Emerging advancements in liver regeneration and organogenesis as tools for liver replacement

Successful induction of human chemically induced liver progenitors with small molecules from damaged liver

BACKGROUND

Human chemically induced liver progenitors (hCLiP) induced by small molecules produced by mature hepatocytes can potentially overcome issues related to hepatocyte transplantation, such as graft rejection or donor shortage. However, to our knowledge, no studies have explored the induction of hCLiP from mature hepatocytes (MHs) in damaged liver, indicated for liver transplantation.

METHODS

Liver tissues were collected from surgically resected livers, including damaged livers, of 86 patients at our department, and hepatocytes were isolated using the collagenase perfusion method. Hepatocytes isolated from 33 of these 86 donors were cultured in YAC medium containing Y-27632 (ROCK inhibitor), A-83-01 (TGF-β type I receptor inhibitor), and CHIR99021 (GSK-3 inhibitor) to induce hCLiP, and their functions were assessed.

RESULTS

Hepatocytes were isolated regardless of the liver fibrosis classifications (viability: F0,1: 87.2 ± 13.2%; F2,3: 87.8 ± 13.1%; and F4: 86.3 ± 4.2%). Most hepatocytes cultured in the YAC medium acquired the liver progenitor cell (LPC) gene. The expression of MH markers (ALB, HNF4α, G6PC, and CYP1A2) was lower in hCLiP than in MHs before reprogramming. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction revealed that hCLiP markers (e.g., EpCAM, SOX9, CK19, and CD133) exhibited higher expression in LPCs than in MHs. Furthermore, hCLiPs had the ability to differentiate into hepatocytes, and were engrafted on the liver surface as mature hepatocytes.

CONCLUSION

Hepatocytes could be isolated from damaged liver. Furthermore, hCLiP may be obtained from hepatocytes isolated from damaged liver and may differentiate into MHs in vitro. Autologous hCLiP can potentially be transplanted without tumorigenesis and remodel damaged liver.

Liver regeneration biology: Implications for liver tumour therapies

The liver has remarkable regenerative potential, with the capacity to regenerate after 75% hepatectomy in humans and up to 90% hepatectomy in some rodent models, enabling it to meet the challenge of diverse injury types, including physical trauma, infection, inflammatory processes, direct toxicity, and immunological insults. Current understanding of liver regeneration is based largely on animal research, historically in large animals, and more recently in rodents and zebrafish, which provide powerful genetic manipulation experimental tools. Whilst immensely valuable, these models have limitations in extrapolation to the human situation. In vitro models have evolved from 2-dimensional culture to complex 3 dimensional organoids, but also have shortcomings in replicating the complex hepatic micro-anatomical and physiological milieu. The process of liver regeneration is only partially understood and characterized by layers of complexity. Liver regeneration is triggered and controlled by a multitude of mitogens acting in autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine ways, with much redundancy and cross-talk between biochemical pathways. The regenerative response is variable, involving both hypertrophy and true proliferative hyperplasia, which is itself variable, including both cellular phenotypic fidelity and cellular trans-differentiation, according to the type of injury. Complex interactions occur between parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells, and regeneration is affected by the status of the liver parenchyma, with differences between healthy and diseased liver. Finally, the process of termination of liver regeneration is even less well understood than its triggers. The complexity of liver regeneration biology combined with limited understanding has restricted specific clinical interventions to enhance liver regeneration. Moreover, manipulating the fundamental biochemical pathways involved would require cautious assessment, for fear of unintended consequences. Nevertheless, current knowledge provides guiding principles for strategies to optimise liver regeneration potential.

Challenges, highlights, and opportunities in cellular transplantation: A white paper of the current landscape

Although cellular transplantation remains a relatively small field compared to solid organ transplantation, the prospects for advancement in basic science and clinical care remain bountiful. In this review, notable historical events and the current landscape of the field of cellular transplantation are reviewed with an emphasis on islets (allo- and xeno-), hepatocytes (including bioartificial liver), adoptive regulatory immunotherapy, and stem cells (SCs, specifically endogenous organ-specific and mesenchymal). Also, the nascent but rapidly evolving field of three-dimensional bioprinting is highlighted, including its major processing steps and latest achievements. To reach its full potential where cellular transplants are a more viable alternative than solid organ transplants, fundamental change in how the field is regulated and advanced is needed. Greater public and private investment in the development of cellular transplantation is required. Furthermore, consistent with the call of multiple national transplant societies for allo-islet transplants, the oversight of cellular transplants should mirror that of solid organ transplants and not be classified under the unsustainable, outdated model that requires licensing as a drug with the Food and Drug Administration. Cellular transplantation has the potential to bring profound benefit through progress in bioengineering and regenerative medicine, limiting immunosuppression-related toxicity, and providing markedly reduced surgical morbidity.

The complement system in liver diseases: Evidence-based approach and therapeutic options

Complement is usually seen to largely originate from the liver to accomplish its tasks systemically - its return to the production site has long been underestimated. Recent progress in genomics, therapeutic effects on complement, standardised possibilities in medical laboratory tests and involvement of complosome brings the complement system with its three major functions of opsonization, cytolysis and phagocytosis back to liver biology and pathology. The LOINC™ system features 20 entries for the C3 component of complement to anticipate the application of artificial intelligence data banks algorythms of which are fed with patient-specific data connected to standard lab assays for liver function. These advancements now lead to increased vigilance by clinicians. This reassessment article will further elucidate the distribution of synthesis sites to the three germ layer-derived cell systems and the role complement now known to play in embryogenesis, senescence, allotransplantation and autoimmune disease. This establishes the liver as part of the gastro-intestinal system in connection with nosological entities never thought of, such as the microbiota-liver-brain axis. In neurological disease etiology infectious and autoimmune hepatitis play an important role in the context of causative viz reactive complement activation. The mosaic of autoimmunity, i.e. multiple combinations of the many factors producing varying clinical pictures, leads to the manifold facets of liver autoimmunity.

Auxiliary xenotransplantation as an in vivo bioreactor-Development of a transplantable liver graft from a tiny partial liver

BACKGROUND

We established a completely novel method of auxiliary xenogeneic partial liver transplantation and examined whether liver grafts procured from Syrian hamsters regenerated in nude rats, which were used as in vivo bioreactors.

METHODS

The hamsters and the rats were all males (n = 10). Partial liver grafts from hamsters were transplanted into nude rats in an auxiliary manner. We evaluated liver graft injury, rejection, and regeneration during 7 days after auxiliary xenogeneic partial liver transplantation.

RESULTS

All rats survived until sacrifice on post-operative day (POD) 1, 3, and 7. HE-staining showed normal at POD1, mild periportal edema, and slight bile duct and venous endothelial inflammation at POD3, and moderate acute cellular rejection at POD7 without parenchymal necrosis. The liver regeneration rates at POD3 and 7 were 1.54 ± 0.23 and 2.54 ± 0.43, respectively. The Ki-67 labeling index was also elevated at POD3 (27.5 ± 4.1%). Serum HGF and VEGF were elevated at POD1 and 3. ATP levels of liver grafts recovered at POD7.

CONCLUSIONS

These results revealed that with appropriate immunosuppressive therapy, partial liver graft regeneration occurred in a xenogeneic animal, which suggests liver grafts regenerated in xenogeneic environments, such as an in vivo bioreactor, have potential to be transplantable liver grafts for humans.

Fibrosis in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: treat or trigger?

Fibrosis is a life-threatening pathological condition resulting from a dysfunctional tissue repair process. There is no efficient treatment and organ transplantation is in many cases the only therapeutic option. Here we review tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) approaches to address fibrosis in the cardiovascular system, the kidney, the lung and the liver. These strategies have great potential to achieve repair or replacement of diseased organs by cell- and material-based therapies. However, paradoxically, they might also trigger fibrosis. Cases of TERM interventions with adverse outcome are also included in this review. Furthermore, we emphasize the fact that, although organ engineering is still in its infancy, the advances in the field are leading to biomedically relevant in vitro models with tremendous potential for disease recapitulation and development of therapies. These human tissue models might have increased predictive power for human drug responses thereby reducing the need for animal testing.

Functional 3D Human Liver Bud Assembled from MSC-Derived Multiple Liver Cell Lineages

The severe shortage of donor liver organs requires the development of alternative methods to provide transplantable liver tissues such as stem cell-derived organoids. Despite several studies describing the generation of vascularized and functional liver tissues, none have succeeded in assembling human liver buds containing hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs). Here, we report a reproducible, easy-to-follow, and comprehensive self-assembly protocol to generate three-dimensional (3D) human liver buds from naïve mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), MSC-derived hepatocytes, and HSC- and LSEC-like cells. By optimizing the ratio between these different cell lineages, the cell mixture self-assembled into 3D human liver buds within 72 h in vitro, and exhibited similar characteristics with early-stage murine liver buds. In a murine model of acute liver failure, the mesenteric transplantation of self-assembled human liver buds effectively rescued animal death, and triggered hepatic ameliorative effects that were better than the ones observed after splenic transplantation of human hepatocytes or naïve MSCs. In addition, transplanted human liver buds underwent maturation during injury alleviation, after which they exhibited a gene expression profile signature similar to the one of adult human livers. Collectively, our protocol provides a promising new approach for the in vitro construction of functional 3D human liver buds from multiple human MSC-derived hepatic cell lineages; this new technique would be useful for clinical transplantation and regenerative medicine research.

Molecular regulation of mammalian hepatic architecture

The essential liver exocrine and endocrine functions require a precise spatial arrangement of the hepatic lobule consisting of the central vein, portal vein, hepatic artery, intrahepatic bile duct system, and hepatocyte zonation. This allows blood to be carried through the liver parenchyma sampled by all hepatocytes and bile produced by the hepatocytes to be carried out of the liver through the intrahepatic bile duct system composed of cholangiocytes. The molecular orchestration of multiple signaling pathways and epigenetic factors is required to set up lineage restriction of the bipotential hepatoblast progenitor into the hepatocyte and cholangiocyte cell lineages, and to further refine cell fate heterogeneity within each cell lineage reflected in the functional heterogeneity of hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. In addition to the complex molecular regulation, there is a complicated morphogenetic choreography observed in building the refined hepatic epithelial architecture. Given the multifaceted molecular and cellular regulation, it is not surprising that impairment of any of these processes can result in acute and chronic hepatobiliary diseases. To enlighten the development of potential molecular and cellular targets for therapeutic options, an understanding of how the intricate hepatic molecular and cellular interactions are regulated is imperative. Here, we review the signaling pathways and epigenetic factors regulating hepatic cell lineages, fates, and epithelial architecture.

Foie gras and liver regeneration: a fat dilemma

The liver has a unique ability of regenerating after injuries or partial loss of its mass. The mechanisms responsible for liver regeneration - mostly occurring when the hepatic tissue is damaged or functionally compromised by metabolic stress - have been studied in considerable detail over the last few decades, because this phenomenon has both basic-biology and clinical relevance. More specifically, recent interest has been focusing on the widespread occurrence of abnormal nutritional habits in the Western world that result in an increased prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD is closely associated with insulin resistance and dyslipidemia, and it represents a major clinical challenge. The disease may progress to steatohepatitis with persistent inflammation and progressive liver damage, both of which will compromise regeneration under conditions of partial hepatectomy in surgical oncology or in liver transplantation procedures. Here, we analyze the impact of ER stress and SIRT1 in lipid metabolism and in fatty liver pathology, and their consequences on liver regeneration. Moreover, we discuss the fine interplay between ER stress and SIRT1 functioning when contextualized to liver regeneration. An improved understanding of the cellular and molecular intricacies contributing to liver regeneration could be of great clinical relevance in areas as diverse as obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, as well as oncology and transplantation.

Hepatocyte transplantation: past efforts, current technology, and future expansion of therapeutic potential

Hepatic cell transplantation (HCT) continues to garner interest as an alternative to orthotopic liver transplantation and the attendant donor shortage. When compared with solid organ transplantation, advantages of cell transplantation include the potential to treat more patients with a considerably less invasive procedure, the ability to utilize organs otherwise unsuitable for transplant, and leaving the native organ in situ with the potential for regeneration. While studies date back to the early 1960s, advancement of clinical application has been slow due in part to limitations of suitable tissue supplies and reproducible robust techniques. Compared with orthotopic liver transplantation, there are fewer absolute contraindications for donor selection. And, current techniques used to harvest, isolate, store, and even transfuse cells vary little between institutions. Significant variation is seen due to a lack of consensus with maintenance therapy. Although the ideal recipient has not been clearly identified, the most significant results have been demonstrated with correction of congenital metabolic liver disorders, with a few trials examining its utility in cirrhotics and more recently acute liver failure. The most exciting new topic of discussion examines techniques to improve engraftment, with many such as ischemic preconditioning and nonselective partial embolization (microbead therapy), while not yet used in HCT study, showing promise in solid organ research. Advancements in HCT, although slow in progress, have great potential in the ability to alleviate the burden faced in solid organ transplantation and possibly become a long-term viable option, beyond that of a bridge or salvage therapy.

Clinical Hepatocyte Transplantation: What Is Next?

Purpose of review

Significant recent scientific developments have occurred in the field of liver repopulation and regeneration. While techniques to facilitate liver repopulation with donor hepatocytes and different cell sources have been studied extensively in the laboratory, in recent years clinical hepatocyte transplantation (HT) and liver repopulation trials have demonstrated new disease indications and also immunological challenges that will require the incorporation of a fresh look and new experimental approaches.

Recent findings

Growth advantage and regenerative stimulus are necessary to allow donor hepatocytes to proliferate. Current research efforts focus on mechanisms of donor hepatocyte expansion in response to liver injury/preconditioning. Moreover, latest clinical evidence shows that important obstacles to HT include optimizing engraftment and limited duration of effectiveness, with hepatocytes being lost to immunological rejection. We will discuss alternatives for cellular rejection monitoring, as well as new modalities to follow cellular graft function and near-to-clinical cell sources.

Summary

HT partially corrects genetic disorders for a limited period of time and has been associated with reversal of ALF. The main identified obstacles that remain to make HT a curative approach include improving engraftment rates, and methods for monitoring cellular graft function and rejection. This review aims to discuss current state-of-the-art in clinical HT and provide insights into innovative approaches taken to overcome these obstacles.