1
|
Lavi A, Yudkevich B, Pechansky S, Tzemach S, Hussein A, Bshara I, Halstuch D, Zelichenko G, Gross M, Cohen M. Implications of a Novel Biopsy Downloading System on Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Surveillance and Focal Therapy - A Prospective Study. Urology 2021; 160:154-160. [PMID: 34780845 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the SmartBx, a novel biopsy downloading system, allowing downloading of biopsy cores with maximal core preservation as prostate biopsy sampling lacks preservation of core configuration & orientation. METHODS We prospectively collected cores from TRUS biopsy patients. Half were collected using the SmartBx & half using standard downloading. We measured length of the first ∼3200 cores through various pathology steps and within core cancer length in 160 SmartBx cores. We compared core length, yield (% of core available for final analysis/ original core on needle) and cancer detection rate between SmartBx and standard cores. T-test or chi-square were used for analysis. RESULTS 6014 cores were collected from 429 patients. Core length (12.3mm vs. 10mm; P<.01) and core yield (77.5% vs. 62.2%; P<.01) were significantly higher using the SmartBx compared to standard method, respectively. Cancer detection rate was significantly higher using the SmartBx for patients with PSA<10 (10.1% vs. 7.96%; n=2080 & n=2073, respectively; P<.016). Other subgroups showed non-significant higher detection rate for SmartBx cores. We noticed higher detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer. Within core cancer length in 160 SmartBx cores was significantly lower compared to standard positive whole cores (4.45mm vs. 10.9mm; P<.001). Assuming cancer site a perfect sphere, disease volume was 11-fold lower for within core compared to entire core (46.1mm vs. 679.9mm; P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS SmartBx results in significant higher core length, yield and cancer detection rate. Precise localization of within core tumor foci allows significant reduction in tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnon Lavi
- Department of Urology, Haamek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
| | - Boris Yudkevich
- Department of Urology, Haamek Medical Center, Afula, Israel; Urology Service, Yoseftal Medical Center, Eilat, Israel
| | | | - Sharon Tzemach
- Department of Urology, Haamek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Anan Hussein
- Department of Urology, Haamek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Ibrahim Bshara
- Department of Urology, Haamek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Daniel Halstuch
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
| | | | - Michael Gross
- Department of Urology, Haamek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Michael Cohen
- Department of Urology, Haamek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee CH, Tan TW, Tan CH. Multiparametric MRI in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: An Overview and a Practical Approach. Korean J Radiol 2021; 22:1087-1099. [PMID: 33856136 PMCID: PMC8236356 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI has become important for the detection of prostate cancer. MRI-guided biopsy is superior to conventional systematic biopsy in patients suspected with prostate cancer. MRI is also increasingly used for monitoring patients with low-risk prostate cancer during active surveillance. It improves patient selection for active surveillance at diagnosis, although its role during follow-up is unclear. We aim to review existing evidence and propose a practical approach for incorporating MRI into active surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chau Hung Lee
- Department of Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Teck Wei Tan
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Cher Heng Tan
- Department of Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
GPM6B Inhibit PCa Proliferation by Blocking Prostate Cancer Cell Serotonin Absorptive Capacity. DISEASE MARKERS 2020; 2020:8810756. [PMID: 33294057 PMCID: PMC7714590 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8810756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is currently one of the most common fatal tumor types in men. Although multiple treatments can alleviate some cases, advanced prostate cancer, especially CRPC, still has a very poor prognosis. Therefore, early detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer have a very important role in the prognosis of patients. Glycoprotein M6B (GPM6B) is a transmembrane protein that belongs to the proteolipid protein family. GPM6B has been proved and can be used as a biomarker for gynecological malignancies and breast carcinoma. However, there are no studies that explored the functions of GPM6B in PCa. We explored differentially expressed genes in prostate cancer by analyzing TCGA data and found GPM6B downregulated in PCa tissues compared to that in normal prostate tissues. The GPM6B expression in PCa patient's tumor tissues was significantly related to clinical stage, T classification, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis, but not significantly related to age and Gleason score. Also, patients with highGPM6B expression had a better prognosis. The overexpression of GPM6B in prostate cancer cells could inhibit cell proliferation. Serotonin treatment could enhance the proliferation of PCa cell lines; moreover, fluoxetine could reverse this result. In conclusion, we identified GPM6B as a tumor suppressor in PCa. In mechanism, it can regulate the uptaking of serotonin and inhibit the growth of prostate cancer. These results suggested the potential function of GPM6B as a diagnostic marker of PCa and provided clues for the development of new treatment targets for PCa.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate focal therapy has the potential to preserve urinary and sexual function while eliminating clinically significant cancer in a subset of men with low-volume, organ-confined prostate cancer. This systematic review aims to examine current evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of focal therapy for standard clinical application. RECENT FINDINGS Focal therapy reduces the rate of cancer progression and conversion to radical therapy in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. As a strategy, success in focal therapy is heavily dependent on the use of imaging and targeted biopsies. Despite advances in these areas, there remains a small but significant risk of under-detecting clinically significant cancer. Similarly, under-estimation of tumor volume may contribute to infield recurrences and close attention must be paid to the ablation margin. Although long-term oncological outcomes remain lacking, focal therapy has a low complication rate, minimal impact on urinary continence and a moderate impact on erectile function. SUMMARY With the appropriate expertise in imaging, targeted biopsy and targeted ablation, focal therapy is a good option in men with low-intermediate risk cancer who are willing to maximize their urinary and sexual function. However, close posttreatment surveillance and the possibility of conversion to whole gland therapy must be accepted.
Collapse
|
5
|
De Souza MF, Kuasne H, Barros-Filho MDC, Cilião HL, Marchi FA, Fuganti PE, Rogatto SR, Cólus IMDS. Circulating mRNA signature as a marker for high-risk prostate cancer. Carcinogenesis 2019; 41:139-145. [DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgz129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men. The indolent course of the disease makes the treatment choice a challenge for physicians and patients. In this study, a minimally invasive method was used to evaluate the potential of molecular markers in identifying patients with aggressive disease. Cell-free plasma samples from 60 PCa patients collected before radical prostatectomy were used to evaluate the levels of expression of eight genes (AMACR, BCL2, NKX3-1, GOLM1, OR51E2, PCA3, SIM2 and TRPM8) by quantitative real-time PCR. Overexpression of AMACR, GOLM1, TRPM8 and NKX3-1 genes was significantly associated with aggressive disease characteristics, including extracapsular extension, tumor stage and vesicular seminal invasion. A trio of genes (GOLM1, NKX3-1 and TRPM8) was able to identify high-risk PCa cases (85% of sensitivity and 58% of specificity), yielding a better overall performance compared with the biopsy Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen, routinely used in the clinical practice. Although more studies are required, these circulating markers have the potential to be used as an additional test to improve the diagnosis and treatment decision of high-risk PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hellen Kuasne
- International Research Center—CIPE—A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Silvia Regina Rogatto
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Surveillance after prostate focal therapy. World J Urol 2018; 37:397-407. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2363-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|
7
|
Gansler T, Shah R, Wang Y, Stevens VL, Yang B, Newton CC, Gapstur SM, Jacobs EJ. Smoking and Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality after Diagnosis in a Large Prospective Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018; 27:665-672. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
8
|
Patel MP, Schulman A, Shah KP, Anderson JB, Polascik TJ. Engaging the primary care community to encourage appropriate prostate cancer screening. Ther Adv Urol 2018; 10:11-16. [PMID: 29344092 PMCID: PMC5761916 DOI: 10.1177/1756287217735799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 09/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer remains a controversial topic, particularly in the primary care community. Our multidisciplinary prostate screening panel at Duke University Health System, USA created a nuanced PSA screening algorithm, implemented it into the Electronic Health Record of Duke Primary Care, and conducted outreach meetings with primary care practices to support its rollout. Through this project, we identified areas of concern among primary care clinicians regarding PSA screening that we structured into two major categories: ideological opposition and logistical opposition. We outlined specific concerns in each major category and described how our team responded to those concerns. As communication between primary care clinicians and prostate specialists is vital to the success and safety of PSA screening programs, we hope that describing primary care concerns and our responses to them will help other health systems thoughtfully and efficiently implement appropriate PSA screening programs moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malhar P. Patel
- Duke University School of Medicine, 8 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27703, USA
| | - Ariel Schulman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin P. Shah
- Duke Primary Care, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John B. Anderson
- Duke Primary Care, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas J. Polascik
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ligand-dependent EphA7 signaling inhibits prostate tumor growth and progression. Cell Death Dis 2017; 8:e3122. [PMID: 29022918 PMCID: PMC5682672 DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2017.507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2017] [Revised: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The downregulation of receptor tyrosine kinase EphA7 is frequent in epithelial cancers and linked to tumor progression. However, the detailed mechanism of EphA7-mediated prostate tumor progression remains elusive. To test the role of EphA7 receptor in prostate cancer (PCa) progression directly, we generated EphA7 receptor variants that were either lacking the cytoplasmic domain or carrying a point mutation that inhibits its phosphorylation by site-directed mutagenesis. Overexpression of wild-type (WT) EphA7 in PCa cells resulted in decreased tumor volume and increased tumor apoptosis in primary tumors. In addition, ectopic expression of WT EphA7 both can delay PCa cell proliferation and could inhibit PCa cell migration and invasion. This protein can also induce PCa cell apoptosis that correlated with increasing the protein expression levels of Bax, elevating the caspase-3 activities, reducing the protein expression levels of Bcl-2 and facilitating the dephosphorylation of Akt, which is further increased by the stimulation of ephrinA5-Fc. However, expression of these EphA7 mutants in PCa cells has no effect in vivo and in vitro. The expression of EphA7 and ephrinA5 was significantly decreased in PCa specimens compared with BPH tissues or paired normal tissues. Moreover, the phosphorylation of EphA7 was positively related with ephrinA5 expression in human prostate tissues. In sum, receptor phosphorylation of EphA7, at least in part, suppress PCa tumor malignancy through targeting PI3K/Akt signaling pathways.
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen K, Tay KJ, Law YM, Aydin H, Ho H, Cheng C, Yuen JSP. Outcomes of combination MRI-targeted and transperineal template biopsy in restaging low-risk prostate cancer for active surveillance. Asian J Urol 2017; 5:184-193. [PMID: 29988897 PMCID: PMC6033238 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Revised: 12/03/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Active surveillance (AS) offers a strategy to reduce overtreatment and now is a widely accepted treatment option for low-risk prostate cancer. An ideal tool for risk-stratification would detect aggressive cancers and exclude such men from taking up AS in the first place. We evaluate if a combination of transperineal template biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy identifies significant prostate cancer amongst men initially diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Methods This prospective, single-blinded study included men with low-risk prostate cancer (D'Amico's Criteria) diagnosed on conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Patients first underwent multiparametric MRI of the prostate ≥6 weeks after initial biopsy. Each suspicious lesion is mapped and assigned a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score. Template biopsy is first performed with the surgeon blinded to MRI findings followed by MRI-targeted biopsy using a robotic transperineal biopsy platform. Results The age of the 19 men included is 65.4 ± 4.9 years (mean ± SD). Prostate specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis and at the time of transperineal biopsy were comparable (7.3 ± 1.7 ng/mL and 7.0 ± 1.8 ng/mL, p = 0.67), so were prostate volumes (34.2 ± 8.9 mL and 32.1 ± 13.4 mL, p = 0.28). MRI-targeted biopsy had a higher percentage of cancer detection per core compared to template biopsy (11.7% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.02), this was more than 3 times superior for Gleason 7 disease (5.9% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.01). Four of 18 (22.2%) patients with MRI lesions had significant disease with MRI-targeted biopsy alone. Three of 19 patients (15.8%) had significant disease with template biopsy alone. In combination, both techniques upclassified five patients (26.3%), all of whom underwent radical prostatectomy. Whole mount histology confirmed tumour location and grade. All six patients with PIRADS 5 lesions had cancer detected (66.6% significant disease). Conclusion A combination of MRI-targeted and template biopsy may optimally risk-classify “low-risk” patients diagnosed on initial conventional transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) prostate biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yan Mee Law
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Hakan Aydin
- Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Henry Ho
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tay KJ, Schulman AA, Sze C, Tsivian E, Polascik TJ. New advances in focal therapy for early stage prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017. [PMID: 28635336 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1345630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate focal therapy offers men the opportunity to achieve oncological control while preserving sexual and urinary function. The prerequisites for successful focal therapy are to accurately identify, localize and completely ablate the clinically significant cancer(s) within the prostate. We aim to evaluate the evidence for current and upcoming technologies that could shape the future of prostate cancer focal therapy in the next five years. Areas covered: Current literature on advances in patient selection using imaging, biopsy and biomarkers, ablation techniques and adjuvant treatments for focal therapy are summarized. A literature search of major databases was performed using the search terms 'focal therapy', 'focal ablation', 'partial ablation', 'targeted ablation', 'image guided therapy' and 'prostate cancer'. Expert commentary: Advanced radiological tools such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS), prostate-specific-membrane-antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) represent a revolution in the ability to understand cancer function and biology. Advances in ablative technologies now provide a menu of modalities that can be rationalized based on lesion location, size and perhaps in the near future, pre-determined resistance to therapy. However, these need to be carefully studied to establish their safety and efficacy parameters. Adjuvant strategies to enhance focal ablation are under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kae Jack Tay
- a Department of Urology , Singapore General Hospital, SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Center , Singapore.,b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Ariel A Schulman
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Christina Sze
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Efrat Tsivian
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Thomas J Polascik
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tay KJ, Polascik TJ, Elshafei A, Tsivian E, Jones JS. Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Partial to Whole-Gland Cryotherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of the Cryo On-Line Data Registry Data. J Endourol 2017; 31:564-571. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kae Jack Tay
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Ahmed Elshafei
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Medical School, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Efrat Tsivian
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - J. Stephen Jones
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tay KJ, Gupta RT, Holtz J, Silverman RK, Tsivian E, Schulman A, Moul JW, Polascik TJ. Does mpMRI improve clinical criteria in selecting men with prostate cancer for active surveillance? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017; 20:323-327. [DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2017.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Revised: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
14
|
Moul JW. Comparison of DRE and PSA in the Detection of Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2016; 197:S208-S209. [PMID: 28010975 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Judd W Moul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Holtz JN, Tay KJ, Polascik TJ, Gupta RT. Integration of multiparametric MRI into active surveillance of prostate cancer. Future Oncol 2016; 12:2513-2529. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous cancer in men though many men will not die of this disease and may not require definitive treatment. Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly utilized potential solution to the issue of overtreatment of prostate cancer. Traditionally, prostate cancer patients have been stratified into risk groups based on clinical stage on digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen and biopsy Gleason score, though each of these variables has significant limitations. This review will discuss the potential role for prostate multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsy techniques incorporating MRI in the selection of candidates for AS, monitoring patients on AS and as triggers for definitive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie N Holtz
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Urologic Surgery & Duke Prostate Center, DUMC Box 2804, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thomas J Polascik
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Urologic Surgery & Duke Prostate Center, DUMC Box 2804, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 3494, 20 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Rajan T Gupta
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC Box 3494, 20 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207:87-95. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.15.15878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
17
|
Moul JW. Editorial Comment. J Urol 2016; 196:732. [PMID: 27264352 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Judd W Moul
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gupta RT, Spilseth B, Patel N, Brown AF, Yu J. Multiparametric prostate MRI: focus on T2-weighted imaging and role in staging of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:831-43. [PMID: 27193786 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0579-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) represents a growing modality for the non-invasive evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa) and is increasingly being used for patients with persistently elevated PSA and prior negative biopsies, for monitoring patients in active surveillance protocols, for preoperative characterization of cancer for surgical planning, and in planning for MRI-targeted biopsy. The focus of this work is twofold. First, we review the key role of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) in mpMRI, specifically outlining how it is used for anatomic evaluation of the prostate, detection of clinically significant PCa, assessment of extraprostatic extension (EPE), and mimics of PCa on this sequence. We will also discuss optimal technical acquisition parameters for this sequence and recent technical advancements in T2WI. Second, we will delineate the role that mpMRI plays in the staging of PCa and describe the implications of the information that mpMRI can provide in determining the most appropriate management plan for the patient with PCa.
Collapse
|
19
|
Moul JW. Editorial Comment. Urology 2016; 87:131-2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
20
|
Abstract
The impact of localized prostate cancer in the elderly depends on disease aggressiveness and life expectancy. In men with localized prostate cancer, those with low-risk disease or a shorter life expectancy should be managed expectantly, whereas those with long life expectancy or more aggressive disease may benefit from curative treatment. Comorbidity and quality-of-life concerns are key considerations during the selection of therapeutic modalities in the elderly in localized and metastatic settings. A variety of new agents have changed the therapeutic landscape in castrate-resistant prostate cancer, but their benefits need to be considered alongside their side effects and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kae Jack Tay
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 103861, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Judd W Moul
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 103861, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 103861, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|