Current approach to intraoperative monitoring in liver transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2008;13:285-290. [PMID: 18685319 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e3283005832]

Hemodynamic monitoring in liver transplantation 'the hemodynamic system'

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of hemodynamic monitoring in liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radial arterial blood pressure monitoring underestimates the aortic root arterial blood pressure and causes excessive vasopressor and worse outcomes. Brachial and femoral artery monitoring is well tolerated and should be considered in critically ill patients expected to be on high dose pressors. The pulmonary artery catheter is the gold standard of hemodynamic monitoring and is still widely used in liver transplantation; however, it is a highly invasive monitor with potential for serious complications and most of its data can be obtained by other less invasive monitors. Rescue transesophageal echocardiography relies on few simple views and should be available as a standby to manage sudden hemodynamic instability. Risk of esophageal bleeding from transesophageal echocardiography in liver transplantation is the same as in other patient populations. The arterial pulse waveform analysis based cardiac output devices are minimally invasive and have the advantage of real-time beat to beat monitoring of cardiac output. No hemodynamic monitor can improve clinical outcomes unless integrated into a goal-directed hemodynamic therapy. The hemodynamic monitoring technique should be tailored to the patient's medical status, surgical technique, and the anesthesiologist's level of expertise.

SUMMARY

The current article provides a review of the current hemodynamic monitoring systems and their integration in goal-directed hemodynamic therapy.

Use of Transesophageal Echocardiography During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Simplifying the Procedure

The intraoperative management of patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is influenced by the cardiovascular manifestations typically found in the context of end-stage liver disease, by the presence of concomitant cardiovascular disease, and by the significant hemodynamic changes that occur during surgery. Hypotension and intraoperative blood pressure fluctuations during OLT are associated with liver graft dysfunction, acute kidney failure, and increased risk of 30-d mortality. Patients also frequently present hemodynamic instability due to various causes, including cardiac arrest. Recent evidence has shown transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to be a useful minimally invasive monitoring tool in patients undergoing OLT that gives valuable real-time information on biventricular function and volume status and can help to detect OLT-specific complications or situations. TEE also facilitates rapid diagnosis of life-threatening conditions in each stage of OLT, which is difficult to identify with other types of monitoring commonly used. Although there is no consensus on the best approach to intraoperative monitoring in these patients, intraoperative TEE is safe and useful and should be recommended during OLT, according to experts, for assessing hemodynamic changes, identifying possible complications, and guiding treatment with fluids and inotropes to achieve optimal patient care.

Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance in living-donor liver transplantation: a prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Based on the controversy surrounding pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in surgical patients, we investigated the interchangeability of cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) measurements between ClearSight™ and PAC during living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

This prospective study included consecutively selected LDLT patients. ClearSight™-based CI and SVR measurements were compared with those from PAC at seven LDLT-stage time points. ClearSight™-based systolic (SAP), mean (MAP), and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures were also compared with those from femoral arterial catheterization (FAC). For the comparison and analysis of ClearSight™ and the reference method, Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze accuracy while polar and four-quadrant plots were used to analyze the trending ability.

RESULTS

From 27 patients, 189 pairs of ClearSight™ and reference values were analyzed. The CI and SVR performance errors (PEs) exhibited poor accuracy between the two methods (51.52 and 51.73%, respectively) in the Bland-Altman analysis. CI and SVR also exhibited unacceptable trending abilities in both the polar and four-quadrant plot analyses. SAP, MAP, and DAP PEs between the two methods displayed favorable accuracy (24.28, 21.18, and 26.26%, respectively). SAP and MAP exhibited acceptable trending ability in the four-quadrant plot between the two methods, but not in the polar plot analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

During LDLT, CI and SVR demonstrated poor interchangeability, while SAP and MAP exhibited acceptable interchangeability between ClearSight™ and FAC.

What is the optimal anesthetic monitoring regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after liver transplantation?-A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant centers vary in approach to intraoperative vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and temperature management. Evidence is limited regarding impact of selected modalities on postoperative outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature and provide expert panel recommendations on optimal intraoperative arterial blood pressure (BP), central venous pressure (CVP), and vascular accesses, monitoring of cardiac function and intraoperative temperature management regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT).

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Recommendations made for: (1) Vascular accesses, arterial BP and CVP monitoring, (2) cardiac function monitoring, and (3) Intraoperative temperature management (CRD42021239908).

RESULTS

Of 2619 articles screened 16 were included. Studies were small, retrospective, and observational. Vascular access studies demonstrated low rates of insertion complications. TEE studies demonstrated low rates of esophageal hemorrhage. One study found lower hospital-LOS and 30-day mortality in patients monitored with both PAC and TEE. Other monitoring studies were heterogenous in design and outcomes. Temperature studies showed increased blood transfusion and ventilation times in hypothermic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations were made for; routine arterial and CVP monitoring as a minimum standard of practice, consideration of discrepancy between peripheral and central arterial BP in patients with hemodynamic instability and high vasopressor requirements, and routine use of high flow cannulae while monitoring for extravasation and hematoma formation. Availability and expertise in PAC and/or TEE monitoring is strongly recommended particularly in hemodynamic instability, portopulmonary HT and/or cardiac dysfunction. TEE use is recommended as an acceptable risk in patients with treated esophageal varices and is an effective diagnostic tool for emergency cardiovascular collapse. Maintenance of intraoperative normothermia is strongly recommended.

Anticoagulation in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation - On what basis?

BACKGROUND

Despite technical refinements, early pancreas graft loss due to thrombosis continues to occur. Conventional coagulation tests (CCT) do not detect hypercoagulability and hence the hypercoagulable state due to diabetes is left untreated. Thromboelastogram (TEG) is an in-vitro diagnostic test which is used in liver transplantation, and in various intensive care settings to guide anticoagulation. TEG is better than CCT because it is dynamic and provides a global hemostatic profile including fibrinolysis.

AIM

To compare the outcomes between TEG and CCT (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and international normalized ratio) directed anticoagulation in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients.

METHODS

A single center retrospective analysis comparing the outcomes between TEG and CCT-directed anticoagulation in SPK recipients, who were matched for donor age and graft type (donors after brainstem death and donors after circulatory death). Anticoagulation consisted of intravenous (IV) heparin titrated up to a maximum of 500 IU/h based on CCT in conjunction with various clinical parameters or directed by TEG results. Graft loss due to thrombosis, anticoagulation related bleeding, radiological incidence of partial thrombi in the pancreas graft, thrombus resolution rate after anticoagulation dose escalation, length of the hospital stays and, 1-year pancreas and kidney graft survival between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients who received TEG-directed anticoagulation were compared against 51 contemporaneous SPK recipients (ratio of 1: 3) who were anticoagulated based on CCT. No graft losses occurred in the TEG group, whereas 11 grafts (7 pancreases and 4 kidneys) were lost due to thrombosis in the CCT group (P = 0.06, Fisher’s exact test). The overall incidence of anticoagulation related bleeding (hematoma/ gastrointestinal bleeding/ hematuria/ nose bleeding/ re-exploration for bleeding/ post-operative blood transfusion) was 17.65% in the TEG group and 45.10% in the CCT group (P = 0.05, Fisher’s exact test). The incidence of radiologically confirmed partial thrombus in pancreas allograft was 41.18% in the TEG and 25.50% in the CCT group (P = 0.23, Fisher’s exact test). All recipients with partial thrombi detected in computed tomography (CT) scan had an anticoagulation dose escalation. The thrombus resolution rates in subsequent scan were 85.71% and 63.64% in the TEG group vs the CCT group (P = 0.59, Fisher’s exact test). The TEG group had reduced blood product usage {10 packed red blood cell (PRBC) and 2 fresh frozen plasma (FFP)} compared to the CCT group (71 PRBC/ 10 FFP/ 2 cryoprecipitate and 2 platelets). The proportion of patients requiring transfusion in the TEG group was 17.65% vs 39.25% in the CCT group (P = 0.14, Fisher’s exact test). The median length of hospital stay was 18 days in the TEG group vs 31 days in the CCT group (P = 0.03, Mann Whitney test). The 1-year pancreas graft survival was 100% in the TEG group vs 82.35% in the CCT group (P = 0.07, log rank test) and, the 1-year kidney graft survival was 100% in the TEG group vs 92.15% in the CCT group (P = 0.23, log tank test).

CONCLUSION

TEG is a promising tool in guiding judicious use of anticoagulation with concomitant prevention of graft loss due to thrombosis, and reduces the length of hospital stay.

Accuracy and Efficacy of Impedance Cardiography as a Non-Invasive Cardiac Function Monitor

PURPOSE

The most common method of monitoring cardiac output (CO) is thermodilution using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), but this method is associated with complications. Impedance cardiography (ICG) is a non-invasive CO monitoring technique. This study compared the accuracy and efficacy of ICG as a non-invasive cardiac function monitoring technique to those of thermodilution and arterial pressure contour.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients undergoing liver transplantation were included. Cardiac index (CI) was measured by thermodilution using PAC, arterial waveform analysis, and ICG simultaneously in each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the degree of agreement.

RESULTS

The difference by thermodilution and ICG was 1.13 L/min/m², and the limits of agreement were -0.93 and 3.20 L/min/m². The difference by thermodilution and arterial pressure contour was 0.62 L/min/m², and the limits of agreement were -1.43 and 2.67 L/min/m². The difference by arterial pressure contour and ICG was 0.50 L/min/m², and the limits of agreement were -1.32 and 2.32 L/min/m². All three percentage errors exceeded the 30% limit of acceptance. Substantial agreement was observed between CI of thermodilution with PAC and ICG at preanhepatic and anhepatic phases, as well as between CI of thermodilution and arterial waveform analysis at preanhepatic phase. Others showed moderate agreement.

CONCLUSION

Although neither method was clinically equivalent to thermodilution, ICG showed more substantial correlation with thermodilution method than with arterial waveform analysis. As a non-invasive cardiac function monitor, ICG would likely require further studies in other settings.

Transesophageal ultrasonography during orthotopic liver transplantation: Show me more

The first perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidelines published 21 years ago were mainly addressed to cardiac anesthesiologists. TEE has since expanded its role outside this setting and currently represents an invaluable tool to assess chamber sizes, ventricular hypertrophy, and systolic, diastolic, and valvular function in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Right-sided microemboli, right ventricular dysfunction, and patent foramen ovale (PFO) are the most common intra-operative findings described during OLT. However, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and left ventricular ballooning syndrome are more difficult to recognize and less frequent. Transesophageal ultrasonography (TEU) during OLT is also underused. Its applications are as follows: (1) assistance in the difficult placement of pulmonary arterial catheters; (2) help with catheterization of great vessels for external veno-venous bypass placement; (3) intra-operative evaluation of surgical liver anastomosis patency, if feasible, through the liver window; and (4) intra-operative investigation of "acute hypoxemia" due to pulmonary and cardiac issues using trans-esophageal lung ultrasound (TELU). The aims of this review are as follows: (1) to summarize the uses of TEE and TEU throughout all phases of OLT, and (2) to describe other new feasible applications.

Cardiac output measurement in liver transplantation patients using pulmonary and transpulmonary thermodilution: a comparative study

During liver transplantation surgery, the pulmonary artery catheter-despite its invasiveness-remains the gold standard for measuring cardiac output. However, the new EV1000 transpulmonary thermodilution calibration technique was recently introduced into the market by Edwards LifeSciences. We designed a single-center prospective observational study to determine if these two techniques for measuring cardiac output are interchangeable in this group of patients. Patients were monitored with both pulmonary artery catheter and the EV1000 system. Simultaneous intermittent cardiac output measurements were collected at predefined steps: after induction of anesthesia (T1), during the anhepatic phase (T2), after liver reperfusion (T3), and at the end of the surgery (T4). The 4-quadrant and polar plot techniques were used to assess trending ability between the two methods. We enrolled 49 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation surgery. We analyzed a total of 588 paired measurements. The mean bias between pulmonary artery catheter and the EV1000 system was 0.35 L/min with 95% limits of agreement of - 2.30 to 3.01 L/min, and an overall percentage error of 35%. The concordance rate between the two techniques in 4-quadrant plot analysis was 65% overall. The concordance rate of the polar plot showed an overall value of 83% for all pairs. In the present study, in liver transplantation patients we found that intermittent cardiac output monitoring with EV1000 system showed a percentage error compared with pulmonary artery catheter in the acceptable threshold of 45%. On the others hand, our results showed a questionable trending ability between the two techniques.

A Comprehensive Review of Transesophageal Echocardiography During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is characterized by significant hemodynamic disturbances and anesthetic challenges. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be used to guide management during these procedures. This review examines the role of echocardiography during OLT, presents common TEE findings during each phase of OLT, and discusses the benefits demonstrated with TEE use and the safety of TEE in this patient population. Finally, the authors propose an algorithm for the safe use of TEE during OLT.

Transoesophageal echocardiography during orthotopic liver transplantation

Despite the importance of haemodynamic management in patients undergoing liver transplantation, there is currently no consensus on the most appropriate type of monitoring to use. In this context, transoesophageal echocardiography can provide useful information to professionals, although their use constraints prevent further spread today.

Postreperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation

As surgical and graft preservation techniques have improved and immunosuppressive drugs have advanced, liver transplantation (LT) is now considered the gold standard for treating patients with end-stage liver disease worldwide. However, despite the improved survival following LT, severe hemodynamic disturbances during LT remain a serious issue for the anesthesiologist. The greatest hemodynamic disturbance is postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), which occurs at reperfusion of the donated liver after unclamping of the portal vein. PRS is characterized by marked decreases in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance, and moderate increases in pulmonary arterial pressure and central venous pressure. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of PRS are complex. Moreover, risk factors associated with PRS are not fully understood. Rapid and appropriate treatment with vasopressors, volume replacement, or venesection must be provided depending on the cause of the hemodynamic disturbance when hemodynamic instability becomes profound after reperfusion. The negative effects of PRS on postoperative early morbidity and mortality are clear, but the effect of PRS on postoperative long-term mortality remains a matter of debate.

Transoesophageal echocardiography during liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) has become the standard of care for patients with end stage liver disease. The allocation of organs, which prioritizes the sickest patients, has made the management of liver transplant candidates more complex both as regards their comorbidities and their higher risk of perioperative complications. Patients undergoing LT frequently display considerable physiological changes during the procedures as a result of both the disease process and the surgery. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which visualizes dynamic cardiac function and overall contractility, has become essential for perioperative LT management and can optimize the anaesthetic management of these highly complex patients. Moreover, TEE can provide useful information on volume status and the adequacy of therapeutic interventions and can diagnose early intraoperative complications, such as the embolization of large vessels or development of pulmonary hypertension. In this review, directed at clinicians who manage TEE during LT, we show why the procedure merits a place in challenging anaesthetic environment and how it can provide essential information in the perioperative management of compromised patients undergoing this very complex surgical procedure.

Endogenous Fibrinolysis: An Important Mediator of Thrombus Formation and Cardiovascular Risk

Most acute cardiovascular events are attributable to arterial thrombosis. Plaque rupture or erosion stimulates platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombosis, whilst simultaneously activating enzymatic processes that mediate endogenous fibrinolysis to physiologically maintain vessel patency. Interplay between these pathways determines clinical outcome. If proaggregatory factors predominate, the thrombus may propagate, leading to vessel occlusion. However, if balanced by a healthy fibrinolytic system, thrombosis may not occur or cause lasting occlusion. Despite abundant evidence for the fibrinolytic system regulating thrombosis, it has been overlooked compared with platelet reactivity, partly due to a lack of techniques to measure it. We evaluate evidence for endogenous fibrinolysis in arterial thrombosis and review techniques to assess it, including biomarkers and global assays, such as thromboelastography and the Global Thrombosis Test. Global assays, simultaneously assessing proaggregatory and fibrinolytic pathways, could play a role in risk stratification and in identifying impaired fibrinolysis as a potential target for pharmacological modulation.

Is stroke volume variation a useful preload index in liver transplant recipients? A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) is a good indicator of preload in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Although dynamic indices, such as stroke volume variation (SVV), have been used as reliable indicators in predicting fluid responsiveness, the evaluation of the relationship between SVV and direct preload status is limited. We investigated the relationship between SVV and RVEDVI, and tested the cutoff value of SVV to predict RVEDVI during liver transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 150 data pairs in 30 living donor liver transplant recipients were retrospectively investigated. Hemodynamic parameters, including SVV and RVEDVI were obtained from each patient at the 5 specific time points. Linear regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The SVV significantly correlated with the RVEDVI (r = -0.616, P < 0.001). Cutoff values for the upper and lower tertiles of RVEDVI were 157 mL/m(2) and 128 mL/m(2), respectively. Tertile analysis indicated that upper tertile of RVEDVI had a significantly lower SVV than the middle tertile (median; 5% vs 8%, P < 0.05), and middle tertile of RVEDVI had a significantly lower SVV than the lower tertile (median; 8% vs 11%, P < 0.05). A 6% cutoff value of SVV estimated the upper tertile RVEDVI (>157 mL/m(2)) with the area under the curve of ROC curve of 0.832. A 9% cutoff value of SVV estimated the lower tertile RVEDVI (<128 mL/m(2)) with the area under the curve of ROC curve of 0.792.

CONCLUSION

SVV may be a valuable estimator of RVEDVI in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Perioperative monitoring in liver transplant patients

Liver transplant (LT) is a major surgical undertaking involving major fluid shifts, hemodynamic instability and metabolic derangements in a patient with preexisting liver failure and multisystemic derangements. Monitoring and organ support initiated in the preoperative phase is continued intraoperatively and into the postoperative phase to ensure an optimal outcome. As cardiovascular events are the leading cause of non-graft related death among LT recipients, major emphasis is placed on cardiovascular monitoring. The other essential monitoring are the continuous assessment of coagulapathy, extent of metabolic derangements, dyselectrolytemis and intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with fulminant hepatic failure. The type and extent of monitoring differs with need according to preexisting child status of the patient and the extent of systemic derangements. It also varies among transplant centers and is mainly determined by individual or institutional practices.

Optimizing cost-effectiveness in perioperative care for liver transplantation: a model for low- to medium-income countries

Although liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment, it has been considered too costly for publicly funded health systems in many countries with low to medium average incomes. However, with economic growth and improving results, some governments are reconsidering this position. Cost-effectiveness data for LT are limited, especially in perioperative care, and the techniques and costs vary widely between centers without overt differences in outcomes. Anesthesiologists working in new programs find it difficult to determine which modalities are essential, which are needed only in exceptional circumstances, and which may be omitted without effects on outcomes. We investigated key elements of preoperative evaluations, intraoperative management, and early postoperative care that might significantly affect costs in order to develop a best-value approach for new programs in resource-limited health systems. We identified all modalities of care commonly used in anesthesia and perioperative care for adult LT along with their costs. Those considered to be universally accepted as minimum requirements for safe care were excluded from the analysis, and so were those considered to be safe and low-cost, even when evidence of efficacy was lacking. The remaining items were, therefore, those with uncertain or context-restricted value and significant costs. A systematic review of the published evidence, practice surveys, and institutional guidelines was performed, and the evidence was graded and summarized. With respect to costs and benefits, each modality was then cited as strongly recommended, recommended or optional, or no recommendation was made because of insufficient evidence. Sixteen modalities, which included preoperative cardiovascular imaging, venovenous bypass, pulmonary artery catheterization, high-flow fluid warming devices, drug therapies for hemostasis, albumin, cell salvage, anesthetic drugs, personnel (staffing) requirements, and early extubation, were assessed. Only high-flow fluid warming was strongly recommended. The recommended modalities included preoperative echocardiography, cell salvage, tranexamic acid and early extubation. Six others were rated optional, and there was insufficient evidence for 5 modalities. We conclude that some costly techniques and treatments can be omitted without adverse effects on outcomes.

The effects of magnesium pretreatment on reperfusion injury during living donor liver transplantation

Background

Ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury is a complex phenomenon that leads to organ dysfunction and causes primary liver failure following liver transplantation. We investigated whether an intravenous administration of magnesium before reperfusion can prevent or reduce IR injury.

Methods

Fifty-nine living donor liver transplant recipients were randomly assigned to an MG group (n = 31) or an NS group (n = 28). Each group was also divided in two groups based on the preoperative magnesium levels (normal: ≥ 0.70 mmol/L, low: < 0.70 mmol/L). The MG groups received 25 mg/kg of MgSO₄ mixed in 100 ml normal saline intravenously before reperfusion and the NS groups received an equal volume of normal saline. The levels of lactate, pH, arterial oxygen tension, and base excess were measured to assess reperfusion injury at five specific times, which were 10 min after the beginning of anhepatic phase, and 10, 30, 60 and 120 min after reperfusion. To evaluate postoperative organ function, the serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin and creatinine levels were measured at preoperative day 1, postoperative day 1 and 5.

Results

The blood lactate levels were significantly lower at 10, 30, 60 and 120 min after reperfusion in the MG groups compared to the NS groups. In addition, significantly higher blood lactate levels were observed in the NS group with preoperative hypomagnesemia than in MG groups.

Conclusions

Magnesium administration before reperfusion of liver transplantation significantly reduces blood lactate levels. These findings suggest that magnesium treatment may have protective effects on IR injury during living donor liver transplantation.

Quality of surgical care in liver and small-bowel transplant: approach to risk assessment and antibiotic prophylaxis

In August 2002, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention implemented the National Surgical Infection Prevention project. The goal of the project was to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with postoperative surgical site infections through appropriate selection and timing of administration and discontinuation of prophylactic antimicrobials. The National Surgical Infection Prevention project, however, excluded transplant surgeries from its focus because of the lack of randomized clinical trials comparing antimicrobial agents. The goals of this article are to (1) provide a framework for risk factors associated with surgical site infections in liver, small-bowel, and multivisceral transplants; (2) review general principles of the appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis; (3) provide a framework for developing a triage of liver, small-bowel, and multivisceral transplant candidates for appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis; and (4) develop an approach to further quality improvements in transplant surgical care. A multidisciplinary team produced recommendations for antibacterial prophylaxis and monitoring.

Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation

We evaluated the value of the stroke volume variation (SVV) calculated with the Vigileo monitor, which recently has been increasingly advocated for fluid management, as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation (LT). We also compared SVV to the central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure (PAOP) in patients. Thirty-three adult recipients scheduled for elective living donor LT were enrolled in this study. Twenty minutes after the start of the anhepatic phase, the CVP, PAOP, approximate inferior vena caval pressure, femoral SVV, and cardiac output values were measured before and 12 minutes after fluid loading. Fluid loading was performed with a 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution (10 mL/kg). The responders were defined as patients whose cardiac index increased ≥ 15% after fluid loading. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that only femoral SVV (area under the curve = 0.894, P = 0.0001) could be used to predict fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of LT. The area under the ROC curve for femoral SVV was 0.894 (P = 0.0001), and it was significantly larger than those for CVP (area under the curve = 0.576, P = 0.004) and PAOP (area under the curve = 0.670, P = 0.021). Femoral SVV >8% identified the responders with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 80%. Our results suggest that femoral SVV derived with the Vigileo monitor would be useful for fluid management during the anhepatic phase in LT recipients.

Quality of Surgical Care in Liver and Small-Bowel Transplant: Approach to Risk Assessment and Antibiotic Prophylaxis

In August 2002, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention implemented the National Surgical Infection Prevention project. The goal of the project was to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with postoperative surgical site infections through appropriate selection and timing of administration and discontinuation of prophylactic antimicrobials. The National Surgical Infection Prevention project, however, excluded transplant surgeries from its focus because of the lack of randomized clinical trials comparing antimicrobial agents. The goals of this article are to (1) provide a framework for risk factors associated with surgical site infections in liver, small-bowel, and multivisceral transplants; (2) review general principles of the appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis; (3) provide a framework for developing a triage of liver, small-bowel, and multivisceral transplant candidates for appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis; and (4) develop an approach to further quality improvements in transplant surgical care. A multidisciplinary team produced recommendations for antibacterial prophylaxis and monitoring.

Perioperative considerations in patients with cirrhotic cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to identify specific criteria for cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, examine the correlation with perioperative adverse outcomes and explore options for hemodynamic monitoring.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is characterized by an increase in cardiac output, blunted systolic contractile response to stress, diastolic dysfunction and electrophysiological abnormalities. Adverse events due to cirrhotic cardiomyopathy are not as well characterized, but evidence suggests that some cardiovascular complications during surgery and in the postoperative period are caused by an impaired response to physiological stress. New developments in hemodynamic monitoring using not only thermodilution technology provide more reliable information about cardiac performance than pressure-derived measures. Transesophogeal echocardiography also offers the physician new information including the ability to visualize heart structures, shape, and function.

SUMMARY

To detect cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, physicians must conduct a systematic examination of the patient. Overt manifestations of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy often only become evident after a patient is exposed to physiological or drug-induced stress. Appropriate hemodynamic monitoring is a cornerstone in the perioperative management of cirrhotic patients.

Comparison of stroke volume variations derived from radial and femoral arterial pressure waveforms during liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Stroke volume variation (SVV) is being increasingly used to predict fluid responsiveness. Since radial arterial pressure (RAP) and femoral arterial pressure (FAP) frequently showing discrepancies during liver transplantation (LT), we sought to investigate the effect of differing arterial waveforms on SVV and cardiac output (CO) derived from the Vigileo device, by comparing SVV and CO values derived from RAP (SVV(RAP), CO(RAP)) and FAP (SVV(FAP), CO(FAP)) during LT.

METHODS

The linear associations and agreements between SVV(RAP) and SVV(FAP) and between CO(RAP) and CO(FAP) were assessed during LT. Hemodynamic variables were measured at nine predefined time points in all 32 recipients, resulting in 288 data pairs.

RESULTS

Correlations were observed between SVV(RAP) and SVV(FAP) (r = .961) and between CO(RAP) and CO(FAP) (r = .848) at all time points. These correlations between SVV(RAP) and SVV(FAP) (r = .923) and between CO(RAP) and CO(FAP) (r = .902) existed even during the period when mean RAP and FAP values differed (10 minutes after reperfusion). Bland-Altman analysis for SVV(RAP) versus SVV(FAP) and for CO(RAP) versus CO(FAP) showed weak biases (-0.2% and -0.5 L/min) and reasonable limits of agreement (-2.2 to 1.8% and -1.9 to 0.9 L/min). The percentage errors for SVV and CO values were 27.0% and 22.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between SVV(RAP) and SVV(FAP) when measured using the Vigileo device during LT. This finding indicated that SVV obtained using the Vigileo device offered relatively consistent information regardless of the catheterization site.

Intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring during organ transplantation: what is new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the recent developments in hemodynamic monitoring during liver and lung transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Even though a consensus on intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring is still lacking, the most frequently monitoring tool used is the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). The filling pressures are widely accepted as not being able to accurately define cardiac preload. On the contrary, the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), although it is operator dependent and requires a prolonged training, is increasing during the intraoperative period to directly evaluate the cardiovascular function. New frontiers have been opened by the transpulmonary thermodilution: intrathoracic blood volume has been shown to have a better correlation with preload than the filling pressures. The advanced modified PAC permits evaluation of the right heart function and preload. Recently, right ventricular end diastolic volume has been shown to correlate better with preload than the filling pressures and also the left ventricular end diastolic area.

SUMMARY

The PAC still represents the most used intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring technique. TEE is increasing in popularity. Recent studies demonstrate that volumetric monitoring conducted with transpulmonary thermodilution and advanced volumetric PAC give good definition of preload and should be implemented in clinical practice.