1
|
Zelisse HS, de Ridder S, van Gent MDJM, Mom CH, Wisman GBA, Roes EM, Reyners AKL, Piek JM, Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer GM, Lok CAR, de Kroon CD, Kooreman LFS, Janssen MJ, Jansen MP, Horlings HM, Collée M, Broeks A, Boere IA, Bart J, van Altena AM, Heeling M, Stoter IM, Voorham QJ, van de Vijver MJ, Dijk F, Belien JAM. The Information Technology (IT) Infrastructure of the Multicenter Archipelago of Ovarian Cancer Research Biobank: A Potential Blueprint for Other Biobanks. Biopreserv Biobank 2024. [PMID: 38682281 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2023.0118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: Biobanks play a crucial role in fundamental and translational research by storing valuable biomaterials and data for future analyses. However, the design of their information technology (IT) infrastructures is often customized to specific requirements, thereby lacking the ability to be used for biobanks comprising other (types of) diseases. This results in substantial costs, time, and efforts for each new biobank project. The Dutch multicenter Archipelago of Ovarian Cancer Research (AOCR) biobank has developed an innovative, reusable IT infrastructure capable of adaptation to various biobanks, thereby enabling cost-effective and efficient implementation and management of biobank IT systems. Methods and Results: The AOCR IT infrastructure incorporates preexisting biobank software, mainly managed by Health-RI. The web-based registration tool Ldot is used for secure storage and pseudonymization of patient data. Clinicopathological data are retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga), both established repositories, reducing administrative workload and ensuring high data quality. Metadata of collected biomaterials are stored in the OpenSpecimen system. For digital pathology research, a hematoxylin and eosin-stained slide from each patient's tumor is digitized and uploaded to Slide Score. Furthermore, adhering to the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles, genomic data derived from the AOCR samples are stored in cBioPortal. Conclusion: The IT infrastructure of the AOCR biobank represents a new standard for biobanks, offering flexibility to handle diverse diseases and types of biomaterials. This infrastructure bypasses the need for disease-specific, custom-built software, thereby being cost- and time-effective while ensuring data quality and legislative compliance. The adaptability of this infrastructure highlights its potential to serve as a blueprint for the development of IT infrastructures in both new and existing biobanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hein S Zelisse
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sander de Ridder
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mignon D J M van Gent
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G Bea A Wisman
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eva-Maria Roes
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anna K L Reyners
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jurgen M Piek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Christianne A R Lok
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis D de Kroon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Loes F S Kooreman
- Department of Pathology and GROW, School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc-Jan Janssen
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Maurice Phm Jansen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Department of CFMPB (Core Facility - Molecular Pathology and Biobanking), The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Bart
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M van Altena
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marlou Heeling
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Matthijs Stoter
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen A M Belien
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dings MPG, Manoukian P, Waasdorp C, Quik JSE, Strijker M, Lodestijn SC, van Neerven SM, Moreno LF, de Oliveira RL, Bonsing BA, Bruno MJ, Busch OR, Doukas M, van Eijck CH, Mohammad NH, de Hingh IH, Molenaar QI, Besselink MG, Vermeulen L, Medema JP, van Laarhoven HWM, Bijlsma MF. Serum levels of iCAF-derived osteoglycin predict favorable outcome in pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:511-523. [PMID: 36069222 PMCID: PMC10087204 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by abundant stroma, the main cellular constituents of which are cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Stroma-targeting agents have been proposed to improve the poor outcome of current treatments. However, clinical trials using these agents showed disappointing results. Heterogeneity in the PDAC CAF population was recently delineated demonstrating that both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressive activities co-exist in the stroma. Here, we aimed to identify biomarkers for the CAF population that contribute to a favorable outcome. RNA-sequencing reads from patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) were mapped to the human and mouse genome to allocate the expression of genes to the tumor or stroma. Survival meta-analysis for stromal genes was performed and applied to human protein atlas data to identify circulating biomarkers. The candidate protein was perturbed in co-cultures and assessed in existing and novel single-cell gene expression analysis from control, pancreatitis, pancreatitis-recovered and PDAC mouse models. Serum levels of the candidate biomarker were measured in two independent cohorts totaling 148 PDAC patients and related them to overall survival. Osteoglycin (OGN) was identified as a candidate serum prognostic marker. Single-cell analysis indicated that Ogn is derived from a subgroup of inflammatory CAFs. Ogn-expressing fibroblasts are distinct from resident healthy pancreatic stellate cells and arise during pancreatitis. Serum OGN levels were prognostic for favorable overall survival in two independent PDAC cohorts (HR = 0.47, P = .042 and HR = 0.53, P = .006). Altogether, we conclude that high circulating OGN levels inform on a previously unrecognized subgroup of CAFs and predict favorable outcomes in resectable PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P G Dings
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Manoukian
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cynthia Waasdorp
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith S E Quik
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marin Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie C Lodestijn
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne M van Neerven
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leandro F Moreno
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo Leite de Oliveira
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,CRISPR Expertise Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Quintus I Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Louis Vermeulen
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul Medema
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Doppenberg D, Besselink MG, van Eijck CHJ, Intven MPW, Koerkamp BG, Kazemier G, van Laarhoven HWM, Meijerink M, Molenaar IQ, Nuyttens JJME, van Os R, van Santvoort HC, van Tienhoven G, Verkooijen HM, Versteijne E, Wilmink JW, Lagerwaard FJ, Bruynzeel AME. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy or best supportive care in patients with localized pancreatic cancer not receiving chemotherapy and surgery (PANCOSAR): a nationwide multicenter randomized controlled trial according to a TwiCs design. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1363. [PMID: 36581914 PMCID: PMC9801528 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10419-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant comorbidities, advanced age, and a poor performance status prevent surgery and systemic treatment for many patients with localized (non-metastatic) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). These patients are currently treated with 'best supportive care'. Therefore, it is desirable to find a treatment option which could improve both disease control and quality of life in these patients. A brief course of high-dose high-precision radiotherapy i.e. stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be feasible. METHODS A nationwide multicenter trial performed within a previously established large prospective cohort (the Dutch Pancreatic cancer project; PACAP) according to the 'Trial within cohorts' (TwiCs) design. Patients enrolled in the PACAP cohort routinely provide informed consent to answer quality of life questionnaires and to be randomized according to the TwiCs design when eligible for a study. Patients with localized PDAC who are unfit for chemotherapy and surgery or those who refrain from these treatments are eligible. Patients will be randomized between SABR (5 fractions of 8 Gy) with 'best supportive care' and 'best supportive care' only. The primary endpoint is overall survival from randomization. Secondary endpoints include preservation of quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and -PAN26), NRS pain score response and WHO performance scores at baseline, and, 3, 6 and 12 months. Acute and late toxicity will be scored using CTCAE criteria version 5.0: assessed at baseline, day of last fraction, at 3 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months following SABR. DISCUSSION The PANCOSAR trial studies the added value of SBRT as compared to 'best supportive care' in patients with localized PDAC who are medically unfit to receive chemotherapy and surgery, or refrain from these treatments. This study will assess whether SABR, in comparison to best supportive care, can relieve or delay tumor-related symptoms, enhance quality of life, and extend survival in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trials, NCT05265663 , Registered March 3 2022, Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Doppenberg
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.7177.60000000084992262Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. G. Besselink
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C. H. J. van Eijck
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. P. W. Intven
- grid.5477.10000000120346234Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B. Groot Koerkamp
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. Kazemier
- grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. W. M. van Laarhoven
- grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.7177.60000000084992262Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Meijerink
- grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Intervention Radiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I. Q. Molenaar
- grid.5477.10000000120346234Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J. J. M. E. Nuyttens
- grid.508717.c0000 0004 0637 3764Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. van Os
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. C. van Santvoort
- grid.5477.10000000120346234Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G. van Tienhoven
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. M. Verkooijen
- grid.5477.10000000120346234Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E. Versteijne
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. W. Wilmink
- grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.7177.60000000084992262Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F. J. Lagerwaard
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. M. E. Bruynzeel
- grid.509540.d0000 0004 6880 3010Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.16872.3a0000 0004 0435 165XCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Strijker M, van der Sijde F, Suker M, Boermeester MA, Bonsing BA, Bruno MJ, Busch OR, Doukas M, van Eijck CH, Gerritsen A, Groot Koerkamp B, Haj Mohammad N, van Hilst J, de Hingh IH, van Hooft JE, Luyer MD, Quintus Molenaar I, Verheij J, Waasdorp C, Wilmink JW, Besselink MG, van Laarhoven HW, Bijlsma MF. Preoperative serum ADAM12 levels as a stromal marker for overall survival and benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic and periampullary cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1886-1896. [PMID: 34103247 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the stroma marker A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease 12 (ADAM12) as a preoperative prognostic and treatment-predictive marker for overall survival (OS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and periampullary cancers. METHODS Materials were derived from the prospective nationwide Dutch Pancreas Biobank (2015-2017). We included patients who underwent resection because of PDAC/periampullary cancer or non-invasive IPMN (control group) and had a preoperative serum sample available. ADAM12 levels were dichotomized using a pre-defined cut-off (316 pg/mL). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses (backward selection) were performed. RESULTS Median ADAM12 levels were 161 (IQR 79-352) pg/mL in 215 PDAC and periampullary adenocarcinomas. High ADAM12 levels (>316 pg/mL) predicted poor OS in the total group of pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas (P = 0.04), but not after adjustment. In distal cholangiocarcinoma (n = 33), high ADAM12 levels predicted poor OS in univariable analysis (P = 0.02), but not in PDAC (P = 0.63). PDAC patients (n = 135) with high ADAM12 levels benefited from adjuvant treatment (median OS 27 vs 14 months, P = 0.02), whereas those with low levels did not (21 vs 21 months, P = 0.87). CONCLUSION High circulating ADAM12 levels, as a proxy for activated stroma, predict survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in PDAC, requiring validation in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marin Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Fleur van der Sijde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mustafa Suker
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arja Gerritsen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Misha D Luyer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cynthia Waasdorp
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Apaolaza PS, Petropoulou PI, Rodriguez-Calvo T. Whole-Slide Image Analysis of Human Pancreas Samples to Elucidate the Immunopathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes Using the QuPath Software. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:689799. [PMID: 34179094 PMCID: PMC8226255 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.689799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes is a chronic disease of the pancreas characterized by the loss of insulin-producing beta cells. Access to human pancreas samples for research purposes has been historically limited, restricting pathological analyses to animal models. However, intrinsic differences between animals and humans have made clinical translation very challenging. Recently, human pancreas samples have become available through several biobanks worldwide, and this has opened numerous opportunities for scientific discovery. In addition, the use of new imaging technologies has unraveled many mysteries of the human pancreas not merely in the presence of disease, but also in physiological conditions. Nowadays, multiplex immunofluorescence protocols as well as sophisticated image analysis tools can be employed. Here, we described the use of QuPath—an open-source platform for image analysis—for the investigation of human pancreas samples. We demonstrate that QuPath can be adequately used to analyze whole-slide images with the aim of identifying the islets of Langerhans and define their cellular composition as well as other basic morphological characteristics. In addition, we show that QuPath can identify immune cell populations in the exocrine tissue and islets of Langerhans, accurately localizing and quantifying immune infiltrates in the pancreas. Therefore, we present a tool and analysis pipeline that allows for the accurate characterization of the human pancreas, enabling the study of the anatomical and physiological changes underlying pancreatic diseases such as type 1 diabetes. The standardization and implementation of these analysis tools is of critical importance to understand disease pathogenesis, and may be informative for the design of new therapies aimed at preserving beta cell function and halting the inflammation caused by the immune attack.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola S Apaolaza
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Diabetes Center at Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peristera-Ioanna Petropoulou
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Diabetes Center at Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Teresa Rodriguez-Calvo
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Diabetes Center at Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mackay TM, Latenstein AEJ, Bonsing BA, Bruno MJ, van Eijck CHJ, Groot Koerkamp B, de Hingh IHJT, Homs MYV, van Hooft JE, van Laarhoven HW, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Stommel MWJ, de Vos-Geelen J, Wilmink JW, Busch OR, van der Geest LG, Besselink MG. Nationwide compliance with a multidisciplinary guideline on pancreatic cancer during 6-year follow-up. Pancreatology 2020; 20:1723-1731. [PMID: 33069583 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compliance with national guidelines on pancreatic cancer management could improve patient outcomes. Early compliance with the Dutch guideline was poor. The aim was to assess compliance with this guideline during six years after publication. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nationwide guideline compliance was investigated for three subsequent time periods (2012-2013 vs. 2014-2015 vs. 2016-2017) in patients with pancreatic cancer using five quality indicators in the Netherlands Cancer Registry: 1) discussion in multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT), 2) maximum 3-week interval from final MDT to start of treatment, 3) preoperative biliary drainage when bilirubin >250 μmol/L, 4) use of adjuvant chemotherapy, and 5) chemotherapy for inoperable disease (non-metastatic and metastatic). RESULTS In total, 14 491 patients were included of whom 2290 (15.8%) underwent resection and 4561 (31.5%) received chemotherapy. Most quality indicators did not change over time: overall, 88.8% of patients treated with curative intent were discussed in a MDT, 42.7% were treated with curative intent within the 3-week interval, 62.7% with a resectable head tumor and bilirubin >250 μmol/L underwent preoperative biliary drainage, 57.2% received chemotherapy after resection, and 36.6% with metastatic disease received chemotherapy. Only use of chemotherapy for non-metastatic, non-resected disease improved over time (23.4% vs. 25.6% vs. 29.7%). CONCLUSION Nationwide compliance to five quality indicators for the guideline on pancreatic cancer management showed little to no improvement during six years after publication. Besides critical review of the current quality indicators, these outcomes may suggest that a nationwide implementation program is required to increase compliance to guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara M Mackay
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk E J Latenstein
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Deparment of Surgery, Leids University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lydia G van der Geest
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mackay TM, Smits FJ, Latenstein AEJ, Bogte A, Bonsing BA, Bos H, Bosscha K, Brosens LAA, Hol L, Busch ORC, Creemers GJ, Curvers WL, den Dulk M, van Dieren S, van Driel LMJW, Festen S, van Geenen EJM, van der Geest LG, de Groot DJA, de Groot JWB, Haj Mohammad N, Haberkorn BCM, Haver JT, van der Harst E, Hemmink GJM, de Hingh IH, Hoge C, Homs MYV, van Huijgevoort NC, Jacobs MAJM, Kerver ED, Liem MSL, Los M, Lubbinge H, Luelmo SAC, de Meijer VE, Mekenkamp L, Molenaar IQ, van Oijen MGH, Patijn GA, Quispel R, van Rijssen LB, Römkens TEH, van Santvoort HC, Schreinemakers JMJ, Schut H, Seerden T, Stommel MWJ, Ten Tije AJ, Venneman NG, Verdonk RC, Verheij J, van Vilsteren FGI, de Vos-Geelen J, Vulink A, Wientjes C, Wit F, Wessels FJ, Zonderhuis B, van Werkhoven CH, van Hooft JE, van Eijck CHJ, Wilmink JW, van Laarhoven HWM, Besselink MG. Impact of nationwide enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care (PACAP-1): a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:334. [PMID: 32299515 PMCID: PMC7161112 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4180-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. Best practices for the use of chemotherapy, enzyme replacement therapy, and biliary drainage have been identified but their implementation in daily clinical practice is often suboptimal. We hypothesized that a nationwide program to enhance implementation of these best practices in pancreatic cancer care would improve survival and quality of life. Methods/design PACAP-1 is a nationwide multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled superiority trial. In a per-center stepwise and randomized manner, best practices in pancreatic cancer care regarding the use of (neo)adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, and metal biliary stents are implemented in all 17 Dutch pancreatic centers and their regional referral networks during a 6-week initiation period. Per pancreatic center, one multidisciplinary team functions as reference for the other centers in the network. Key best practices were identified from the literature, 3 years of data from existing nationwide registries within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP), and national expert meetings. The best practices follow the Dutch guideline on pancreatic cancer and the current state of the literature, and can be executed within daily clinical practice. The implementation process includes monitoring, return visits, and provider feedback in combination with education and reminders. Patient outcomes and compliance are monitored within the PACAP registries. Primary outcome is 1-year overall survival (for all disease stages). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, 3- and 5-year overall survival, and guideline compliance. An improvement of 10% in 1-year overall survival is considered clinically relevant. A 25-month study duration was chosen, which provides 80% statistical power for a mortality reduction of 10.0% in the 17 pancreatic cancer centers, with a required sample size of 2142 patients, corresponding to a 6.6% mortality reduction and 4769 patients nationwide. Discussion The PACAP-1 trial is designed to evaluate whether a nationwide program for enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care can improve 1-year overall survival and quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03513705. Trial opened for accrual on 22th May 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Mackay
- Department of surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F J Smits
- Department of surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A E J Latenstein
- Department of surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Bogte
- Department of gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - B A Bonsing
- Department of surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - H Bos
- Department of medical oncology, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, the Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - L A A Brosens
- Department of pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of pathology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - L Hol
- Department of gastroenterology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O R C Busch
- Department of surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G J Creemers
- Department of medical oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - W L Curvers
- Department of gastroenterology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M den Dulk
- Department of surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - S van Dieren
- Department of surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L M J W van Driel
- Department of gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Festen
- Department of surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J M van Geenen
- Department of gastroenterology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - L G van der Geest
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - D J A de Groot
- Department of medical oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J W B de Groot
- Department of medical oncology, Oncology Center Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - N Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - B C M Haberkorn
- Department of medical oncology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J T Haver
- Department of nutrition and dietetics, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E van der Harst
- Department of surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G J M Hemmink
- Department of gastroenterology, Oncology Center Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Department of surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - C Hoge
- Department of gastroenterology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M Y V Homs
- Department of medical oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N C van Huijgevoort
- Department of gastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M A J M Jacobs
- Department of gastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E D Kerver
- Department of medical oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M S L Liem
- Department of surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - M Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - H Lubbinge
- Department of gastroenterology, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, the Netherlands
| | - S A C Luelmo
- Department of medical oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - V E de Meijer
- Department of surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - L Mekenkamp
- Department of medical oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Department of surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - M G H van Oijen
- Department of medical oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G A Patijn
- Department of surgery, Oncology Center Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - R Quispel
- Department of gastroenterology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - L B van Rijssen
- Department of surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T E H Römkens
- Department of gastroenterology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Department of surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - H Schut
- Department of medical oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - T Seerden
- Department of gastroenterology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Department of surgery, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - A J Ten Tije
- Department of medical oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - N G Venneman
- Department of gastroenterology and hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - R C Verdonk
- Department of gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - J Verheij
- Department of pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F G I van Vilsteren
- Department of gastroenterology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J de Vos-Geelen
- Department of medical oncology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A Vulink
- Department of medical oncology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - C Wientjes
- Department of gastroenterology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F Wit
- Department of surgery, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, the Netherlands
| | - F J Wessels
- Department of radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - B Zonderhuis
- Department of surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C H van Werkhoven
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J E van Hooft
- Department of gastroenterology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C H J van Eijck
- Department of surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Department of medical oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Department of medical oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Strijker M, Mackay TM, Bonsing BA, Bruno MJ, van Eijck CHJ, de Hingh IHJT, Koerkamp BG, van Laarhoven HW, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, van Tienhoven G, Wilmink JW, Zeverijn S, Busch OR, Besselink MG. Establishing and Coordinating a Nationwide Multidisciplinary Study Group: Lessons Learned by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Ann Surg 2020; 271:e102-e104. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
9
|
Jalalzadeh H, Indrakusuma R, Blankensteijn JD, Wisselink W, Yeung KK, Lindeman JHN, Hamming JF, Koelemay MJW, Legemate DA, Balm R. Design and protocol of a comprehensive multicentre biobank for abdominal aortic aneurysms. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028858. [PMID: 31375618 PMCID: PMC6688677 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The pathophysiology and natural course of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are insufficiently understood. In order to improve our understanding, it is imperative to carry out longitudinal research that combines biomarkers with clinical and imaging data measured over multiple time points. Therefore, a multicentre biobank, databank and imagebank has been established in the Netherlands: the 'Pearl Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm' (AAA bank). METHODS AND ANALYSIS The AAA bank is a prospective multicentre observational biobank, databank and imagebank of patients with an AAA. It is embedded within the framework of the Parelsnoer Institute, which facilitates uniform biobanking in all university medical centres (UMCs) in the Netherlands. The AAA bank has been initiated by the two UMCs of Amsterdam UMC and by Leiden University Medical Center. Participants will be followed during AAA follow-up. Clinical data are collected every patient contact. Three types of biomaterials are collected at baseline and during follow-up: blood (including DNA and RNA), urine and AAA tissue if open surgical repair is performed. Imaging data that are obtained as part of clinical care are stored in the imagebank. All data and biomaterials are processed and stored in a standardised manner. AAA growth will be based on multiple measurements and will be analysed with a repeated measures analysis. Potential associations between AAA growth and risk factors that are also measured on multiple time points can be assessed with multivariable mixed-effects models, while potential associations between AAA rupture and risk factors can be tested with a conditional dynamic prediction model with landmarking or with joint models in which linear mixed-effects models are combined with Cox regression. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The AAA bank is approved by the Medical Ethics Board of the Amsterdam UMC (University of Amsterdam). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03320408.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Jalalzadeh
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reza Indrakusuma
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan D. Blankensteijn
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Wisselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kak K Yeung
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan H N Lindeman
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap F Hamming
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark J W Koelemay
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dink A Legemate
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron Balm
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|