Laparoscopic radical adrenalectomy for cancer: long-term outcomes. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:134-138. [PMID: 18303532 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0b013e3282f3e6d2]

Laparoscopy versus open adrenalectomy in patients with solid tumor metastases: results of a multicenter European study

Background

The outcome of adrenalectomy carried out by laparoscopy or open surgery for solid tumor metastases was assessed.

Methods

A total of 317 patients with histologically confirmed adrenal metastatic disease collected from 30 centres in Europe underwent adrenalectomy by laparoscopy (n=146) or open laparotomy (n=171). Differences between laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy were assessed by a single Cox analysis for both procedures.

Results

The median overall survival was 24.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.4-26.6] months for open adrenalectomy and 45.0 (95% CI: 22.6-67.4) for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (P=0.008). Survival rates were 68%, 49%, 35% and 29% at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years for open surgery vs. 88%, 62%, 52% and 46% for laparoscopy, respectively. In the subgroup of R0 resections, the difference in survival in favor of laparoscopy (median 46 vs. 27 months) was marginally significant (P=0.073). Renal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42; 95% CI: 0.23-0.76, P=0.005], surgery of the primary tumor (HR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19-0.54), and use of chemotherapy (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.88) were associated with a better survival, whereas type of resection (R1/R2 vs. R0) was associated with a worse prognosis (HR 2.29; 95% CI: 1.52-3.44, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy patients showed a longer survival than open adrenalectomy individuals, as minimally invasive approach was attempted more common in less advanced disease which led to higher number of R0 resections.

Laparoscopy versus open adrenalectomy in patients with solid tumor metastases: results of a multicenter European study

BACKGROUND

The outcome of adrenalectomy carried out by laparoscopy or open surgery for solid tumor metastases was assessed.

METHODS

A total of 317 patients with histologically confirmed adrenal metastatic disease collected from 30 centres in Europe underwent adrenalectomy by laparoscopy (n=146) or open laparotomy (n=171). Differences between laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy were assessed by a single Cox analysis for both procedures.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 24.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.4-26.6] months for open adrenalectomy and 45.0 (95% CI: 22.6-67.4) for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (P=0.008). Survival rates were 68%, 49%, 35% and 29% at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years for open surgery vs. 88%, 62%, 52% and 46% for laparoscopy, respectively. In the subgroup of R0 resections, the difference in survival in favor of laparoscopy (median 46 vs. 27 months) was marginally significant (P=0.073). Renal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) 0.42; 95% CI: 0.23-0.76, P=0.005], surgery of the primary tumor (HR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19-0.54), and use of chemotherapy (HR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.88) were associated with a better survival, whereas type of resection (R1/R2 vs. R0) was associated with a worse prognosis (HR 2.29; 95% CI: 1.52-3.44, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy patients showed a longer survival than open adrenalectomy individuals, as minimally invasive approach was attempted more common in less advanced disease which led to higher number of R0 resections.

Clinical analysis of adrenal lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter (an analysis of 251 cases)

Background

To describe the pathological distribution, imaging manifestations, and surgical managements and prognosis of large adrenal tumors (LATs) ≥ 5 cm

Methods

A total of 251 patients with LATs were analyzed on the basis of pathological or clinical diagnosis. Regarding surgery, open adrenalectomy was performed on 89 patients, and laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed on 89 patients. Thirty-two patients with bilateral tumors were analyzed in terms of clinical characteristics. The survival rate was determined for 43 patients with adrenal metastases and 29 patients with primary adrenal malignancies. The CT characteristics including tumor diameter, shape, edge, heterogeneity, necrosis, calcification, pre-contrast attenuation, and contrast attenuation were analyzed for 117 patients.

Results

The majority of LATs were still benign, but they had a higher probability to be malignant. Benign LATs made up 68.13% of all cases, mainly adrenal cysts (19.52%), pheochromocytoma (18.73%), benign adenoma (16.73%), and myelolipoma (7.17%). Malignant LATs accounted for 28.69% of cases, mainly including adrenocortical carcinoma (8.76%) and metastases (17.13%). Laparoscopic surgery was found to involve less trauma than open surgery. It was also safer and postoperative recovery was faster, but it had drawbacks and could not completely replace open surgery. CT features had obvious specificity for the diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors. For example, benign adenomas had a smaller pre-contrast (< 10 Hu) whereas malignant adrenal tumors had, on the contrary, higher attenuation. Regarding adrenal malignant carcinoma, adrenal primary malignant tumors showed a better prognosis than adrenal metastases (mean survival of 19.17 months vs 9.49 months). Primary adrenal cortical carcinoma without metastasis had a better prognosis than primary adrenal cortical carcinoma metastasis (mean survival of 23.71 months vs 12.75 months), and adrenal solitary metastasis had a better prognosis than general multiple metastatic carcinoma (mean survival of 14.95 months vs 5.17 months).

Conclusion

LATs were more likely to be benign; however, they still had a high probability of being a malignant tumor. Understanding the clinicopathological characteristics of LATs can facilitate selection of more effective clinical treatment options.

Outcomes of surgery for benign and malignant adrenal disease from the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons' national registry

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the indications, procedures and outcomes for adrenal surgery from the UK Registry of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery database from 2005 to 2017, and compared outcomes between benign and malignant disease.

METHODS

Data on adrenalectomies were extracted from a national surgeon-reported registry. Preoperative diagnosis, surgical technique, length of hospital stay, morbidity and in-hospital mortality were examined.

RESULTS

Some 3994 adrenalectomies were registered among patients with a median age of 54 (i.q.r. 43-65) years (55·9 per cent female). Surgery was performed for benign disease in 81·5 per cent. Tumour size was significantly greater in malignant disease: 60 (i.q.r. 34-100) versus 40 (24-55) mm (P < 0·001). A minimally invasive approach was employed in 90·2 per cent of operations for benign disease and 48·2 per cent for cancer (P < 0·001). The conversion rate was 3·5-fold higher in malignant disease (17·3 versus 4·7 per cent; P < 0·001). The length of hospital stay was 3 (i.q.r. 2-5) days for benign disease and 5 (3-8) days for malignant disease (P < 0·050). In multivariable analysis, risk factors for morbidity were malignant disease (odds ratio (OR) 1·69, 1·22 to 2·36; P = 0·002), tumour size larger than 60 mm (OR 1·43, 1·04 to 1·98; P = 0·028) and conversion to open surgery (OR 3·48, 2·16 to 5·61; P < 0·001). The in-hospital mortality rate was below 0·5 per cent overall, but significantly higher in the setting of malignant disease (1·2 versus 0·2 per cent; P < 0·001). Malignant disease (OR 4·88, 1·17 to 20·34; P = 0·029) and tumour size (OR 7·47, 1·52 to 39·61; P = 0·014) were independently associated with mortality in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Adrenalectomy is a safe procedure but the higher incidence of open surgery for malignant disease appears to influence postoperative outcomes.

Longitudinal analysis of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy regarding patient-reported satisfaction and cosmesis outcomes

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

To compare longitudinal patient-reported cosmesis of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) to that of conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (CLA).

METHODS

A total of 23, 15, and 9 patients underwent transumbilical LESS-A (TU-LESS), subcostal LESS-A (SC-LESS), and CLA, respectively. A questionnaire was administered asking the patient to assess wound pain (0: not painful to 10: very painful), satisfaction (0: not satisfied to 10: very satisfied), and cosmesis (0: very ugly to 10: very beautiful) on the basis of a visual analogue scale. We mailed questionnaires to all patients who received LESS-A and CLA at postoperative 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the pain scores between TU-LESS, SC-LESS, and CLA at every time point. In the CLA group, the cosmesis and satisfaction scores were significantly lower at postoperative 3 months (p = 0.0033, 0.0130). There were no significant inter-group differences in the cosmesis score between the three groups after postoperative 6 months. However, the satisfaction score of SC-LESS decreased after postoperative 3 months and was significantly lower at postoperative 9 and 12 months (p = 0.0333, 0.0160). The difference between the satisfaction scores of each procedure gradually increased after postoperative 6 months.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first comprehensive longitudinal analysis of patient-reported satisfaction and cosmesis outcomes between LESS-A and CLA. The resulting data provide important insights into the improvement in satisfaction in patients who underwent TU-LESS. These findings can facilitate the treatment decision-making process for patients who are considering laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Adrenocortical carcinoma surgery-surgical extent and approach

PURPOSE

Adequate tumour resection is the gold standard of care for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). However, the optimal surgical strategy remains debatable. In our opinion, the extent of surgery (adequate tumour resection) is the primary concern, rather than the surgical approach (laparoscopic or open). We propose that both surgical approaches have a role in the management of ACC provided the extent of resection is selected based on patient and tumour characteristics and accurate pre-operative investigations.

METHODS

A review of 25 curative intent resections for ACC between 2002 and 2013 was done. Group A (16 patients-64 %) included all patients who underwent planned radical adrenalectomy without any other resection and group B (9 patients-36 %) included all patients who underwent a planned extensive resection based on pre-operative investigations.

RESULTS

Of 471 adrenalectomies, 25 were performed for ACC with curative intent. Tumours were significantly larger in group B with mean size of 119.6 versus 62.4 mm in group A (p = 0.002). Tumours in group B also had higher WEISS scores (mean score 7 vs 5.2, p = 0.033) and almost always required multi-organ resection. The recurrence rate was 37.5 % (n = 6) for group A and 44.4 % for group B (n = 4), p = 1.00. Poor prognosis was associated with significantly higher WEISS scores (p = 0.016) and a trend towards more advanced ENSAT disease stage (p = 0.06). Estimated overall survival was 74.17 months (group A 67.3 vs group B 70.1, p = 0.244).

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate pre-operative staging is critical to select a tailored surgical strategy. Multi-organ resection remains the preferred approach for large and potentially invasive ACC. Some patients presenting with smaller ACC may benefit from a more extensive resection.

Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Adrenal Cancer—A Systematic Review

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is increasingly employed for removal of adrenal masses. As adrenal tumors increase in size, however, their malignant potential likewise increases, raising concerns for the use of laparoscopy for removal of large adrenal malignancies. We present a systematic review of the use of laparoscopic adrenalectomy of large malignant tumors. A PubMed search was undertaken and two independent reviewers reviewed the manuscripts and a methodological index for nonrandomized studies score was determined. Manuscripts with scores greater than eight were included. The primary end points were rate of cancer recurrence, rate of conversion to open, complications, and surgical technique. Our initial search produced 412 manuscripts. After abstract review, 44 manuscripts were scored, of which 19 manuscripts were used. A total of 2183 tumors were removed, of which 517 were malignant. Average follow-up time was 38.7 months. The recurrence rate was 12.9 per cent. The rate of conversion was 3.6 per cent. The main techniques used were transabdominal and retroperitoneal. No significant differences in rate of recurrence or complications were seen when compared with open. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy may be performed for large and malignant tumors; however, most manuscripts on this subject lack significant scientific rigor and follow-up.

Surgical management of adrenocortical carcinoma

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is rare but one of the most malignant endocrine tumors. This article reviews and summarizes the current knowledge about the treatment of ACC. The epidemiology and molecular events involved in the pathogenesis of ACC are briefly outlined. The different diagnostic tools to distinguish benign from malignant adrenocortical tumors, including biochemical analysis and imaging, are discussed. The surgical treatment of ACC has evolved in the last 2 decades. The different surgical alternatives for the treatment of ACC in the context of primary, recurrent, or metastatic disease are reviewed, and the remaining challenges and controversies are discussed.

Needlescopic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare the perioperative parameters of needle-assisted and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A).

METHODS

We compared 23 patients undergoing needle-assisted LESS-A with 29 patients undergoing conventional LESS-A at Hiroshima University Hospital between November 2009 and February 2014. Needle-assisted LESS-A was performed using a MiniLap instrument (Stryker, San Jose, CA, USA). We used this instrument to protectively retract the liver at the right side of the tumor and the spleen at the left side by grasping with a Securea endoscopic surgical spacer (Hogy Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Various parameters including insufflation time, estimated blood loss, pain scale, resumption of oral intake, transfusion rate, and complications were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

In all cases, LESS-A was completed successfully with no major intraoperative complications. Patients in both treatment groups had similar age, body mass index, sex, and laterality. Significantly, needle-assisted LESS-A was performed using the transumbilical approach rather than the subcostal approach. The insufflation time of the needle-assisted LESS-A was shorter than that of the conventional LESS-A (p = 0.0335). No patients required intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions. Retrospective design and the small sample size are main limitations of this study.

CONCLUSION

Needle-assisted LESS-A was performed safely and in a manner that mitigated many of the difficulties of LESS surgery.

Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic removal of an isolated adrenal metastasis in a patient with breast cancer detected with FDG PET/CT

Adrenal metastasis from breast cancer rarely occurs in the course of this disease. Laparoscopic surgery has increased in the therapy for malignant tumors because of its lower morbidity and mortality compared with conventional surgical methods. However, complications such as the appearance of a port-site metastasis may also occur. Clinical examination and conventional cross-sectional imaging usually reveal this only at advanced stage. The authors reported on a case with abdominal wall port-site metastasis detected with F-FDG PET/CT 33 months after the laparoscopic removal of a late-onset, PET/CT-verified adrenal metastasis from lobular breast cancer.

Laparoendoscopic single site, laparoscopic or open surgery for adrenal tumors: Selecting the optimal approach

Numerous surgical modalities are available to treat adrenal lesions. Minimally-invasive approaches for adrenalectomy are indicated in most circumstances, and new evidence continues to be accumulated. In this context, current indications for open surgical adrenalectomy (OS-A), minimally-invasive adrenalectomy (MI-A), and laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) remain unclear. A comprehensive English-language literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMED to identify articles and guidelines pertinent to the surgical management of adrenal tumors. A comprehensive chart review was performed for three illustrative cases. Clinical recommendations were generated based on relevant literature and the expertise of the investigator group. MI-A offers advantages over OS-A in properly selected patients, who experience fewer complications, lower blood loss, and shorter hospital stays. Robot-assisted laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy may offer advantages over transperitoneal surgery, and LESS-A may be an even less-invasive option that will require further evaluation. MI-A remains the surgical treatment of choice for most adrenal lesions. Tumor size and stage are the primary indications for selecting alternative treatment modalities. OS-A remains the gold standard for large tumors (> 10 cm) and suspected or known advanced stage malignancy. LESS-A appears to be an appropriate initial approach for small tumors (< 4-5 cm), including pheochromocytoma and isolated adrenal metastases.

Videoscopic adrenalectomy - when does retroperitoneal seem better?

INTRODUCTION

Videoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard for the surgical treatment of benign adrenal tumours. The two most common approaches are the lateral transperitoneal approach (LTA) and the posterior retroperitoneal approach (PRA). So far it has not been established which is the preferable one. The choice depends primarily on the surgeon's preference and contraindications for a particular approach in individual cases.

AIM

To compare the two most common approaches for videoscopic adrenalectomy, LTA and PRA, based on a literature review and our own experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature (PubMed and Cochrane 1990 - current) and analysed retrospectively our own patients who underwent videoscopic adrenalectomy between 2009 and 2013. The analysis covered patient features, tumour characteristics, reasons for qualification for each approach, operative time and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Out of 71 videoscopic adrenalectomies, 50 were performed using PRA and 21 using LTA. Patients in the PRA group on average were older, but had smaller tumours. There was no significant difference in perioperative morbidity between PRA and LTA. Mean blood loss and total operative time were smaller/shorter for the PRA group in comparison to the LTA group. Time to first oral intake and the average postoperative hospital stay were shorter for PRA than LTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Videoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and efficient technique performed using both LTA and PRA approaches. The choice of technique should be guided, most of all, by surgeon experience, patient characteristics, tumour size and location. Our preferable approach is PRA, especially for small (< 6 cm) benign tumours. We find LTA advantageous for tumours of larger size, with suspected malignant character (either primary or secondary), in ectopic position, as well as in patients lacking an ipsilateral kidney or when a simultaneous abdominal operation is planned.

Adrenocortical carcinoma: what the surgeon needs to know. Case report and literature review

Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare and aggressive cancer and its prognosis is frequently unsatisfactory. Due to its rarity there's a lack of prospective randomized studies. Without experience in the approach of this kind of tumor, managing becomes challenging and, moreover, we have only few recommendations, based on weak evidence. We report a case that has some peculiarities and is an excellent food for thought. Then we deal with a literature review to highlight and summarize most significant aspects of epidemiology, clinic, diagnosis, therapy and prognosis in an exquisitely surgical point of view.

Patient-reported satisfaction and cosmesis outcomes following laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy

INTRODUCTION

We evaluate patient-reported satisfaction and cosmesis of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) in comparison with that of conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (CLA).

METHODS

A total of 19 and 104 patients who respectively underwent LESS-A and CLA between May 1996 and June 2011 were included in the study. Questionnaires inquiring about scar pain (0: not painful, 10: very painful), satisfaction (0: not satisfied, 10: very satisfied) and cosmesis (0: very unsightly, 10: very beautiful) on the basis of a visual analogue scale were sent to patients postoperatively.

RESULTS

The respondents consisted of 11 and 54 patients who underwent LESS-A and CLA, respectively. There was no significant inter-group difference in age, sex, affected side or body mass index. No significant differences were observed in operative time or estimated blood loss. There were also no significant differences in pain (0.67 vs. 0.57, p = 0.393), satisfaction (8.92 vs. 8.46, p = 0.453), or cosmesis score (8.58 vs. 8.00, p = 0.487) between the LESS-A and CLA groups overall. In female patients, the satisfaction score was significantly higher in the LESS-A group than in the CLA group (10.0 vs. 8.72, p = 0.049). In young patients (<50 years old), the satisfaction score was also significantly higher in the LESS-A group than in the CLA group (9.17 vs. 6.38, p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Young patients and female patients who had received LESS-A adrenal surgery were more satisfied with the scar outcomes than were the young patients and female patients who had received CLA. We suggest that this patient subset most values the cosmetic benefits of LESS-A.

Endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy for adrenal metastases

Objectives. To evaluate whether retroperitoneal approach for adrenalectomy is a safe and effective treatment for adrenal metastases (AM). Methods. From June 2004 to January 2014, nine consecutive patients with AM were treated with endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (ERA). A retrospective study was conducted, and clinical data, tumor characteristics, and oncologic outcomes were acquired and analyzed. Results. Renal cancer was the primary site of malignancy in 44.4% of cases. The mean operative time was 132 ± 10.4 min. There were 5 synchronous and 4 metachronous AM. One patient required conversion to transperitoneal laparoscopic procedure. No mortality or perioperative complications were observed. The median overall survival was 11 months (range: 2-42 months). Survival rates of 50% and 25% were identified at 1 and 3 years, respectively. At the end of the study, 4 patients were alive with a mean observed follow-up of 20 months. No patients presented with local tumor relapse or port-site metastases. Conclusions. This study shows that ERA is a safe and effective procedure for resection of AM and advances the surgical treatment of adrenal disease. The use of the retroperitoneal approach for adrenal tumors less than 6 cm can provide very favorable surgical outcomes.

Long-term survival after adrenalectomy for stage I/II adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC): a retrospective comparative cohort study of laparoscopic versus open approach

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the standard treatment for benign adrenal lesions. The laparoscopic approach has also been increasingly accepted for adrenal metastases but remains controversial for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). In a retrospective cohort study we compared the outcome of LA versus open adrenalectomy (OA) in the treatment of stage I and II ACC.

METHODS

This was a double cohort study comparing the outcome of patients with stage I/II ACC and a tumor size <10 cm submitted to LA or OA at Lille University Hospital referral center from 1985 to 2011. Main outcomes analyzed were: postoperative morbidity, overall survival, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Among 111 consecutive patients operated on for ACC, 34 met the inclusion criteria. LA and OA were performed in 13 and 21 patients, respectively. Baseline patient characteristics (gender, age, tumor size, hormonal secretion) were similar between groups. There was no difference in postoperative morbidity, but patients in LA group were discharged earlier (p < 0.02). After a similar follow-up (66 ± 52 for LA and 51 ± 43 months for OA), Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-specific survival and disease-free survival were identical in both groups (p = 0.65, p = 0.96, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LA was associated with a shorter length of stay and did not compromise the long-term oncological outcome of patients operated on for stage I/II ACC ≤ 10 cm ACC. Our results suggest that LA can be safely proposed to patients with potentially malignant adrenal lesions smaller than 10 cm and without evidence of extra-adrenal extension.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for cancer

Laparoscopic procedures are preferred by surgeons and patients alike because of decreased pain, reduced perioperative morbidity, and an earlier return to self-reliance. During the last decade, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the technique most commonly used for the removal of benign adrenal tumors. The indications for laparoscopy in malignant adrenal tumors remains controversial, because oncologic resections have not been reproducible compared with open techniques.

Open versus endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of localized (stage I/II) adrenocortical carcinoma: results of a multiinstitutional Italian survey

BACKGROUND

We compared the oncologic effectiveness of open adrenalectomy and endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-six patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma (stage I/II) who underwent R0 resection were included in an Italian multiinstitutional surgical survey. They were divided into 2 groups based on the operative approach (either conventional or endoscopic).

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six patients underwent open adrenalectomy and 30 patients underwent endoscopic adrenalectomy. The 2 groups were well matched for age, sex, lesion size, and stage (P = NS). The mean follow-up time was similar for the 2 groups (P = NS). The local recurrence rate was 19% for open adrenalectomy and 21% for endoscopic adrenalectomy, whereas distant metastases were recorded in 31% of patients in the conventional adrenalectomy group and 17% in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). The mean time to recurrence was 27 ± 27 months in the conventional open adrenalectomy group and 29 ± 33 months in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (38.3% vs 58.2%) and 5-year overall survival rates (48% vs 67%; P = NS).

CONCLUSION

The operative approach does not affect the oncologic outcome of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma, if the principles of surgical oncology are respected.

Evaluation and management of adrenal incidentaloma

Adrenal incidentaloma is the most common adrenal neoplasm encountered in clinical practice. The timely, accurate, and cost-effective evaluation and management of adrenal lesions found incidentally can be challenging for clinicians. Evaluation begins with biochemical screening and additional imaging. Management strategies vary by patient factors and tumor characteristics. Adrenalectomy is indicated for lesions that are hormonally active, larger than 4-5 cm, symptom-related, and have an imaging appearance that is atypical of a benign lesion.

Adrenocortical carcinoma: which surgical approach?

INTRODUCTION

There are no randomised studies comparing open and laparoscopic approaches foradrenalectomy in patients with adrenal cortical carcinoma.

METHODS

There is evidence of postoperative benefit for the patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared to open adrenalectomy (level B).

RESULTS

Results from comparison of oncological outcomes in ACC between open and laparoscopic approaches are equivocal: increasedrisk of local recurrence and peritoneal carcinomatosis by the laparoscopic route (level D), and identical results between the two approaches in terms of survival, recurrence and peritoneal carcinomatosis (level C).

CONCLUSION

An open approach is recommended in case of local invasion, with a view to achieving an R0 resection (level D). Laparoscopic resection of ACC/potentially malignant tumours, which includes removal of surrounding periadrenal fat and results in an R0 resection without tumour capsule rupture, may be performed for preoperative and intraoperative stage 1-2 ACC and tumours with a diameter < 10 cm (level C).

Contemporary management of adrenocortical carcinoma

CONTEXT

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and typically aggressive malignancy. Available recommendations are based primarily on retrospective series or expert opinions, and only few prospective clinical studies have yet been published.

OBJECTIVE

To combine the available evidence for diagnostic work-up and treatment of ACC to a contemporary recommendation on the management of this disease.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systematic literature search for studies conducted on humans and published in English using the Medline/PubMed database up to 31 January 2011. In addition, we screened published abstracts at meetings and several Web sites for recommendations on ACC management.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In patients with suspected localised ACC, a thorough endocrine and imaging work-up is followed by complete (R0) resection of the tumour by an expert surgeon. In experienced hands, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is probably as effective and safe for localised and noninvasive ACC as open surgery. Most clinicians agree that mitotane should be used as adjuvant therapy in the majority of patients, as they have a high risk for recurrence. An international panel has suggested using tumour stage, resection status, and the proliferation marker Ki67 as guidance for or against adjuvant therapy. In patients with advanced disease at presentation or recurrence not amenable to complete resection, a surgical approach is frequently inadequate. In these cases, mitotane alone or in combination with cytotoxic drugs is the treatment of choice. The most promising regimens (etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin plus mitotane, and streptozotocin plus mitotane) are currently compared in an international phase 3 trial, and results should be available by the end of 2011. Several targeted therapies are under investigation and may lead to new treatment options. Management of endocrine manifestations with steroidogenesis inhibitors is required in patients suffering uncontrolled hormone excess.

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed recommendations are provided to guide the management of patients with ACC.

Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) adrenalectomy: technique and outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe the surgical technique, to analyze outcomes and to provide an overview of the current status of laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) adrenalectomy.

METHODS

A comprehensive PubMed search was performed for all relevant urological literature regarding LESS and adrenal surgery. In addition, experience gained at the authors' own institutions was considered. Clinical descriptive and comparative reports on LESS adrenal surgery procedures were analysed.

RESULTS

LESS adrenal surgery has been effectively performed for a number of indications. A wide variety of approaches (transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal, multichannel trocar versus multiple ports, trans- or extraumbilical) have been described. LESS adrenalectomy seems to be safe, taking more time than the standard laparoscopic counterpart but appears to offer the patient less postoperative discomfort. Technical difficulties of the procedure include the requirement of more time for adjustment of articulating instruments, longer 'one-handed' manipulation time, and a high peroperative tissue re-grasping rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility and safety of LESS adrenalectomy has been demonstrated. Only long-term follow-up outcomes will prove its benefits over conventional laparoscopy and define the role and the oncological safety of LESS adrenal surgery.

Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: surgical and oncologic outcome in 152 patients

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare oncologic outcome in patients with ACC who underwent either open adrenalectomy (OA) or laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for localised disease.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 152 patients with stage I-III ACC with a tumour < or =10 cm registered with the German ACC Registry.

INTERVENTION

Patients were stratified into two groups according to the surgical procedure (LA or OA). For comparison, we used both a matched pairs approach by selecting for each patient from the LA group (n=35) one corresponding patient from the OA group (n=117) and multivariate analysis in all 152 patients.

MEASUREMENTS

Disease-specific survival was chosen as the predefined primary end point. Secondary end points were recurrence-free survival, frequency of tumour capsule violation and postoperative peritoneal carcinomatosis, and incidence and reasons for conversion from LA to OA.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

LA and OA did not differ with regard to the primary end point using either the matched pairs approach (hazard ratio [HR] for death: 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.72; p=0.55) or multivariate analysis (HR for death: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.51-1.92; p=0.92). Similarly, adjusted recurrence-free survival was not different between LA and OA (HR: 0.91; 95% CI, 0.56-1.47; p=0.69). Frequency of tumour capsule violation and peritoneal carcinomatosis were comparable between groups. In 12 of 35 patients of the LA group, surgery was converted to open surgery with no impact on the clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

For localised ACC with a diameter of < or =10 cm, LA by an experienced surgeon is not inferior to OA with regard to oncologic outcome.

[Laparoscopic approach in the treatment of malignant adrenal tumours]

BACKGROUND

Malignant primary or secondary adrenal tumours are uncommon. For most of them early surgery with adrenalectomy is the only means of cure. Although controversy exists on this issue, the increasing experience in laparoscopic surgery extends the indication for laparoscopic adrenalectomy to potentially malignant and to metastatic adrenal tumours. Our aim was to evaluate the technical feasibility of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for malignant neoplasias, describing the results of our consecutive series of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 13 patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy for malignant neoplasia between March 1999 and June 2009, at the Hospital de Clínicas of the Universidad of Buenos Aires and at the Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires. A transperitoneal laparoscopic approach was used in all patients. The mean follow up was 37.9 months (2-84).

RESULTS

Thirteen laparoscopic adrenalectomies were performed due to malignant neoplasia. Mean age was 55.2+12 years. The relationship between male and female was 10/3. Five patients had an adrenal carcinoma, 1 patient a malignant phaeochromocytoma, and 7 patients had metastatic tumours. Three patients required conversion to laparotomy. Average operation time was 146.4 min. There were two perioperative complications and no mortality. Average length of hospital stay was 4.6 days (1-35). The survival at 3 years was 46%. The cause of death was the underlying disease in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a reasonable technique for malignant adrenal tumours, when the open oncological resection can be reproduced by the laparoscopic approach.

Retrospective evaluation of the outcome of open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for stage I and II adrenocortical cancer

BACKGROUND

Although there is consensus that laparoscopy is the standard of care for the resection of benign adrenal tumours, there is controversy regarding the role of laparoscopy for the resection of adrenocortical cancer (ACC).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to review the ACC database of the San Luigi Hospital to compare the oncologic effectiveness of open adrenalectomy (OA) versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the treatment of patients with stage I and II ACC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We performed a retrospective analysis involving 43 patients with stage I and II ACC who had undergone radical surgery.

INTERVENTION

The patients were stratified into two groups according to the surgical procedure. The "open group" consisted of patients treated with OA; the "lap group" consisted of patients treated with LA.

MEASUREMENTS

Oncologic effectiveness of the procedures was tested comparing the recurrence-free survival of patients treated with OA versus LA. Secondary outcome measures were differences in terms of type of recurrence and overall survival.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The open group consisted of 25 patients and the lap group of 18 patients. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic data. The median follow-up was 38 mo in the open group and 30 mo in the lap group. Recurrence rate was 64% in the open group and 50% in the lap group. The median recurrence-free survival was 18 mo in the open group and 23 in the lap group (p=0.8). No differences in terms of pattern of recurrences were recorded. During follow-up, 28% of the open group patients and 5% of the lap group patients died. No differences in terms of survival time were noted (p=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings provide interesting evidence that OA and LA may be comparable in terms of recurrence-free survival for patients with stage I and II ACC when the principles of surgical oncology are respected.

[Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: presentation of 43 cases]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to present and analyse our experience in laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Descriptive and retrospective study including LA performed over 8 years, between 2000 and 2008 in our hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 43 LA were performed to 41 patients using a transperitoneal lateral approach. Indications for adrenalectomy included hyperaldosteronism (19), non-functioning adenoma (8), phaeochromocytoma (6), Cushing's syndrome (6), metastasis (3) and adrenal primary tumour (1). Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days and the median size of the masses was 30mm (range: 4-155mm) Complications occurred in 3 patients (2 respiratory infections, and 1 intraoperative bleeding). There was no mortality. Only one case needed conversion to open adrenalectomy; no patients required reintervention.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective method in the treatment of adrenal masses and it can be performed with minimal risk and morbidity.

Laparo-endoscopic single-site left transperitoneal adrenalectomy

A 53-yr-old woman presented with abdominal pain. Ultrasonography, computed tomography, and an endocrinologic work-up revealed a 4-cm nonfunctional left adrenal mass. A TriPort laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed. The TriPort was inserted through a 3-cm subcostal incision. Using 5-mm instruments, a left adrenalectomy was performed. The specimen was dissected (harmonic scalpel) and extracted through a 10-mm bag. A TriPort adrenalectomy was successfully completed in 240 min (blood loss: 20 ml). The postoperative period was uneventful (discharge within 3 d). In our opinion, the TriPort adrenalectomy is feasible and safe, with favourable perioperative and short-term outcomes and a delighted patient at the 8-mo follow-up.

Surgical management of metastases to the adrenal gland: open, laparoscopic, and ablative approaches

The adrenal gland is a potential site of metastasis for various malignancies. Metastases to the adrenal gland are the second most common type of adrenal mass lesion after adenomas. Differentiation of a metastatic lesion from a primary adrenal lesion can be challenging and requires the selective use of radiologic imaging, serologic testing, and adrenal biopsy. In patients who present with an isolated adrenal metastasis, adrenalectomy is often considered to aid in cancer control. Numerous studies have reported improved survival with resection of solitary adrenal metastases for various types of primary tumors. Traditionally, open adrenalectomy was the preferred option for these patients. More recently, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has offered a minimally invasive approach, with its resultant advantages of improved perioperative parameters. Proper patient selection for the laparoscopic versus open approach remains paramount in deciding the best treatment for the individual patient.