Surrogate markers of rejection:

Association Between High Sensitivity Troponin Levels Following Pediatric Orthotopic Heart Transplantation and Intensive Care Unit Resource Utilization

The utility of troponin levels, including high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT), after orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) is controversial. Conflicting data exist regarding its use as a marker of acute rejection. Few studies have examined possible associations of hs-TnT levels immediately after OHT with metrics of intensive care unit (ICU) resource utilization or risk of acute rejection. We performed a retrospective cohort chart review including all OHT recipients < 20 years of age at our center between June 2019 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on supra- or sub-median initial hs-TnT levels (median 3462.5 ng/L). Primary outcome was days requiring ICU-level care, secondary outcomes included days intubated, days requiring positive pressure ventilation (PPV), days on inotropic medications, actual ICU length of stay, Vasoactive Inotrope Scores (VIS) on postoperative days (POD) 0 through 7, and acute rejection at 30 days and one year after OHT. Patients with higher hs-TnT required ICU level care for longer [13.5 (10-17.5) vs. 9.5 (8-12) days, p = 0.01] and spent more days intubated [6 (4-7) vs. 3 (3-5) days, p < 0.001], on PPV [9 (6-15) vs. 6 (5-8.5) days, p = 0.02], and on inotropes [11 (9-14) vs. 8 (7-11) days, p = 0.025]. VIS was only different between groups on POD7 [5 (3-7) vs. 3 (0-5), p = 0.04]. There was no difference in rejection between the groups. Higher hs-TnT immediately following pediatric OHT may predict higher ICU resource utilization, despite no difference in VIS, although it does not predict acute rejection in the first year after OHT.

HEARTBiT: A Transcriptomic Signature for Excluding Acute Cellular Rejection in Adult Heart Allograft Patients

BACKGROUND

Nine mRNA transcripts associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR) in previous microarray studies were ported to the clinically amenable NanoString nCounter platform. Here we report the diagnostic performance of the resulting blood test to exclude ACR in heart allograft recipients: HEARTBiT.

METHODS

Blood samples for transcriptomic profiling were collected during routine post-transplantation monitoring in 8 Canadian transplant centres participating in the Biomarkers in Transplantation initiative, a large (n = 1622) prospective observational study conducted between 2009 and 2014. All adult cardiac transplant patients were invited to participate (median age = 56 [17 to 71]). The reference standard for rejection status was histopathology grading of tissue from endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). All locally graded ISHLT ≥ 2R rejection samples were selected for analysis (n = 36). ISHLT 1R (n = 38) and 0R (n = 86) samples were randomly selected to create a cohort approximately matched for site, age, sex, and days post-transplantation, with a focus on early time points (median days post-transplant = 42 [7 to 506]).

RESULTS

ISHLT ≥ 2R rejection was confirmed by EMB in 18 and excluded in 92 samples in the test set. HEARTBiT achieved 47% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI], 36%-57%) given ≥ 90% sensitivity, with a corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.56-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

HEARTBiT's diagnostic performance compares favourably to the only currently approved minimally invasive diagnostic test to rule out ACR, AlloMap (CareDx, Brisbane, CA) and may be used to inform care decisions in the first 2 months post-transplantation, when AlloMap is not approved, and most ACR episodes occur.

Elevated blood eosinophil count is a valuable biomarker for predicting late acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have indicated the value of increased blood eosinophil counts for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the relationship between eosinophil count and late ACR at more than 6 months after OLT is still unclear.

METHODS

We sought to retrospectively analyzed the ACR predictive value of eosinophil counts. In the day before or the day of biopsy among 40 biopsies performed on 37 patients beyond 6 months after OLT.

RESULTS

Relative eosinophil count was significantly higher in the ACR (n = 24) than the non-ACR cohort, albeit with no significant difference in absolute eosinophil count. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed an absolute eosinophil count of 0.145 × 10(9)/L and a relative eosinophil count of 2.3% to show the highest Youden index with area under the ROC curves of 0.746 and 0.813, respectively. When absolute eosinophil count ≥ 0.145 × 10(9)/L or relative eosinophil count ≥ 2.3% was defined to be elevated, the sensitivity and specificity to predict ACR were 45.8% and 87.5%, and 75% and 87.5%, respectively. When the absolute eosinophil count ≥ 0.285 × 10(9)/L or relative eosinophil count ≥ 3% was defined as elevated, the sensitivity and specificity were 25% and 100%, and 50% and 100%, respectively. All patients with an absolute eosinophil count ≥ 0.285 × 10(9)/L showed a relative eosinophil count ≥ 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated blood eosinophil count was a valuable biomarker to predict late ACR after OLT.

Biomarkers of heart transplant rejection: the good, the bad, and the ugly!

Acute cellular rejection (ACR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) are important limitations for the long-term survival of heart transplant recipients. Although much progress has been made in reducing ACR with modern immunosuppressive treatments and continuous biopsy surveillance, there is still a long way to go to better understand and treat AMR, to enable early detection of patients at risk of CAV, and to reduce the development and sustained progression of this irreversible disease that permanently compromises graft function. This review considers the advances made in ACR detection and treatment allowing a more prolonged survival and the risk factors leading to endothelial injury, dysfunction, inflammation, and subsequent CAV, as well as new treatment modalities for CAV. The review also evaluates the controversies around the definition, pathogenesis, and treatment of AMR. To date, much progress is still needed to significantly reduce post-transplant complications and increase graft and patient survival.

Correlation of noninvasive markers of cardiac allograft rejection with endomyocardial biopsy: a case report

Although endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard to diagnose cardiac allograft rejection, the search continues for clinical parameters that may aid in the early diagnosis of rejection. We report the case of a 29-year-old man who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation and subsequently had multifocal moderate allograft rejection. During the patient's hospital course, he exhibited a number of clinical parameters that served as important clues for the worsening rejection. After aggressive immunosuppression, the improvement of these markers hinted toward his eventual recovery.