Plasma Level of Soluble Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor Predicts the Severity of Acute Alcohol Pancreatitis

Prognostic role of suPAR in acute pancreatitis: A protocol for systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common emergency condition with high morbidity, mortality, and socio-economic impact. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a potential biomarker for AP prognosis. This study systematically reviews the literature on suPAR's prognostic roles in assessing AP severity, organ failure, mortality, and other pathological markers.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of 5 databases up to March 19, 2023, was conducted, selecting cohort studies that examined suPAR's relationship with AP outcomes. Outcome variables included AP severity, organ failure, mortality, hospital stay length, and suPAR's association with other inflammatory markers. Our paper has been registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42023410628).

RESULTS

Nine prospective observational studies with 1033 AP patients were included. Seven of eight studies found suPAR significantly elevated in severe acute pancreatitis (P < .05). Four studies showed suPAR effectively predicted organ failure risk, and 4 studies concluded suPAR significantly predicted mortality (P < .05). The review had no high-risk studies, enhancing credibility.

CONCLUSION

suPAR is a valuable prognostic marker in AP, significantly predicting severity, organ failure, hospital stay length, and mortality. Further large-scale studies are needed to explore suPAR's role in other clinical outcomes related to AP disease course, to establish it as a mainstay of AP prognosis.

P-suPAR may reflect the inflammatory response after pancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Several different scoring systems have been developed to predict post-pancreatectomy complications. Currently used inflammatory markers are of only limited value in predicting complications after pancreatic surgery. Plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (P-suPAR) is a prognostic biomarker associated with different inflammatory conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate P-suPAR levels before and after pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-six patients evaluated for pancreatic surgery due to suspected malignant or premalignant lesion were recruited for this study at Tampere University Hospital between 2016 and 2021. P-suPAR was analyzed before the planned operation and on postoperative days (PODs) one and three.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-three patients [median age 67 (range 33-84) years, 50 % male] underwent a pancreatic surgery procedure. Compared to preoperative values [median 3.7 (IQR 3.1-4.7) ng/mL], P-suPAR was significantly lower on PODs 1 [3.2 (2.5-3.9) ng/mL; p < 0.001] and 3 [3.2 (2.7-4.1) ng/mL; p < 0.001]. P-suPAR on POD 1 was significantly lower in patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) [2.6 (2.1-3.4) ng/mL] than in patients with no POPF [3.2 (2.6-3.8) ng/mL; p = 0.007]. Similar decreases in P-suPAR values were seen in patients with postoperative acute pancreatitis (POAP) and surgical site infection (SSI).

CONCLUSIONS

After pancreatic surgery, P-suPAR level on POD 1 is significantly lower in patients with POPF, POAP or SSI. P-suPAR is decreased after pancreatic resection in all patients. This type of postoperative P-suPAR profile has not previously been described, and may reflect the compensatory anti-inflammatory reaction following the initial systemic inflammatory reaction caused by surgical trauma.

Plasma soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (P-suPAR) in the diagnostics between malignant and non-malignant pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker elevated in several inflammatory conditions and cancers. It has recently been shown to be elevated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) predicts the severity of the disease in first acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) and ten-year mortality after recovery from first AAP. According to our previous results, P-suPAR is not elevated in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and could possibly be used in distinguishing pancreatic cancer (PC) from CP. When imaging creates a suspicion of a pancreatic lesion, the distinction between malignant and non-malignant disease is crucial. Additional tools are needed, and we still lack a sufficiently sensitive and specific biomarker. Our aim was to further investigate whether preoperatively measured P-suPAR is beneficial in distinguishing between malignant and non-malignant pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-six patients evaluated in Tampere University Hospital for pancreatic surgery for suspected malignant pancreatic lesion were recruited for the study. The final study group consisted of 113 patients. P-suPAR and other covariates were measured before the planned operation.

RESULTS

P-suPAR was significantly higher in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) [median 4.1 (IQR 3.3-5.1) ng/mL] than in patients with non-malignant [3.3 (2.9-4.4) ng/mL; p = 0.012] histology. ROC curve analysis resulted in an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI 0.55-0.76); p = 0.007 and a cutoff value of 3.2 ng/mL. Crosstabulation yielded sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 43%. A combination of positive P-suPAR and elevated plasma carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (P-CA19-9) tests did not improve sensitivity but elevated specificity up to 86-88%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative P-suPAR is elevated in patients with PC compared to patients with a non-malignant pancreatic lesion. Combining P-suPAR with P-CA19-9 may improve diagnostic accuracy.

Recent Advancements in Antifibrotic Therapies for Regression of Liver Fibrosis

Cirrhosis is a severe form of liver fibrosis that results in the irreversible replacement of liver tissue with scar tissue in the liver. Environmental toxicity, infections, metabolic causes, or other genetic factors including autoimmune hepatitis can lead to chronic liver injury and can result in inflammation and fibrosis. This activates myofibroblasts to secrete ECM proteins, resulting in the formation of fibrous scars on the liver. Fibrosis regression is possible through the removal of pathophysiological causes as well as the elimination of activated myofibroblasts, resulting in the reabsorption of the scar tissue. To date, a wide range of antifibrotic therapies has been tried and tested, with varying degrees of success. These therapies include the use of growth factors, cytokines, miRNAs, monoclonal antibodies, stem-cell-based approaches, and other approaches that target the ECM. The positive results of preclinical and clinical studies raise the prospect of a viable alternative to liver transplantation in the near future. The present review provides a synopsis of recent antifibrotic treatment modalities for the treatment of liver cirrhosis, as well as a brief summary of clinical trials that have been conducted to date.

THE ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS AFTER THE REVISED ATLANTA CLASSIFICATION

BACKGROUND

New recommendations for the management of patients with acute pancreatitis were set after the Atlanta Classification was revised in 2012.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present systematic review is to assess whether these recommendations have already been accepted and implemented in daily medical practices.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was carried out in studies conducted with humans and published in English and Portuguese language from 10/25/2012 to 11/30/2018. The search was conducted in databases such as PubMed/Medline, Cochrane and SciELO, based on the following descriptors/Boolean operator: "Acute pancreatitis" AND "Atlanta". Only Randomized Clinical Trials comprising some recommendations released after the revised Atlanta Classification in 2012 were included in the study.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine studies were selected and considered valid after inclusion, exclusion and qualitative evaluation criteria application. These studies were stratified as to whether, or not, they applied the recommendations suggested after the Atlanta Classification revision. Based on the results, 68.5% of the studies applied the recommendations, with emphasis on the application of severity classification (mild, moderately severe, severe); 16.4% of them were North-American and 14.7% were Chinese. The remaining 31.5% just focused on comparing or validating the severity classification.

CONCLUSION

Few studies have disclosed any form of acceptance or practice of these recommendations, despite the US and Chinese efforts. The lack of incorporation of these recommendations didn't enable harnessing the benefits of their application in the clinical practice (particularly the improvement of the communication among health professionals and directly association with the worst prognoses); thus, it is necessary mobilizing the international medical community in order to change this scenario.

Plasma suPAR may help to distinguish between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

SuPAR (soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor) is a biomarker reflecting the inflammatory state of the human body. Earlier studies suggest that urinary suPAR/creatinine ratio levels are elevated in chronic pancreatitis (CP), and that plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) level is elevated in pancreatic cancer (PC). Our aim was to study the levels of P-suPAR in CP in a long-term prospective follow-up setting to explore the possibility of distinguishing between PC and CP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two patient groups were compared. The first group included 83 patients who were prospectively followed up after their first acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) for median 7.0 (range 0.3-9.8) years. Twelve patients in this group developed CP during follow-up, and two patients were further excluded from the CP cohort. The second group consisted of 25 patients operated on for suspicion of pancreatic malignancy and final pathological diagnosis of PC. P-suPAR levels were measured and compared within and between these groups.

RESULTS

P-suPAR levels remained low during follow-up despite the development of CP. P-suPAR was significantly higher in PC patients [median 3.7 (IQR 3.1-4.4) ng/mL] than in CP patients [2.6 (1.8-3.6) ng/mL]; p = .014. A cutoff value of 2.8 ng/mL resulted from a ROC curve with area under curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.61-0.97), p = .009 in differentiation between PC and CP with a sensitivity and a specificity of 88% and 70% respectively.

CONCLUSION

P-suPAR is higher in patients with PC than in patients with CP, and it could thus be used in differentiating between PC and CP.

Validation of suPAR turbidimetric assay on Cobas® (c502 and c702) and comparison to suPAR ELISA

suPAR is a plasma marker of chronic inflammation, and an elevated suPAR is consistently associated with worse outcome in a variety of clinical conditions. Quantification of suPAR is useful for determining patient risk in triage, but there is no fast automatized method for quick determination of suPAR. We developed and validated a rapid latex particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay for quantification of plasma suPAR on the c502 and the c702 Roche Cobas® 8000 measurment systems. The turbidimetric assay was validated against the suPARnostic® ELISA (ViroGates, Denmark). This validation demonstrates suPAR can be analysed by turbidimetry giving very similar results (<15% difference) compared to the ELISA method and the observed correlations (n = 103) were strong, r > 0.95. Roche Cobas® 8000 instruments demonstrated repeatability and repoducibility, CV % at 3.4-4.1 and 5.7-11.4, respectively. The estimated limit of detection was 1.30 µg/L and 1.31 µg/L for the Cobas® c502 and c702, respectively. Dilution tests showed linearity of suPAR from 1.8 to 26.5 μg/L. The acceptable concentrations of Bilirubin, Intralipid and Hemoglobin, were 350 µmol/L, 3.3 g/L and 1.4 g/L, respectively. suPAR can be quantified reproducibly within 10 min using a turbidimetry assay. This assay is faster than ELISA with similar results, making it suitable for clinical routine analysis.

Plasma level of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) predicts long-term mortality after first acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker associated with inflammatory and certain malignancies. Earlier we have shown that plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) predicts severity of acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) on admission. Our aim was to investigate whether P-suPAR levels predict AAP recurrences or mortality during long-term follow-up after first AAP.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients (median age 47.5, range 25-71 years) suffering their first AAP during 2001-2005 were recruited and followed prospectively for 9 years with a median follow-up time of 7.0 (range 0.3-9.8) years. P-suPAR was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from the samples taken at follow-up visits. Survival was registered in November 2014.

RESULTS

P-suPAR level on admission or after recovery of the first AAP did not predict the recurrence of AAP. However, higher P-suPAR measured after recovery of first AAP (3.6 vs. 2.9 ng/mL) predicted mortality during follow-up period (hazard ratio 1.48, p = .008). Cut-off value for P-suPAR indicating a higher risk for 10-year mortality resulted a value of ≥3.4 ng/mL. When adjusted for other covariates, P-suPAR above cut-off level retained its statistical significance as an independent factor.

CONCLUSIONS

P-suPAR level on admission or after recovery of the first AAP does not predict the recurrence of AAP during long-term follow-up. However, P-suPAR ≥3.4 mg/mL measured after recovery from first AAP is associated with an increased risk of 10-year mortality as an independent factor. This can be used to detect patients with highest risk after AAP, in order to focus the preventive healthcare actions.

Serum Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor Does Not Outperform C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin as an Early Marker of Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) concerns 10–20% of acute pancreatitis (AP) patients and is associated with a poor prognosis and high mortality. An early prognosis of the unfavorable outcome, transfer to an intensive care unit (ICU) and the introduction of an adequate treatment are crucial for patients’ survival. Recently, the elevated circulating urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has been reported to predict SAP with a high diagnostic accuracy among patients in a tertiary center. The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic utility of uPAR and other inflammatory markers as the predictors of the unfavorable course of AP in patients admitted to a secondary care hospital within the first 24 h of the onset of AP. The study included 95 patients, eight with a SAP diagnosis. Serum uPAR was measured on admission and in the two subsequent days. On admission, uPAR significantly predicted organ failure, acute cardiovascular failure, acute kidney injury, the need for intensive care, and death. The diagnostic accuracy of the admission uPAR for the prediction of SAP, organ failure, and ICU transfer or death was low to moderate and did not differ significantly from the diagnostic accuracy of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, D-dimer and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1. In the secondary care hospital, where most patients with AP are initially admitted, uPAR measurements did not prove better than the currently used markers.