1
|
Piburn KH, Sigurjonsdottir VK, Indridason OS, Maestretti L, Patton MV, McGrath A, Palsson R, Gallo A, Chaudhuri A, Grimm PC. Patterns in Tacrolimus Variability and Association with De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Formation in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:1194-1203. [PMID: 35882506 PMCID: PMC9435976 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.16421221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES High tacrolimus intrapatient variability has been associated with inferior graft outcomes in patients with kidney transplants. We studied baseline patterns of tacrolimus intrapatient variability in pediatric patients with kidney transplants and examined these patterns in relation to C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibodies. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS All tacrolimus levels in participants who underwent kidney-only transplantation at a single pediatric center from 2004 to 2018 (with at least 12-month follow-up, followed until 2019) were analyzed to determine baseline variability. Intrapatient variability was defined using the coefficient of variation (SD/mean ×100%) of all samples in a 6-month moving window. Routine de novo donor-specific antibody measurements were available for a subgroup of patients transplanted in 2010-2018. Cox proportional hazards models using tacrolimus intrapatient variability as a time-varying variable were used to examine the association between intrapatient variability and graft outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibody formation. RESULTS Tacrolimus intrapatient variability developed a steady-state baseline of 30% at 10 months post-transplant in 426 patients with a combined 31,125 tacrolimus levels. Included in the outcomes study were 220 patients, of whom 51 developed C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibodies. De novo donor-specific antibody formers had higher intrapatient variability, with a median of 38% (interquartile range, 28%-48%) compared with 28% (interquartile range, 20%-38%) for nondonor-specific antibody formers (P<0.001). Patients with high tacrolimus intrapatient variability (coefficient of variation >30%) had higher risk of de novo donor-specific antibody formation (hazard ratio, 5.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.45 to 11.68). Patients in the top quartile of tacrolimus intrapatient variability (coefficient of variation >41%) had the strongest association with C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibody formation (hazard ratio, 11.81; 95% confidence interval, 4.76 to 29.27). CONCLUSIONS High tacrolimus intrapatient variability was strongly associated with de novo donor-specific antibody formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim H. Piburn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Vaka K. Sigurjonsdottir
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California,Division of Nephrology, Internal Medicine and Emergency Services, Landspitali–The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland,Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Olafur S. Indridason
- Division of Nephrology, Internal Medicine and Emergency Services, Landspitali–The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Lynn Maestretti
- Pediatric Kidney Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California
| | - Mary Victoria Patton
- Pediatric Kidney Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California
| | - Anne McGrath
- Pediatric Kidney Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California
| | - Runolfur Palsson
- Division of Nephrology, Internal Medicine and Emergency Services, Landspitali–The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland,Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Amy Gallo
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Abanti Chaudhuri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Paul C. Grimm
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oomen L, Bootsma-Robroeks C, Cornelissen E, de Wall L, Feitz W. Pearls and Pitfalls in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation After 5 Decades. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:856630. [PMID: 35463874 PMCID: PMC9024248 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.856630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Worldwide, over 1,300 pediatric kidney transplantations are performed every year. Since the first transplantation in 1959, healthcare has evolved dramatically. Pre-emptive transplantations with grafts from living donors have become more common. Despite a subsequent improvement in graft survival, there are still challenges to face. This study attempts to summarize how our understanding of pediatric kidney transplantation has developed and improved since its beginnings, whilst also highlighting those areas where future research should concentrate in order to help resolve as yet unanswered questions. Existing literature was compared to our own data of 411 single-center pediatric kidney transplantations between 1968 and 2020, in order to find discrepancies and allow identification of future challenges. Important issues for future care are innovations in immunosuppressive medication, improving medication adherence, careful donor selection with regard to characteristics of both donor and recipient, improvement of surgical techniques and increased attention for lower urinary tract dysfunction and voiding behavior in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes Oomen
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Bootsma-Robroeks
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Nephrology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth Cornelissen
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth de Wall
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wout Feitz
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|