Optimizing value in head and neck cancer free flap surgery

Application of Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing for Head and Neck Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Traditional hospital accounting fails to provide an accurate cost of complex surgical care. Here we describe the application of time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to characterize costs of head and neck oncologic procedures involving free tissue transfer.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary academic medical center.

METHODS

An analysis of head and neck oncologic procedures involving microvascular free flap reconstruction from 2018 to 2020 (n = 485) was performed using TDABC methodology to measure cost across operative case and postoperative admission, using quantity of time and cost per unit of each resource to characterize resource utilization. Univariate and generalized linear mixed models were used to examine associations between patient and hospital characteristics and cost of care delivery.

RESULTS

The total cost of care delivery was $41,905.77 ± 21,870.27 with operating room (OR) supplies accounting for only 10% of the total cost. Multivariable analyses identified significant cost drivers including operative time, postoperative length of stay, number of return trips to the OR, postoperative complication, number of free flaps performed, and patient transfer from another hospital or via emergency department admission (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Operative time and postoperative length of stay, but not operative supplies, were primary drivers of cost of care for head and neck oncology cases involving free tissue transfer. TDABC offers granular cost characterization to inform cost optimization through unused capacity identification and postoperative admission efficiencies.

Submental Flap Versus Radial Forearm Free Flap for the Reconstruction of Medium Size Soft Tissue Defect in the Oral Cavity

The aim of this work is to compare the functional and esthetic outcome of the submental flap and radial forearm free flap for the reconstruction of medium-sized soft tissue defect in the oral cavity. Patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and reconstructed with a submental flap or radial forearm free flap between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed and analyzed. Tumor site, complication at the donor site, complication at the recipient site, duration of the hospital stay, local or cervical recurrence, and esthetic results were also analyzed to compare the difference in outcomes between the two groups. Submental flap represents a safe and useful reconstructive recourse for head and neck reconstructive surgeons when it is correctly indicated. Lower rate of complication at the donor site, better esthetic result, and a shorter hospital stay represent the strengths of this flap when it is not necessary to perform compartment surgery. However, more studies are needed with a larger number of patients.

Team-Based Surgical Approach to Head and Neck Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction

Importance

Because microvascular free flap reconstruction is increasingly used to restore function in patients with head and neck cancer, there is a growing need for evidence-based perioperative care.

Objective

To assess the association of different team-based surgical approaches with intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study of 733 patients was conducted at an academic tertiary care medical center. Head and neck oncologic procedures involving microvascular free flap reconstruction with available intraoperative data collected from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021, were included.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient characteristics including demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions, operative variables, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes were measured. Descriptive statistics and effect size measures were performed to compare the 3 intraoperative surgical team approaches, specifically single surgeon, separate 2-team approach, and integrated 2-team approach; 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without caliper was performed to compare single- vs 2-team and separate and integrated 2-team approaches. Effect size measures including Cramer V for dichotomous variables, the Kendall W coefficient of concordance for ordinal variables, and η2 for continuous variables were reported with 95% CIs to describe precision.

Results

Among 733 cases, there were no clinically significant differences in patient demographic characteristics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and choice of free flap reconstruction based on intraoperative surgical team approach. The mean (SD) age was 58.7 (12.4) years, and 514 were male (70.1%). In terms of operative and postoperative variables, there was a difference in operative times and intraoperative fluid requirements among the 3 different techniques, with the integrated 2-team approach demonstrating a mean reduction in operative time of approximately 2 hours (η2 = 0.871; 95% CI, 0.852-0.887; mean [SD] operative time = 541 [191] minutes for the single-surgeon approach, 399 [175] minutes for the integrated 2-team approach, and 537 [200] minutes for the separate 2-team approach) and lower fluid requirements of greater than 1 L (η2 = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.762-0.817). In both unadjusted analyses and propensity score matching, there were no clinically significant differences in terms of ischemia time, use of pressors, postoperative complications (including free flap failure, number of return trips to the operating room, length of stay, or 30-day readmission) based on intraoperative team approach.

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings suggest that the integrated 2-team surgical approach for complex head and neck microvascular reconstruction can be used to safely decrease operative time, with no difference in postoperative outcomes.

Clinical comparison of superior thyroid artery perforator flap and sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap for intraoral reconstruction

The aim was to evaluate the techniques and outcomes of superior thyroid artery perforator flaps (STAPF) for intraoral reconstruction and to compare them with those of the sternocleidomastoid myocutaneous flap (SCMMF). The cases of 43 patients who underwent reconstruction with either a SCMMF or STAPF for the repair of a medium-sized intraoral defect, between January 2013 and December 2020, were reviewed retrospectively. Although both flaps are based on the superior thyroid artery, their specific harvesting techniques largely differ. All SCMMF (n = 23) were superiorly-based rotational flaps with myocutaneous designs. The STAPF cases (n = 20) included 18 septocutaneous flaps and two chimeric flaps. The flap size was larger in the STAPF group (P = 0.008), while incomplete level IIB dissection (oncological safety) was more frequent in the SCMMF group (P = 0.002). The flap necrosis rate was lower in the STAPF group (STAPF 15% vs SCMMF 34.8%, though this was not statistically significant). Cox multivariate analysis showed that the postoperative flap outcome (total flap necrosis vs flap survival; hazard ratio 27, 95% confidence interval 2.149-336.05; P = 0.001) and complications (excluding fistula) (hazard ratio 14, 95% confidence interval 1.314-142.767; P = 0.029) were associated with overall patient survival. Both speech (P < 0.001) and neck mobility (P < 0.001) functions were superior with STAPF reconstruction. Compared with the traditional SCMMF, the STAPF was found to have a lower necrosis rate with uncompromised oncological safety during harvesting. The STAPF is a good alternative for the repair of medium-sized head and neck defects.

Analysis of one- versus two-staged reconstruction in head and neck cancer patients: What are the benefits?

In head and neck oncology, surgical treatment frequently results in microvascular reconstruction. Oncologic resection followed by immediate reconstruction is often associated with prolonged working and surgical duration, challenging a surgeon's concentration level and potentially worsening patient outcome. To improve the surgeon's performance and to reduce risk of potential complications, we implemented a two-stage procedure in patients with head and neck cancer. This study critically analyzed the surgical outcomes, organizational benefits, and investigated job satisfaction among affected health care professionals. A retrospective data analysis of patients who had undergone microvascular reconstruction after oncologic head and neck surgery between 2010 and 2021 included 33 patients (n = 33). Twenty patients underwent single-stage reconstruction (group 1, n = 20) and 13 patients underwent two-stage reconstruction (group 2, n = 13) with 12.2 (± 7.4) days between surgeries. The mean surgical duration, and mean start and end time of the reconstructive surgery component differed significantly (p = 0.002). The mean total complication rate (p = 0.58) did not differ significantly, although a trend toward higher demands for blood products was observed in group 1. There was no significant difference in five-year survival (p = 0.28). A questionnaire on subjective work performance was answered by the affected health care professionals (n = 34) and it revealed that 88% preferred long surgeries to be scheduled first and that 97% work most efficiently in the morning. In conclusion, two-stage reconstruction is a suitable option in selected head and neck cancer patients offering the possibility of optimizing preoperative planning and organization. This may result in regular working hours, reduced surgeon fatigue, and improved job satisfaction without compromising patient outcomes or survival.

Postoperative Complications of Free Flap Reconstruction in Moderate-Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on Real-World Data

Background

Postoperative complications (POCs) of moderate-advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after free flap reconstruction have received little attention. We investigated the risk factors that lead to POCs and their impact on management and prognosis.

Patients and Methods

A single-center, prospective cohort study was conducted at Beijing Stomatological Hospital on primary HNSCC patients treated between 2015 and 2020.

Results

In total, 399 consecutive HNSCC patients who underwent radical resection of the primary tumor and free flap reconstruction were enrolled in this study, 155(38.8%) experienced POCs. The occurrence of POCs directly led to worse short-term outcomes and poorer long-term overall survival (P=0.0056). Weight loss before the operation (P=0.097), Tumor site (P=0.002), stage T4b (P=0.016), an ACE-27 index of 2-3 (P=0.040), operation time≥8h (P=0.001) and Clindamycin as antibiotic prophylaxis (P=0.001) were significantly associated with POCs.

Conclusions

The occurrence of POCs significantly leads to worse short-term outcomes and increases the patients’ burden.

Practice patterns of virtual surgical planning: Survey of the reconstructive section of the American Head and Neck Society

PURPOSE

Virtual surgical planning (VSP), with custom made implants and guides represents a recent major advance. Nonetheless, knowledge related to practice patterns is limited. The purpose of this study was to provide data from the AHNS Reconstruction Section related to practice patterns, perceived value of VSP, as well as elucidate specific situations which represent high value for the application of VSP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-center web-based survey consisting of 30 questions regarding practice patterns related to VSP practices delivered via email to 203 members of the AHNS Reconstructive Surgery Section at institutions across North America.

RESULTS

There was a 34% response rate (70/203). A majority of the respondents (96%) used VSP in approximately 50% of their mandibular reconstruction cases, and in 42% of maxillary cases. 46% reported using patient specific implants >75% of cases. Respondents estimated that ~17% of patients received dental implant reconstruction. The majority of respondents (71.0%) did not know the cost of VSP at their institution. The remaining respondents indicated the average cost was $6680 per case. VSP was felt to be necessary as a teaching tool by 55.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that a majority of respondents frequently utilize VSP in their practice for head and neck reconstruction. Complex, multi-unit reconstructions were felt to offer the greatest value when utilizing VSP. Future work should focus on increasing the rates of dental implant reconstruction in this population, optimizing value of VSP with careful case selection, and understanding the educational value and costs of these platforms.

Cost and clinical outcomes of postoperative intensive care unit versus general floor management in head and neck free flap reconstructive surgery patients

PURPOSE

To compare clinical, surgical, and cost outcomes in patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstructive surgery in the setting of postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) against general floor management.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of head and neck free-flap reconstructive surgery patients at a single tertiary academic medical center. Clinical data was obtained from medical records. Cost data was obtained via the Mayo Clinic Rochester Cost Data Warehouse, which assigns Medicare reimbursement rates to all professional billed services.

RESULTS

A total of 502 patients were included, with 82 managed postoperatively in the ICU and 420 on the general floor. Major postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly between groups (Odds Ratio[OR] 1.54; p = 0.41). After covariate adjustments, patients managed in the ICU had a 3.29 day increased average length of hospital stay (Standard Error 0.71; p < 0.0001) and increased need for take-back surgery (OR 2.35; p = 0.02) when compared to the general floor. No significant differences were noted between groups in terms of early free-flap complications (OR 1.38;p = 0.35) or late free-flap complications (Hazard Ratio 0.81; p = 0.61). Short-term cost was $8772 higher in the ICU (range = $5640-$11,903; p < 0.01). Long-term cost did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative management of head and neck oncologic free-flap patients in the ICU does not significantly improve major postoperative outcomes or free-flap complications when compared to general floor care, but does increase short-term costs. General floor management may be appropriate when cardiopulmonary compromise is not present.

The Effect of Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap on Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects: A Meta-Analysis With Multiple Free Soft Flaps

BACKGROUND

With the gradual popularity of relatively novel medial sural artery perforator flap (MSAPF), robust studies are needed to compare the surgical outcomes of MSAPF versus multiple free soft flaps (MFSFs) to verify the advantages and disadvantages of MSAPF.

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) until September, 2020, to identify studies that compared surgical outcomes of MSAPF and MFSFs. Two authors followed the PRISMA guidelines, individually extracted the data and performed the quality assessments. Survival rate of flaps, satisfaction degree of patients in recipient and donor site, skin grafting, and morbidity of recipient and donor site were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 441 cases from 7 studies were included in our analysis. No significant differences were found regarding survival rate of flaps, recipient morbidity, and recipient satisfaction degree between the 2 groups. However, MSAPF group was significantly superior to MFSFs group in terms of skin grafting, morbidity, and satisfaction degree of donor site.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed that the MSPAF and MFSFs groups were similar in terms of survival rate of flaps, recipient morbidity, and recipient satisfaction degree. Medial sural artery perforator flap group was superior to MFSFs group in terms of morbidity and satisfaction degree of donor site. The results may prove that MSAPF is gaining popularity for a reason and is a good choice for repairing soft tissue defects.

Head and Neck Reconstruction of the Vessel-Depleted Neck: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Damage of the vascular system secondary to radical neck dissection and/or radiotherapy or other treatments has a negative impact on microsurgical reconstruction. The search for adequate recipient vessels is hindered by the complexity of previous procedures.

METHODS

A systematic review of microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in the vessel-depleted neck was performed. The issues analyzed were indications for surgery, more frequently performed flaps, vascular systems used as recipient vessels, outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

The eligibility criteria were fulfilled by 57 studies published between September 1993 and January 2020. In 8235 patients, 8694 flaps were performed, 925 of which were for a vessel-depleted neck. The most commonly used flap was the anterolateral thigh flap, used in 195 cases (30%), followed by the radial forearm free flap, used in 157 cases (24%). The potential recipient vessels were numerous for arteries (26 options) and veins (31 options). For the 712 flaps with an identifiable recipient artery, the superficial temporal artery was the most commonly used vessel (n = 142, 20%). The superficial temporal vein was the most commonly used vessel for 639 flaps with an identifiable recipient vein (n = 118, 18.5%). Complications amounted to 11%; 80 out of 716 flaps in papers that reported them. Flap losses were reported in 2% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Major microsurgical head and neck reconstruction for postoncologic defects depends on appropriate recipient vessels. Vein availability is paramount. Understanding the complexity of this problem is useful for preoperative planning, precise decision-making, and an accurate surgical approach.

Intensive Care Versus Nonintensive Care Ward for Postoperative Management of Head and Neck Free Flaps: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Although advances in surgical technique and medical management have drastically improved outcomes of free flap reconstructive surgery in head and neck patients, there is no clear consensus on appropriate level of postoperative care. Methods: The literature was searched systematically for all comparative studies of intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU admissions for head and neck patients. The primary outcomes were flap failure rate, flap complications, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included cost implications, medical complications, and rates of revision surgery, readmission, and mortality. Results: Nine articles (2510 patients) were included. Patients admitted to non-ICU wards were not significantly at increased risk for free flap failure, flap-related complications, or longer LOS. Total medical complications were found to have a pooled relative risk (RR) of 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.83], favoring the non-ICU cohort. In particular, the non-ICU cohort was less likely to develop neuropsychiatric complications (RR 0.34 [95% CI 0.24 to 0.48]) and sepsis (RR 0.18 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.68]) with no difference in cardiovascular or pulmonary complications. Discussion: Patients admitted to non-ICU wards did not experience higher rates of adverse flap-related outcomes and had decreased risk of developing medical complications in the studies included in this meta-analysis.

Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications in Craniomaxillofacial Trauma and Head and Neck Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The global COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. Our review serves as a safety resource based on the current literature and is aimed at providing best-practice recommendations. Specifically, this article is focused on considerations in the management of craniomaxillofacial trauma as well as reconstructive procedures after head and neck oncologic resection.

METHODS

Relevant clinical data were obtained from peer-reviewed journal articles, task force recommendations, and published guidelines from multiple medical organizations utilizing data sources including PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, and Google search queries. Relevant publications were utilized to develop practice guidelines and recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

The global COVID-19 pandemic has placed a significant strain on health care resources with resultant impacts on patient care. Surgeons operating in the head and neck are particularly at risk of occupational COVID-19 exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and must therefore be cognizant of protocols in place to mitigate exposure risk and optimize patient care.

Predictive factors for prolonged operative time in head and neck patients undergoing free flap reconstruction

PURPOSE

Defining the predictive factors associated with prolonged operative time may reduce post-operative complications, improve patient outcomes, and decrease cost of care. The aims of this study are to 1) analyze risk factors associated with prolonged operative time in head and neck free flap patients and 2) determine the impact of lengthier operative time on surgical outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated 282 head and neck free flap reconstruction patients between 2011 and 2013 at a tertiary care center. Perioperative factors investigated by multivariate analyses included gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, tumor subsite, stage, flap type, preoperative comorbidities, and perioperative hematocrit nadir. Association was explored between operative times and complications including flap take back, flap survival, transfusion requirement, flap site hematoma, and surgical site infection.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 418.2 ± 88.4 (185-670) minutes. Multivariate analyses identified that ASA class III (beta coefficient + 24.5, p = .043), stage IV tumors (+34.8, p = .013), fibular free flaps (-44.8, p = .033 for RFFF vs. FFF and - 67.7, p = .023 for ALT vs FFF) and COPD (+36.0, p = .041) were associated with prolonged operative time. History of CAD (-43.5, p = .010) was associated with shorter operative time. There was no statistically significant association between longer operative time and adverse flap outcomes or complications.

CONCLUSION

As expected, patients who were medically complex, had advanced cancer, or underwent complex flap reconstruction had longer operative times. Surgical planning should pay special attention to certain co-morbidities such as COPD, and explore innovative ways to minimize operative time. Future research is needed to evaluate how these factors can help guide planning algorithms for head and neck patients.