Emergency department evaluation and management of blunt abdominal trauma in children

Physical Examination is the Best Predictor of the Need for Abdominal Surgery in Children Following Motor Vehicle Collision

BACKGROUND

Exploratory laparotomy in children after motor vehicle collision (MVC) is rare. In the absence of definitive hemorrhage or free abdominal air on radiographic imaging, predictors for operative exploration are conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore objective findings that may aid in determining which children require operative abdominal exploration after MVC.

METHODS

Data from 2010-2014 at an American College of Surgeons-certified level 1 pediatric trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, vital signs, laboratory data, radiologic studies, operative records, associated injuries, and outcomes were analyzed and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Eight hundred sixty-two patients 0-18 years of age presented to the hospital after an MVC during the study period. Seventeen patients (2.0%) required abdominal exploration and all were found to have intraabdominal injuries. Respiratory rate was the only vital sign that was significantly altered (p = 0.04) in those who required abdominal surgery compared with those who did not. Physical examination findings, such as the seat belt sign, abdominal bruising, abdominal wound, and abdominal tenderness, were present significantly more frequently in those requiring abdominal surgery (p < 0.0001). Each finding had a negative predictive value for the need for operative exploration of at least 0.98. There were no significant differences in trauma laboratory values or radiographic findings between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Data from this study solidify the relationship between specific physical examination findings and the need for abdominal exploration after MVC in children. In addition, these data suggest that a lack of the seat belt sign, abdominal bruising, abdominal wounds, or abdominal tenderness are individually predictive of patients who will not require surgical intervention.

Pediatric emergencies admitted in the resuscitation room of a Swiss university hospital

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric resuscitation is an intense, stressful, and challenging process. The aim of this study was to review the life-threatening pediatric (LTP) emergencies admitted in a Swiss university hospital with regards to patients' demographics, reason for admission, diagnosis, treatment, significant events, critical incidents, and outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data was conducted, including all LTP emergencies admitted over a period of 2 years in the resuscitation room (RR). Variables, including indication for transfer, mode of prehospital transportation, diagnosis, and time spent in RR, were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 60,939 pediatric emergencies treated in our university hospital over 2 years, a total of 277 LTP emergencies (0.46%) were admitted in the RR. They included 160 boys and 117 girls, aged 6 days to 15.95 years (mean, 6.69 years; median, 5.06). A medical problem was identified in 55.9% (n = 155) of the children. Of the 122 children treated for a surgical problem, 35 (28.3%) went directly from the RR to the operating room. Hemodynamic instability was noted in 19.5% of all LTP emergencies, of which 1.1% benefited from O negative transfusion. Admission to the intensive care unit was necessary for 61.6% of the children transferred from another hospital. The average time spent in the RR was 46 minutes. The overall mortality rate was 7.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The LTP emergencies accounted for a small proportion of all pediatric emergencies. They were more medical than surgical cases and resuscitation measures because of hemodynamic instability were the most frequent treatment.

Abdominal injuries in a low trauma volume hospital--a descriptive study from northern Sweden

BACKGROUND

Abdominal injuries occur relatively infrequently during trauma, and they rarely require surgical intervention. In this era of non-operative management of abdominal injuries, surgeons are seldom exposed to these patients. Consequently, surgeons may misinterpret the mechanism of injury, underestimate symptoms and radiologic findings, and delay definite treatment. Here, we determined the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of traumatic abdominal injuries at our hospital to provide a basis for identifying potential hazards in non-operative management of patients with these injuries in a low trauma volume hospital.

METHODS

This retrospective study included prehospital and in-hospital assessments of 110 patients that received 147 abdominal injuries from an isolated abdominal trauma (n = 70 patients) or during multiple trauma (n = 40 patients). Patients were primarily treated at the University Hospital of Umeå from January 2000 to December 2009.

RESULTS

The median New Injury Severity Score was 9 (range: 1-57) for 147 abdominal injuries. Most patients (94%) received computed tomography (CT), but only 38% of patients with multiple trauma were diagnosed with CT < 60 min after emergency room arrival. Penetrating trauma caused injuries in seven patients. Solid organ injuries constituted 78% of abdominal injuries. Non-operative management succeeded in 82 patients. Surgery was performed for 28 patients, either immediately (n = 17) as result of operative management or later (n = 11), due to non-operative management failure; the latter mainly occurred with hollow viscus injuries. Patients with multiple abdominal injuries, whether associated with multiple trauma or an isolated abdominal trauma, had significantly more non-operative failures than patients with a single abdominal injury. One death occurred within 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-operative management of patients with abdominal injuries, except for hollow viscus injuries, was highly successful in our low trauma volume hospital, even though surgeons receive low exposure to these patients. However, a growing proportion of surgeons lack experience in decision-making and performing trauma laparotomies. Quality assurance programmes must be emphasized to ensure future competence and quality of trauma care at low trauma volume hospitals.

Pediatric adrenal trauma in the 21st century: Children's Hospital of Atlanta experience

PURPOSE

Adrenal trauma in children is rare and poorly characterized. To characterize these injuries better, we reviewed the contemporary experience at a large pediatric trauma center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried the trauma registry of Children's Hospitals of Atlanta for all patients treated for adrenal trauma (ICD-9 codes 868.01 and 868.11) between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2009. We performed a detailed chart review.

RESULTS

Of 12,045 patients who were treated for trauma during the study period 42 children (0.35%) with adrenal injuries were identified. All injuries resulted from blunt trauma. Motor vehicle crash was the most common mechanism, responsible for 41% of injuries. A total of 41 cases (98%) were diagnosed by computerized tomography and 1 during exploratory laparotomy for associated vascular injury. Injuries were to the right adrenal gland in 36 cases (86%), left in 5 (12%) and bilateral in 1 (2%). The most common associated regions were the liver (55%), head or brain (33%) and skeleton (31%). Five patients (12%) experienced isolated adrenal injuries. One patient required treatment for adrenal insufficiency and none required adrenalectomy, adrenalorrhaphy or adrenal embolization. Of patients with isolated adrenal injuries 2 were hospitalized and 3 were treated as outpatients. All had an unremarkable course.

CONCLUSIONS

Adrenal trauma in children is rare. Although typically associated with high morbidity, this outcome is likely from related injuries as an isolated adrenal injury generally portends a benign course.

Repeat abdominal computed tomography scans after pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: missed injuries, extra costs, and unnecessary radiation exposure

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that pediatric blunt trauma patients, initially evaluated at nontrauma centers with abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans, often undergo repeat scans after transfer. This study was designed to quantify this phenomenon, assess consequences, and elucidate possible causes.

METHODS

This article is an institutional review board-approved, retrospective chart review of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma patients transferred to a level I trauma center from 2002 to 2007 and evaluated with abdominal CT at the trauma center or at a referring facility.

RESULTS

A total of 388 patients met the study criteria, with 6 patients being excluded because of inability to verify outside records resulting in study group of 382 patients. Of those 382 patients, 199 (52%) underwent abdominal CT before transfer. Thirty-six (18%) of those 199 patients underwent repeat CT scanning at our level I trauma center. Of these 36 patients, 19 (53%) were transferred without their outside CT scans, with 10 (53%) of these 19 having significant abdominal injuries. Of the remaining 17, 6 (17%) had repeat scans to assess changes in vital signs, or patient condition, or because of inadequate outside imaging. The remaining 11 (30%) were repeated despite an acceptable outside CT and no change in patient condition. Only 2 of 11 resulted in changed management. Additional radiation delivered from these repeat scans totaled 180 mSv, and additional patient charges totaled more than $110,000. There was an apparent trend toward increased repeat scanning (from 6.7% in 2002 to 16.7% in 2007).

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal CT scans, for evaluation of pediatric blunt trauma, are frequently repeated after transfer from outside hospitals. In many cases, repeat scans provide useful diagnostic information. However, more than 80% of repeat scanning is potentially preventable with better education of transport personnel (paramedics, emergency medical technicians, and nurses) and emergency department physicians.

Crianças necessitam de jejum antes de ultrassonografia abdominal?

OBJETIVO: Comparar a qualidade de imagens ultrassonográficas do abdome de crianças, obtidas com e sem a instituição de jejum prévio. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Trata-se de estudo prospectivo, incluindo crianças com até 12 anos de idade. Os pacientes foram examinados sequencialmente por dois utrassonografistas e as imagens foram classificadas em escores: 1 (não visualizado ou parcialmente visualizado, inadequada para diagnóstico); 2 (suficientes para diagnóstico); 3 (excelentes). As imagens foram ainda classificadas como "diagnósticas" ou "não diagnósticas". RESULTADOS: Foram examinados 77 pacientes, sendo 47 meninos e 30 meninas, com idades entre 0 e 12 anos (mediana de 1 ano). Jejum se mostrou vantajoso de forma estatisticamente significativa apenas na avaliação da vesícula biliar, por apenas um dos avaliadores (p = 0,032). Depois de agrupadas em "diagnóstica" ou "não diagnóstica", nenhuma diferença foi observada entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: A instituição de jejum não afetou de forma significativa a qualidade das imagens de ultrassonografias abdominais obtidas em crianças.

Interventional radiology for paediatric trauma

Paediatric interventional radiology plays a cornerstone role in the management of paediatric trauma. In the acute setting, interventional radiology techniques allow minimally invasive control of haemorrhage or re-establishment of blood flow. Percutaneous stenting and drainage can allow disruptions in urinary or biliary systems to heal without the need for further surgery. Interventional radiology techniques also have a significant role in treating delayed complications of trauma, including embolization of arterial pseudoaneurysms and pulmonary embolism prophylaxis in individuals immobilized due to the trauma or its operative treatment.