Developments in optimizing transperineal prostate biopsy

Preliminary clinical practice of radical prostatectomy without preoperative biopsy

BACKGROUND

At present, biopsy is essential for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy (RP). However, with the development of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), it might be feasible to avoid biopsy before RP. Herein, we aimed to explore the feasibility of avoiding biopsy before RP in patients highly suspected of having PCa after assessment of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI.

METHODS

Between December 2017 and April 2022, 56 patients with maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of ≥4 and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥4 lesions who received RP without preoperative biopsy were enrolled from two tertiary hospitals. The consistency between clinical and pathological diagnoses was evaluated. Preoperative characteristics were compared among patients with different pathological types, T stages, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades, and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-five (98%) patients were confirmed with PCa by pathology, including 49 (89%) with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, defined as ISUP grade ≥2 malignancy). One patient was diagnosed with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). CsPCa patients, compared with clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa) and HGPIN patients, were associated with a higher level of prostate-specific antigen (22.9 ng/mL vs. 10.0 ng/mL, P = 0.032), a lower median prostate volume (32.2 mL vs. 65.0 mL, P = 0.001), and a higher median SUVmax (13.3 vs. 5.6, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It might be feasible to avoid biopsy before RP for patients with a high probability of PCa based on PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI. However, the diagnostic efficacy of csPCa with PI-RADS ≥4 and SUVmax of ≥4 is inadequate for performing a procedure such as RP. Further prospective multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm our perspectives and establish predictive models with PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI.

Shifting to transperineal prostate biopsy: A narrative review

To address the limitations and challenges associated with transrectal (TR) biopsy and to present transperineal (TP) biopsy as a viable and potentially safer alternative to TR biopsy. Prostate cancer (PCa) is a significant global health concern. The prevalence of advanced-stage prostate cancer in Asia is higher than that in the United States, emphasizing the need for effective screening and diagnosis methods. The gold standard of diagnosis is a TR biopsy. However, it has limitations due to the risk of infection and potential complications, such as injury to the rectal artery. Efforts have been made to address issues such as false-negative biopsies, under-sampling, and over-sampling through MRI-guided biopsies. However, the TR approach makes it difficult to access the apical and anterior regions of the prostate. TP biopsy has emerged as an alternative to address the limitations of TR biopsy. Nevertheless, a TP biopsy is a painful procedure, requiring the use of general anesthesia and expensive equipment. As a result, it has been perceived as costly and time-consuming. In addition, it requires a steep learning curve. The introduction of local anesthesia such as pudendal nerve block and the adoption of freehand techniques have contributed to the feasibility of performing TP biopsy. Recent research indicates that freehand TP biopsy can yield comparable diagnostic results to template-guided approaches. The diagnostic performance, cancer detection rates, and complication rates of TP biopsy have demonstrated its potential as a safe and effective diagnostic method.

Evolution of anxiety management in prostate biopsy under local anesthesia: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS

Prostate biopsy (PB) is an essential step in the diagnosis and active surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa). Transperineal PB (TP-PB) is now the recommended approach and is mostly conducted under local anesthesia. However, this procedure can potentially cause anxiety for patients, given the oncological context and the fear of peri-procedural pain and complications. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the currently available tools for the management of peri-interventional anxiety during TP-PB, with a particular emphasis on the potential role of virtual reality (VR) in this setting.

RESULTS

In TP-PB, preoperative anxiety can lead to increased pain perception, longer procedure time, and decreased patient satisfaction. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches have been explored to reduce anxiety, such as premedication, deep sedation, education, relaxation techniques, hypnosis, and music therapy, albeit with mixed results. VR has recently emerged in the technological armamentarium for managing pain and anxiety, and the efficiency of this technology has been evaluated in various medical fields, including pediatrics, gastroenterology, urology, gynecology, and psychiatry.

CONCLUSION

Despite the paucity of available data, VR appears to be a safe and effective technique in reducing anxiety in many procedures, even in frail patients. No studies have evaluated the role of VR in TP-PB. Future research should thus explore the optimal way to implement VR technology and any potential benefits for TP-PB patients.

Likelihood of sampling prostate cancer at systematic biopsy as a function of gland volume and number of cores

BACKGROUND

Pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate is used to conduct targeted prostate biopsy (TB), guided by ultrasound and registered (fused) to the MRI. Systematic biopsy (SB) continues to be used together with TB or in mpMRI-negative patients. There is insufficient evidence on how to use SB to inform clinical decision-making in the mpMRI era. The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of prostate volume and number of SB cores on sampling clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) using a simulation method based on clinical data.

METHODS

SBs were simulated using data from 42 patients enrolled in a transrectal ultrasound robot-assisted biopsy trial. Linear mixed models were used to examine the relationship between the number of SB cores and prostate volume on 1) clinically significant cancer detection probability (csCDP) and 2) percent of mpMRI depicted regions of interest (ROIs) sampled with the SB.

RESULTS

Median values and interquartile range (IQR) were 47.16 cm3 (35.61-65.57) for prostate volume, 0.57 cm3 (0.39-0.83) for ROI volume, and 4.0 (2-4) for PI-RADS v2.1 scores on MRI. csCDP increased with the increasing number of simulated SB cores and decreased substantially with larger prostate volume. Similarly, the percent of ROIs sampled increased with the increasing number of simulated SB cores and was lower for prostate volumes ≥60 cm3 compared to glands <60 cm3.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of the number of SBs performed on detecting csPCa varies largely with gland volume. The common 12-core SB can achieve adequate cancer detection and sampling of ROIs in smaller glands, but not in larger glands. In addition to TB or in mpMRI-negative patients, the number of SB cores can be adjusted to prostate volume. Performing 12-core SB alone in ≥60 cm3 glands results in inadequate sampling and potential PCa underdiagnosis.