Clubfoot for the primary care physician: frequently asked questions

An Insight on Current Clubfoot Management: A Reported Data From Lebanon

BACKGROUND/AIM

Clubfoot, which has been reported in the literature since the time of Hippocrates in 400 BC, is regarded as one of the most difficult congenital orthopedic anomalies, with a high relapse incidence of 16.87 infants per 10,000 births. The Lebanese region holds limited data concerning the evolution of clubfoot management. Herein, we aim to present novel findings in the treatment of clubfoot without surgical intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center, cross-sectional research included 300 patients with virgin idiopathic clubfoot treated at our facility from 2015 to 2020. The Pirani and DiMeglio Scores were used to determine the severity of the illness prior to treatment, and the DiMeglio Score was used to determine the severity of the disease after treatment. For data analysis, the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM-Version 26; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used and results with p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Our study included 300 patients, with 188 boys (62.7%) and 112 girls (37.3%). The mean age of the patients' onset was 32 days. We recorded an average initial Pirani score of 4.27 ± 0.65 and an average initial DiMeglio score of 11.58 ± 2.56 (62 out of 300) while the average final DiMeglio score was 2.17 ± 1.82. The mean number of casts was 5 ± 0.8, with a minimum of four and a maximum of six casts. The prevalence of relapse was 20.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clubfoot remains a challenging deformity with a high rate of treatment failure and recurrence. While the superiority of Ponseti's technique in terms of success rate could not be disputed, tailored therapy based on the patient's socioeconomic status is considered critical for compliance and treatment success.

Clubfoot management in the Middle East: a survey-based review

Clubfoot is the most frequent congenital deformity involving the foot. Little is known about the management of this disease in the Middle East as sparse data is available in the literature. Through the last 5 decades, congenital clubfoot management in the Middle East went from manipulation through Kite’s technique in the late seventies, to early primary surgical intervention in the late eighties and early nineties of the previous century, and then back to manipulation with Ponseti’s technique and the French functional technique in the late nineties, with the latter falling out of favor with time. This is comparable to the evolution of management witnessed in the United States and in Europe, with 10 to 15 years of delay. The delay is getting shorter with time due to the easier access to published scientific data and the increasing number of fellows from Middle East travelling to referral centers in Europe and the USA. A survey was performed among pediatric orthopedic surgeons in the Middle East to assess their approach to clubfoot management. This is the first survey of its kind in the region. It showed a wide adoption (97.1%) of the Ponseti’s technique with serial manipulation and casting, Achilles tenotomy followed by abduction bracing. Divergent practices were found concerning the upper age limit for Ponseti treatment and the setting of the Achilles tenotomy. Nevertheless, these subjects are still a matter of debate in the literature and international conferences. All in all, pediatric orthopedic surgeons in the Middle East are offering their patients the gold standard of care. However, lot of work is to be done in raising awareness for this disease in the community, and among our colleagues as prenatal screening for clubfoot in the Middle East is practically nonexistent.