were analysed. The Face-Q questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction, and the fracture dimensional properties were measured using computed tomography. The results were compared with a matched non-fractured control group. The mean total Face-Q questionnaire score was 114.77 (SD = 17.38) versus 114.23 (SD = 15.23) (research-versus control group, respectively), with a mean difference of 0.55 (SD = 4.85), which was not significant (p = 0.91). The size of impression area did not appear to have a linear relationship with patient satisfaction within the entire population (p = 0.87; r = 0.00). Presence of a scar in the fracture site was a significant predictor of patient satisfaction, contributing to 31% of the entire population's overall score (p = 0.01) and 57% in the dislocated fracture population (p = 0.003). The conservatively treated patients' satisfaction score was comparable to the control group. A higher satisfaction score after a conservative treatment is associated with the absence of a scar on the fracture site, even with dislocations up to 6 mm at the deepest impression point.

Transglabellar Butterfly Incision for Anterior Cranial Vault Access: Case Report

(1) Background: The transglabellar approach, a type of transfacial technique, typically involves glabellar resection and opening the frontal sinus via a bicoronal incision, providing access to the anterior cranial vault. To prevent complications, the frontal sinus is typically obliterated. However, the success of transnasal endoscopic techniques has prompted a re-evaluation of these traditional methods. (2) Methods: This paper provides a brief literature review and discusses the removal of an elongated glioma of the left gyrus rectus (4.4 × 1.9 × 2.2 cm) in a 63-year-old male using a transglabellar subfrontal approach via a butterfly incision, with frontal sinus preservation. (3) Results: An uneventful gross-total resection of a WHO grade II oligodendroglioma was achieved. There is a paucity of literature describing a transglabellar subfrontal approach via a butterfly incision with frontal sinus preservation. (4) Conclusions: The described approach could be utilized in selected cases such as small intra-axial lesions oriented longitudinally along the inferomedial frontal lobe from the posterior wall of the frontal sinus to the anterior communicating artery complex in patients with pre-existing glabellar rhytids. Since this is merely a case presentation, we cannot conclude that this represents established clinical practice. The outcomes of this approach should be investigated in the future.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: An Evaluation of Patient Demographics, Mechanisms of Injury, Classification, and Management Strategies in Patients Referred to a Trauma Center, From 2014 to 2019

This retrospective study aimed to present demographic data, mechanisms of injury, anatomical locations, and management strategies in patients with frontal sinus fractures. The study included 91 patients with frontal sinus fractures attending the Rajaee Hospital of Shiraz between 2014 and 2019. The data recorded for each patient included age, sex, injury mechanism, fracture classification, associated craniofacial fractures, nasofrontal duct injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and treatment approach. The mean age of patients was 31.0±14.0 years, with male predominance (95.6%). Car crashes represented the most frequent mechanism of frontal sinus fracture, involving 31 subjects (34%). Isolated anterior and posterior table fractures were seen in 32 (35.2%) and 5 (5.5%) patients. Fifty-four patients (59.3%) presented both tables' involvement. Frontal sinus injuries occurred frequently (74.7%) with other facial fractures. Nasofrontal duct injury was found in 7 patients (7.7%), and 13 (14.3%) exhibited cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Fifty patients (55%) were treated with observation alone; 16 (17.5%) underwent sinus preservation, 12 (13.2%) experienced sinus obliteration, and 13 (14.3%) endured cranialization. Fisher's exact test revealed no significant association between the classification of fracture and the mechanism of injury ( P =0.591). However, a significant association was observed between the fracture classification and the treatment applied ( P =0.023). Frontal sinus fractures were most often caused by car crashes in young adults. Combined anterior and posterior table fractures were more commonly found than isolated anterior or posterior table involvement. Most frontal sinus fractures were treated conservatively without DDS surgical operation.

Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center: Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature

Study Design

Case series.

Objective

This retrospective review of frontal sinus fractures aims to describe our current experience managing these fractures at an urban level I trauma center.

Methods

An institutional database of 2081 patients who presented with maxillofacial fractures on computed tomography face/sinus in 2019 was queried for all patients with traumatic frontal sinus fractures. Demographics, trauma-related history, management approach, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

Results

Sixty-three (7.3%) patients had at least one fracture involving the frontal sinus. The most common etiologies were assaults, falls, and motor vehicle accidents. Surgical repair was performed in 26.8% of patients with frontal sinus fractures, and the other 73.2% were observed. Fractures that were displaced, comminuted, obstructive of the frontal sinus outflow tract, or associated with a dural tear or cerebrospinal fluid leak were more likely to be operative.

Conclusions

The majority of frontal sinus fractures in this study were treated with observation. Despite advances in transnasal endoscopic approaches, many surgeons still rely on open approaches to repair frontal sinus fractures.

Approaches to the Maxillofacial Skeleton: Application of Standard and Minimally Invasive Techniques

Management of maxillofacial trauma is complex and challenging and requires a clear understanding of facial anatomy and function. There are multiple approaches that can be used to access each anatomical region, each with specific indications and complication profiles. Open, "invasive" approaches are being replaced or augmented with minimally invasive and endoscopic approaches when possible. Thorough knowledge of indications, surgical techniques, and potential complications allows surgeons to make appropriate decisions for access and repair of fractures. This article is a comprehensive review of standard and minimally invasive approaches, with description of techniques and pros and cons for their use.

Treatment Outcomes With Conservative Management of Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Historically, early surgical management of frontal sinus outflow tract (FSOT) fractures has been standard practice. There has been a paradigm shift toward nonsurgical or delayed management. Unfortunately, clinical indications and treatment outcomes for this approach are poorly understood. This study evaluates radiologic indicators, as well as sinus reaeration and complication rates for FSOT injuries treated nonsurgically.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of FSOT injuries between 2005 and 2019.

SETTING

Academic, tertiary care medical center.

METHODS

Radiographic fracture patterns of the frontal ostia (FO) and frontal recess (FR) were recorded as either patent, disrupted, or obstructed. Sinus reaeration, surgical rescue, and complication rates were documented. Patients with follow-up imaging >42 days were included. Patients undergoing immediate surgical intervention were excluded.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were identified and 44 met the criteria (88 sinuses). Among nonobstructed FSOT injuries (ie, patent or disrupted), reaeration occurred in 91% of the FO and 98% of FR injuries. Two sinuses required surgical rescue including 1 Draf IIB (1%), and 1 obliteration (1%). Two sinuses had complications including 1 mucocele (1%) and 1 cerebrospinal fluid leak (1%). FO and FR fracture patterns had no identifiable correlation with long-term reaeration rates or the need for surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Among nonobstructive injuries to the FSOT, average reaeration rates in observed patients were high (91%-98%). Rescue surgery (2%) and complication rates (2%) were low, suggesting that nonsurgical management of nonobstructed FSOT is a viable strategy. No radiographic features were clearly identified to be predictive of sinus reaeration.

Balloon Sinuplasty and Stenting in the Management of Complex Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Classical management of complex fractures involving the frontal sinus outflow tract (FSOT) favors obliteration or cranialization to avoid delayed complications. We aim to exhibit success with a novel application of balloon sinuplasty and frontal stenting in the management of complex injuries disrupting the FSOT, which might have otherwise required more invasive interventions.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Single institution, level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with fractures involving the FSOT. Outcomes include patency of the FSOT on imaging and endoscopy, rate of complications, degree of residual tabular displacement, and need for revision surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria, with complete FSOT obstruction seen in all cases on computed tomography. All patients underwent balloon sinuplasty with frontal sinus stenting; 48% underwent concurrent anterior table repair, and 36% open repair of nasoorbitoethmoid complex fractures. The mean follow-up length was 13.9 months, at which time 91.3% of patients demonstrated radiographic and endoscopic FSOT patency. No residual sinus opacification or pneumocephalus was observed.

CONCLUSION

Balloon sinuplasty with frontal sinus stenting is a straightforward and minimally invasive technique that can create a safe sinus in complex fractures disrupting the FSOT while avoiding the need for more invasive procedures.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Contemporary Approach in the Endoscopic Era

Although frontal sinus fractures are relatively uncommon, the potential for long-term morbidity is significant. Management strategies remain controversial due to a lack of strong clinical evidence. Despite a paucity of strong literature, a logical treatment algorithm is presented based on the structural integrity of three anatomic parameters: anterior table, frontal sinus outflow tract, and the posterior table/dura. The literature supports a paradigm shift from open surgical management to a more conservative treatment algorithm emphasizing observation and minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. Long-term follow-up for complex frontal sinus injuries is critical.

Endonasal Free Flap Reconstruction Combined With Draf Frontal Sinusotomy for Complex Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Technical Report & Case Series

BACKGROUND

Frontal sinus cranialization with closure via bifrontal pericranial flaps is the gold standard for separating the nasofrontal recess from the intracranial cavity for posterior table defects. Despite the high success rate, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak may persist and is particularly challenging when vascularized reconstructive options from the bicoronal incision are exhausted.

OBJECTIVE

To assess a novel endonasal technique using an adipofascial radial forearm free flap delivered to the frontal recess through a Draf sinusotomy to repair complex CSF leaks from the frontal sinus.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 3 patients (all male; ages 42, 43, and 69 yr) with persistent CSF leak despite frontal sinus cranialization and repair with bifrontal pericranium was performed. Etiology of injury was traumatic in 2 patients and iatrogenic in 1 patient after anaplastic meningioma treatment. To create space for the flap and repair the nasofrontal ducts, endoscopic Draf III (Case 1, 3) or Draf IIb left frontal sinusotomy (Case 2) was performed. The forearm flap was harvested, passed through a Caldwell-Luc exposure, and placed within the Draf frontal sinustomy. The flap vessels were tunneled to the left neck and anastomosed to the facial vessels by the mandibular notch.

RESULTS

Intraoperatively, the flaps were well-seated and provided a watertight seal. Postoperative hospital courses were uncomplicated. There were no new CSF leaks or flap necrosis at 12, 14, and 16 mo.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic endonasal free flap reconstruction through a Draf procedure is a novel viable option for persistent CSF leak after failed frontal sinus cranialization.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Review on Etiology and Management Emphasizing Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Techniques

ABSTRACT

In spite of a long and tortuous history of the acute management of frontal sinus fractures, current optimal management remains steeped in controversy. These fractures are frequently produced by excessive forces and are often accompanied with other injuries. However, disruption of the nasofrontal duct persists as essential to maintain proper sinus function and should guide current management. Although there has never been any distinct procedure defining optimal outcomes, proper treatment is contingent on precise diagnosis culled from a complete history, physical examination, and imaging studies. This is further augmented by the surgeon's intraoperative findings. Reconstruction will ultimately rest on the degree of disruption of the anterior and posterior sinus walls, as well as the status and function of the nasofrontal ducts. For these reasons, current management continues to be challenging and evolving. Thus, this review will discuss the etiology and clinical presentation of frontal sinus fractures, the current complications arising in the subject, and the evolution of treatment options towards a more conservative and endoscopic approach to care.

Traumatic Frontal Sinus Fractures Management: Experience from High-Trauma Centre

Objective

Analysis of our traumatic brain injury data, reviewing current literatures and assessing planning valuable decision making in frontal sinus fracture for young neurosurgeons.

Methods

Hospital data base for head trauma was retrieved after board permission for retrospective analysis of cases admitted from 2010-2020. Patients with frontal sinus fractures and head trauma were identified according to a flow chart. Variables of the study included patients' demographics, mechanism of injury, incidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, types of associated injuries, imaging findings and operative techniques.

Results

Three-hundred eighty two patients were eligible to be screened in our study and represented the sample size under investigations in the following sections, 206 (53.9%) of patients were treated conservatively while 176 patients (46.1%) were identified as having an indication for surgical intervention. Eighty-four percent of patients were males. The mean age was 36.2±9.4 years (14-86 years). Depressed skull fracture was commonly associated injury (17.61%). Leakage of CSF was found in 32.95% of patients.

Conclusion

Frontal sinus fracture is not an easy scenario. It harbors many proportions and deliver many varieties in which, deep understanding of anatomy, naso-frontal outflow tract status, CSF leakage and neurological injury are of important points in decision. Our institutional algorithm provide rapid, accessible and applicable treatment protocol for resident and young neurosurgeons which minimizes consultations of other specialties.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: 10-Year Contemporary Experience at a Level 1 Urban Trauma Center

Frontal sinus fractures account for 5% to 15% of all facial fractures, and have traditionally been associated with high kinetic energy blunt injury. Surgical management is largely focused on minimizing potentially serious sequelae including frontal sinus dysfunction, CSF leak, and significant cosmetic deformity. An institutional database of 1944 patients presenting with maxillofacial fractures over a 10-year period was queried. Demographics, mechanism of injury, yearly trends, surgical approaches, and follow-up data were examined. A total of 160 (8.3%) patients presented with at least 1 fracture of the frontal sinus anterior table, posterior table, or frontal sinus outflow tract during the study period. The average annual number of cases was 15.9 ± 5.7 per year with a peak of 21.5 ± 4.0 cases during the 2014 to 2015 period and a decline to 8.5 ± 1.5 cases/year from 2016 to 2017. Among those patients with falls, 61.5% (n = 40) were a result of tripping or fainting at a height of <6 ft. 55.6% of fracture types were isolated to the anterior table, but fracture location was not significantly associated with operative intervention. Cases of operative fracture type had a higher rate of both displacement and comminution compared to nonoperative fractures (P < 0.00001). Of all patients presenting with frontal sinus fractures, 75% of cases were managed nonoperatively. However, many patients presented with falls and other seemingly low energy injuries which are not traditionally associated with frontal sinus trauma. These results highlight the need for continued follow-up even in otherwise low-risk urban populations in order to avoid long term sinus dysfunction.

Is there still a role for cranialization in modern sinus surgery?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To give an overview of recently published literature on the indications and use of cranialization of the frontal sinuses.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies on cranialization have evaluated its role in frontal sinus fractures, inflammatory disease, and tumors involving both the frontal sinus and anterior cranial fossa. Currently, a more conservative approach is favored with traumatic injury to the frontal sinus outflow tract, with multiple studies demonstrating outflow recanalization with observation alone. Similarly, advancements in endoscopic sinus surgical approaches allow the many posterior table fractures to be managed without cranialization. Severe inflammatory disease of the frontal sinus including giant mucoceles with frontal lobe compression have successfully been managed without cranialization in multiple studies suggesting an endoscopic surgical approach can be favored in these settings. Both benign and malignant tumors of the frontal sinus are managed without cranialization with select cases favoring an open approach with cranialization depending on tumor location. Malignant tumors of the frontal sinus are more likely to require cranialization as oncologic resection including margins can lead to large dural defects with significant tissue loss, which is unfavorable for more conservative reconstructive options.

SUMMARY

Cranialization remains a necessary and indicated procedure in the appropriate clinical circumstances. A more conservative approach to frontal sinus fractures is warranted, with recent literature supporting similar outcomes and less morbidity. Inflammatory disease of the frontal sinus including giant mucoceles with frontal lobe compression can be managed without cranialization. Although most benign tumors can be resected via endoscopic approaches, cranialization remains a mainstay as part of the reconstructive plan after oncologic resection of malignant tumors involving the frontal sinus.

What Is the Role of the Endoscope in the Sinus Preservation Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures?

PURPOSE

The management of frontal sinus fractures has remained controversial. The present study investigated the role of minimally invasive endoscopic surgery in a sinus preservation treatment protocol and described the ideal approach for each frontal sinus fracture type.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of patients with multiple frontal sinus fracture types. Patient demographic data, including age, gender, and cause of the fracture, were recorded. Four main management methods were proposed. Group A underwent observation only, group B underwent reduction and fixation of the anterior table, group C underwent endoscopic management of the frontal sinus outflow tract (FSOT), and group D underwent cranialization with an assessment of FSOT. The outcome measurements were the correction of the clinical deformity, which was determined by comparison of the preoperative and postoperative images, and the patent frontal sinus drainage, which was measured on the postoperative radiologic sagittal and coronal views of the frontal recess. The long-term outcomes were confirmed by the absence of long-term complications on postoperative follow-up examinations. Statistical analysis and comparisons were performed using SPSS software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (52 men, 8 women; mean age, 29.5 ± 8 years) were included in the present study. Of the 60 patients, 20 were in group A, 20 in group B, 16 in group C, and 4 in group D. All 60 patients had undergone correction of the deformity and had a patent FSOT postoperatively. No long-term complications were encountered in the follow-up period (median, 24 months; range, 12 to 36 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic evaluation of the FSOT is of great importance in the surgical management of frontal fractures, because it allows for sinus preservation. The outcomes achieved in the present study were the result of selecting the right management plan for each fracture type.