Uterus transplantation - donor and recipient work-up

Uterine Transplantation and Fertility Preservation: A Hopeful Horizon for Cancer Survivors

Uterine transplantation, a groundbreaking medical intervention, stands as a beacon of hope for cancer survivors grappling with the dual challenges of a cancer diagnosis and potential fertility loss due to aggressive treatments. This review provides a comprehensive exploration of uterine transplantation as an innovative solution for fertility preservation in the context of cancer survivorship. The multifaceted discussion encompasses the impact of cancer on fertility, the imperative of fertility preservation, and the evolution of uterine transplantation as a transformative procedure. The post-transplantation care section delves into the intricacies of recovery, the delicate balance of immunosuppressive therapy, and the ongoing support required for recipients to embrace the full spectrum of reproductive possibilities and overall well-being. Ethical considerations surrounding uterine transplantation, including donor selection, risk assessment, and societal perspectives, are critically examined to navigate the ethical landscape of this evolving field. In conclusion, uterine transplantation is presented as a medical breakthrough and a symbol of interdisciplinary collaboration, resilience, and unwavering hope. The review underscores the role of collaborative efforts among medical professionals, researchers, ethicists, and psychologists in advancing this transformative field. Looking to the future, uterine transplantation signifies a paradigm shift in fertility preservation, offering a tangible path toward parenthood for cancer survivors. The procedure, grounded in science, ethics, and compassion, illuminates the way forward, inspiring a future where fertility preservation becomes an attainable reality for those whose reproductive dreams were once compromised by cancer treatments.

Imaging of Uterine Transplantation

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is a novel procedure being studied as a treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility. Imaging plays an important role throughout the life cycle of a uterus transplant. In this review, we will first describe the surgical technique of UTx. The article will then focus on the importance of imaging in the evaluation of potential recipients and donors and during the immediate post-surgical time course as graft viability is established. Imaging as part of including in vitro fertilization, pregnancy, and complications will also be discussed.

Who should provide the uterus? The ethics of live donor recruitment for uterus transplantation

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is an experimental surgery likely to face the issue of organ shortage. In my article, I explore how this issue might be addressed by changing the prevailing practices around live uterus donor recruitment. Currently, women with children - often the mothers of recipients - tend to be overrepresented as donors. Yet, other potentially eligible groups who may have an interest in providing their uterus - such as transgender men, or cisgender women who do not wish to gestate or to have children - tend to be excluded as potential donors. Moving forward, I recommend that donor inclusion criteria for UTx be broadened to be more inclusive of these latter groups.

A multi-institutional study of renal outcomes and renal-related pregnancy outcomes in uterus transplant recipients

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is an effective treatment option for uterine factor infertility. However, the need for immunosuppression and congenital renal anomalies that coexist with uterine agenesis in about 30% of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome create a risk for renal dysfunction. We therefore examined renal function trajectory and related pregnancy complications in an international cohort of 18 UTx recipients from September 2016-February 2020 who had at least one live birth. All UTx recipients had a diminution in their renal function that was apparent starting at 30 days posttransplant and in half the reduction in eGFR was at least 20%; the decrease in eGFR persisted into the early post-partum period. Half met criteria for Stage 1 acute kidney injury (AKI) as defined by the AKI Network criteria during their pregnancy. Overall, 28% of UTx recipients developed pre-eclampsia. eGFR was lower at embryo transfer and throughout pregnancy among those who developed pre-eclampsia, reaching statistical significance at week 16 of pregnancy. This effect was independent of tacrolimus levels. Mean eGFR remained significantly lower in the first 1-3 months after delivery. In the subgroup who reached 12 months of postpartum follow up and had a graft hysterectomy (n = 4), there was no longer a statistical difference in eGFR (pretransplant 106.7 ml/m ± 17.7 vs. 12 mos postpartum 92.6 ml/m ± 21.7, p = .13) but the number was small. Further study is required to delineate long term renal risks for UTx recipients, improve patient selection, and make decisions regarding a second pregnancy.

Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement

Uterus transplantation is a surgical treatment for women with congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility. While uterus transplantation is a life-enhancing transplant that is commonly categorized as a vascular composite allograft (e.g., face or hand), it is similar to many solid organ transplants (e.g., kidney) in that both living donors (LDs) and deceased donors (DDs) can be utilized for organ procurement. While many endpoints appear to be similar for LD and DD transplants (including graft survival, time to menses, livebirth rates), there are key medical, technical, ethical, and logistical differences between these modalities. Primary considerations in favor of a LD model include thorough screening of donors, enhanced logistics, and greater donor availability. The primary consideration in favor of a DD model is the lack of physical or psychological harm to a living donor. Other important factors, that may not clearly favor one approach over the other, are important to include in discussions of LD vs. DD models. We favor a stepwise approach to uterus transplantation, one in which programs first begin with DD procurement before attempting LD procurement to maximize successful organ recovery and to minimize potential harms to a living donor.