Significance of biologics in renal transplantation: past, present, and future

Evidence of Interleukin-2-Receptor-Antibody Induction in Low-Risk Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

The recommended standard immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients comprises an initial induction therapy mainly with an interleukin-2-receptor antibody (IL2-RA) and a triple maintenance therapy. With tacrolimus and mycophenolate acid it is unknown whether IL2-RA application affects the short- and long-term results. This question is addressed in the present analysis.

METHODS

From July 2007 to June 2019 a total of 127 living donor kidney transplant recipients meeting the center-specific definition of immunologic low risk situation (first transplantation, HLA-mismatch ≤3, panel reactive antibody ≤10%) were identified. In 83 recipients with a first-degree relationship to the donor we omitted the IL2-RA induction (IL2-RA-). The remaining 44 recipients, mostly not first-degree relatives, served as controls (IL2-RA+). Biopsy-proven acute rejection and long-term patient and graft survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates after 3 months were similar in both groups with 4.8% (IL2-RA-) vs 13.7% (IL2-RA+; P = .0937), including borderline rejection rates of 18.0% (IL2-RA-) vs 18.3% (IL2-RA+; P = 1.000), respectively. Ten-year long-term survival rates were comparable between the IL2-RA- and the IL2-RA+ group with 95.6% vs 93.5% (patient survival; P = .5465) and 92.1% vs 90.6% (death-censored graft survival; P = .8893).

CONCLUSION

For low-risk living donor kidney transplant recipients with first-degree relationship to the donor, it is safe to omit induction therapy with IL2-RA.

Prognostic factors for renal transplant graft survival in a retrospective cohort of 1000 cases: The role of desensitization therapy

BACKGROUND

To review the results of renal transplantation after promulgation of the Human Organ Transplant Act in Taiwan in 1987, we conducted a retrospective study in the first 1000 cases performed in our hospital. Prognostic factors for graft survival were assessed with emphasis on the impact of donor-specific antibody (DSA).

METHODS

Between January 1988 and April 2014, there were 1000 cases of renal transplantation performed in our hospital. Excluding 30 patients of ABO-incompatible transplantation, we reviewed 970 cases of ABO-compatible renal transplantation to analyze the prognostic factors for graft survival. The patients were grouped according to the dates of operations before (the Early group: 503 cases) and after (the Late group: 467 cases) the introduction of detection and desensitization of alloantibody in our hospital in 2004.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year graft survival rate were 82.6%, which was significantly lower in the Early group (79.2%) than the Late group (86.3%) (p = 0.0012). The 1-year rejection-free survival was significantly lower in the Early group (78.3%) than the Late group (91.2%) (p = 0.0165). The difference between the two groups became insignificant when the time of observation extended beyond 12 months. In a multivariate regression model, we identified significant factors for poor graft survival, including HLA mismatches, delayed graft function with or without recovery, and antibody-mediate rejection (AMR).

CONCLUSION

HLA mismatches, delayed graft function with or without recovery, and AMR were significant factors for poor graft survival. Detection and desensitization of DSA currently might be inadequate to improve the long-term outcome of renal transplantation.

High Dimensional Renal Profiling: Towards a Better Understanding or Renal Transplant Immune Suppression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to discuss new approaches to avoid CNI/CCS toxicities with a focus on new biologics and new methods to understand transplant rejection at the single-cell level.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently developed biologics hold significant promise as the next wave of therapeutics designed to promote CNI/CCS-free long-term allograft acceptance. Indeed, belatacept, soluble CTLA4-Ig, is largely devoid of CNI-like toxicities, although it is accompanied by an increased frequency of acute rejection. Besides belatacept, other biologics hold promise as CNI-free immune suppressive approaches. Finally, powerful new single cell approaches can enable characterization of cellular populations that drive rejection within the rejecting allograft.

SUMMARY

We propose that the incorporated single cell profiling into studies investigating new biologics in transplantation, could be tailored to each patient, correlated with potential biomarkers in the blood and urine, and provide a platform where therapeutic targets can be rationally defined, mechanistically-based, and exploited.

The Past, Present, and Future of HLA Typing in Transplantation

The HLA region is the most polymorphic genes in the human genome and is associated with an increasing number of disease states. Historically, HLA typing methodology has been governed by phenotypic determination. This practice has evolved into the use of molecular methods such as real-time PCR, sequence-specific oligonucleotides, and sequencing-based methods. Numerous studies have identified HLA matching as a key determinate to improve patient outcomes from transplantation. Solid-organ transplants focus on HLA-DRB1 in renal organ allocation while hematopoietic cell transplants focus on HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 matching. The role of HLA typing in the future will be driven by HLA expression, understanding of HLA haplotypes, and rapid HLA typing.