Gastrointestinal tract feeding access and the role of fundoplication in combination with gastrostomy

A very feasible alternative in patients with feeding difficulties from gastrostomy: Jejunal tube advanced through the gastrostomy

BACKGROUND

Our aim is to share our experiences regarding patients who cannot be fed effectively through the gastrostomy tube, but were inserted feeding jejunostomy through the gastrostomy orifice using scopic fluoroscopic techniques utilised by the interventional radiology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2010 and May 2013 the patients that were inserted jejunostomy tube through the gastrostomy orifice using fluoroscopic techniques were retrospectively analysed. Data including primary indication for gastrostomy, sex, concomitant disease and the requirement for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were all recorded.

RESULTS

There were five patients with these criteria. They all received either medical or surgical GERD therapy; nevertheless enteral feeding failed to reach an effective level, they all had vomiting and did not gain any weight. Following conversion, all the patients gained minimum 2 kg in 2-5 months; all the patients tolerated enteral feeding and were discharged in the early period. There were neither procedure related complications such as perforation, bleeding nor sedation related complications. Procedure took no more than 30 min as a whole. There was no need for surgical intervention. However in one patient re-intervention was required due to accidental removal of the catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of feeding difficulties following the gastrostomy; instead of an invasive surgical intervention; physicians should consider jejunal feeding that is advanced through the gastrostomy, which does not require any anaesthesia.

National trends and outcomes of pediatric gastrostomy tube placement

OBJECTIVES

National outcomes data regarding surgical gastrostomy tube (G-tube) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube procedures are lacking. Our objectives were to describe trends in G-tube and PEG procedures, examine regional variation, and compare outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study using pediatric admissions during 1997, 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009 from the Kids' Inpatient Database. Length of stay and cost were adjusted for demographics, complexity, setting, year, and infection or surgical complication.

RESULTS

G-tubes were placed during 64,412 admissions, increasing from 16.6 procedures/100,000 US children in 1997 to 18.5 in 2009. Surgical gastrostomy rates increased by 19% (0.17 procedures/100,000/year, P < 0.002) and, among children <1 year, they increased by 32% (2.56 procedures/100,000/year, P < 0.01). PEG rates did not increase (0.02 procedures/100,000/year, P = 0.47) in the study years. The West had an 18% higher rate than the national average for surgical G-tubes and a 10% higher rate for PEGs. When the sole procedure during the admission was gastrostomy, the G-tube was associated with a 19% (confidence interval 9.7-57.5) longer length of stay, and a 25% higher cost (confidence interval 16.4-34.5) compared with PEG.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical gastrostomy insertion rates have increased whereas PEG rates have not, despite evidence of better severity-adjusted outcome measures for PEG tubes. Surgical gastrostomy insertion in children <1 year of age yielded the greatest increase, which may relate to a changing patient population; however, regional variation suggests that provider preference also plays a role. Our data underline the need for more robust collection and analysis of surgical outcomes to guide decision making.

Reflux related hospital admissions after fundoplication in children with neurological impairment: retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of fundoplication on reflux related hospital admissions for children with neurological impairment.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational cohort study. Setting 42 children's hospitals in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

3721 children with neurological impairment born between 2000 and 2005 who had at least one hospital admission at a study hospital before their fundoplication.

INTERVENTION

Fundoplication.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incident rate ratio for reflux related hospital admissions, defined as the post-fundoplication admission rate divided by the pre-fundoplication admission rate.

RESULTS

Of the 955 285 children born during the study period, 144,749 (15%) had neurological impairment. Of these, 27,720 (19%) were diagnosed as having gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, of whom 6716 (24%) had a fundoplication. Of these, 3721 (55%) had at least one previous hospital admission and were included in the study cohort. After fundoplication, hospital admissions decreased for any reflux related cause (incident rate ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.72; P<0.01), aspiration pneumonia (0.71, 0.62 to 0.81; P<0.01), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (0.60, 0.57 to 0.63; P<0.01), and mechanical ventilation (0.40, 0.37 to 0.43; P<0.01), after adjustment for other patient and hospital related factors that may influence reflux related hospital admissions. Hospital admissions increased for asthma (incident rate ratio 1.52, 1.38 to 1.67; P<0.01) and remained constant for pneumonia (1.07, 0.98 to 1.17; P=0.16). Conclusions Children with neurological impairment who have fundoplication had reduced short term reflux related hospital admissions for aspiration pneumonia, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and mechanical ventilation. However, admissions for pneumonia remained constant and those for asthma increased after fundoplication. Comparative effectiveness data for other treatments (such as gastrojejunal feeding tubes) are unknown.

Preoperative prediction of need for fundoplication before gastrostomy tube placement in children

PURPOSE

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is a common procedure performed for children with oral aspiration and failure to thrive. The concurrent presence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) may be difficult to diagnose in these children and may dictate the need for an antireflux procedure. The purpose of this study was to review our preoperative evaluation of children undergoing PEG placement to better elucidate preoperative factors that may require eventual fundoplication.

METHODS

A retrospective review at a tertiary care, children's hospital between May 2002 and August 2007 was performed of patients undergoing PEG placement. Patients were identified through database search by operative procedure codes. Patient groups were defined as those undergoing PEG alone (group 1) and those requiring fundoplication after prior PEG (group 2). Comparison of patient demographics and radiologic qualitative results of GER was analyzed using chi(2) analysis, with significance determined at P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 863 patients underwent PEG placement over this 64-month period. A sampled cohort of patients undergoing PEG over a year comprised group 1. Forty-four patients (5.1%) underwent Nissen fundoplication after prior PEG placement (group 2). Patient demographics were similar between the groups. Comparison of comorbid conditions and qualitative indicators of GER between the groups showed only cerebral palsy had a significantly higher associated risk of GER that required antireflux surgery. Preoperative clinical assessment had a 95% positive predictive value in identifying children who required only PEG.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high predictive value of individualized clinical assessment in the ultimate decision for gastrostomy without need of fundoplication, further studies are needed to determine whether children with conditions such as cerebral palsy may require a concurrent antireflux surgery at the time of gastrostomy.