A diagnostic ‘C’ saw: the ups and downs of C1q testing

Clinical recommendations for posttransplant assessment of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies: A Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk consensus document

Although anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are commonly measured in clinical practice and their relationship with transplant outcome is well established, clinical recommendations for anti-HLA antibody assessment are sparse. Supported by a careful and critical review of the current literature performed by the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 working group, this consensus report provides clinical practice recommendations in kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplantation based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The recommendations address 3 major clinical problems in transplantation and include guidance regarding posttransplant DSA assessment and application to diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics: (1) the clinical implications of positive posttransplant DSA detection according to DSA status (ie, preformed or de novo), (2) the relevance of posttransplant DSA assessment for precision diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and for treatment management, and (3) the relevance of posttransplant DSA for allograft prognosis and risk stratification. This consensus report also highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical investigations and trials in the future that will further refine the clinical utility of posttransplant DSA assessment, leading to improved transplant management and patient care.

Complement-Binding Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies: Biomarker for Immunologic Risk Stratification in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation Recipients

Antibody-mediated rejection is a common cause of early kidney allograft loss but the specifics of antibody measurement, therapies and endpoints have not been universally defined. In this retrospective study, we assessed the performance of risk stratification using systematic donor-specific antibody (DSA) monitoring. Included in the study were children who underwent kidney transplantation between January 1, 2010 and March 1, 2018 at Stanford, with at least 12-months follow-up. A total of 233 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 45 (range, 9–108) months. Median age at transplant was 12.3 years, 46.8% were female, and 76% had a deceased donor transplant. Fifty-two (22%) formed C1q-binding de novo donor-specific antibodies (C1q-dnDSA). After a standardized augmented immunosuppressive protocol was implemented, C1q-dnDSA disappeared in 31 (58.5%). Graft failure occurred in 16 patients at a median of 54 (range, 5–83) months, of whom 14 formed dnDSA. The 14 patients who lost their graft due to rejection, all had persistent C1q-dnDSA. C1q-binding status improved the individual risk assessment, with persistent; C1q binding yielding the strongest independent association of graft failure (hazard ratio, 45.5; 95% confidence interval, 11.7–177.4). C1q-dnDSA is more useful than standard dnDSA as a noninvasive biomarker for identifying patients at the highest risk of graft failure.

The impact of HLA donor-specific antibodies on engraftment and the evolving desensitization strategies

The majority of contemporary allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) procedures utilize partially HLA-mismatched stem cell grafts. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are associated with primary graft failure independent of the graft source, conditioning intensity and other patient and donor factors. Here we provide an update on testing and monitoring of DSA, review the impact of DSA on stem cell engraftment, and present promising desensitization modalities. Ultimately, we attempt to provide practical recommendations for DSA screening and mitigation strategies.

Approaches for the characterization of clinically relevant pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in solid organ transplant patients

The avoidance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) attributed to human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibody incompatibility remains an essential function of clinical Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (H&I) laboratories who are supporting solid organ transplantation. Developments in HLA antibody identification assays over the past thirty years have greatly reduced unexpected positive cellular crossmatches and improved solid organ transplant outcomes. For sensitized patients, the decision to register unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches is often heavily influenced by results from solid phase antibody assays, particularly the Luminex^® Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assays, although the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by these assays remains unclear. As such, the identification of non-clinically relevant antibodies may proportionally increase the number of unacceptable transplant mismatches registered, with an associated increase in waiting time for a compatible organ. We reflect on the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by the Luminex SAB^® assays and consider whether the application of additional assays and/or tools could further develop our ability to define the clinical relevance of antibodies identified in patient sera. Improvements in this area would assist equity of access to a compatible transplant for highly sensitized patients awaiting a solid organ transplant.

Challenges of Diagnosing Antibody-Mediated Rejection: The Role of Invasive and Non-Invasive Biomarkers

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment modality for end-stage kidney disease, leading to improvement in a patient’s quality and quantity of life. With significant improvements in short-term outcomes, prolonging long-term allograft and patient survival remain ongoing challenges. The ability to monitor allograft function, immune tolerance and predict rejection accurately would enable personalization and better prognostication during post-transplant care. Though kidney biopsy remains the backbone of transplant diagnostics, emerging biomarkers can help detecting kidney allograft injury early enough to prevent permanent damage and detect injury before it is clinically apparent. In this review, we summarize the recent biomarkers that have shown promise in the prediction of acute rejection with a focus on antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation.

Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection with double-filtration plasmapheresis, low dose IVIg plus rituximab after kidney transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) at early or late post-transplantation remains challenging. We performed a single-center single-arm study where four cases of acute ABMR and nine cases of chronic active ABMR (defined by Banff classification) were treated with double-filtration plasmapheresis (two cycles of three consecutive daily sessions with a 4-day gap between). At the end of the third and sixth DFPP sessions, the patients received rituximab 375 mg/m² . After a median follow-up of 1078 (61-1676) days, kidney-allograft survival was 50%. Before DFPP/rituximab therapy, the median donor-specific alloantibody (DSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was 9160 (4000-15 400); 45 days (D45) later it had significantly decreased to 7375 (215-18 100) (P = .018). In addition, at one-year (Y1) post-therapy, MFI had decreased further, that is, 4060 (400-7850) (P = .001). In two patients, DSA MFIs decreased and remained below 2000. The slope of estimated glomerular-filtration rate within the 6 months preceding intervention was -1.18 mL/min/month and remained unchanged at -1.29 mL/min/month within the year after intervention. Proteinuria remained unchanged. Baseline Banff scores on repeat allograft biopsies (post-therapy D45, Y1) did not show any improvement. Side-effects were mild to moderate. We conclude that the combined DFPP/rituximab significantly decreased DSAs in ABMR kidney-transplant recipients but did not improve renal function or renal histology at 1-year follow-up.

Donor-specific antibody characteristics, including persistence and complement-binding capacity, increase risk for chronic lung allograft dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major complication limiting long-term survival in lung transplant recipients (LTRs), with those developing donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) previously found to have increased risk for CLAD. However, as DSA responses vary in timing of development, specificity, breadth, persistence, and complement-binding capacity, we hypothesized that these characteristics would impact CLAD and survival outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed DSA characteristics and outcomes in a single-center cohort of 582 LTRs who had serum samples collected prospectively from 2010 to 2016. Luminex-based single antigen bead assays were performed to assess DSA.

RESULTS

DSAs were detected in 247 LTRs (42%), of which 124 (21.3%) were de novo DSAs and 53 (9.1%) were complement-binding (C1q+). CLAD developed in 208 LTRs (35.7%) during the follow-up period, with 67.8% determined as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome phenotype and 32.2% as restrictive allograft syndrome phenotype. We found a shorter time to CLAD in LTRs with persistent DSAs (p = 0.04) and HLA-DQ-specific DSAs (p = 0.03). LTRs who developed C1q+ DSAs had significantly shorter time to CLAD (p < 0.001), with 100% of C1q+ DSAs being persistent and no differences between CLAD phenotypes. CLAD-free survival was significantly reduced in LTRs who developed C1q+ DSAs (p = 0.001), HLA-DQ-specific DSAs (p = 0.03), and multiple DSAs (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Together, our findings demonstrate that DSA characteristics of persistence, HLA-DQ specificity, and C1q+ DSAs are associated with shorter time to CLAD. Additionally, C1q+, HLA-DQ-specific, and multiple DSAs are associated with decreased CLAD-free survival. These characteristics may improve DSA risk stratification for deleterious outcomes in LTRs.

Investigating complement mediated interference in class I HLA-specific antibodies following renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Single antigen bead testing (SAB) for HLA-specific antibody enables efficient organ allocation and aids in the diagnosis of antibody mediated rejection. In this retrospective cohort study, a population of kidney transplant recipients possessing HLA Class I antibodies was used to evaluate the best method for resolving complement interference, the so called "prozone" effect. The aim was to compare the use of EDTA versus a Biotin-Streptavidin Complex as methodological approaches for abating the prozone effect using a fixed 1 in 10 dilution as validation.

METHODS

One hundred and seventeen patients transplanted in our centre between 2009 and 2014 were identified as having class I HLA-specific antibody(-ies) using a Labscreen® Mixed assay. Positive sera underwent class I HLA-specific SAB testing; for comparison a standard SAB with and without EDTA, BSC and dilution (1 in 10) modifications were utilised. Samples were processed on the Luminex platform generating 11,349 bead reactions for analysis.

RESULTS

We identified sera from 23 patients giving rise to 170 bead reactions showing complement interference. Using linear modelling, we observed slightly higher MFIs on average in both EDTA and BSC modifications when compared to the standard assay, allowing the nominal threshold MFI of 2000 in the standard assay to be adjusted to 2097 and 2033 in the EDTA and BSC assays respectively. We calculated 99% prediction intervals to establish outlier bead reactions for each assay. The 1 in 10 dilution was used as a crosscheck for determining which prozone reactions were overcome by EDTA and BSC. Using ROC curve analysis, EDTA was found to be ~90% sensitive and 100% specific compared to BSC which was ~60% sensitive and 100% specific in ameliorating prozone positive reactions at the thresholds defined by linear models.

DISCUSSION

Our data indicates that both EDTA and BSC are suitable assays in overcoming CMI. We recommend that all clinical laboratories adopt a validated assay designed specifically to abrogate CMI for all potential renal transplant recipients, as the standard assay is inhibited in nearly 20% of a post-transplant cohort.

Relevance of donor-specific antibody monitoring after kidney transplantation: Findings from the Collaborative Transplant Study and the Heidelberg Transplant Center

Monitoring of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) has become part of the clinical routine in kidney transplantation. This paper gives a brief overview on data from the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) and the Heidelberg Transplant Center on the clinical relevance of post-transplant DSA monitoring in patients undergoing renal transplantation. The obtained findings underline the importance of DSA monitoring in the post-operative course in immunologically high-risk patients and patients with deterioration of graft function. Especially in patients with a pre-activated immune system, a gap in the immunosuppressive therapy appear to lead to persistence, reappearance or de novo occurrence of strong, complement-activating DSA, resulting in severe antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and, without timely intervention, in AMR-related graft loss.

Immune Algorithm Optimization for Organ Transplantation in Poland

The lack of a uniform method for determining unacceptable HLA mismatches (UAMs) for organ transplantation worldwide has resulted in many different algorithms for donor-recipient matching. Here we present our proposal for changes to the current algorithm for immune evaluation of potential kidney recipients in Poland based on the experience of various transplantation centers. The most important finding of this article is an algorithm that stratifies the pretransplant immunologic risk based on strict laboratory criteria, enabling harmonization between transplant centers in Poland. This is because of a step-by-step algorithm for alloantibody assessment using solid-phase assays (SPA) and clearly defined technical issues, as well as cutoffs for reporting UAMs. Our novel approach focuses on a laboratory testing extension in the scope of HLA typing; detection and characterization of alloantibodies before transplantation; desensitization; and post-transplant monitoring. The proposed changes will allow for the assessment of clinically relevant anti-HLA antibodies with complement binding properties; the determination of UAMs in the potential donor; the calculation of virtual panel reactive antibodies (vPRA); the calculation of the recipient's immunologic rejection risk stratification; the assessment of the donor-recipient virtual cross-match (vXM); and the determination of the final recipient's selection for the biological cross-match testing. Collectively, the optimized algorithm permit for UAM verification is based on laboratory proofed data and will firmly improve organ allocation and transplant outcomes in Poland. We hope that this novel approach also improves the individual patient's risk stratification and future personalized treatment.