1
|
Takahashi M, Takehara Y, Fujisaki K, Okuaki T, Fukuma Y, Tooyama N, Ichijo K, Amano T, Goshima S, Naganawa AS. Three Dimensional Ultra-short Echo Time MRI Can Depict Cholesterol Components of Gallstones Bright. Magn Reson Med Sci 2021; 20:359-370. [PMID: 33390560 PMCID: PMC8922345 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Non-calcified cholesterol stones that are small in size are hard to be depicted on CT or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. This institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective in vitro study aims to characterize contrast behaviors of 3 main components of the gallstones, i.e., cholesterol component (CC), bilirubin calcium component (BC) and CaCO3 (CO) on 3D radial scan with ultrashort TE (UTE) MRI, and to test the capability of depicting CC of gallstones as bright signals as compared to background saline. METHODS Fourteen representative gallstones from 14 patients, including 15 CC, 6 BC and 4 CO, were enrolled. The gallstones underwent MRI including fat-saturated T1-weighted image (fs-T1WI) and UTE MRI with dual echoes. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the chemical analysis for the 25 portions of the stones were compared. RESULTS BC was bright on fs-T1WI, which did not change dramatically on UTE MRI and the signal did not remain on UTE subtraction image between dual echoes. Whereas the CC was negative or faintly positive signal on fs-T1WI, bright signal on UTE MRI and the contrast remained even higher on the UTE subtraction, which reflected their short T2 values. Median CNRs and standard errors of the segments on each imaging were as follows: on fs-T1WI, -10.2 ± 4.2 for CC, 149.7 ± 27.6 for BC and 37.9 ± 14.3 for CO; on UTE MRI first echo, 16.7 ± 3.3 for CC, 74.9 ± 21.3 for BC and 17.7 ± 8.4 for CO; on UTE subtraction image, 30.2 ±2.0 for CC, -11.2 ± 5.4 for BC and 17.8 ± 10.7 for CO. Linear correlations between CNRs and cholesterol concentrations were observed on fs-T1WI with r = -0.885, (P < 0.0001), UTE MRI first echo r = -0.524 (P = 0.0072) and UTE subtraction with r = 0.598 (P = 0.0016). CONCLUSION UTE MRI and UTE subtraction can depict CC bright.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamoru Takahashi
- Department of Radiology, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yasuo Takehara
- Department of Fundamental Development for Advanced Low Invasive Diagnostic Imaging, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kenji Fujisaki
- Seirei Medical Checkup Center, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | | | - Norihiro Tooyama
- Department of Radiology, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Katsutoshi Ichijo
- Department of Radiology, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Tomoyasu Amano
- Department of Radiological Technology, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Goshima
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - and Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Greenhalf W, Lévy P, Gress T, Rebours V, Brand RE, Pandol S, Chari S, Jørgensen MT, Mayerle J, Lerch MM, Hegyi P, Kleeff J, Castillo CFD, Isaji S, Shimosegawa T, Sheel A, Halloran CM, Garg P, Takaori K, Besselink MG, Forsmark CE, Wilcox CM, Maisonneuve P, Yadav D, Whitcomb D, Neoptolemos J. International consensus guidelines on surveillance for pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club. Pancreatology 2020; 20:910-918. [PMID: 32624419 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) have an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. We present the international consensus guidelines for surveillance of pancreatic cancer in CP. METHODS The international group evaluated 10 statements generated from evidence on 5 questions relating to pancreatic cancer in CP. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate the level of evidence available per statement. The working group voted on each statement for strength of agreement, using a nine-point Likert scale in order to calculate Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. RESULTS In the following domains there was strong consensus: (1) the risk of pancreatic cancer in affected individuals with hereditary pancreatitis due to inherited PRSS1 mutations is high enough to justify surveillance; (2) the risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with CP associated with SPINK1 p. N34S is not high enough to justify surveillance; (3) surveillance should be undertaken in pancreatic specialist centers; (4) surveillance should only be introduced after the age of 40 years and stopped when the patient would no longer be suitable for surgical intervention. All patients with CP should be advised to lead a healthy lifestyle aimed at avoiding risk factors for progression of CP and pancreatic cancer. There was only moderate or weak agreement on the best methods of screening and surveillance in other types of environmental, familial and genetic forms of CP. CONCLUSIONS Patients with inherited PRSS1 mutations should undergo surveillance for pancreatic cancer, but the best methods for cancer detection need further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Greenhalf
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Philippe Lévy
- Service de Pancréatologie-Gastroentérologie, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, DHU UNITY, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP, 92118 Clichy Cedex, and Université Paris 7, France
| | - Thomas Gress
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Hospital, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Vinciane Rebours
- Service de Pancréatologie-Gastroentérologie, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, DHU UNITY, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP, 92118 Clichy Cedex, and Université Paris 7, France
| | - Randall E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5200 Centre Avenue, Suite 409, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Steve Pandol
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Suresh Chari
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus M Lerch
- Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, D-17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Institute for Translational Medicine &Department of Translational Medicine/1st Department of Medicine, Medical School, Pécs, H-7624, Hungary
| | - Jörg Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Shuiji Isaji
- Department of Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
| | - Tooru Shimosegawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Andrea Sheel
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher M Halloran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Pramod Garg
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Kyoichi Takaori
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chris E Forsmark
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Patrick Maisonneuve
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Dhiraj Yadav
- Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Whitcomb
- Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John Neoptolemos
- Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hart PA, Topazian M, Raimondo M, Cruz-Monserrate Z, Fisher WE, Lesinski GB, Steen H, Conwell DL. Endoscopic Pancreas Fluid Collection: Methods and Relevance for Clinical Care and Translational Science. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111:1258-66. [PMID: 27481304 PMCID: PMC5568003 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic secretions have an important role in the regulation of a normal nutritional state but can be altered owing to a variety of pathophysiological mechanisms in the context of exocrine pancreatic disease. The development of an endoscopic technique for collection of pancreatic fluid, termed endoscopic pancreatic function testing, has led to improved understanding of these alterations and is particularly helpful to characterize chronic pancreatitis. In addition, investigators have found endoscopically collected pancreatic fluid to be a valuable biofluid for the purposes of translational science. Techniques such as proteomic, cytokine, genetic mutation, DNA methylation, and microRNA analyses, among others, can be utilized to gain a better understanding of the molecular characteristics of chronic pancreatitis and other pancreatic diseases. Endoscopic collection of pancreatic fluid is safe and relatively straightforward, permitting opportunities for longitudinal analysis of these translational markers throughout the course of disease. This manuscript summarizes our current knowledge of pancreatic fluid, with an emphasis on proper techniques for sample collection and handling, its clinical utility, and preliminary observations in translational science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phil A. Hart
- Section of Pancreatic Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mark Topazian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Massimo Raimondo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate
- Section of Pancreatic Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - William E. Fisher
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gregory B. Lesinski
- Section of Pancreatic Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Hanno Steen
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Msaachusetts, USA
| | - Darwin L. Conwell
- Section of Pancreatic Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Joergensen MT, Gerdes AM, Sorensen J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell O, Mortensen MB. Is screening for pancreatic cancer in high-risk groups cost-effective? - Experience from a Danish national screening program. Pancreatology 2016; 16:584-92. [PMID: 27090585 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Revised: 03/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, symptoms are few and diffuse, and when the diagnosis has been made only 10-15% would benefit from resection. Surgery is the only potentially curable treatment for pancreatic cancer, and the prognosis seems to improve with early detection. A hereditary component has been identified in 1-10% of the PC cases. To comply with this, screening for PC in high-risk groups with a genetic disposition for PC has been recommended in research settings. DESIGN Between January 2006 and February 2014 31 patients with Hereditary pancreatitis or with a disposition of HP and 40 first-degree relatives of patients with Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) were screened for development of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with yearly endoscopic ultrasound. The cost-effectiveness of screening in comparison with no-screening was assessed by the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICER). RESULTS By screening the FPC group we identified 2 patients with PDAC who were treated by total pancreatectomy. One patient is still alive, while the other died after 7 months due to cardiac surgery complications. Stratified analysis of patients with HP and FPC provided ICERs of 47,156 US$ vs. 35,493 US$ per life-year and 58,647 US$ vs. 47,867 US$ per QALY. Including only PDAC related death changed the ICER to 31,722 US$ per life-year and 42,128 US$ per QALY. The ICER for patients with FPC was estimated at 28,834 US$ per life-year and 38,785 US$ per QALY. CONCLUSIONS With a threshold value of 50,000 US$ per QALY this screening program appears to constitute a cost-effective intervention although screening of HP patients appears to be less cost-effective than FPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiken Thyregod Joergensen
- Vejle Hospital, Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | | | - Jan Sorensen
- Centre for Health Economic Research (COHERE), Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|