1
|
Iesari S, Nava FL, Zais IE, Coubeau L, Ferraresso M, Favi E, Lerut J. Advancing immunosuppression in liver transplantation: A narrative review. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024; 23:441-448. [PMID: 38523030 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Immunosuppression is essential to ensure recipient and graft survivals after liver transplantation (LT). However, our understanding and management of the immune system remain suboptimal. Current immunosuppressive therapy cannot selectively inhibit the graft-specific immune response and entails a significant risk of serious side effects, i.e., among others, de novo cancers, infections, cardiovascular events, renal failure, metabolic syndrome, and late graft fibrosis, with progressive loss of graft function. Pharmacological research, aimed to develop alternative immunosuppressive agents in LT, is behind other solid-organ transplantation subspecialties, and, therefore, the development of new compounds and strategies should get priority in LT. The research trajectories cover mechanisms to induce T-cell exhaustion, to inhibit co-stimulation, to mitigate non-antigen-specific inflammatory response, and, lastly, to minimize the development and action of donor-specific antibodies. Moreover, while cellular modulation techniques are complex, active research is underway to foster the action of T-regulatory cells, to induce tolerogenic dendritic cells, and to promote the function of B-regulatory cells. We herein discuss current lines of research in clinical immunosuppression, particularly focusing on possible applications in the LT setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Iesari
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Laura Nava
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Elena Zais
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Coubeau
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; Service de Chirurgie et Transplantation Abdominale, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 55 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mariano Ferraresso
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 19 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Evaldo Favi
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 19 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy.
| | - Jan Lerut
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramírez-Valle F, Maranville JC, Roy S, Plenge RM. Sequential immunotherapy: towards cures for autoimmunity. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2024; 23:501-524. [PMID: 38839912 DOI: 10.1038/s41573-024-00959-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Despite major progress in the treatment of autoimmune diseases in the past two decades, most therapies do not cure disease and can be associated with increased risk of infection through broad suppression of the immune system. However, advances in understanding the causes of autoimmune disease and clinical data from novel therapeutic modalities such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies provide evidence that it may be possible to re-establish immune homeostasis and, potentially, prolong remission or even cure autoimmune diseases. Here, we propose a 'sequential immunotherapy' framework for immune system modulation to help achieve this ambitious goal. This framework encompasses three steps: controlling inflammation; resetting the immune system through elimination of pathogenic immune memory cells; and promoting and maintaining immune homeostasis via immune regulatory agents and tissue repair. We discuss existing drugs and those in development for each of the three steps. We also highlight the importance of causal human biology in identifying and prioritizing novel immunotherapeutic strategies as well as informing their application in specific patient subsets, enabling precision medicine approaches that have the potential to transform clinical care.
Collapse
|
3
|
Guinan EC, Contreras-Ruiz L, Crisalli K, Rickert C, Rosales I, Makar R, Colvin R, Geissler EK, Sawitzki B, Harden P, Tang Q, Blancho G, Turka LA, Markmann JF. Donor antigen-specific regulatory T cell administration to recipients of live donor kidneys: A ONE Study consortium pilot trial. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1872-1881. [PMID: 37422112 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) can inhibit cellular immunity in diverse experimental models and have entered early phase clinical trials in autoimmunity and transplantation to assess safety and efficacy. As part of the ONE Study consortium, we conducted a phase I-II clinical trial in which purified donor antigen reactive (dar)-Tregs (CD4+CD25+CD127lo) were administered to 3 patients, 7 to 11 days after live donor renal transplant. Recipients received a modified immunosuppression regimen, without induction therapy, consisting of maintenance tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Steroids were weaned off over 14 weeks. No rejection was seen on any protocol biopsy. Therefore, all patients discontinued mycophenolate mofetil 11 to 13 months posttransplant, per protocol. An early for-cause biopsy in 1 patient, 5 days after dar-Treg infusion, revealed absence of rejection and accumulation of Tregs in the kidney allograft. All patients had Treg-containing lymphoid aggregates evident on protocol biopsies performed 8 months posttransplant. The patients are now all >6 years posttransplant on tacrolimus monotherapy with excellent graft function. None experienced rejection episodes. No serious adverse events were attributable to Treg administration. These results support a favorable safety profile of dar-Tregs administered early after renal transplant, suggest early biopsy might be an instructive research endpoint and provide preliminary evidence of potential immunomodulatory activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva C Guinan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Laura Contreras-Ruiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Kerry Crisalli
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Charles Rickert
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Ivy Rosales
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Robert Makar
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Robert Colvin
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Edward K Geissler
- University Hospital Regensburg, Department of Surgery, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Birgit Sawitzki
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Virchow - Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Paul Harden
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| | - Qizhi Tang
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | - Giles Blancho
- Centre of Research in Transplantation and Immunology, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
| | - Laurence A Turka
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - James F Markmann
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wassmer CH, El Hajji S, Papazarkadas X, Compagnon P, Tabrizian P, Lacotte S, Toso C. Immunotherapy and Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Basic and Clinical Data. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4574. [PMID: 37760542 PMCID: PMC10526934 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the management of patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage HCC, even making some of them potential candidates for liver transplantation. However, acute rejection has been observed after ICI therapy, challenging its safety in transplant settings. We summarize the key basic impact of immune checkpoints on HCC and liver transplantation. We analyze the available case reports and case series on the use of ICI therapy prior to and after liver transplantation. A three-month washout period is desirable between ICI therapy and liver transplantation to reduce the risk of acute rejection. Whenever possible, ICIs should be avoided after liver transplantation, and especially so early after a transplant. Globally, more robust prospective data in the field are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles-Henri Wassmer
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; (S.E.H.); (X.P.); (S.L.); (C.T.)
| | - Sofia El Hajji
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; (S.E.H.); (X.P.); (S.L.); (C.T.)
| | - Xenofon Papazarkadas
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; (S.E.H.); (X.P.); (S.L.); (C.T.)
| | - Philippe Compagnon
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland;
| | - Parissa Tabrizian
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10019, USA;
| | - Stéphanie Lacotte
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; (S.E.H.); (X.P.); (S.L.); (C.T.)
| | - Christian Toso
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; (S.E.H.); (X.P.); (S.L.); (C.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang QQ, Zhang WJ, Chang S. HDAC6 inhibition: a significant potential regulator and therapeutic option to translate into clinical practice in renal transplantation. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1168848. [PMID: 37545520 PMCID: PMC10401441 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1168848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6), an almost exclusively cytoplasmic enzyme, plays an essential role in many biological processes and exerts its deacetylation-dependent/independent effects on a variety of target molecules, which has contributed to the flourishing growth of relatively isoform-specific enzyme inhibitors. Renal transplantation (RT) is one of the alternatively preferred treatments and the most cost-effective treatment approaches for the great majority of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). HDAC6 expression and activity have recently been shown to be increased in kidney disease in a number of studies. To date, a substantial amount of validated studies has identified HDAC6 as a pivotal modulator of innate and adaptive immunity, and HDAC6 inhibitors (HDAC6i) are being developed and investigated for use in arrays of immune-related diseases, making HDAC6i a promising therapeutic candidate for the management of a variety of renal diseases. Based on accumulating evidence, HDAC6i markedly open up new avenues for therapeutic intervention to protect against oxidative stress-induced damage, tip the balance in favor of the generation of tolerance-related immune cells, and attenuate fibrosis by inhibiting multiple activations of cell profibrotic signaling pathways. Taken together, we have a point of view that targeting HDAC6 may be a novel approach for the therapeutic strategy of RT-related complications, including consequences of ischemia-reperfusion injury, induction of immune tolerance in transplantation, equilibrium of rejection, and improvement of chronic renal graft interstitial fibrosis after transplantation in patients. Herein, we will elaborate on the unique function of HDAC6, which focuses on therapeutical mechanism of action related to immunological events with a general account of the tantalizing potential to the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian-qian Zhang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei-jie Zhang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Sheng Chang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lackner K, Ebner S, Watschinger K, Maglione M. Multiple Shades of Gray-Macrophages in Acute Allograft Rejection. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24098257. [PMID: 37175964 PMCID: PMC10179242 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24098257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Long-term results following solid organ transplantation do not mirror the excellent short-term results achieved in recent decades. It is therefore clear that current immunosuppressive maintenance protocols primarily addressing the adaptive immune system no longer meet the required clinical need. Identification of novel targets addressing this shortcoming is urgently needed. There is a growing interest in better understanding the role of the innate immune system in this context. In this review, we focus on macrophages, which are known to prominently infiltrate allografts and, during allograft rejection, to be involved in the surge of the adaptive immune response by expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and direct cytotoxicity. However, this active participation is janus-faced and unspecific targeting of macrophages may not consider the different subtypes involved. Under this premise, we give an overview on macrophages, including their origins, plasticity, and important markers. We then briefly describe their role in acute allograft rejection, which ranges from sustaining injury to promoting tolerance, as well as the impact of maintenance immunosuppressants on macrophages. Finally, we discuss the observed immunosuppressive role of the vitamin-like compound tetrahydrobiopterin and the recent findings that suggest the innate immune system, particularly macrophages, as its target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Lackner
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Susanne Ebner
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Katrin Watschinger
- Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Daniel Swarovski Research Laboratory, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Farshbafnadi M, Razi S, Rezaei N. Transplantation. Clin Immunol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818006-8.00008-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
8
|
The Value of Single-cell Technologies in Solid Organ Transplantation Studies. Transplantation 2022; 106:2325-2337. [PMID: 35876376 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Single-cell technologies open up new opportunities to explore the behavior of cells at the individual level. For solid organ transplantation, single-cell technologies can provide in-depth insights into the underlying mechanisms of the immunological processes involved in alloimmune responses after transplantation by investigating the role of individual cells in tolerance and rejection. Here, we review the value of single-cell technologies, including cytometry by time-of-flight and single-cell RNA sequencing, in the context of solid organ transplantation research. Various applications of single-cell technologies are addressed, such as the characterization and identification of immune cell subsets involved in rejection or tolerance. In addition, we explore the opportunities for analyzing specific alloreactive T- or B-cell clones by linking phenotype data to T- or B-cell receptor data, and for distinguishing donor- from recipient-derived immune cells. Moreover, we discuss the use of single-cell technologies in biomarker identification and risk stratification, as well as the remaining challenges. Together, this review highlights that single-cell approaches contribute to a better understanding of underlying immunological mechanisms of rejection and tolerance, thereby potentially accelerating the development of new or improved therapies to avoid allograft rejection.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang CA, Bhagchandani P, Poyser J, Velasco BJ, Zhao W, Kwon HS, Meyer E, Shizuru JA, Kim SK. Curative islet and hematopoietic cell transplantation in diabetic mice without toxic bone marrow conditioning. Cell Rep 2022; 41:111615. [PMID: 36351397 PMCID: PMC9922474 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Mixed hematopoietic chimerism can promote immune tolerance of donor-matched transplanted tissues, like pancreatic islets. However, adoption of this strategy is limited by the toxicity of standard treatments that enable donor hematopoietic cell engraftment. Here, we address these concerns with a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen that enables hematopoietic chimerism and allograft tolerance across fully mismatched major histocompatibility complex (MHC) barriers. Treatment with an αCD117 antibody, targeting c-Kit, administered with T cell-depleting antibodies and low-dose radiation permits durable multi-lineage chimerism in immunocompetent mice following hematopoietic cell transplant. In diabetic mice, co-transplantation of donor-matched islets and hematopoietic cells durably corrects diabetes without chronic immunosuppression and no appreciable evidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Donor-derived thymic antigen-presenting cells and host-derived peripheral regulatory T cells are likely mediators of allotolerance. These findings provide the foundation for safer bone marrow conditioning and cell transplantation regimens to establish hematopoietic chimerism and islet allograft tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles A Chang
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Preksha Bhagchandani
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jessica Poyser
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Brenda J Velasco
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Weichen Zhao
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Hye-Sook Kwon
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Everett Meyer
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Northern California JDRF Center of Excellence, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Judith A Shizuru
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Northern California JDRF Center of Excellence, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Seung K Kim
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Northern California JDRF Center of Excellence, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fitch ZW, Kang L, Li J, Knechtle SJ, Turek JW, Kirk AD, Markert ML, Kwun J. Introducing thymus for promoting transplantation tolerance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 150:549-556. [PMID: 35690492 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Establishing tolerance remains a central, if elusive, goal of transplantation. In solid-organ transplantation, one strategy for inducing tolerance has been cotransplantation of various forms of thymic tissue along with another organ. As one of the biological foundations of central tolerance, thymic tissue carries with it the ability to induce tolerance to any other organ or tissue from the same donor (or another donor tissue-matched to the thymic tissue) if successfully transplanted. In this review, we outline the history of this approach as well as work to date on its application in organ transplantation, concluding with future directions. We also review our experience with allogeneic processed thymus tissue for the treatment of congenital athymia, encompassing complete DiGeorge syndrome and other rare genetic disorders, and consider whether allogeneic processed thymic tissue implantation may offer a novel method for future experimentation with tolerance induction in organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary W Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Lillian Kang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | - Joseph W Turek
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Allan D Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - M Louise Markert
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Salminen A. Clinical perspectives on the age-related increase of immunosuppressive activity. J Mol Med (Berl) 2022; 100:697-712. [PMID: 35384505 PMCID: PMC8985067 DOI: 10.1007/s00109-022-02193-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The aging process is associated with a remodeling of the immune system involving chronic low-grade inflammation and a gradual decline in the function of the immune system. These processes are also called inflammaging and immunosenescence. The age-related immune remodeling is associated with many clinical changes, e.g., risk for cancers and chronic infections increases, whereas the efficiency of vaccination and immunotherapy declines with aging. On the other hand, there is convincing evidence that chronic inflammatory states promote the premature aging process. The inflammation associated with aging or chronic inflammatory conditions stimulates a counteracting immunosuppression which protects tissues from excessive inflammatory injuries but promotes immunosenescence. Immunosuppression is a driving force in tumors and chronic infections and it also induces the tolerance to vaccination and immunotherapies. Immunosuppressive cells, e.g., myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), regulatory T cells (Treg), and type M2 macrophages, have a crucial role in tumorigenesis and chronic infections as well as in the tolerance to vaccination and immunotherapies. Interestingly, there is substantial evidence that inflammaging is also associated with an increased immunosuppressive activity, e.g., upregulation of immunosuppressive cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Given that both the aging and chronic inflammatory states involve the activation of immunosuppression and immunosenescence, this might explain why aging is a risk factor for tumorigenesis and chronic inflammatory states and conversely, chronic inflammatory insults promote the premature aging process in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antero Salminen
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dubouchet L, Todorov H, Seurinck R, Vallet N, Van Gassen S, Corneau A, Blanc C, Zouali H, Boland A, Deleuze JF, Ingram B, de Latour RP, Saeys Y, Socié G, Michonneau D. Operational tolerance after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is characterized by distinct transcriptional, phenotypic, and metabolic signatures. Sci Transl Med 2022; 14:eabg3083. [PMID: 35196024 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg3083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying operational tolerance after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in humans are poorly understood. We studied two independent cohorts of patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings. Primary tolerance was associated with long-lasting reshaping of the recipients' immune system compared to their healthy donors with an increased proportion of regulatory T cell subsets and decreased T cell activation, proliferation, and migration. Transcriptomics profiles also identified a role for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide biosynthesis in the regulation of immune cell functions. We then compared individuals with operational tolerance and nontolerant recipients at the phenotypic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic level. We observed alterations centered on CD38+-activated T and B cells in nontolerant patients. In tolerant patients, cell subsets with regulatory functions were prominent. RNA sequencing analyses highlighted modifications in the tolerant patients' transcriptomic profiles, particularly with overexpression of the ectoenzyme NT5E (encoding CD73), which could counterbalance CD38 enzymatic functions by producing adenosine. Further, metabolomic analyses suggested a central role of androgens in establishing operational tolerance. These data were confirmed using an integrative approach to evaluating the immune landscape associated with operational tolerance. Thus, balance between a CD38-activated immune state and CD73-related production of adenosine may be a key regulator of operational tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helena Todorov
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ruth Seurinck
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Sofie Van Gassen
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Aurélien Corneau
- Plateforme de Cytométrie de la Pitié-Salpétrière (CyPS), UMS037-PASS, Sorbonne Université-Faculté de Médecine, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Catherine Blanc
- Plateforme de Cytométrie de la Pitié-Salpétrière (CyPS), UMS037-PASS, Sorbonne Université-Faculté de Médecine, F-75013 Paris, France
| | - Habib Zouali
- Centre d'étude du polymorphisme humain, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Anne Boland
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, 91057 Evry, France
| | - Jean-François Deleuze
- Centre d'étude du polymorphisme humain, 75010 Paris, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, 91057 Evry, France
| | | | - Regis Peffault de Latour
- Hematology Transplantation, Saint Louis Hospital, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Yvan Saeys
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gérard Socié
- Université de Paris, INSERM U976, F-75010 Paris, France.,Hematology Transplantation, Saint Louis Hospital, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - David Michonneau
- Université de Paris, INSERM U976, F-75010 Paris, France.,Hematology Transplantation, Saint Louis Hospital, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shimozawa K, Contreras-Ruiz L, Sousa S, Zhang R, Bhatia U, Crisalli KC, Brennan LL, Turka LA, Markmann JF, Guinan EC. Ex vivo generation of regulatory T cells from liver transplant recipients using costimulation blockade. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:504-518. [PMID: 34528383 PMCID: PMC9078620 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The potential of adoptive cell therapy with regulatory T cells (Tregs) to promote transplant tolerance is under active exploration. However, the impact of specific transplant settings and protocols on Treg manufacturing is not well-delineated. Here, we compared the use of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients before or after liver transplantation to the use of healthy control PBMCs to determine their suitability for Treg manufacture using ex vivo costimulatory blockade with belatacept. Despite liver failure or immunosuppressive therapy, the capacity for Treg expansion during the manufacturing process was preserved. These experiments did not identify performance or quality issues that disqualified the use of posttransplant PBMCs-the currently favored protocol design. However, as Treg input correlated with output, significant CD4-lymphopenia in both pre- and posttransplant patients limited Treg yield. We therefore turned to leukapheresis posttransplant to improve absolute yield. To make deceased donor use feasible, we also developed protocols to substitute splenocytes for PBMCs as allostimulators. In addition to demonstrating that this Treg expansion strategy works in a liver transplant context, this preclinical study illustrates how characterizing cellular input populations and their performance can both inform and respond to clinical trial design and Treg manufacturing requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuyoshi Shimozawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,Nihon University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Sofia Sousa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ruan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Urvashi Bhatia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kerry C Crisalli
- Department of Surgery and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Lisa L. Brennan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Laurence A. Turka
- Department of Surgery and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - James F. Markmann
- Department of Surgery and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA,Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
| | - Eva C. Guinan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fehr T, Hübel K, de Rougemont O, Abela I, Gaspert A, Güngör T, Hauri M, Helmchen B, Linsenmeier C, Müller T, Nilsson J, Riesterer O, Scandling JD, Schanz U, Cippà PE. Successful Induction of Specific Immunological Tolerance by Combined Kidney and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in HLA-Identical Siblings. Front Immunol 2022; 13:796456. [PMID: 35173720 PMCID: PMC8841472 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.796456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Induction of immunological tolerance has been the holy grail of transplantation immunology for decades. The only successful approach to achieve it in patients has been a combined kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an HLA-matched or -mismatched living donor. Here, we report the first three patients in Europe included in a clinical trial aiming at the induction of tolerance by mixed lymphohematopoietic chimerism after kidney transplantation. Two female and one male patient were transplanted with a kidney and peripherally mobilized hematopoietic stem cells from their HLA-identical sibling donor. The protocol followed previous studies at Stanford University: kidney transplantation was performed on day 0 including induction with anti-thymocyte globulin followed by conditioning with 10x 1.2 Gy total lymphoid irradiation and the transfusion of CD34+ cells together with a body weight-adjusted dose of donor T cells on day 11. Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine A and steroids for 10 days, cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil for 1 month, and then cyclosporine A monotherapy with tapering over 9–20 months. The 3 patients have been off immunosuppression for 4 years, 19 months and 8 months, respectively. No rejection or graft-versus-host disease occurred. Hematological donor chimerism was stable in the first, but slowly declining in the other two patients. A molecular microscope analysis in patient 2 revealed the genetic profile of a normal kidney. No relevant infections were observed, and the quality of life in all three patients is excellent. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, all three patients were vaccinated with the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®), and they showed excellent humoral and in 2 out 3 patients also cellular SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity. Thus, combined kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a feasible and successful approach to induce specific immunological tolerance in the setting of HLA-matched sibling living kidney donation while maintaining immune responsiveness to an mRNA vaccine (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00365846).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Fehr
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Thomas Fehr,
| | - Kerstin Hübel
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivier de Rougemont
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irene Abela
- Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ariana Gaspert
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tayfun Güngör
- Division of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Children’s Hospital Zurich – Eleonore Foundation & Children`s Research Center (CRC), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mathias Hauri
- Division of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Children’s Hospital Zurich – Eleonore Foundation & Children`s Research Center (CRC), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Helmchen
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Linsenmeier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Müller
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Nilsson
- Laboratory for Transplantation Immunology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Riesterer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - John D. Scandling
- Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Urs Schanz
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pietro E. Cippà
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Nephrology, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rickert CG, Markmann JF. Transplantation in the Age of Precision Medicine: The Emerging Field of Treg Therapy. Semin Nephrol 2022; 42:76-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
16
|
Hann A, Oo YH, Perera MTPR. Regulatory T-Cell Therapy in Liver Transplantation and Chronic Liver Disease. Front Immunol 2021; 12:719954. [PMID: 34721383 PMCID: PMC8552037 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.719954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The constant exposure of the liver to gut derived foreign antigens has resulted in this organ attaining unique immunological characteristics, however it remains susceptible to immune mediated injury. Our understanding of this type of injury, in both the native and transplanted liver, has improved significantly in recent decades. This includes a greater awareness of the tolerance inducing CD4+ CD25+ CD127low T-cell lineage with the transcription factor FoxP3, known as regulatory T-Cells (Tregs). These cells comprise 5-10% of CD4+ T cells and are known to function as an immunological "braking" mechanism, thereby preventing immune mediated tissue damage. Therapies that aim to increase Treg frequency and function have proved beneficial in the setting of both autoimmune diseases and solid organ transplantations. The safety and efficacy of Treg therapy in liver disease is an area of intense research at present and has huge potential. Due to these cells possessing significant plasticity, and the potential for conversion towards a T-helper 1 (Th1) and 17 (Th17) subsets in the hepatic microenvironment, it is pre-requisite to modify the microenvironment to a Treg favourable atmosphere to maintain these cells' function. In addition, implementation of therapies that effectively increase Treg functional activity in the liver may result in the suppression of immune responses and will hinder those that destroy tumour cells. Thus, fine adjustment is crucial to achieve this immunological balance. This review will describe the hepatic microenvironment with relevance to Treg function, and the role these cells have in both native diseased and transplanted livers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angus Hann
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ye H Oo
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Rare Disease (ERN-Rare Liver Centre), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - M Thamara P R Perera
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhou L, Li H, Zhang XX, Zhao Y, Wang J, Pan LC, Du GS, He Q, Li XL. Rapamycin treated tol-dendritic cells derived from BM-MSCs reversed graft rejection in a rat liver transplantation model by inducing CD8 +CD45RC -Treg. Mol Immunol 2021; 137:11-19. [PMID: 34182227 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence of tolerance dendritic cells (tolDCs), generated from Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) treated with rapamycin (Rapa) on liver allograft survival in a rat acute liver transplantation model. METHODS Different GM-CSF induction project was used to obtain immature DCs (imDCs), mature DCs (matDCs) or tolDCs from BM-MSCs. First, MLR was performed to analyze the activity of tolDCs on polyclonaly stimulated total T cells. Then, co-cultured imDCs, matDCs and tolDCs with CD8+T cells isolated by magnetic activated cell sorting to analyze the influence on its regulatory characteristic. Last, the established rat acute liver transplantation model were adoptive transfused with imDCs, matDCs or tolDCs isolated by anti-CD11c immunomagnetic beads. The phenotype of DC cells and level of CD8+Treg in the culture system and in vivo, the expression of CD8 and CD45RC in the tissues were analyzed by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, respectively. RESULTS The loGM-CSF plus IL-4 decreased the costimulatory molecules of CD80/86 and MHC class II of DCs comparison with hiGM-CSF from BM-MSCs no matter whether stimulation by LPS (P<0.05). Rapa treated not only reduced the expression of CD80/86 and MHC class II but also down-regulated the expression of CD11c after LPS stimulation which was more obviously in tolDCs by loGM-CSF project (P<0.05). Moreover, tolDCs displayed a rather higher level of IL-10 and low level of IL-12p70 than others (P<0.01), which shown a rather lower stimulative effect on the proliferation of T cells comparison with matDCs and imDCs. Co-cultured with CD8+Treg showed an improvement on induction of CD8+TCR+CD45RC-T cells (CD8+Treg) in ex vivo. The rats transfused with tolDCs has a delayed survival benefits with high level of CD8+Tregs (P<0.01) and high expression of CD45RC in liver tissue (P<0.01) and spleen when comparison with other groups. The infused tolDCs improved a mean survival time (MST) of 32 days comparison with a MTS of 9.5 days and 15.75 days displayed by rat that per-infused with matDCs and imDCs, respectively. CONCLUSION Rapa modified tolDCs derived from BM-MSCs reversed graft rejection by improve tolerance characteristics of CD8+CD45RC-Treg in acute liver rat transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Han Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Xin-Xue Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Yang Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Li-Chao Pan
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Guo-Sheng Du
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Qiang He
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
| | - Xian-Liang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Baker KF, Sim JPX, Isaacs JD. Biomarkers of tolerance in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a new era in clinical management? THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2021; 3:e371-e382. [PMID: 38279392 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00069-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Modern therapeutic agents and treatment regimens have made sustained remission an attainable target for many patients across a spectrum of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, albeit at the risk of adverse events and the expense of drug prescription and safety monitoring. Clinicians and patients are thus increasingly faced with a novel treatment dilemma: whether and how best to stop immunomodulatory treatment in patients who achieve remission. In this final paper in a Series on therapeutic tolerance induction, we summarise our current knowledge of biomarkers of immune homeostasis in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and their application to the prediction and attainment of sustained drug-free remission. We summarise evidence from prospective studies of immunomodulatory drug cessation across a range of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease. We also consider current evidence for clinical, serological, proteomic, metabolomic, cellular, and microbiomic biomarkers of immune homeostasis. Finally, we discuss the steps necessary for clinical translation of these biomarkers, as well as the potential transformative effect of these biomarkers on management of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases if clinical translation is successfully achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth F Baker
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jasmine P X Sim
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John D Isaacs
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cwykiel J, Madajka-Niemeyer M, Siemionow M. Development of Donor Recipient Chimeric Cells of bone marrow origin as a novel approach for tolerance induction in transplantation. Stem Cell Investig 2021; 8:8. [PMID: 33969113 DOI: 10.21037/sci-2020-044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Cell therapies and chimerism-based strategies are currently the most successful approach for tolerance induction in transplantation. This study aimed to establish and characterize novel Donor Recipient Chimeric Ccell (DRCC) therapy of bone marrow (BM) origin presenting donor-recipient phenotype to support tolerance induction. Methods Ex vivo fusions of fully MHC-mismatched BM cells from ACI (RT1a) and Lewis (RT1l) rats were performed using polyethylene-glycol (PEG). The creation of rat DRCC was tested by flow cytometry (FC), confocal microscopy and PCR. FC characterized DRCC's phenotype (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45, CD90, CD11b/c, CD45RA, OX-82, or CD4/CD25) and apoptosis, while mixed lymphocyte reaction assessed DRCC's immunogenicity and colony forming unit assay tested DRCC's differentiation and proliferation. DRCC's polyploidy was evaluated using Hoechst33342 staining and COMET assay tested genotoxicity of fusion procedure. ELISA analyzed the secretion of IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, TGFß1, IFNγ and TNFα by DRCC at day 1, 5 and 14 post-fusion. The DRCC's phenotype after long-term culturing was assessed by reverse-transcription PCR. Results The chimeric state of DRCC was confirmed. Fusion did not change the expression of hematopoietic markers compared to BM controls. Although an increased number of early and late apoptotic (Annexin V+/Sytox blue- and Annexin V+/Sytox blue+, respectively) DRCC was detected at 24h post-fusion, the number significantly decreased at day 5 (38.4%±3.1% and 22.6%±2.5%, vs. 28.3%±2.5% and 13.9%±2.6%, respectively, P<0.05). DRCC presented decreased immunogenicity, increased expression of IL-10 and TGFβ1 and proliferative potential comparable to BM controls. The average percentage of tetraploid DRCC was 3.1%±0.2% compared to 0.96%±0.1% in BM controls. The lack of damage to the DRCC's DNA content supported the DRCC's safety. In culture, DRCC maintained proliferation for up to 28 days while preserving hematopoietic profile. Conclusions This study confirmed feasibility of DRCC creation via ex vivo PEG mediated fusion. The created DRCC revealed pro-tolerogenic properties indicating potential immunomodulatory effect of DRCC therapy when applied in vivo to support tolerance induction in solid organ and vascularized composite allograft transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Cwykiel
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Maria Siemionow
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Marfil-Garza BA, Hefler J, Bermudez De Leon M, Pawlick R, Dadheech N, Shapiro AMJ. Progress in Translational Regulatory T Cell Therapies for Type 1 Diabetes and Islet Transplantation. Endocr Rev 2021; 42:198-218. [PMID: 33247733 DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have become highly relevant in the pathophysiology and treatment of autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes (T1D). As these cells are known to be defective in T1D, recent efforts have explored ex vivo and in vivo Treg expansion and enhancement as a means for restoring self-tolerance in this disease. Given their capacity to also modulate alloimmune responses, studies using Treg-based therapies have recently been undertaken in transplantation. Islet transplantation provides a unique opportunity to study the critical immunological crossroads between auto- and alloimmunity. This procedure has advanced greatly in recent years, and reports of complete abrogation of severe hypoglycemia and long-term insulin independence have become increasingly reported. It is clear that cellular transplantation has the potential to be a true cure in T1D, provided the remaining barriers of cell supply and abrogated need for immune suppression can be overcome. However, the role that Tregs play in islet transplantation remains to be defined. Herein, we synthesize the progress and current state of Treg-based therapies in T1D and islet transplantation. We provide an extensive, but concise, background to understand the physiology and function of these cells and discuss the clinical evidence supporting potency and potential Treg-based therapies in the context of T1D and islet transplantation. Finally, we discuss some areas of opportunity and potential research avenues to guide effective future clinical application. This review provides a basic framework of knowledge for clinicians and researchers involved in the care of patients with T1D and islet transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua Hefler
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Mario Bermudez De Leon
- Department of Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigación Biomédica del Noreste, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Rena Pawlick
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - A M James Shapiro
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.,Clinical Islet Transplant Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Induction of Allograft Tolerance While Maintaining Immunity Against Microbial Pathogens: Does Coronin 1 Hold a Key? Transplantation 2020; 104:1350-1357. [PMID: 31895336 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Selective suppression of graft rejection while maintaining anti-pathogen responses has been elusive. Thus far, the most successful strategies to induce suppression of graft rejection relies on inhibition of T-cell activation. However, the very same mechanisms that induce allograft-specific T-cell suppression are also important for immunity against microbial pathogens as well as oncogenically transformed cells, resulting in significant immunosuppression-associated comorbidities. Therefore, defining the pathways that differentially regulate anti-graft versus antimicrobial T-cell responses may allow the development of regimen to induce allograft-specific tolerance. Recent work has defined a molecular pathway driven by the immunoregulatory protein coronin 1 that regulates the phosphodiesterase/cyclic adenosine monophosphate pathway and modulates T cell responses. Interestingly, disruption of coronin 1 promotes allograft tolerance while immunity towards a range of pathogenic microbes is maintained. Here, we briefly review the work leading up to these findings as well as their possible implications for transplantation medicine.
Collapse
|
22
|
Maluf DG, Leventhal JR, Mas VR. Achieving Solid Organ Transplant Tolerance: New Findings, More Questions and the Search Continues. Transplantation 2020; 104:1531-1532. [PMID: 32732825 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Maluf
- Research Transplant Institute, James D Eason Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Valeria R Mas
- Research Transplant Institute, James D Eason Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sawitzki B, Harden PN, Reinke P, Moreau A, Hutchinson JA, Game DS, Tang Q, Guinan EC, Battaglia M, Burlingham WJ, Roberts ISD, Streitz M, Josien R, Böger CA, Scottà C, Markmann JF, Hester JL, Juerchott K, Braudeau C, James B, Contreras-Ruiz L, van der Net JB, Bergler T, Caldara R, Petchey W, Edinger M, Dupas N, Kapinsky M, Mutzbauer I, Otto NM, Öllinger R, Hernandez-Fuentes MP, Issa F, Ahrens N, Meyenberg C, Karitzky S, Kunzendorf U, Knechtle SJ, Grinyó J, Morris PJ, Brent L, Bushell A, Turka LA, Bluestone JA, Lechler RI, Schlitt HJ, Cuturi MC, Schlickeiser S, Friend PJ, Miloud T, Scheffold A, Secchi A, Crisalli K, Kang SM, Hilton R, Banas B, Blancho G, Volk HD, Lombardi G, Wood KJ, Geissler EK. Regulatory cell therapy in kidney transplantation (The ONE Study): a harmonised design and analysis of seven non-randomised, single-arm, phase 1/2A trials. Lancet 2020; 395:1627-1639. [PMID: 32446407 PMCID: PMC7613154 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30167-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of cell-based medicinal products (CBMPs) represents a state-of-the-art approach for reducing general immunosuppression in organ transplantation. We tested multiple regulatory CBMPs in kidney transplant trials to establish the safety of regulatory CBMPs when combined with reduced immunosuppressive treatment. METHODS The ONE Study consisted of seven investigator-led, single-arm trials done internationally at eight hospitals in France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA (60 week follow-up). Included patients were living-donor kidney transplant recipients aged 18 years and older. The reference group trial (RGT) was a standard-of-care group given basiliximab, tapered steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. Six non-randomised phase 1/2A cell therapy group (CTG) trials were pooled and analysed, in which patients received one of six CBMPs containing regulatory T cells, dendritic cells, or macrophages; patient selection and immunosuppression mirrored the RGT, except basiliximab induction was substituted with CBMPs and mycophenolate mofetil tapering was allowed. None of the trials were randomised and none of the individuals involved were masked. The primary endpoint was biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) within 60 weeks after transplantation; adverse event coding was centralised. The RTG and CTG trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01656135, NCT02252055, NCT02085629, NCT02244801, NCT02371434, NCT02129881, and NCT02091232. FINDINGS The seven trials took place between Dec 11, 2012, and Nov 14, 2018. Of 782 patients assessed for eligibility, 130 (17%) patients were enrolled and 104 were treated and included in the analysis. The 66 patients who were treated in the RGT were 73% male and had a median age of 47 years. The 38 patients who were treated across six CTG trials were 71% male and had a median age of 45 years. Standard-of-care immunosuppression in the recipients in the RGT resulted in a 12% BCAR rate (expected range 3·2-18·0). The overall BCAR rate for the six parallel CTG trials was 16%. 15 (40%) patients given CBMPs were successfully weaned from mycophenolate mofetil and maintained on tacrolimus monotherapy. Combined adverse event data and BCAR episodes from all six CTG trials revealed no safety concerns when compared with the RGT. Fewer episodes of infections were registered in CTG trials versus the RGT. INTERPRETATION Regulatory cell therapy is achievable and safe in living-donor kidney transplant recipients, and is associated with fewer infectious complications, but similar rejection rates in the first year. Therefore, immune cell therapy is a potentially useful therapeutic approach in recipients of kidney transplant to minimise the burden of general immunosuppression. FUNDING The 7th EU Framework Programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Sawitzki
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul N Harden
- Oxford Transplantation Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Petra Reinke
- BeCAT, BCRT, and Department of Nephrology & Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aurélie Moreau
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France
| | - James A Hutchinson
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - David S Game
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Qizhi Tang
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eva C Guinan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Manuela Battaglia
- Diabetes Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - William J Burlingham
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ian S D Roberts
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Mathias Streitz
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Régis Josien
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France; Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Cimna, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nantes, France
| | - Carsten A Böger
- Department of Nephrology, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Cristiano Scottà
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James F Markmann
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Mass General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joanna L Hester
- Transplantation Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karsten Juerchott
- BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cecile Braudeau
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France; Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Cimna, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nantes, France
| | - Ben James
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Division of Personalized Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Medicine and Toxicology, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Jeroen B van der Net
- Oxford Transplantation Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tobias Bergler
- Department of Nephrology, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Rossana Caldara
- Transplant Medicine, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - William Petchey
- Oxford Transplantation Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthias Edinger
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Regensburg Center for Interventional Immunology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Dupas
- Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Immunotech, Marseille, France
| | | | - Ingrid Mutzbauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Division of Personalized Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Medicine and Toxicology, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Natalie M Otto
- BeCAT, BCRT, and Department of Nephrology & Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Charité Campus Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria P Hernandez-Fuentes
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fadi Issa
- Transplantation Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Norbert Ahrens
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Transfusion Medicine, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Ulrich Kunzendorf
- Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Christian Albrechts University, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Josep Grinyó
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter J Morris
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Leslie Brent
- St Mary's Hospital Transplant Unit, Paddington, London, UK
| | - Andrew Bushell
- Transplantation Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Laurence A Turka
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Mass General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Bluestone
- UCSF Diabetes Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert I Lechler
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maria C Cuturi
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France
| | - Stephan Schlickeiser
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter J Friend
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tewfik Miloud
- Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Immunotech, Marseille, France
| | - Alexander Scheffold
- Institute for Immunology, Christian Albrechts University, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Antonio Secchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Milan, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Kerry Crisalli
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Mass General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sang-Mo Kang
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rachel Hilton
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Department of Nephrology, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Gilles Blancho
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France
| | - Hans-Dieter Volk
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giovanna Lombardi
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kathryn J Wood
- Transplantation Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Edward K Geissler
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Division of Personalized Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Medicine and Toxicology, Regensburg, Germany; Regensburg Center for Interventional Immunology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lei H, Reinke P, Volk HD, Lv Y, Wu R. Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance in Liver Transplantation-Crosstalk Between Alloreactive T Cells and Liver Cells With Therapeutic Prospects. Front Immunol 2019; 10:2667. [PMID: 31803188 PMCID: PMC6877506 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LTx) is currently the most powerful treatment for end-stage liver disease. Although liver allograft is more tolerogenic compared to other solid organs, the majority of LTx recipients still require long-term immune suppression (IS) to control the undesired alloimmune responses, which can lead to severe side effects. Thus, understanding the mechanism of liver transplant tolerance and crosstalk between immune cells, especially alloreactive T cells and liver cells, can shed light on more specific tolerance induction strategies for future clinical translation. In this review, we focus on alloreactive T cell mediated immune responses and their crosstalk with liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), hepatocytes, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and cholangiocytes in transplant setting. Liver cells mainly serve as antigen presenting cells (APCs) to T cells, but with low expression of co-stimulatory molecules. Crosstalk between them largely depends on the different expression of adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors. Inflammatory cytokines secreted by immune cells further elaborate this crosstalk and regulate the fate of naïve T cells differentiation within the liver graft. On the other hand, regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an essential role in inducing and keeping immune tolerance in LTx. Tregs based adoptive cell therapy provides an excellent therapeutic option for clinical transplant tolerance induction. However, many questions regarding cell therapy still need to be solved. Here we also address the current clinical trials of adoptive Tregs therapy and other tolerance induction strategies in LTx, together with future challenges for clinical translation from bench to bedside.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Lei
- National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Reinke
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Center of Advanced Therapies, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans-Dieter Volk
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yi Lv
- National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Rongqian Wu
- National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|