Unavailability of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography Adversely Impacts Hospital Outcomes of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: A National Survey and Propensity-Matched Analysis

Healthcare disparities in pancreatitis: knowledge gaps and next steps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines current research on healthcare disparities in pancreatitis, identifies knowledge gaps, and proposes strategies to develop targeted multilevel interventions to address inequities in pancreatitis care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current literature has identified patient, disease, and healthcare-level factors contributing to disparities in risk factors and health outcomes of pancreatitis. Moreover, social structures, economic systems, social vulnerability, and policy significantly influence the pancreatitis care continuum.

SUMMARY

Understanding the root causes of health inequities is critical to developing effective approaches for the prevention, early detection, and management of pancreatitis.

Greater cost without greater benefit: The need to refine transfer criteria for patients with severe acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Appropriate and timely care is essential in the management of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). We hypothesized that transferred patients with SAP undergoing procedural intervention would have higher mortality compared to those managed directly at academic centers.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of Maryland's statewide claims database from 2009 to 2022 of adult patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of SAP (acute pancreatitis with organ failure). Patients were divided into three groups: those admitted directly from the emergency room to academic facilities (AD), non-academic facilities (NA), or transferred to academic facilities (TR). Procedural intervention included endoscopic, percutaneous image-guided, or surgical. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were admission costs, length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

RESULTS

There were 7,648 (48.9%) in the NA group, 6,682 (42.7%) in the AD group and 1,316 (8.4%) in the TR group. On regression analysis, odds of death were 0.57x lower in the NA group and 0.67x lower in the AD group compared to transfers (<0.001). Procedural intervention was not associated with increased mortality. Transferred patients had longer median LOS (11 vs NA = 5, AD = 6, p < 0.001), increased median cost of admission ($41k vs NA = $12k, AD = $17k, p < 0.001) and greater ICU admission (45.6% vs NA = 20.6%, AD = 23.9%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Transferred patients have greater burden of illness and cost of care without evidence of improved outcomes in the management of SAP regardless of procedural intervention. Transfer criteria for patients with SAP must be further refined to reduce unnecessary transfers.

Urgent and emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for gallstone-induced acute cholangitis and pancreatitis

Urgent or emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is indicated for gallstone-induced acute cholangitis and pancreatitis. The technique and optimal timing of ERCP depend on the disease state, its severity, anatomy, patient background, and the institutional situation. Endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage within 24 h is recommended for moderate to severe acute cholangitis. The clinical outcomes of biliary drainage with nasobiliary drainage tube placement and plastic stent placement are comparable, and the choice is made on a case-by-case basis considering the advantages and disadvantages of each. The addition of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is basically not necessary when performing drainage alone, but single-session stone removal following EST is acceptable in mild to moderate cholangitis cases without antithrombotic therapy or coagulopathy. For gallstone pancreatitis, early ERCP/EST are recommended in cases with impacted gallstones in the papilla. In some cases of gallstone pancreatitis, a gallstone impacted in the papilla has already spontaneously passed into the duodenum, and early ERCP/EST lacks efficacy in such cases, with unfavorable findings of cholangitis or cholestasis. If it is difficult to diagnose the presence of gallstones impacted in the papilla on imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography can be useful in determining the indication for ERCP.

The Evaluation of Clinical Status of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography for the Placement of Metal and Plastic Stents in Cholangiocarcinoma Therapy

Objective

Cholangiocarcinoma is a common malignant tumor that occurs in the bile duct system, which can be treated by using the endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP). This study was aimed at exploring the therapeutic effect of ERCP with metal stent and plastic stent for cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

The clinical data of 71 patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated by ERCP in our hospital from June 2020 to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different stent types, the patients were divided into plastic stent group (n = 43) and metal stent group (n = 28). Patients in the plastic stent group and metal stent group were received with plastic stent and metal stent, respectively. The indexes of liver function (serum alkaline phosphatase (ALT), direct bilirubin (DBIL), glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and total bilirubin (TBIL)), postoperative complications, success rate of stent implantation, and survival time of patients in the two groups were determined. Logistic multivariate regression analysis was used to analyze the prognostic factors of postoperative cholangiocarcinoma.

Results

The liver function indexes of the two groups were significantly improved after treatment with the stent, in which the ameliorative effect in the metal stent group was better than that in the plastic stent group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the plastic stent group and the metal stent group was 53.49% and 14.29%, respectively, and the success rate of stent placement was 60.47% and 96.43%, respectively. The incidence of complications in the metal stent group was lower than that in the plastic stent group, and the success rate of stent placement was higher than that in the plastic stent group (P < 0.05). The median survival time of patients in the plastic stent group and the metal stent group was 8.15 and 11.83 months, respectively. The survival time of patients in the metal stent group was longer than that of the plastic stent group. The median survival time of patients with types I, II, III, and IV was 12.73, 11.54, 10.57, and 9.36 months, respectively. The survival time of patients with stage I was significantly higher than that of patients with types II, III, and IV. There was an inverse relationship between the disease type and the survival time of patients. Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm, portal vein invasion, lymph node metastasis, and classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma were the risk factors (P < 0.05) and metal stent type was the protective factor (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In the clinical treatment of patients with cholangiocarcinoma, the placement of metal stent and plastic stent under ERCP plays an important role. The placement of the metal stent under ERCP has a higher success rate and better prognosis and can prolong the survival time of patients to a greater extent, but the price of the metal stent is relatively expensive. For patients with an expected survival period of more than 4-6 months, the metal stent should be considered; otherwise, the plastic stent can be used to maintain cost-effectiveness. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively analyze the patient's economic affordability, expected survival time, stent drainage time, and personal needs and then select an appropriate treatment method.

Outcomes of inpatient cholecystectomy among adults with cystic fibrosis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic biliary and gallbladder disorders are common in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) and the prevalence may rise with increasing CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator use. Cholecystectomy may be considered, but the outcomes of cholecystectomy are not well described among modern patients with CF.

AIM

To determine the risk profile of inpatient cholecystectomy in patients with CF.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from 2002 until 2014 to investigate outcomes of cholecystectomy among hospitalized adults with CF compared to controls without CF. A propensity weighted sample was selected that closely matched patient demographics, patient’s individual comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. The propensity weighted sample was used to compare outcomes among patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hospital outcomes of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy were compared among adults with CF.

RESULTS

A total of 1239 inpatient cholecystectomies were performed in patients with CF, of which 78.6% were performed laparoscopically. Mortality was < 0.81%, similar to those without CF (P = 0.719). In the propensity weighted analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there was no difference in mortality, or pulmonary or surgical complications between patients with CF and controls. After adjusting for significant covariates among patients with CF, open cholecystectomy was independently associated with a 4.8 d longer length of stay (P = 0.018) and an $18449 increase in hospital costs (P = 0.005) compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CF have a very low mortality after cholecystectomy that is similar to the general population. Among patients with CF, laparoscopic approach reduces resource utilization and minimizes post-operative complications.

Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a nationwide inpatient cohort study

Background

The timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis is unclear. We accessed a national database to analyze the outcomes of urgent (<24 h) and early (24-72 h) ERCP in this cohort.

Methods

The cohort was extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Hospital ERCP volumes were generated using unique hospital identifiers. Multivariate regression modeling was used to analyze the predictors of urgent vs. early ERCP use, and to determine various outcome variables between the 2 cohorts.

Results

Overall, 105,433 admissions were evaluated. There was a significant rise in urgent ERCP performed over the study period. Older patients, males, patients with comorbidities, African American and Hispanic patient populations were less likely to receive urgent ERCP. High ERCP volume hospitals, teaching hospitals, and hospitals in the Midwest and West were more likely to perform urgent ERCP. There were no differences in mortality rates or complication rates between the 2 cohorts. However, there were significant differences in length of stay and healthcare cost analysis.

Conclusions

The increasing use of urgent ERCP did not result in a clinically significant benefit in terms of mortality, length of stay, or healthcare cost analysis. The use of urgent ERCP is also not uniform across various demographic and hospital cohorts. Urgent ERCP may be over-utilized, and it may be reasonable to perform ERCP in this patient population based on the physician’s suspicion about the severity of disease.

Predictors of hospital transfer and associated risks of mortality in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

There is limited research in prognosticators of hospital transfer in acute pancreatitis (AP). Hence, we sought to determine the predictors of hospital transfer from small/medium-sized hospitals and outcomes following transfer to large acute-care hospitals.

METHODS

Using the 2010-2013 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), patients ≥18 years of age with a primary diagnosis of AP were identified. Hospital size was classified using standard NIS Definitions. Multivariable analyses were performed for predictors of "transfer-out" from small/medium-sized hospitals and mortality in large acute-care hospitals.

RESULTS

Among 381,818 patients admitted with AP to small/medium-sized hospitals, 13,947 (4%) were transferred out to another acute-care hospital. Multivariable analysis revealed that older patients (OR = 1.04; 95%CI 1.03-1.06), men (OR = 1.15; 95%CI 1.06-1.24), lower income quartiles (OR = 1.54; 95%CI 1.35-1.76), admission to a non-teaching hospital (OR = 3.38; 95%CI 3.00-3.80), gallstone pancreatitis (OR = 3.32; 95%CI 2.90-3.79), pancreatic surgery (OR = 3.14; 95%CI 1.76-5.58), and severe AP (OR = 3.07; 95%CI 2.78-3.38) were predictors of "transfer-out". ERCP (OR = 0.53; 95%CI 0.43-0.66) and cholecystectomy (OR = 0.14; 95%CI 0.12-0.18) were associated with decreased odds of "transfer-out". Among 507,619 patients admitted with AP to large hospitals, 31,058 (6.1%) were "transferred-in" from other hospitals. The mortality rate for patients "transferred-in" was higher than those directly admitted (2.54% vs. 0.91%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that being "transferred-in" from other hospitals was an independent predictor of mortality (OR = 1.47; 95% CI 1.22-1.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AP transferred into large acute-care hospitals had a higher mortality than those directly admitted likely secondary to more severe disease. Early implementation of published clinical guidelines, triage, and prompt transfer of high-risk patients may potentially offset these negative outcomes.

A narrative review of acute pancreatitis and its diagnosis, pathogenetic mechanism, and management

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease that can progress to severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), which increases the risk of death. AP is characterized by inappropriate activation of trypsinogen, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and destruction of secretory cells. Other contributing factors may include calcium (Ca²⁺) overload, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired autophagy, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. In addition, exosomes are also associated with pathophysiological processes of many human diseases and may play a biological role in AP. However, the pathogenic mechanism has not been fully elucidated and needs to be further explored to inform treatment. Recently, the treatment guidelines have changed; minimally invasive therapy is advocated more as the core multidisciplinary participation and "step-up" approach. The surgical procedures have gradually changed from open surgery to minimally invasive surgery that primarily includes percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD), endoscopy, small incision surgery, and video-assisted surgery. The current guidelines for the management of AP have been updated and revised in many aspects. The type of fluid to be used, the timing, volume, and speed of administration for fluid resuscitation has been controversial. In addition, the timing and role of nutritional support and prophylactic antibiotic therapy, as well as the timing of the surgical or endoscopic intervention, and the management of complications still have many uncertainties that could negatively impact the prognosis and patients' quality of life. Consequently, to inform clinicians about optimal treatment, we aimed to review recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of AP and its diagnosis and management.