Clinically relevant interpretation of solid phase assays for HLA antibody

Donor specific anti-HLA antibodies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Single Center prospective evaluation and desensitization strategies employed

BACKGROUND

In the setting of mismatched-hematopoietic stem cells transplantation, the detection of antibodies directed against donor-specific HLA allele(s) or antigen(s) (DSA) represents a barrier for engraftment. It is thus necessary to plan an immunosuppressive strategy, or to select an alternative donor. This prospective study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of our strategy for testing DSAs and the efficacy of the desensitization strategy (DS) employed between November 2017 and November 2020.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The anti-HLA antibody search was performed using the Luminex bead assays (Lifecode ID and LSA I/II-Immucor) and expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI >1,000 positive). If the patient had DSAs and no alternative donors, a DS was employed with rituximab (day -15), 2 single volume plasmaphereses (PP; days -9 and -8), intravenous immunoglobulins (day -7) and infusion of HLA selected platelets, if persistent DSAs were directed against class I HLA. DS was scheduled with or without PP, according to the DSA MFI (>1,000 or <5,000) and FCXM (flow cytometry crossmatch).

RESULTS

Twenty-two out of 126 patients (17.46%) showed anti-HLA antibodies, 5 of them DSAs (3.97% of total); 3 patients underwent DS obtaining engraftment. Female gender (p=0.033) and a history of previous pregnancies or miscarriages (p=0.009) showed a statistically significant impact on alloimmunization. Factors associated with a delayed neutrophil engraftment were patient's female gender (p=0.039), stem cell source (p=0.025), and a high HSCT-specific comorbidity index (p=0.028). None of the analyzed variables, including the DSA detection, influenced engraftment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the importance to test DSAs in mismatched-hematopoietic stem cells transplantation The DS used proved successful in removing DSAs. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to better define and validate consensus strategies on DSA management in HSCT.

ABO-adjusted cPRA metric for kidney allocation in an Asian-predominant population

Recent studies showed that ABO-adjusted calculated panel reactive antibody (ABO-cPRA) may better reflect the histocompatibility level in a multi-ethnic population, but such data in Asians is not available. We developed an ABO-adjusted cPRA metric on a cohort of waitlist kidney transplant patients (n = 647, 99% Chinese) in Hong Kong, based on HLA alleles and ABO frequencies of local donors. The concordance between the web-based ABO-cPRA calculator and the impact on kidney allocation were evaluated. The blood group distribution for A, B, O and AB among waitlist kidney candidates were 26.2%, 27.5%, 40.1%, and 6.1%, and their chances of encountering incompatible blood group donors were 32.6%, 32.4%, 57.6%, and 0%, respectively. There is poor agreement between web-based ABO-cPRA calculator and our locally developed metrics. Over 90% of patients showed an increase in cPRA after ABO adjustment, most notably in those with cPRA between 70% and 79%. Blood group O patients had a much greater increase in cPRA scores after adjustment while patients of blood group A and B had similar increment. 10.6% of non-AB blood group waitlist patients had ABO-cPRA elevated to ≥80%. A local ABO-adjusted cPRA metric is required for Asian populations and may improve equity in kidney distribution for patients with disadvantageous blood groups. The result from the current study potentially helps other countries/localities in establishing their own unified ABO-cPRA metrics and predict the impact on kidney allocation.

Donor-specific HLA antibodies are associated with graft failure and delayed hematologic recovery after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft failure (GF) is one of the major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although earlier reports have associated the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) with increased risk of GF after unrelated donor allo-HCT, recent studies have failed to confirm this association.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to validate the presence of DSAs as a risk factor for GF and hematologic recovery in the unrelated donor allo-HCT setting.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated 303 consecutive patients who underwent their first unrelated donor allo-HCT at our institution from January 2008 to December 2017. DSA evaluation was performed using 2 Single Antigen Beads (SAB) assays, DSA titration with 1:2, 1:8, and 1:32 dilutions, C1q-binding assay, and absorption/elution protocol to assess possible false-positive DSA reactivity. The primary endpoints were neutrophil and platelet recovery and GF, whereas the secondary endpoint was overall survival. Multivariable analyses were performed using Fine-Gray competing risks regression or Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 14 years (range, 0-61 years), 56.1% were male, and 52.5% were transplanted for nonmalignant diseases. Eleven patients (3.63%) were DSA-positive. Of them, 10 had preexisting DSAs, and one showed post-transplant de novo DSA. Nine patients had 1 DSA, 1 had 2 DSAs, and 1 had 3 DSAs, with a median MFI of 4334 (range, 588-20,456) and 3581 (range, 227-12,266) in LABScreen and LIFECODES SAB assays, respectively. Overall, 21 patients experienced GF. Of them, 12 had primary graft rejection, 8 had secondary graft rejection, and 1 had primary poor graft function. The cumulative incidences of GF at 28, 100, and 365 days were 4.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-6.6%), 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.8%), and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4%-10.2%), respectively. In the multivariable analyses, DSA-positive patients had significantly delayed neutrophil (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P = .006) and platelet recovery (SHR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74; P = .0003) than patients without DSAs. In addition, only DSAs were significant predictors of primary GF at 28 days (SHR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.65-4.68; P = .0001). The Fine-Gray regression also demonstrated that the presence of DSAs was strongly associated with a higher incidence of overall GF (SHR = 7.60; 95%CI, 2.61-22.14; P = .0002). DSA-positive patients with GF had significantly higher median MFI values than DSA-positive patients who achieved engraftment in LIFECODES SAB assay using neat serum (10,334 vs. 1250; P = .006) and in LABScreen SAB at 1:32 dilution (1627 vs. 61; P = .006). All 3 patients with C1q-positive DSAs failed to engraft. DSAs were not predictive of inferior survival (hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20-1.26, P = .14).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results validate the presence of DSAs as a significant risk factor for GF and poor hematologic recovery after unrelated donor allo-HCT. Thus, careful pre-transplant DSA evaluation may optimize unrelated donor selection and improve allo-HCT outcomes.

Donor specific HLA antibody in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Implications for donor selection

Advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) have led to changes in the approach to donor selection. Many of these new approaches result in greater HLA loci mismatching, either through the selection of haploidentical donors or permissive HLA mismatches. Although these approaches increase the potential of transplant for many patients by expanding the number of acceptable donor HLA genotypes, they add the potential barrier of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). DSA presents a unique challenge in HSCT, as it can limit engraftment and lead to graft failure. However, transient reduction of HLA antibodies through desensitization treatments can limit the risk of graft failure and facilitate engraftment. Thus, the consideration of DSA in donor selection and the management of DSA prior to transplant are playing an increasingly important role in HSCT. In this review, we will discuss studies addressing the role of HLA antibodies in HSCT, the reported impact of desensitization on DSA levels, and the implications for selecting donors for patients with DSA. We found that there is a clear consensus that moderate strength DSA should be avoided, while desensitization strategies are reported to be effective in most cases at reducing DSA to amenable levels. There is limited information regarding the impact of specific characteristics of DSA, such as HLA loci or overall level of sensitization, which could further aid in donor selection for sensitized HSCT candidates.

Prozone rates in the solid-phase platelet crossmatch assay and correlation with class I HLA antibody levels

BACKGROUND

Solid-phase platelet crossmatch (PXM) testing is used to help manage patients with platelet transfusion-refractoriness. Recently, we published the first report of false-negative PXM results from prozone effect that was mitigated using sample dilution. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of PXM prozone effect and the levels of class I HLA antibodies (HLA-Abs) associated with positive PXM results and with false-negative PXM results from prozone effect.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study of patients undergoing PXM testing from July 2019 through December 2020 was performed. All PXM tests were run simultaneously using undiluted and 1:4 diluted patient plasma. Prozone effect was defined as a negative PXM result using undiluted patient plasma but a positive PXM result using 1:4 diluted patient plasma.

RESULTS

Among 59 patients, 830 individual ABO-compatible PXM results yielded an overall positivity rate of 25.8% (214/830) and a false-negative rate from prozone effect of 4.7% (10/214). Among the 28 patients with class I HLA-Ab testing and no other anti-platelet antibodies, maximum HLA-Ab mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was significantly associated with a positive PXM result (p < .0001; AUC approx. 0.9) and categorized into negative (<3700), indeterminate (3700-10300), and positive (>10300) maximum HLA-Ab MFI zones. Maximum HLA-Ab MFI, however, was not associated with prozone effect (p = .17; AUC approx. 0.6).

DISCUSSION

While there is a strong predictive association between class I HLA-Ab levels and positive PXM results, PXM prozone effect is a common occurrence not associated with class I HLA-Ab levels, so additional testing with diluted samples should be considered.

Improved detection of donor-specific HLA-class II antibody in kidney transplant recipients by modified immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis

Immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis (ICFA) which basic principle is same as Luminex crossmatch (LXM), could detect donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA). The advantages of ICFA are (i) detection of DSA and (ii) no requirement of viable cells over the flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM). However, FCXM has been widely used because of its higher sensitivity than ICFA, in particular HLA-class II antibody detection. In this study the accuracy of DSA detection against HLA-class II was investigated by modifying the original method of ICFA. Increment of the sensitivity was found when purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used instead of whole blood. An ICFA-PBMC in addition to FCXM-T/B was conducted for 118 patients before kidney transplantation and 13 patients with de novo DSA against HLA-class II after transplantation. Significantly positive correlation was observed between the values of ICFA-PBMC and DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) targeting class II (p < 0.0001). When the cutoff level of 1.4 was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the average DSA MFI was found to be significantly higher in the ICFA-PBMC (class II) positive group comparing to that in the negative group (12,217 vs 3885, p = 0.0027). ICFA-PBMC and optimized cutoff level could provide valid information in cases of suspected DSA.

Chronic Histologic Changes Are Present Regardless of HLA Mismatches: Evidence from HLA Identical Living Donor Kidney Transplants

BACKGROUND

At 5 and 10 years after kidney transplantation, chronic histologic changes such as arteriolar hyalinosis and mesangial expansion are common, however, determining etiology is difficult. We compared surveillance biopsies in living donor kidney transplants (LDKTx) from HLA matched siblings (termed HLA-identical (HLA-ID)) to HLA non-ID to investigate which histologic changes were likely due to alloimmune injury and which were due to non-alloimmune injury.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, cohort study comparing HLA-ID sibling LDKTx (n=175) to HLA non-ID LDKTx (n=175; matched for age, sex and year of transplant +/- 2 years) performed at a single institution from 03/1999 to 11/2018.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and maintenance immunosuppression were similar. Mortality rates were similar, but in the HLA-ID group, 10-year death-censored graft survival was higher (93.8% vs 80.9% HLA non-ID LDKTx, p<0.001), rejection rates were lower (after 1 year 9.6% vs 27.1%; p<0.001) and Banff inflammation scores including glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis were lower on surveillance biopsies at 1, 5 and 10 years. In contrast, chronic Banff scores (interstitial fibrosis, arteriolar hyalinosis, mesangial expansion, etc.) were similar in prevalence and severity on surveillance biopsies at 1, 5 and 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

HLA-ID LDKTx have less inflammation and less transplant glomerulopathy, but most chronic histologic changes were similar to less-well matched LDKTx. We conclude that these types of chronic changes are not associated with HLA mismatches and may be due to non-immunologic causes (hypertension, obesity, etc.) suggesting that new management approaches to prevent these lesions may be needed.

The challenge of using the virtual crossmatch as a singular tool for the detection of Anti-HLA antibodies- A study from a tertiary care institute from South India

INTRODUCTION

Detection of donor specific antibodies (DSA) is critical in both solid organ and mismatched haematopoietic stem cell transplants. The single antigen bead assay (SAB) is widely used as a virtual crossmatch in these settings. However, HLA allele variation across ethnicities and differing genetic backgrounds is a well-known and acknowledged fact and representation of alleles prevalent in a population is key while using a virtual crossmatch as a sole decision making tool. Against this background, this study was performed to assess the feasibility of using the SAB as a single tool to identify DSA in our population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The HLA alleles identified in the study population were analysed to assess their representation on SAB panels from two different vendors.

RESULTS

The study population comprised of a total of 966 subjects for whom 6 loci high resolution HLA typing was done. A total of 241 different alleles were assigned in the population. Among the 241 alleles identified in our study population, 48.55% (n = 117) alleles were represented in the SAB A panel and 48.13% (n = 116) represented in the SAB B panel. Unrepresented alleles were 51.45% (n = 124) in panel A and 51.87% (n = 125) in panel B. All the twelve alleles were represented for 16.05% (n = 155) and 16.25% (n = 157) of study population in panel A and in panel B respectively. The remaining individuals (83.95%, (n = 811) in panel A and 83.75%, (n = 809) in panel B) had at least one allele unrepresented.

CONCLUSION

Our study addresses an important limitation in utilizing the SAB as a single tool to identify DSA, owing to non-representation of locally prevalent / unique alleles in our population. More than 50% of alleles were unrepresented in both the SAB assays we studied, which included alleles from both Class I and Class II. We recommend therefore that, until a comprehensive coverage of alleles is provided, or epitope matching becomes robust, that the SAB be combined with a physical crossmatch when mismatched alleles are not represented.

Immunologic Risk Assessment and Approach to Immunosuppression Regimen in Kidney Transplantation

The outcomes of kidney transplantation show a steady improvement with an increasing number of transplantations and decreasing incidence of acute rejection episodes. Successful transplantation begins with a comprehensive immunologic risk assessment and judicious choice of therapeutic agents. In this review, we discuss the trends in transplant immunosuppression practices and outcomes in the United States. We discuss practical testing algorithms for clinical decision making in induction therapy and fine-tuning maintenance immunosuppression. We introduce assessment tools for immune monitoring after transplantation and speculate on future directions in management.

Discrepant Antibody Testing Results: Which One to Believe?

The impact of solid-phase immunoassay for HLA antibody detection on the field of transplantation has been extremely significant by providing the most sensitive and precise method for characterization of HLA antibodies. However, despite all the benefits, technical limitations and inherent artifacts represent significant challenges, particularly with Luminex-based single-antigen bead (SAB) assay. Discordant results between antibody detection (screening assay) and identification (SAB) is not uncommon. Positive SAB assay in the context of negative screening testing is well documented and attributed to altered tertiary structure of HLA molecules exposing new epitopes or detection of naturally occurring antibodies. However, there are few reports that addressed the opposite scenario when negative SAB appeared in the context of positive screening assay. In such discrepant results, unmissed HLA antibody has to be excluded with certainty by other tests; however, with the availability of variable assays it may be difficult to choose the best combinations that clarify discrepancy without adding more confusion. Here we describe the results of correlation between 2 antibody screening solid-phase immunoassays (LABScreen Mixed using Luminex and FlowPRA Screen) on conventional flow cytometry and compare their outcomes with SAB and crossmatch results.

Anti-HLA Antibody Levels Are Associated With the Risk of Graft Failure After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant provides a curative treatment for a considerable amount of hematologic diseases, and it is widely used today. Successful allogeneic stem cell transplant can be compromised by treatment-related toxicity, graft-versus-host disease, infectious complications, disease relapse, and graft failure. Primary graft failure is an important cause of hematopoietic stem cell transplant failure. Primary graft failure correlates with the level of complement-binding, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies prior to transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 15 patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant using peripheral blood stem cells in terms of graft failure and anti-HLA antibody levels before transplant. All were treated between January 2015 and June 2016. Pretreatment serum anti-HLA class I and anti-HLA class II antibody levels were measured in all patients.

RESULTS

Anti-HLA class I antibodies were present in 7 patients (46.6%) and anti-HLA class II antibodies in 8 (53.3%). All three patients who developed primary graft failure were anti-HLA-positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-HLA antibodies are a significant cause of graft failure. It is a situation that must be understood with caution. Our results support the considerations that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, especially when a fully compatible sibling donor is not present, should include screening of donor-specific antibodies of alternative donors and desensitization therapy for allosensitized patients before transplant.

Histocompatibility and management of the highly sensitized kidney transplant candidate

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Increasing national participation in kidney paired donation and implementation of new sharing policies via the current kidney allocation system have brought about greater opportunities for the most highly sensitized patients awaiting a kidney transplant. The purpose of this review is to discuss the application of histocompatibility data in the context of the clinical practice of kidney transplantation as pertains to the sensitized candidate.

RECENT FINDINGS

With desensitization techniques, transplantation across virtually any antibody barrier is technically feasible, but long-term outcomes after transplantation are improved when the immunologic match between donor and recipient is optimized. Solid-phase immunoassays have changed the landscape of histocompatibility testing. These sensitive and specific assays for identifying donor-specific antibody not only help determine feasibility of transplantation but have enabled outcomes studies aimed at understanding the spectrum of risk posed by different antibody profiles. This, in turn, has helped guide decision-making in donor selection, in particular for sensitized patients.

SUMMARY

Careful evaluation of donor-specific antibody profiles with individualized, patient-specific determination of unacceptable antigens is necessary to ensure that highly sensitized patients receive every opportunity for transplantation.

Application and interpretation of histocompatibility data in thoracic (heart and lung) transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to update our current understanding and utilization of immunogenetic tools in heart and lung transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasingly, complex patients have been managed perioperatively for heart and lung transplant using a variety of tests and techniques. Recent treatment regimens and listing strategies have exploited recent laboratory advances. However, the better characterization has led to an even more complex description of sensitized heart and lung candidates. Several recent studies have examined antibody strengths and behavior to guide clinical decision-making and examine postoperative outcomes. Finally, non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies have emerged as possible determinants of allograft outcome in heart and lung transplant.

SUMMARY

Heart and lung transplant candidates with preformed and de-novo posttransplant antibodies continue to represent a challenging and high-risk group of patients. Modern immunogenetic techniques have broadened our understanding and have revealed an even more complex relationship between antibodies, allografts, and outcomes.

The Road to HLA Antibody Evaluation: Do Not Rely on MFI

Technological advances in HLA laboratory testing undoubtedly improved the sensitivity and specificity of HLA antibody assessment but not without introducing a set of challenges regarding data interpretation. In particular, the introduction of solid-phase single-antigen bead (SAB) antibody assessment brought the belief that mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was a quantifiable value. As such, MFI levels heavily influenced HLA antibody reporting, monitoring, and clinical practice. However, given that SAB testing was neither intended for nor approved to be quantifiable, is the use of MFI in current clinical and laboratory practice valid? What, if anything, does this numerical value actually reveal about the pathogenic potential of the antibody? What are the pitfalls and caveats associated with reporting MFI? Herein, we travel the road to HLA antibody assessment and explore the reliability of MFI values to make clinical decisions.

Application and interpretation of histocompatibility data in pediatric kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in technology to assess immunologic risk in solid organ transplant offer an opportunity to optimize the approach to pediatric deceased donor kidney transplant in the setting of a new allocation system in the United States.

RECENT FINDINGS

Degree of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, class II HLA mismatch, unacceptable antigens and donor-specific antibody (DSA) detected by solid-phase assays, and epitope matching pretransplant affect pediatric kidney transplant outcomes. Detection of de novo DSAs (dnDSAs) posttransplant has been associated with increased risk of acute rejection and worse allograft function. Development of dnDSA occurs in recipients with greater epitope mismatching.

SUMMARY

Improved long-term outcomes may be anticipated in pediatric kidney transplant recipients by incorporating extended HLA mismatch information and updating the clinical approach to donor kidney matching using available technology to identify clinically relevant immunologic risk.

Antibody-Dependent NK Cell Activation Is Associated with Late Kidney Allograft Dysfunction and the Complement-Independent Alloreactive Potential of Donor-Specific Antibodies

Although kidney transplantation remains the best treatment for end-stage renal failure, it is limited by chronic humoral aggression of the graft vasculature by donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). The complement-independent mechanisms that lead to the antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of kidney allografts remain poorly understood. Increasing lines of evidence have revealed the relevance of natural killer (NK) cells as innate immune effectors of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), but few studies have investigated their alloreactive potential in the context of solid organ transplantation. Our study aimed to investigate the potential contribution of the antibody-dependent alloreactive function of NK cells to kidney graft dysfunction. We first conducted an observational study to investigate whether the cytotoxic function of NK cells is associated with chronic allograft dysfunction. The NK-Cellular Humoral Activation Test (NK-CHAT) was designed to evaluate the recipient and antibody-dependent reactivity of NK cells against allogeneic target cells. The release of CD107a/Lamp1⁺ cytotoxic granules, resulting from the recognition of rituximab-coated B cells by NK cells, was analyzed in 148 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs, mean graft duration: 6.2 years). Enhanced ADCC responsiveness was associated with reduced graft function and identified as an independent risk factor predicting a decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate over a 1-year period (hazard ratio: 2.83). In a second approach, we used the NK-CHAT to reveal the cytotoxic potential of circulating alloantibodies in vitro. The level of CD16 engagement resulting from the in vitro recognition of serum-coated allogeneic B cells or splenic cells was further identified as a specific marker of DSA-induced ADCC. The NK-CHAT scoring of sera obtained from 40 patients at the time of transplant biopsy was associated with ABMR diagnosis. Our findings indicate that despite the administration of immunosuppressive treatments, robust ADCC responsiveness can be maintained in some KTRs. Because it evaluates both the Fab recognition of alloantigens and Fc-driven NK cell activation, the NK-CHAT represents a potentially valuable tool for the non-invasive and individualized evaluation of humoral risk during transplantation.