A clinical algorithm for management of fertility in adolescents with the Klinefelter syndrome:

Fertility Preservation Is Recommended in Adolescents with Klinefelter Syndrome: Con

In adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome (KS), cryopreservation would require surgery, which might delay testosterone therapy needed for testosterone deficiency. As surgical sperm retrieval rates are similar for all age groups in the KS population, fertility preservation in KS adolescents should not be recommended.

Utility of evaluating semen samples from adolescents with Klinefelter Syndrome for cryopreservation: A multi-institution evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) is the most common genetic condition cause of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). KS also often results in decreased testicular growth and testosterone production. Because of this, exogenous testosterone therapy is commonly prescribed for KS patients to treat hypogonadism, but this may have additional impacts to future fertility potential. KS adolescent patients may be asked to provide multiple semen samples to identify potential sperm for early cryopreservation.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a multi-institutional database to evaluate the prevalence of sperm in the ejaculate of adolescent KS patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of all adolescent KS patients seen at two high-volume tertiary male infertility clinics between 2015 and 2020. Adolescence was defined as individuals aged 12-19 years, as per the World Health Organization. Demographic information data including weight, height, medical comorbidities, and concurrent medications were collected. Serum hormone levels including FSH, LH, and testosterone were collected, as well as any available semen analysis data.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were identified and included in the database. A total of 100 (86.2%) had hormone data available and 48 (41.3%) had semen analysis data. Of the 48 patients with semen analyses, only 4 (8.3%) patients had rare sperm in the ejaculate while the remaining had azoospermia (91.7%). None of the specimens were suitable for cryopreservation. The average serum total testosterone level of adolescent KS patients was 181 ± 216 ng/dL. FSH levels were 14.3 ± 18.8 IU/L (normal 0.3-10.0 IU/L) and LH levels were 7.8 ± 12.4 IU/L (normal 1.2-7.8 IU/L). A total of 17 patients repeated a semen analysis, and in no instance did this result in sperm where there was none previously.

CONCLUSION

The findings from a large multicenter retrospective cohort of adolescent KS patients suggest that a single semen analysis is sufficient for attempted cryopreservation purposes, and that multiple semen analyses is not needed.

Prediction Models for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Is There Any Room for Further Studies?

Several prediction models for successful sperm retrieval (SSR) in patients with azoospermia due to spermatogenic dysfunction (also termed non-obstructive azoospermia—NOA) have been developed and published in the past years, however their resulting prediction accuracy has never been strong enough to translate their results in the clinical practice. This notwithstanding, the number of prediction models being proposed in this field is growing. We have reviewed the available evidence and found that, although patients with complete AZFc deletion or a history of cryptorchidism may have better probability of SSR compared to those with idiopathic NOA, no clinical or laboratory marker is able to determine whether a patient with NOA should or should not undergo microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) to have his testicular sperm retrieved. Further research is warranted to confirm the utility of evaluating the expression of noncoding RNAs in the seminal plasma, to individuate patients with NOA with higher probability of SSR.

Adolescent Fertility Preservation: Where Do We Stand Now

Adolescence is a period of flux for many body systems. While fertility potential typically increases after menarche, there are diseases where the opposite occurs and fertility preservation options need to be considered early. In cases of cancer, options vary by pubertal status and can include ovarian tissue cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, sperm cryopreservation, and testicular tissue cryopreservation. Much remains to be learned about fertility and preservation options in those with differences in sexual development (DSDs); however, depending on the form of DSD, fertility preservation may not be necessary. Similarly, traditional fertility counseling in children with galactosemia may need to be changed, as data suggest that fertility rates attributed to other causes of premature ovarian insufficiency may not be as applicable to this disease. Adolescents with Turner's syndrome are at high risk for premature ovarian failure; therefore, it is important to consider options as early as possible since ovarian reserves are depleted quickly. On the other hand, transgender and gender diverse adolescents may even be able to undergo fertility preservation after starting hormone therapy. In all cases, there are additional ethical components including technical/surgical risks in childhood, offering experimental therapies without creating false hope and evaluating children's consent and assent capabilities that must be considered.

Infertility considerations in klinefelter syndrome: From origin to management

Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is defined as the presence of one or more extra "X" chromosome in a male patient. It affects approximately 1 in 600 newborn males and the most common chromosomal abnormality, leading to male hypogonadism and infertility. There is a lack of data supporting best practices for KS patients' care. In this paper we review controversial issues in KS research ranging from mechanisms of variation in KS phenotype to abnormalities resulting in reduced sperm production to successful sperm retrieval disparities after testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Translation to live birth and offspring health is also examined. Finally, medical therapies used to optimize the hormonal status and chances of fertility in KS patients are reviewed. We will also discuss the experimental spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) treatments, which are considered the future for TESE negative patients.