Advances in immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation

The Nephrologist's Role in the Collaborative Multi-Specialist Network Taking Care of Patients with Diabetes on Maintenance Hemodialysis: An Overview

Diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of renal failure in incident dialysis patients in several countries around the world. The quality of life for patients with diabetes in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) treatment is in general poor due to disease complications. Nephrologists have to cope with all these problems because of the “total care model” and strive to improve their patients’ outcome. In this review, an updated overview of the aspects the nephrologist must face in the management of these patients is reported. The conventional marker of glycemic control, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), is unreliable. HD itself may be responsible for dangerous hypoglycemic events. New methods of glucose control could be used even during dialysis, such as a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. The pharmacological control of diabetes is another complex topic. Because of the risk of hypoglycemia, insulin and other medications used to treat diabetes may need dose adjustment. The new class of antidiabetic drugs dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors can safely be used in non-insulin-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Nephrologists should take care to improve the hemodynamic tolerance to HD treatment, frequently compromised by the high level of ultrafiltration needed to counter high interdialytic weight gain. Kidney and pancreas transplantation, in selected patients with diabetes, is the best therapy and is the only approach able to free patients from both dialysis and insulin therapy.

Single center results of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in patients with type 2 diabetes

Studies have found similar outcomes of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney transplantation (SPKT) in patients with Type 2 (T2D) and Type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, there are scarce data evaluating the association of recipient factors such as age, BMI, or pretransplant insulin requirements with outcomes, thus the criteria for the optimal recipient selection remains unclear. In this study, 284 T1D and 39 T2D patients, who underwent SPKT between 2006 and 2017 with 1 year of follow-up at minimum, were assessed for potential relationship of pretransplant BMI and insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes and pancreatic graft failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar rates of freedom from posttransplant diabetes (94.7% T2D vs. 92.3% T1D at 1 yr, and 88.1% T2D vs. 81.1% T1D at 5 yrs) and graft survival (89.7% T2D vs. 90.4% T1D at 1 yr, and 89.7% T2D vs. 81.2% T1D at 5 yrs). There was no significant association between BMI or pretransplant insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes occurrence in either T1D (p = .10, .43, respectively) or T2D (p = .12, .63) patients in the cohort; or with graft failure (T1D: p = .40, .09; T2D: p = .71, .28). These observations suggest a less restricted approach to selective use of SPKT in patients with T2D.

Single center results of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in patients with type 2 diabetes

Studies have found similar outcomes of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney transplantation (SPKT) in patients with Type 2 (T2D) and Type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, there are scarce data evaluating the association of recipient factors such as age, BMI, or pretransplant insulin requirements with outcomes, thus the criteria for the optimal recipient selection remains unclear. In this study, 284 T1D and 39 T2D patients, who underwent SPKT between 2006 and 2017 with 1 year of follow-up at minimum, were assessed for potential relationship of pretransplant BMI and insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes and pancreatic graft failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar rates of freedom from posttransplant diabetes (94.7% T2D vs. 92.3% T1D at 1 yr, and 88.1% T2D vs. 81.1% T1D at 5 yrs) and graft survival (89.7% T2D vs. 90.4% T1D at 1 yr, and 89.7% T2D vs. 81.2% T1D at 5 yrs). There was no significant association between BMI or pretransplant insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes occurrence in either T1D (p = .10, .43, respectively) or T2D (p = .12, .63) patients in the cohort; or with graft failure (T1D: p = .40, .09; T2D: p = .71, .28). These observations suggest a less restricted approach to selective use of SPKT in patients with T2D.

Current outcomes in islet versus solid organ pancreas transplant for β-cell replacement in type 1 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With continued optimization of islet isolation and immunosuppression protocols, the medium-term rates of insulin independence following islet transplantation have improved significantly. This review evaluates the most up-to-date outcomes data for both solid organ pancreas and islet transplantation to develop an algorithm for selection of β-cell replacement in type 1 diabetes patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Solid organ pancreas and islet transplantation have both displayed improved rates of 5-year insulin independence, largely attributable to improvements in immunosuppressive regimens. The medium-term rates of insulin independence following islet transplantation in highly selected type 1 nonuremic diabetic recipients is beginning to approach the success rates observed following solitary pancreas transplantation.

SUMMARY

Although pancreas transplantation has historically been favored for β-cell replacement, current outcomes following islet transplantation justify the use of this minimally invasive therapy in carefully selected patients. Pancreas transplant remains the procedure of choice for β-cell replacement in uremic patients. Islet transplantation should be considered in nonuremic patients with low BMI and low insulin requirements, patients lacking the cardiovascular reserve to undergo open abdominal surgery, or patients who elect to forego the risks of a major operation in exchange for an increased risk of islet graft failure.

A Comparative Analysis of the Safety, Efficacy, and Cost of Islet Versus Pancreas Transplantation in Nonuremic Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Few current studies compare the outcomes of islet transplantation alone (ITA) and pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) for type 1 diabetes (T1D). We examined these two beta cell replacement therapies in nonuremic patients with T1D with respect to safety, graft function and cost. Sequential patients received PTA (n = 15) or ITA (n = 10) at our institution. Assessments of graft function included duration of insulin independence; glycemic control, as measured by hemoglobin A1c; and elimination of severe hypoglycemia. Cost analysis included all normalized costs associated with transplantation and inpatient management. ITA patients received one (n = 6) or two (n = 4) islet transplants. Mean duration of insulin independence in this group was 35 mo; 90% were independent at 1 year, and 70% were independent at 3 years. Mean duration of insulin independence in PTA was 55 mo; 93% were insulin independent at 1 year, and 64% were independent at 3 years. Glycemic control was comparable in all patients with functioning grafts, as were overall costs ($138 872 for ITA, $134 748 for PTA). We conclude that with advances in islet isolation and posttransplant management, ITA can produce outcomes similar to PTA and represents a clinically viable option to achieve long-term insulin independence in selected patients with T1D.

Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective

A review of recent literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with respect to immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation (PTX). In the past decade, the majority of PTXs were performed with depleting antibody induction, particularly in the setting of either calcineurin inhibitor minimization, corticosteroid withdrawal or both. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of predominantly tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolatemofetil, TAC/mycophenolic acid or TAC/sirolimus with or without corticosteroids. Depending on PTX category, donor and recipient risk factors, case mix and immunosuppressive regimen, the 1-year incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 5-20%. Current 1-year rates of immunological pancreas graft loss range between 1.8 and 6%. Depleting antibody induction and either TAC/mycophenolatemofetil or TAC/sirolimus maintenance therapy with early steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of immunosuppression in PTX. However, the development of non-nephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimens is highly desirable to improve quality of life in all solid organ transplant recipients.

Tacrolimus inhibits the revascularization of isolated pancreatic islets

AIMS

Immunosuppressive drugs could be crucial factors for a poor outcome after islet allotransplantation. Unlike rapamycin, the effects of tacrolimus, the current standard immunosuppressant used in islet transplantation, on graft revascularization remain unclear. We examined the effects of tacrolimus on islet revascularization using a highly sensitive imaging system, and analyzed the gene expression in transplanted islets by introducing laser microdissection techniques.

METHODS

Islets isolated from C57BL/6-Tg (CAG-EGFP) mice were transplanted into the nonmetallic dorsal skinfold chamber on the recipients. Balb/c athymic mice were used as recipients and were divided into two groups: including a control group (n = 9) and tacrolimus-treated group (n = 7). The changes in the newly-formed vessels surrounding the islet grafts were imaged and semi-quantified using multi-photon laser-scanning microscopy and a Volocity system. Gene expression in transplanted islets was analyzed by the BioMark dynamic system.

RESULTS

The revascularization process was completed within 14 days after pancreatic islet transplantation at subcutaneous sites. The newly-formed vascular volume surrounding the transplanted islets in the tacrolimus-treated group was significantly less than that in the control group (p<0.05). Although the expression of Vegfa (p<0.05) and Ccnd1 (p<0.05) was significantly upregulated in the tacrolimus-treated group compared with that of the control group, no differences were observed between the groups in terms of other types of gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that tacrolimus inhibits the revascularization of isolated pancreatic islets without affecting the characteristics of the transplanted grafts. Further refinements of this immunosuppressive regimen, especially regarding the revascularization of islet grafts, could improve the outcome of islet allotransplantation.

Trends in immunosuppression after pancreas transplantation: what is in the pipeline?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of currently available immunosuppressive strategies and novel therapeutic developments in pancreas transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

From 1966 through 2012 more than 30 000 pancreas transplantations have been performed around the world with excellent patient and graft survival. However, drug-related side effects and toxicities remain to negatively affect long-term outcomes. At present, more than 90% of pancreas transplant recipients receive induction therapy with depleting or nondepleting antibodies. The most widely used maintenance protocols are based on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with early or delayed corticosteroid withdrawal. In case of documented side effects related to this standard protocol, several regimens are actively pursued to switch to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors as well as to attempt initial calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and immunosuppression minimization. In addition, the recent documented negative impact of donor-specific antibodies on pancreas transplantation outcome has resulted in new treatment protocols for antibody-mediated rejection including intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-CD20 antibodies and protease inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Implementation of novel therapeutic strategies and combination protocols to reduce or avoid drug toxicities and immune-related complications that are evaluated in prospective and randomized trials is requested to improve outcomes after pancreas transplantation.

Transplantation of the pancreas

Pancreas transplantation consistently induces insulin-independence in beta-cell-penic diabetic patients, but at the cost of major surgery and life-long immunosuppression. One year after grafting, patient survival rate now exceeds 95 % across recipient categories, while insulin independence is maintained in some 85 % of simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients and in nearly 80 % of solitary pancreas transplant recipients. The half-life of the pancreas graft currently averages 16.7 years, being the longest among extrarenal grafts, and substantially matching the one of renal grafts from deceased donors. The difference between expected (100 %) and actual insulin-independence rate is mostly explained by technical failure in the postoperative phase, and rejection in the long-term period. Death with a functioning graft remains a further major issue, especially in uremic patients who have undergone prolonged periods of dialysis. Refinements in graft preservation, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and prophylactic treatments are expected to further improve the results of pancreas transplantation.

[Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in pancreatic transplantation]

Pancreatic transplantation carries a higher risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection than renal transplantation alone. The management of CMV disease in pancreatic transplantation depends on the risk indicated by the donor's and recipient's serological profiles (CMV IgG) and the use of antibodies as immunosuppressive therapy (especially thymoglobulin). Most clinical guidelines recommend the use of prophylaxis in preference to preemptive therapy in both donor (D)+/recipient (R)- and D+/R+ pancreatic transplantations. In combinations with highest risk (D+/R-), prophylaxis with valganciclovir 900mg per day for 3 to 6 months is recommended, adjusted to renal funtion. In D+/R+ combinations, if antibody therapy was used in the transplant or in rejection, valgancioclovir prophylaxis is also recommended for 1 to 3 months. When prophylaxis is finished, in both cases, viral load determination (quantitative polymerase chain reaction of CMV) or antigenemia should be carried out for the first year. In D-/R-combinations, preemptive therapy can be considered with determinations of viral load or antigenemia at each follow-up visit during the first year. Once prophylaxis has been suspended, special attention should be paid to the development of delayed CMV disease.

Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetics using an immunosuppressive protocol based on the anti-LFA-1 antibody efalizumab

The applicability of islet transplantation as treatment for type 1 diabetes is limited by renal and islet toxicities of currently available immunosuppressants. We describe a novel immunosuppressive regimen using the antileukocyte functional antigen-1 antibody efalizumab which permits long-term islet allograft survival while reducing the need for corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Eight patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemic unawareness received intraportal allogeneic islet transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction followed by maintenance with efalizumab and sirolimus or mycophenolate. When efalizumab was withdrawn from the market in mid 2009, all patients were transitioned to regimens consisting of mycophenolate and sirolimus or mycophenolate and tacrolimus. All patients achieved insulin independence and four out of eight patients became independent after single-islet transplants. Insulin independent patients had no further hypoglycemic events, hemoglobin A1c levels decreased and renal function remained stable. Efalizumab was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were encountered. Although long-term follow-up is limited by discontinuation of efalizumab and transition to conventional imunnosuppression (including CNI in four cases), these results demonstrate that insulin independence after islet transplantation can be achieved with a CNI and steroid-free regimen. Such an approach may minimize renal and islet toxicity and thus further improve long-term islet allograft survival.

The potential utility of bone marrow or umbilical cord blood transplantation for the treatment of type I diabetes mellitus

The pathology of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) involves the autoimmune destruction or malfunction of pancreatic β cells, leading to a lack of insulin. The absence of insulin is life-threatening, necessitating daily hormone injections from an exogenous source. Insulin injections do not adequately mimic the precise regulation of β cells on glucose homeostasis, however, eventually leading to complications in diabetic patients. There currently is no definitive cure for T1D. Pancreas transplantation, although quite successful, is an invasive intervention that is restricted to patients with advanced complications, requires constant immunosuppression, and is severely limited by donor availability. Recent progress in human islet cell isolation and immunosuppressive protocols has restored euglycemia in patients who received islet cells from 2 or 3 pancreas donors. However, because of the scarcity of cadaver pancreata and the low yield of islet cells obtained by the procedure, not all patients have access to this surgical intervention. Thus, other therapeutic approaches are needed to arrest immune aggression, preserve β cell mass, and provide efficient replacement. In this sense, bone marrow and umbilical cord blood transplantation are promising possibilities that merit exploration. In this review, we summarize multiple strategies that have been proposed and tested for potential therapeutic benefit in patients with T1D.

Current status of organ transplantation in Japan and worldwide

Recent advances in immunosuppressant therapy have dramatically reduced the frequency of acute rejection of organ transplants. Subsequently, the short-term graft survival rate has been improved, and ABO blood type-incompatible and existing anti-HLA antibody-positive kidney transplantation has been enabled, which has increased the availability of living kidney donors. Japan has a unique history and strategies of liver transplantation (LT) for various liver diseases. The outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Japan is comparable to that of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Western countries despite the relatively short history of LT. The main disadvantage of LT in Japan is donor shortage mainly due to the small number of available deceased donors. There are some disadvantages with LDLT in autoimmune liver diseases because of the dependence on blood relative donors. The first brain-dead pancreas transplantation (PTx) was performed in 2000. Since that time, 42 brain-dead PTx, 2 non-heart beating PTx, and 14 living donor PTx had been performed by the end of 2007. One of the 44 recipients of deceased donor PTx died of unknown causes 11 months after transplantation. Although most of the deceased donors in Japan were marginal and their condition was not favorable, the results of these cases were comparable to those of Western countries. Fourteen intestinal transplantations (ITx) had been performed by the end of 2007 in four transplant centers. There were 3 deceased donor and 11 live donor transplants. The original diseases included short bowel syndrome (n = 6), intestinal function disorder (n = 6), and retransplantation (n = 2). The graft and patient survival rate are 60% and 69%, respectively. Eight recipients survived and stopped parenteral nutrition with full-functioning grafts. Amendment of the Japanese law for the utilization of deceased donors should increase the number available donors in the future.

One hundred pancreas transplants performed in a Brazilian institution

After decades of controversy surrounding the therapeutic validity of pancreas transplantation, the procedure has become accepted as the preferred treatment for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Between January 2001 and January 2008, 100 patients underwent pancreatic transplantation at our center: 88 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and 12 pancreas transplantations alone. Pancreas graft management of the exocrine drainage technique involved enteric drainage in 8 (all simultaneous pancreas-kidney) and the bladder in 92 cases. The recipient systemic venous system was used for the pancreas graft venous effluent in all cases. Our overall results have shown that the number of functioning pancreatic grafts was 64 of 100. Graft losses were: rejection (n = 8), venous thrombosis (n = 9), arterial thrombosis (n = 1), or surgical complications such as anastomotic leak (n = 3), perigraft infection (n = 10), pancreatitis of the graft (n = 5). Most cases of pancreatitis (80%) had preservation times exceeding 18 hours. Despite surgical and immunosuppressive complications, our impression was that pancreas transplantation was a highly effective therapy for diabetes mellitus. After 7 years of the program and 100 transplantations, we believe that there is a major role for transplantation in diabetes management.

Experiência obtida em 100 transplantes de pâncreas

OBJETIVO: Relatar nossa experiência com 100 transplantes de pâncreas realizados em um período de sete anos. MÉTODOS: Entre janeiro de 2001 e janeiro de 2008, 100 pacientes foram submetidos a transplante de pâncreas em nosso serviço, sendo 88 transplantes de pâncreas e rim simultâneo (TPRS) e 12 transplantes de pâncreas isolado (TPI). Todos foram transplantes primários. O manejo da porção exócrina do enxerto pancreático envolveu drenagem entérica em oito casos (todos TPRS) e a bexiga em 92 casos. O sistema venoso sistêmico do receptor foi utilizado para a drenagem venosa do enxerto em todos os casos. Nossos últimos 30 pacientes submetidos à TPRS não receberam terapia de indução independentemente do painel imunológico.Os pacientes TPRS receberam basiliximab e TPI receberam timoglobulina nos casos induzidos. Imunossupressão de manutenção foi realizada com tacrolimus, micofenolato mofetil e corticóides. O volume de perfusão do enxerto pancreático foi limitado a 800ml da solução de Celsior ou UW. RESULTADOS: Demonstram que os enxertos ainda funcionantes são atualmente 64 dos 100 realizados. Perda do enxerto foi causada por: rejeição (oito pacientes), trombose venosa (nove pacientes), trombose arterial (um paciente) Complicações cirúrgicas encontradas: fístula anastomótica (tres pacientes), infecção peri-enxerto (10 pacientes), pancreatite do enxerto (cinco pacientes). A Rejeição foi observada com menos freqüência nos TPRS (5/92) que nos TPI (3/12). A morte ocorreu em 24 pacientes. CONCLUSÃO: Nossa impressão é que o transplante de pâncreas é altamente efetivo como terapia para o diabetes mellitus apesar da morbidade do procedimento.

Pancreas transplantation

The first successful pancreas transplantation in conjunction with a simultaneous kidney transplantation was performed in 1966 by Kelly, Lillehei and others from the University of Minnesota. In Taipei Veterans General Hospital, the first pancreas transplantation (simultaneously coupled with kidney transplantation) was successfully performed on September 19, 2003, and we were qualified to harvest and transplant pancreas graft by the Taiwan Department of Health on August 31, 2007. Currently, pancreas transplantation remains the most effective method of establishing physiological and durable normoglycemia for patients with diabetes mellitus. The main indication for pancreas transplantation is type 1 diabetes with diabetic complications such as nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiocerebral vasculopathy, or with frequent life-threatening hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. Pancreas graft survival rate at 1 year was 85% for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, 78% for pancreas-after-kidney transplantation, and 76% for pancreas transplantation alone. At 3 years, pancreas graft survival rates were at least 62% in all categories.