Rectourethral fistulas in the cancer survivor

Outcomes of an Algorithmic, Multidisciplinary Approach to Rectourethral Fistula Repair: A Pre- and Postintervention Quasi-Experimental Study

BACKGROUND

Rectourethral fistulas are a rare yet severe complication of prostate surgery, pelvic irradiation therapy, or both. Multiple surgical repairs exist with widely varying success rates.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to present our institutional multidisciplinary algorithm for rectourethral fistula repair and its outcomes.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, pre- and postintervention, quasi-experimental design, comparing the frequency of fistula healing and reversal of urinary and fecal diversion before and after implementation of our algorithm.

SETTING

All patients who presented to the Duke University with rectourethral fistula between 2002 and 2019 were included.

PATIENTS

This study included 79 patients treated for rectourethral fistula: 36 prealgorithm and 43 postalgorithm.

INTERVENTIONS

Our multidisciplinary algorithm was implemented in 2012. Patients with fistulas <2 cm and without history of radiation therapy underwent York-Mason repair, whereas those with fistulas 2-3 cm or with prior irradiation underwent transperineal repair with gracilis flap interposition. Those with nonrepairable fistulas (>3 cm or fixed tissues) underwent pelvic exenteration. Before repair, the algorithm recommended all patients to undergo urinary and bowel diversion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The 2 primary outcomes were rectourethral fistula healing, defined as both radiographic and clinical resolutions, and reversal of urinary and fecal diversions.

RESULTS

Frequency of fistula healing improved in the post- versus prealgorithm subgroups (93.1% vs 71.9%; p = 0.04). The relative risk of fistula healing pre- versus postintervention was 0.77 (0.61-0.98; p = 0.04) among the overall cohort. Eighteen patients (22.8%) underwent pelvic exenteration for nonrepairable fistulas and were not included in primary outcome measures.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include the study's retrospective nature, possible selection bias because of algorithmic patient selection, and small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a multidisciplinary institutional algorithm improved rectourethral fistula repair success with high rates of ostomy reversal. Proper patient selection and multidisciplinary involvement are paramount to this success. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B955 .

RESULTADOS DE UN ABORDAJE ALGORTMICO Y MULTIDISCIPLINARIO PARA LA REPARACIN DE FSTULAS RECTOURETRALES UN ESTUDIO CUASIEXPERIMENTAL PREVIO Y POSTERIOR A LA INTERVENCIN

ANTECEDENTES:Las fístulas rectouretrales son una complicación rara pero grave de la cirugía de próstata, la radiación pélvica o ambas. Existen múltiples reparaciones quirúrgicas con tasas de éxito muy variables.OBJETIVO:Presentar el algoritmo multidisciplinario de nuestra institución para la reparación de fístulas rectouretrales y sus resultados.DISEÑO:Este fue un diseño retrospectivo, previo y posterior a la intervención, cuasiexperimental, que comparó la frecuencia de curación de la fístula y la reversión de la derivación urinaria y fecal antes y después de la implementación de nuestro algoritmo.ESCENARIO:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes que acudieron a Duke con fístula rectouretral entre 2002 y 2019.PACIENTES:Setenta y nueve pacientes fueron tratados por fístula rectouretral; 36 pre-algoritmo y 43 post-algoritmo.INTERVENCIONES:Nuestro algoritmo multidisciplinario se implementó en 2012. Los pacientes con fístulas <2 cm y sin antecedentes de radiación se sometieron a reparación de York-Mason, mientras que aquellos con fístulas de 2-3 cm o radiación pélvica previa se sometieron a reparación transperineal con interposición de colgajo de gracilis. Aquellos con fístulas no reparables (> 3 cm o tejidos fijos) fueron sometidos a exenteración pélvica. Antes de la reparación, el algoritmo recomomendó que todos los pacientes se sometieran a una derivación urinaria y fecal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los dos resultados primarios fueron la curación de la fístula rectouretral, definida como la resolución radiográfica y clínica, y la reversión de las derivaciones urinaria y fecale.RESULTADOS:La frecuencia de curación de la fístula mejoró en el subgrupo post-algoritmo vs. pre-algoritmo (93.1% vs. 71.9%, p = 0.04). El riesgo relativo de curación de la fístula antes de la intervención en comparación con después de la intervención fue de 0.77 (0.61-0.98, p = 0.04) entre la cohorte general. Dieciocho pacientes (22.8%) se sometieron a exenteración pélvica por fístulas no reparables y, por lo tanto, no se incluyeron en las medidas de resultado primarias.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones de este estudio incluyen su naturaleza retrospectiva, posible sesgo de selección debido a la selección algorítmica de pacientes y un tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIONES:La implementación de un algoritmo institucional multidisciplinario mejoró el éxito en la reparación de la fístula rectouretral con altas tasas de reversión de la ostomía. La selección adecuada de pacientes y la participación multidisciplinaria son fundamentales para este éxito. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B955 . (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Gracilis muscle transposition in complex anorectal fistulas of diverse types and etiologies: long-term results of 60 cases

PURPOSE

Complex fistulas often require several attempts at repair and continue to be a challenging task for the surgeon, but above all, a major burden for the affected patient. This study is aimed at evaluating the potential of gracilis muscle transposition (GMT) as a therapeutic option for complex fistulas of diverse etiologies.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted over a period of 16 years with a total of 60 patients (mean age 50 years). All were treated for complex fistula with GMT at St. Josef's Hospital in Regensburg, Germany. Follow-up data were collected and analyzed using a prospective database and telephone interview. Success was defined as the absence of fistula.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (44 women, 16 men; mean age 50 years, range 24-82 years) were reviewed from January 2005 to June 2021. Primary fistula closure after GMT was achieved in 20 patients (33%) and 19 required further interventions for final healing. Overall healing rate was 65%. Fistula type was heterogeneous, with a dominant subgroup of 35 rectovaginal fistulas. Etiologies of the fistulas were irradiation, abscesses, obstetric injury, and iatrogenic/unknown, and 98% of patients had had previous unsuccessful repair attempts (mean 3.6, range 1-15). In 60% of patients with a stoma (all patients had a stoma, 60/60), stoma closure could be performed after successful fistula closure. Mean follow-up after surgery was 35.9 months (range 1-187 months). No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative complications were observed in 25%: wound healing disorders (n = 6), gracilis necroses (n = 3), incisional hernia (n = 2), scar tissue pain (n = 2), suture granuloma (n = 1), and osteomyelitis (n = 1). In 3 patients, a second gracilis transposition was performed due to fistula recurrence (n = 2) or fecal incontinence (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Based on the authors' experience, GMT is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of complex fistulas when other therapeutic attempts have failed and should therefore be considered earlier in the treatment process. It should be seen as the main but not the only step, as additional procedures may be required for complete closure in some cases.

Patient-Reported and Physiologic Outcomes Following Pelvic Exenteration for Non-Repairable Radiated Rectourethral Fistula

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of pelvic exenteration (PelvEX) on patient-reported pain, distress, and quality of life along with physiologic indicators of health in cancer survivors with radiated, non-repairable rectourethral fistula (RUF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed a prospectively maintained quality improvement database of RUF patients at our institution from 2012 to 2020. Patients with radiated, non-repairable RUF who underwent PelvEX and had follow up to 1 year were included. Pain and distress scores were collected preoperatively and at 1-year follow up. Number of narcotic prescriptions in the 3 months before surgery and the year after surgery were abstracted. Short Form 12 surveys were administered in the postoperative period. Serum albumin, creatinine, carbon dioxide, hematocrit, and glucose were abstracted from electronic health records. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

Eleven patients met inclusion criteria. Patient-reported pain significantly decreased at 1 year follow-up compared to preoperative scores (median pre: 4 vs 1 year post: 0, P = .0312). Patient-reported distress significantly decreased pre- versus post-PelvEX (median pre: 5 vs post: 0, P = .0156). At the time of postoperative pain and distress surveys, 9 (82.8%) patients did not have narcotic prescriptions. Postoperative Short Form 12 scores were similar to an age-matched United States population (mental: P = .3125; physical: P = .1484). Serum-based indicators of health were not different in the pre- versus postoperative period (all P >.05).

CONCLUSION

PelvEX may be a valuable treatment option to decrease patient-reported pain and distress without compromising quality of life or physiologic health in patients with radiated, non-repairable RUF.

Pelvic Radiation Disease

Pelvic radiation is increasingly being used for the neoadjuvant and definitive treatment of pelvic organ malignancy. While this treatment can be highly effective, and may assist in organ sparing, it is also associated with significant toxicity and devastating adverse events that need to be considered. In broad terms, pelvic radiation disease affects both the primary target organ as well as adjacent organs and soft tissue structures, with complications that can be classified and graded according to consensus criteria. The complication grade is often modality, dose, and area dependent. The most common manifestations are proctitis, cystitis, recto-urethral fistula, ureteric stricture, and bone involvement. Toxicity can be misdiagnosed for many years, resulting in significant management delays. Complications can be difficult to prevent and challenging to treat, requiring specialized multi-disciplinary input to achieve the best possible strategy to minimize impact and improve patient quality of life.

Adverse Features of Rectourethral Fistula Requiring Extirpative Surgery and Permanent Dual Diversion: Our Experience and Recommendations

Introduction: To report a series of men with a rectourethral fistula (RUF) resulting from pelvic cancer treatments and explore their therapeutic differences and impact on the functional outcomes and quality of life highlighting the adverse features that should determine permanent urinary or dual diversion. Methods: A retrospective database search was performed in four centers to identify patients with RUF resulting from pelvic cancer treatment. Medical records were analyzed for the demographics, comorbidities, diagnostic evaluation, fistula characteristics, surgical approaches and outcomes. The endpoints analyzed included a successful fistula closure following a repair and the impact of the potential adverse features on outcomes. Results: Twenty-three patients, aged 57–79 years (median 68), underwent an RUF reconstruction. The median follow-up (FU) was 54 months (range 18–115). The patients were divided into two groups according to the etiology: radiation/energy-ablation treatments with or without surgery (G1, n = 10) and surgery only (G2, n = 13). All of the patients underwent a temporary diverting colostomy and suprapubic cystostomy. Overall, a successful RUF closure was achieved in 18 (78%) patients. An interposition flap was used in six (60%) patients and one (7.7%) patient in groups G1 and G2, respectively (p = 0.019). The RUF was managed successfully in all 13 patients in group G2 as opposed to 5/10 (50%) in group G1 (p = 0.008). The patients in the radiation/energy-ablation group were more likely to require permanent dual diversion (50% vs. 0%, p < 0.0075). Conclusion: Radiation/energy-ablation therapies are associated with a more severe RUF and more complex reconstructions. Most of these patients require an abdominoperineal approach and flap interposition. The failure of an RUF repair with the need for permanent dual diversion, eventually combined with extirpative surgery, is higher after previous radiation/energy-ablation treatment. Therefore, permanent dual diversion as the primary treatment should always be included in the decision-making process as reconstruction may be futile in specific settings.

Urorectal fistula repair using different approaches: operative results and quality of life issues

PURPOSE

To evaluate efficacy of urorectal fistula (URF) repair using different approaches and the clinical factor determinant of success, and also the morbidity associated to the procedure and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in male survivors of pelvic malignancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of 39 patients with URF primarily intervened in three institutions using different surgical approaches. Success was defined as effective fistula closure. Variables evaluated included demographics, previous treatments, surgical approach, ancillary surgeries, complications and HRQoL by using a standardized non-validated specific questionnaire. Median follow-up from surgery to interview was 55 months (interquartile range 49, range 4-112). Factors determinant of success were investigated using logistic regression. Safety of the procedure was evaluated by Clavien-Dindo scale. Deterioration of continence and erectile function and other HRQoL issues were evaluated.

RESULTS

Prostate cancer treatment was the predominant etiology. The success rate for fistula repair was 89.5%. The surgical approach was not related to failed repair (p=0.35) or complications (p=0.29). Factors associated with failure were complications (p=0.025), radiotherapy (p=0.03), fistula location (p=0.04) and fistula size (p=0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed fistula size was the only independent determinant of failure (OR 6.904, 1.01-47.75). Complications occurred in 46.2% and severe complications in 12.8%. The mortality related to the procedure was 2.6%. Urinary incontinence was present before repair in 26.3% and erectile dysfunction in 89.5%. Fistula repair caused de novo urinary incontinence in 7.9% and deterioration of erectile status in 44.7%. Globally 79% were satisfied after repair and only 7.9% rated HRQoL as unhappy. Trans-sphincteric approach was related to less deterioration of erectile function (p=0.003), and higher perceived satisfaction in QoL (p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical approach elected to correct URF is not determinant of success nor of complications. Fistula size appears as independent determinant for failure. Trans-sphincteric approach could be advantageous over other procedures regarding HRQoL issues.

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Radiation Therapy: Past and Present

The incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) is increasing concomitantly with population aging. Accordingly, interest in radiation therapy (RT) and the frequency of RT are also increasing. The types of RT can be broadly divided into external beam RT (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT), and combination therapy (EBRT+BT). Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after RT for the treatment of PCa are common; however, there are few reviews on the relationship between RT and LUTS. Herein, we review the causes and incidence of LUTS, as well as the evaluation and treatment options. Because of the reported risks of RT, patients undergoing RT should be counseled regarding the challenges of treatment and informed that they may have higher failure rates than nonirradiated patients. Moreover, thorough evaluation and treatment strategies are needed to support treatment recommendations. With a review of the existing literature, this narrative article provides an overview to aid urologists in treating patients presenting with complications associated with RT for the treatment of PCa. Further research is required to provide evidence of the effectiveness and feasibility of the management approach to the care of patients with LUTS after RT for the treatment of PCa.

Posterior urethral stenosis after prostate cancer treatment: contemporary options for definitive management

Posterior urethral stenosis (PUS) is an uncommon but challenging problem following prostate cancer therapy. A review of the recent literature on the prevalence of PUS and treatment modalities used in the last decade was performed. A summative narrative of current accepted techniques in management of PUS is presented, and supplement with our own experience and algorithms.

Outcomes and Quality of Life Among Men After Anal Sphincter-Sparing Transperineal Rectourethral Fistula Repair

OBJECTIVE

To describe long-term quality of life (QOL) outcomes after rectourethral fistula (RUF) repair. RUF is a debilitating diagnosis and complex surgical dilemma with limited data regarding QOL after repair.

METHODS

Patients at a tertiary referral center undergoing transperineal RUF repair 1/2009-5/2016 were analyzed. Patients were contacted by telephone to assess QOL following repair. Descriptive analysis performed of short-term surgical data (success and complications) and long-term QOL data (novel questionnaire).

RESULTS

Twenty one men underwent RUF surgery with 95% success after initial repair. Fifty two percent had a history of radiation and/or ablation. Four individuals (19%) experienced a Clavien-Dindo complication within 30 days, with 3 of those being grade III+. Fifteen had postoperative urinary incontinence, of whom 73% underwent artificial urinary sphincter placement. Three previously radiated individuals underwent subsequent urethral stricture surgery. At long-term follow-up (mean 45.6 ± 27.1 months), 53% reported perineal pain, 43% reported problems related to the gracilis flap, and 80% reported urinary incontinence (primarily occasional mild leakage). Twenty one percent were unable to do the things they wanted in their daily lives, while 80% reported that surgery positively impacted their life. None would have opted for complete urinary diversion.

CONCLUSION

RUF repair leads to patient satisfaction and improved QOL, despite possible residual issues such as perineal pain and urinary incontinence. Definitive RUF repair should be offered to suitable radiated and nonradiated patients.

Review Article: Past, Present and Future of Cancer Survivorship and the Importance of the Urologist

INTRODUCTION

Cancer survivorship is a concept that focuses on the complete medical and holistic care of the patient with cancer from the time of diagnosis to the time of death. In 2015 the number of cancer survivors in the United States was expected to exceed 14.5 million people and a significant portion of these patients have malignancies that affect the genitourinary health of the survivor. In this review we describe the concept of cancer survivorship and review the important role of the urologist in cancer survivor care.

METHODS

A literature search concerning cancer survivorship and urogenital neoplasms was performed. We systematically searched Medline® from inception until July 2015 with the objective of identifying studies specifically targeting broad survivorship care concerns for genitourinary neoplasms. We also included nonsystematically identified publications, and governmental and agency produced reports that are currently available through various government entities and organizations.

RESULTS

Systematic searching yielded 35 articles and 7 reports for inclusion in our literature review. Urology relevant Medline findings were categorized into review articles, biopsychosocial aspects of cancer care, guidelines or society recommendations, diet and exercise related materials, models or coordination of care, or other. We found that the development of guidelines and recommendations for survivorship care in urology has been limited by the quality of the studies published to date.

CONCLUSIONS

More patients are surviving cancer and living with the consequences of treatment of the primary disease. Awareness of the components of survivorship will be critical as more national organizations require specific survivorship care programs to address these issues. Given that a large number of cancer survivors in the United States have survived urological malignancy or have urological side effects of treatment, the urology community must be familiar with the global concept of survivorship.

Pubic symphysis osteomyelitis in the prostate cancer survivor: clinical presentation, evaluation, and management

OBJECTIVE

To describe pelvic bone osteomyelitis in the prostate cancer survivor, to report on clinical presentation and treatment, and to suggest an algorithmic approach to managing this syndrome complex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review from January 2011 to June 2014 was performed to identify prostate cancer patients with pubic symphysis osteomyelitis at a tertiary-care academic medical center with emphasis on genitourinary cancer survivorship. Data on clinical presentation and outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ten patients were diagnosed with having osteomyelitis of the pubic symphysis with or without extension into the pubic rami. Three patients had associated rectal fistulas. Four patients had radical prostatectomy, 5 patients received radiotherapy, and 1 patient received high-intensity focused ultrasound as the primary treatment for prostate cancer. The most common presenting symptoms were pelvic and suprapubic pain, difficulty in walking, and recurrent urinary infections at a median of 7 years after prostate cancer treatment (range, 1.5-16 years). Eight of the 10 patients underwent pubic bone debridement with urinary and fecal diversion when needed. Two patients continue to be managed conservatively with suppressive antibiotics owing to low disease burden. Complete resolution of symptoms was noted in patients undergoing operative intervention, without any pelvic ring instability due to pubic bone resection.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pelvic pain, difficulty with ambulation, and recurrent infections in a prostate cancer survivor should prompt investigation for pubic bone osteomyelitis-a poorly recognized syndrome complex that is best managed in a multidisciplinary setting.

Minimally invasive management of urological fistulas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urological fistulas are an underestimated problem worldwide and have devastating consequences for patients. Many urological fistulas result from surgical complications and/or inadequate perinatal obstetric healthcare. Surgical correction is the standard treatment. This article reviews minimally invasive surgical approaches to manage urological fistulas with a particular emphasis on the robotic techniques of fistula correction.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, many surgeons have explored a minimally invasive approach for the management of urological fistulas. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery and the reproducibility of reconstructive surgery techniques. Introduction of the robotic platform has provided significant advantages given the improved dexterity and exceptional vision that it confers.

SUMMARY

Fistulas are a concern worldwide. Laparoscopic surgery correction has been developed through the efforts of several authors, and difficulties such as the increased learning curve have been overcome with innovations, including the robotic platform. Although minimally invasive surgery offers numerous advantages, the most successful approach remains the one with the surgeon is most familiar.

Acquired recto-uretral fistulas: etiopathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic options

Rectouretral fistulas are a rare disease, but represent an important problem for the patient that suffers them and a challenge for the urologist and colorectal surgeon who has to manage them. A wide review has been performed focusing on etiopathogenic factors, diagnostic and therapeutic options including the analysis of different surgical techniques. PubMed, MEDLINE y EMBASE medical database were searched up to September 2014.