Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis and the Apolipoprotein E4 Allele

TMAO promotes apoptosis and oxidative stress of pancreatic acinar cells by mediating IRE1α-XBP-1 pathway

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis caused by hyperlipidemia is a severe life-threatening condition. Therefore, it is urgent to develop new therapeutic methods to treat this disease.

METHODS

Cell viability was determined by the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. Western blotting (WB) was used to detect the expression levels of apoptotic and endoribonuclease inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α)/X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1) pathway-associated proteins. The induction of cell apoptosis was determined using flow cytometry. The expression levels of the oxidative stress indicators were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

WB analysis and the CCK-8 assay demonstrated that trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) decreased cell viability and facilitated apoptosis of MPC-83 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the induction of oxidative stress was assessed by evaluating the levels of specific markers, including hydrogen peroxide, reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and superoxide dismutase. The levels of the aforementioned markers were increased in the TMAO-treated group. Subsequently, the IRE1α/XBP-1 pathway-associated proteins were analyzed by WB analysis and the data demonstrated that the regulatory effects of TMAO on MPC-83 cells were meditated by the IRE1α/XBP-1 signaling pathway. Subsequently, rescue experiments were performed to further assess the effects of TMAO.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides evidence on the application of TMAO as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for the therapeutic intervention of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis.

Increased levels of miR-372 correlate with disease progression in patients with hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis

The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of microRNA (miRNA)-372 in the serum of patients with hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis (HTGAP), and its clinical significance. Patients with a serum lipid concentration ≥11.3 or 5.65-11.3 mmol/l with chylous serum were included in group A (n=40). The remaining patients did not have HTGAP and were included in group B (B). A further 25 patients with hyperlipidemia, but not AP (group C), and 30 healthy volunteers (group D) were recruited as controls. The level of miR-372 in the serum of group A (4.76±2.60) was significantly increased compared with groups B (0.98±0.80), C (0.85±0.62) and D (0.76±0.44); however, there was no significant difference in the expression of miR-372 between groups B, C and D. The expression level of miR-372 was significantly increased in the severe HTGAP group (6.45±2.20) compared with the mild HTGAP group (3.08±1.74). Further experiments suggested that the expression level of miR-372 was positively correlated with the level of triacylglycerol (r=0.666; P<0.001) but not with the level of amylase (r=-0.145; P>0.05). ROC analysis indicated that the combined use of miR-372 expression levels and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring improved the diagnostic value for HTGAP. In summary, the expression of miR-372 in HTGAP was significantly upregulated and increased with the severity of the disease. The results of the present study may provide a novel strategy for the diagnosis and severity assessment of HTGAP in the clinic.

Relationships between Metabolic Comorbidities and Occurrence, Severity, and Outcomes in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review

Background. The population of patients with acute pancreatitis treated by the staff at our department of gastroenterology includes those with mild and self-limited disease ranging to those with severe and fatal disease. Early diagnosis and accurate prediction of the severity and outcome of this disease, which is commonly seen by our department, is important for a successful outcome. Metabolic comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus, fatty liver, obesity, and metabolic syndrome) are relevant to the severity and progression of many diseases. The objective of this review was to examine clinical relationships between metabolic comorbidities and occurrence, severity, and outcome of acute pancreatitis.

A systematic review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology and current management of hyperlipidaemic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aims of this systematic review were to define the epidemiology and pathophysiology of hyperlipidaemic pancreatitis, establish its association with clinical outcome and define management strategies.

METHODS

The Cochrane, Embase and Medline databases were searched, limited to the last decade, for articles on hyperlipidaemic pancreatitis. All randomised controlled trials, observational studies and case series (with a minimum of 10 patients) on hyperlipidaemic pancreatitis were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies with 1979 patients were included. The median admission triglyceride concentration was 42.8 mmol/L (range 13.6-108.6 mmol/L) [3785 mg/dL (range 1205-9612 mg/dL)]. Severe hypertriglyceridaemia (>1000 mg/dL, 11.0 mmol/L) was present in 1.7% of the adult population, and about 15-20% of these developed hyperlipidaemic acute pancreatitis. Medical management of severe hyperlipidaemia at onset of acute pancreatitis has not been investigated fully. However, tight regulation of triglyceride concentration after presentation with acute pancreatitis was found to reduce the risk of recurrence. Plasmapheresis reduced concentrations of triglycerides by up to 85%, but this did not impact morbidity or mortality. All studies included defined hyperlipidaemia as a more severe form of pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence suggests an increasing risk of acute pancreatitis in patients with hyperlipidaemia and a more severe form of pancreatitis. There is some evidence to suggest biochemical benefit of using novel techniques like plasmapheresis without the desired physiological benefit. However, there is a need for an international consensus on the management of hyperlipidaemic pancreatitis. More rigorous and methodologically robust studies are required to inform such consensus guidelines.