1
|
Flammia F, Fusco R, Triggiani S, Pellegrino G, Reginelli A, Simonetti I, Trovato P, Setola SV, Petralia G, Petrillo A, Izzo F, Granata V. Risk Assessment and Radiomics Analysis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN). Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241263644. [PMID: 39293798 PMCID: PMC11412216 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241263644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are a very common incidental finding during patient radiological assessment. These lesions may progress from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and even pancreatic cancer. The IPMN progression risk grows with time, so discontinuation of surveillance is not recommended. It is very important to identify imaging features that suggest LGD of IPMNs, and thus, distinguish lesions that only require careful surveillance from those that need surgical resection. It is important to know the management guidelines and especially the indications for surgery, to be able to point out in the report the findings that suggest malignant degeneration. The imaging tools employed for diagnosis and risk assessment are Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with contrast medium. According to the latest European guidelines, MRI is the method of choice for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with IPMN since this tool has a highest sensitivity in detecting mural nodules and intra-cystic septa. It plays a key role in the diagnosis of worrisome features and high-risk stigmata, which are associated with IPMNs malignant degeneration. Nowadays, the main limit of diagnostic tools is the ability to identify the precursor of pancreatic cancer. In this context, increasing attention is being given to artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics analysis. However, these tools remain in an exploratory phase, considering the limitations of currently published studies. Key limits include noncompliance with AI best practices, radiomics workflow standardization, and clear reporting of study methodology, including segmentation and data balancing. In the radiological report it is useful to note the type of IPMN so as the morphological features, size, rate growth, wall, septa and mural nodules, on which the indications for surveillance and surgery are based. These features should be reported so as the surveillance time should be suggested according to guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Flammia
- SIRM Foundation, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sonia Triggiani
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Division of Radiology, "Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Piero Trovato
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Radiology Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Departement of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Divisions of Hepatobiliary Surgery, "Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Katta MR, Kalluru PKR, Bavishi DA, Hameed M, Valisekka SS. Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer: diagnosis, limitations, and the future prospects-a narrative review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04625-1. [PMID: 36739356 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04625-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review aims to explore the role of AI in the application of pancreatic cancer management and make recommendations to minimize the impact of the limitations to provide further benefits from AI use in the future. METHODS A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using a combination of MeSH keywords, including "Artificial intelligence", "Pancreatic cancer", "Diagnosis", and "Limitations". RESULTS The beneficial implications of AI in the detection of biomarkers, diagnosis, and prognosis of pancreatic cancer have been explored. In addition, current drawbacks of AI use have been divided into subcategories encompassing statistical, training, and knowledge limitations; data handling, ethical and medicolegal aspects; and clinical integration and implementation. CONCLUSION Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to computational machine systems that accomplish a set of given tasks by imitating human intelligence in an exponential learning pattern. AI in gastrointestinal oncology has continued to provide significant advancements in the clinical, molecular, and radiological diagnosis and intervention techniques required to improve the prognosis of many gastrointestinal cancer types, particularly pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Maha Hameed
- Clinical Research Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Setola SV, Galdiero R, Maggialetti N, Silvestro L, De Bellis M, Di Girolamo E, Grazzini G, Chiti G, Brunese MC, Belli A, Patrone R, Palaia R, Avallone A, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Risk Assessment and Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:351. [PMID: 36672301 PMCID: PMC9857317 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest cancers, and it is responsible for a number of deaths almost equal to its incidence. The high mortality rate is correlated with several explanations; the main one is the late disease stage at which the majority of patients are diagnosed. Since surgical resection has been recognised as the only curative treatment, a PC diagnosis at the initial stage is believed the main tool to improve survival. Therefore, patient stratification according to familial and genetic risk and the creation of screening protocol by using minimally invasive diagnostic tools would be appropriate. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are subsets of lesions which deserve special management to avoid overtreatment. The current PC screening programs are based on the annual employment of magnetic resonance imaging with cholangiopancreatography sequences (MR/MRCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). For patients unfit for MRI, computed tomography (CT) could be proposed, although CT results in lower detection rates, compared to MRI, for small lesions. The actual major limit is the incapacity to detect and characterize the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) by EUS and MR/MRCP. The possibility of utilizing artificial intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favour the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the real utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these motives, it would be appropriate to realize screening programs in research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 41012 Napoli, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Venanzio Setola
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Galdiero
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Maggialetti
- Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs (DSMBNOS), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Silvestro
- Division of Clinical Experimental Oncology Abdomen, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Elena Di Girolamo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giulia Grazzini
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiti
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Patrone
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Palaia
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Division of Clinical Experimental Oncology Abdomen, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khasawneh H, Patra A, Rajamohan N, Suman G, Klug J, Majumder S, Chari ST, Korfiatis P, Goenka AH. Volumetric Pancreas Segmentation on Computed Tomography: Accuracy and Efficiency of a Convolutional Neural Network Versus Manual Segmentation in 3D Slicer in the Context of Interreader Variability of Expert Radiologists. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2022; 46:841-847. [PMID: 36055122 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare accuracy and efficiency of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-enhanced workflow for pancreas segmentation versus radiologists in the context of interreader reliability. METHODS Volumetric pancreas segmentations on a data set of 294 portal venous computed tomographies were performed by 3 radiologists (R1, R2, and R3) and by a CNN. Convolutional neural network segmentations were reviewed and, if needed, corrected ("corrected CNN [c-CNN]" segmentations) by radiologists. Ground truth was obtained from radiologists' manual segmentations using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation algorithm. Interreader reliability and model's accuracy were evaluated with Dice-Sorenson coefficient (DSC) and Jaccard coefficient (JC). Equivalence was determined using a two 1-sided test. Convolutional neural network segmentations below the 25th percentile DSC were reviewed to evaluate segmentation errors. Time for manual segmentation and c-CNN was compared. RESULTS Pancreas volumes from 3 sets of segmentations (manual, CNN, and c-CNN) were noninferior to simultaneous truth and performance level estimation-derived volumes [76.6 cm 3 (20.2 cm 3 ), P < 0.05]. Interreader reliability was high (mean [SD] DSC between R2-R1, 0.87 [0.04]; R3-R1, 0.90 [0.05]; R2-R3, 0.87 [0.04]). Convolutional neural network segmentations were highly accurate (DSC, 0.88 [0.05]; JC, 0.79 [0.07]) and required minimal-to-no corrections (c-CNN: DSC, 0.89 [0.04]; JC, 0.81 [0.06]; equivalence, P < 0.05). Undersegmentation (n = 47 [64%]) was common in the 73 CNN segmentations below 25th percentile DSC, but there were no major errors. Total inference time (minutes) for CNN was 1.2 (0.3). Average time (minutes) taken by radiologists for c-CNN (0.6 [0.97]) was substantially lower compared with manual segmentation (3.37 [1.47]; savings of 77.9%-87% [ P < 0.0001]). CONCLUSIONS Convolutional neural network-enhanced workflow provides high accuracy and efficiency for volumetric pancreas segmentation on computed tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Khasawneh
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Anurima Patra
- Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| | | | - Garima Suman
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jason Klug
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tonini V, Zanni M. Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: What strategies to avoid a foretold catastrophe. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:4235-4248. [PMID: 36159004 PMCID: PMC9453775 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i31.4235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
While great strides in improving survival rates have been made for most cancers in recent years, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the solid tumors with the worst prognosis. PDAC mortality often overlaps with incidence. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment, but it can be performed in a very limited number of cases. In order to improve the prognosis of PDAC, there are ideally two possible ways: the discovery of new strategies or drugs that will make it possible to treat the tumor more successfully or an earlier diagnosis that will allow patients to be operated on at a less advanced stage. The aim of this review was to summarize all the possible strategies available today for the early diagnosis of PDAC and the paths that research needs to take to make this goal ever closer. All the most recent studies on risk factors and screening modalities, new laboratory tests including liquid biopsy, new imaging methods and possible applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning were reviewed and commented on. Unfortunately, in 2022 the results for this type of cancer still remain discouraging, while a catastrophic increase in cases is expected in the coming years. The article was also written with the aim of highlighting the urgency of devoting more attention and resources to this pathology in order to reach a solution that seems more and more unreachable every day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Tonini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Manuel Zanni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lin KW, Ang TL, Li JW. Role of artificial intelligence in early detection and screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Artif Intell Med Imaging 2022; 3:21-32. [DOI: 10.35711/aimi.v3.i2.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains to be one of the deadliest malignancies in the world despite treatment advancement over the past few decades. Its low survival rates and poor prognosis can be attributed to ambiguity in recommendations for screening and late symptom onset, contributing to its late presentation. In the recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) as emerged as a field to aid in the process of clinical decision making. Considerable efforts have been made in the realm of AI to screen for and predict future development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This review discusses the use of AI in early detection and screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and factors which may limit its use in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Weicong Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore
| | - Tiing Leong Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore
| | - James Weiquan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang K, Herr I. Machine-Learning-Based Bibliometric Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer Research Over the Past 25 Years. Front Oncol 2022; 12:832385. [PMID: 35419289 PMCID: PMC8995465 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Machine learning and semantic analysis are computer-based methods to evaluate complex relationships and predict future perspectives. We used these technologies to define recent, current and future topics in pancreatic cancer research. Publications indexed under the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term 'Pancreatic Neoplasms' from January 1996 to October 2021 were downloaded from PubMed. Using the statistical computing language R and the interpreted, high-level, general-purpose programming language Python, we extracted publication dates, geographic information, and abstracts from each publication's metadata for bibliometric analyses. The generative statistical algorithm "latent Dirichlet allocation" (LDA) was applied to identify specific research topics and trends. The unsupervised "Louvain algorithm" was used to establish a network to identify relationships between single topics. A total of 60,296 publications were identified and analyzed. The publications were derived from 133 countries, mostly from the Northern Hemisphere. For the term "pancreatic cancer research", 12,058 MeSH terms appeared 1,395,060 times. Among them, we identified the four main topics "Clinical Manifestation and Diagnosis", "Review and Management", "Treatment Studies", and "Basic Research". The number of publications has increased rapidly during the past 25 years. Based on the number of publications, the algorithm predicted that "Immunotherapy", Prognostic research", "Protein expression", "Case reports", "Gemcitabine and mechanism", "Clinical study of gemcitabine", "Operation and postoperation", "Chemotherapy and resection", and "Review and management" as current research topics. To our knowledge, this is the first study on this subject of pancreatic cancer research, which has become possible due to the improvement of algorithms and hardware.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangtao Wang
- Molecular OncoSurgery, Section Surgical Research, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ingrid Herr
- Molecular OncoSurgery, Section Surgical Research, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mikdadi D, O'Connell KA, Meacham PJ, Dugan MA, Ojiere MO, Carlson TB, Klenk JA. Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and image biomarker discovery. Cancer Biomark 2022; 33:173-184. [PMID: 35213360 DOI: 10.3233/cbm-210301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning, has the potential to revolutionize biomedical research. Defined as the ability to "mimic" human intelligence by machines executing trained algorithms, AI methods are deployed for biomarker discovery. OBJECTIVE We detail the advancements and challenges in the use of AI for biomarker discovery in ovarian and pancreatic cancer. We also provide an overview of associated regulatory and ethical considerations. METHODS We conducted a literature review using PubMed and Google Scholar to survey the published findings on the use of AI in ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, and cancer biomarkers. RESULTS Most AI models associated with ovarian and pancreatic cancer have yet to be applied in clinical settings, and imaging data in many studies are not publicly available. Low disease prevalence and asymptomatic disease limits data availability required for AI models. The FDA has yet to qualify imaging biomarkers as effective diagnostic tools for these cancers. CONCLUSIONS Challenges associated with data availability, quality, bias, as well as AI transparency and explainability, will likely persist. Explainable and trustworthy AI efforts will need to continue so that the research community can better understand and construct effective models for biomarker discovery in rare cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Mikdadi
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Kyle A O'Connell
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, VA, USA.,Department of Biology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Philip J Meacham
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Madeleine A Dugan
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Michael O Ojiere
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Thaddeus B Carlson
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Juergen A Klenk
- Biomedical Data Science Lab, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Arlington, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen X, Fu R, Shao Q, Chen Y, Ye Q, Li S, He X, Zhu J. Application of artificial intelligence to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:960056. [PMID: 35936738 PMCID: PMC9353734 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.960056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide although substantial advancement has been made in its comprehensive treatment. The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has allowed its clinical applications to expand remarkably in recent years. Diverse methods and algorithms are employed by AI to extrapolate new data from clinical records to aid in the treatment of PC. In this review, we will summarize AI's use in several aspects of PC diagnosis and therapy, as well as its limits and potential future research avenues. METHODS We examine the most recent research on the use of AI in PC. The articles are categorized and examined according to the medical task of their algorithm. Two search engines, PubMed and Google Scholar, were used to screen the articles. RESULTS Overall, 66 papers published in 2001 and after were selected. Of the four medical tasks (risk assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis prediction), diagnosis was the most frequently researched, and retrospective single-center studies were the most prevalent. We found that the different medical tasks and algorithms included in the reviewed studies caused the performance of their models to vary greatly. Deep learning algorithms, on the other hand, produced excellent results in all of the subdivisions studied. CONCLUSIONS AI is a promising tool for helping PC patients and may contribute to improved patient outcomes. The integration of humans and AI in clinical medicine is still in its infancy and requires the in-depth cooperation of multidisciplinary personnel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ruibiao Fu
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qian Shao
- Department of Surgical Ward 1, Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qinghuang Ye
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sheng Li
- College of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiongxiong He
- College of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jinhui Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jinhui Zhu,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang H, Hu B. Early gastrointestinal cancer: The application of artificial intelligence. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 2:185-197. [DOI: 10.37126/aige.v2.i4.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Early gastrointestinal (GI) cancer has been the core of clinical endoscopic work. Its early detection and treatment are tightly associated with patients’ prognoses. As a novel technology, artificial intelligence has been improved and applied in the field of endoscopy. Studies on detection, diagnosis, risk, and prognosis evaluation of diseases in the GI tract have been in development, including precancerous lesions, adenoma, early GI cancers, and advanced GI cancers. In this review, research on esophagus, stomach, and colon was concluded, and associated with the process from precancerous lesions to early GI cancer, such as from Barrett’s esophagus to early esophageal cancer, from dysplasia to early gastric cancer, and from adenoma to early colonic cancer. A status quo of research on early GI cancers and artificial intelligence was provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bing Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kenner BJ, Abrams ND, Chari ST, Field BF, Goldberg AE, Hoos WA, Klimstra DS, Rothschild LJ, Srivastava S, Young MR, Go VLW. Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Applying Artificial Intelligence to Electronic Health Records. Pancreas 2021; 50:916-922. [PMID: 34629446 PMCID: PMC8542068 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) applied to clinical data from electronic health records (EHRs) to improve early detection for pancreatic and other cancers remains underexplored. The Kenner Family Research Fund, in collaboration with the Cancer Biomarker Research Group at the National Cancer Institute, organized the workshop entitled: "Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges in Utilizing Electronic Health Records (EHR)" in March 2021. The workshop included a select group of panelists with expertise in pancreatic cancer, EHR data mining, and AI-based modeling. This review article reflects the findings from the workshop and assesses the feasibility of AI-based data extraction and modeling applied to EHRs. It highlights the increasing role of data sharing networks and common data models in improving the secondary use of EHR data. Current efforts using EHR data for AI-based modeling to enhance early detection of pancreatic cancer show promise. Specific challenges (biology, limited data, standards, compatibility, legal, quality, AI chasm, incentives) are identified, with mitigation strategies summarized and next steps identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Natalie D. Abrams
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Suresh T. Chari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Sudhir Srivastava
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Matthew R. Young
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Vay Liang W. Go
- UCLA Center for Excellence in Pancreatic Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence is poised to revolutionize medical image. It takes advantage of the high-dimensional quantitative features present in medical images that may not be fully appreciated by humans. Artificial intelligence has the potential to facilitate automatic organ segmentation, disease detection and characterization, and prediction of disease recurrence. This article reviews the current status of artificial intelligence in liver imaging and reviews the opportunities and challenges in clinical implementation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Mendoza Ladd A, Diehl DL. Artificial intelligence for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The future is promising. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:1283-1295. [PMID: 33833482 PMCID: PMC8015296 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i13.1283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a worldwide public health concern. Despite extensive research efforts toward improving diagnosis and treatment, the 5-year survival rate at best is approximately 15%. This dismal figure can be attributed to a variety of factors including lack of adequate screening methods, late symptom onset, and treatment resistance. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains a grim diagnosis with a high mortality rate and a significant psy-chological burden for patients and their families. In recent years artificial intelligence (AI) has permeated the medical field at an accelerated pace, bringing potential new tools that carry the promise of improving diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases. In this review we will summarize the landscape of AI in diagnosis and treatment of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Mendoza Ladd
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX 79905, United States
| | - David L Diehl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822, United States
| |
Collapse
|