The pits and pearls in translating operational tolerance biomarkers into clinical practice. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2012;17:655-662. [PMID: 23080065 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e32835a6f62]

Association of genetic variation of the six gene prognostic model for castration-resistant prostate cancer with survival

BACKGROUND

We previously identified a blood RNA transcript-based model consisting of six immune or inflammatory response genes (ABL2, SEMA4D, ITGAL, C1QA, TIMP1, and CDKN1A) that was prognostic for survival in cohorts of men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We investigated whether inherited variation in these six genes was associated with overall survival (OS) in men with CRPC.

METHODS

The test cohort comprised 600 patients diagnosed with CRPC between 1996 and 2011 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Genotyping of 66 tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning the six genes was performed on blood derived DNAs. For the top four SNPs (P < 0.05), validation was conducted in an independent cohort of 223 men diagnosed with CRPC between 2000 and 2014. Multivariable Cox regression adjusting for known prognostic factors estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the association of genetic variants with OS.

RESULTS

Two thirds of patients in both cohorts had metastases at CRPC diagnosis. Median OS from CRPC diagnosis was 3.6 (95%CI 3.3-4.0) years in the test cohort and 4.6 (95%CI 3.8-5.2) years in the validation cohort. Fifty-nine SNPs in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were analyzed. The major alleles of rs1318056 and rs1490311 in ABL2, and the minor alleles of rs2073917 and rs3764322 in ITGAL were associated with increased risk of death in the test cohort (adjusted-HRs 1.27-1.39; adjusted-p <0.05; false discovery rate <0.35). In the validation cohort, a similar association with OS was observed for rs1318056 in ABL2 (adjusted-HR 1.44; 95%CI 0.89-2.34) and rs2073917 in ITGAL (adjusted-HR 1.41; 95%CI 0.82-2.42). The associations did not reach statistical significance most likely due to the small sample size of the validation cohort (adjusted-p = 0.142 and 0.209, respectively). Additional eQTL analysis indicated that minor alleles of rs1318056 and rs1490311 in ABL2 are associated with a lower ABL2 expression in blood.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings corroborate our initial work on the RNA expression of genes involved in immunity and inflammation from blood and clinical outcome and suggest that germline polymorphisms in ABL2 and ITGAL may be associated with the risk of death in men with CRPC. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and to explore their functional mechanisms.

Messengers of tolerance

The use of immunosuppressant drugs after organ transplantation has brought great success in the field of organ transplantation with respect to short-term outcome. However, major challenges (i.e., limited improvement of long-term survival, immunosuppressant toxicity, infections and carcinoma) demand alternate treatment approaches that minimizes the use of immunosuppressants. Interestingly, few studies have identified groups of transplant patients who developed operational tolerance and thereby keep their allograft without complications in absence of immunosuppressants. These rare groups of patients are of particular interest as study subjects for understanding mechanisms of graft tolerance that could be leveraged in future for inducing tolerance and for understanding mechanisms involved in improving long-term allograft outcomes. Also, biomarkers from these studies could benefit the larger transplant population by their application in immunosuppressant tailoring and identification of tolerant patients among patients with stably functioning allografts. This review compiles several gene expression studies performed in samples from tolerant patients in different solid organ transplantations to identify key genes and associated molecular pathways relevant to tolerance. This review is aimed at putting forth all this important work done thus far and to identify research gaps that need to be filled, in order to achieve the greater purpose of these studies.

Biomarkers in renal transplantation: An updated review

Genomics, proteomics and molecular biology lead to tremendous advances in all fields of medical sciences. Among these the finding of biomarkers as non invasive indicators of biologic processes represents a useful tool in the field of transplantation. In addition to define the principal characteristics of the biomarkers, this review will examine the biomarker usefulness in the different clinical phases following renal transplantation. Biomarkers of ischemia-reperfusion injury and of delayed graft function are extremely important for an early diagnosis of these complications and for optimizing the treatment. Biomarkers predicting or diagnosing acute rejection either cell-mediated or antibody-mediated allow a risk stratification of the recipient, a prompt diagnosis in an early phase when the histology is still unremarkable. The kidney solid organ response test detects renal transplant recipients at high risk for acute rejection with a very high sensitivity and is also able to make diagnosis of subclinical acute rejection. Other biomarkers are able to detect chronic allograft dysfunction in an early phase and to differentiate the true chronic rejection from other forms of chronic allograft nephropathies no immune related. Finally biomarkers recently discovered identify patients tolerant or almost tolerant. This fact allows to safely reduce or withdrawn the immunosuppressive therapy.

Transplant genetics and genomics

Ever since the discovery of the major histocompatibility complex, scientific and clinical understanding in the field of transplantation has been advanced through genetic and genomic studies. Candidate-gene approaches and recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have enabled a deeper understanding of the complex interplay of the donor-recipient interactions that lead to transplant tolerance or rejection. Genetic analysis in transplantation, when linked to demographic and clinical outcomes, has the potential to drive personalized medicine by enabling individualized risk stratification and immunosuppression through the identification of variants associated with immune-mediated complications, post-transplant disease or alterations in drug-metabolizing genes.

Fingerprints of transplant tolerance suggest opportunities for immunosuppression minimization

HLA incompatible organ transplant tolerance is the holy grail of transplantation. Stable engraftment of an HLA mismatched allograft and life-long tolerance induction, though feasible in highly selected cohorts with depletional protocols, is not ready for generalized application to the entire transplant recipient pool. It has thus been important to harness biomarkers that can uncover mechanisms and tools for monitoring HLA mismatched recipients that develop a state of operational tolerance, during accidental immunosuppression withdrawal secondary to problems of over-immunosuppression (infection or malignancy) or toxicity (mostly cosmetic or cardiovascular). A restricted and unpredictable group of patients can demonstrate a clinical state of operational tolerance, manifested by state of stable graft function of a graft with HLA mismatches between recipient and donor, intact immune responses to third party antigens and no measurable immunosuppression. These patients have served as the basis for the discovery of clinically correlative biomarkers, in distal biofluids (mainly blood), that can define the existing state of operational clinical tolerance. Operationally tolerant patients are rare, as withdrawal of immunosuppression most often results in rejection and graft loss. Nevertheless, operationally tolerant kidney, liver and heart allograft recipients have been reported. The presence of similar biomarker signature profiles in HLA mismatched transplant recipients on immunosuppression, suggests the feasibility of utilizing these biomarkers for educated immunosuppression minimization with a view to retaining immunological quiescence, while reducing the maintenance immunosuppression burden to a "safe" alloimmune threshold. Though clinical operational tolerance is rare, as immunosuppression cessation most often results in increased alloimmunity and rejection, the biomarker profile studies that have harnessed whole genome profiling suggest that the frequency of this state may be ~8% in kidney allograft recipients, and even more frequent in pediatric recipients and in liver transplantation: 25% in adult liver allograft recipients and ~60% in pediatric liver allograft recipients. In this review we discuss putative molecular mechanisms, cellular players and correlative biomarkers that have been developed through clinically associative studies of tolerant and non-tolerant patients. Through mechanisms of carefully constructed and monitored randomized, prospective clinical trials, the transplant community stands at the cusp of improved quality of recipient life through educated immunosuppression minimization.

Immune biomarkers: the promises and pitfalls of personalized medicine

Substantial progress in molecular immunology, coupled with an increasing focus on translational research and an enthusiasm for personalized medicine, has resulted in a rapid expansion in the field of immune biomarkers in recent years. In this Science and Society article, we provide a conceptual overview of the field and discuss the progress that has been made so far, as well as the future potential in the context of the scientific, logistical, financial, legal and ethical framework within which this research is being carried out and translated into clinical use.

Pediatric transplantation and tolerance: past, present, and future

Solid organ transplantation is the treatment of choice in children with end-stage organ failure. With improving methods of transplant surgery and post-transplant care, transplantation is more frequently performed worldwide. However, lifelong and non-specific suppression of the recipient's immune system is a cause of significant morbidity in children, including infection, diabetes, and cancer. There is a great need to develop IS minimization/withdrawal and tolerance induction approaches.

Achieving operational tolerance in transplantation: how can lessons from the clinic inform research directions?

Since the first solid organ transplant between the Herrick twins in 1954, transplantation immunology has sought to move away from harmful immunosuppressive regimens towards tolerogenic strategies that promote long-term graft survival. This has required a concerted multinational effort with scientists and clinicians working towards a common goal. Reports of immunosuppression-free kidney and liver allograft recipients have provided the proof-of-principle, but intentional generation of tolerance in clinical transplantation is still only achieved infrequently. Recently, there have been an increasing number of encouraging developments in the field in both experimental and clinical studies. In this article, we review the latest advances in tolerance research and consider possible future barriers and solutions in achieving reliable graft acceptance in the long term.