Comparison of autoanalyzer and back titration for measurement of bicarbonate concentration in endoscopically collected pancreatic fluid

Assessment of exocrine pancreatic function in children and adolescents with direct and indirect testing

The exocrine pancreas plays an important role in digestion. Understanding of the physiology and regulation of exocrine function provides insight into disease processes and basis of functional testing. Specifically, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) can cause maldigestion and thus a proper assessment of exocrine pancreatic function is important. There are indirect and direct methods for evaluating pancreatic function. Indirect methods are varied and include stool, serum, urine, and breath tests. Fecal elastase is a commonly used indirect test today. Direct methods involve stimulated release of pancreatic fluid that is collected from the duodenum and analyzed for enzyme activity. The most used direct test today is the endoscopic pancreatic function test. Indirect pancreatic function testing is limited in identifying cases of mild to moderate EPI, and as such in these cases, direct testing has higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing EPI. This review provides a comprehensive guide to indirect and direct pancreatic function tests as well as an in-depth look at exocrine pancreatic function including anatomy, physiology, and regulatory mechanisms.

Endoscopic Pancreatic Function Testing (ePFT) in Children: A Position Paper From the NASPGHAN Pancreas Committee

Endoscopic pancreatic function testing (ePFT) is one of the few ways to directly diagnose exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and considerable confusion regarding indications, utility, and interpretation of the test remains. This position paper of the Pancreas Committee of the North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition reviews the history and indications for ePFT in children. We compare various methods in current practice and determine their strengths and limitations, and based on data from children and adults we provide guidance on a protocol on how to perform ePFT in children. Lastly, we pose areas in need of further research relating to ePFT in children.

Assessment of Exocrine Pancreatic Function During Endoscopy in Children

This article will review briefly the physiology of pancreatic enzyme secretion and the role of stimulated endoscopic testing for assessing exocrine pancreatic function. Published studies in both the pediatric and adult literature are reviewed. The technique and utility of endoscopic pancreatic function testing as the method of choice in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic disorders in childhood is described. Finally, emerging, clinically useful markers that can be measured in the pancreatic fluid will be described.

Method Performance of Bicarbonate and Electrolytes by Use of Duodenal Fluid for Assessment of Exocrine Pancreatic Function

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is challenging for both clinicians and laboratories. Indirect pancreatic function tests such as serum trypsinogen, fecal elastase, and fecal fat measurements are moderately sensitive for diagnosis of advanced chronic pancreatitis but show reduced sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of early disease. An alternative is the endoscopic pancreatic function test, which uses duodenal secretions after administration of IV secretin. Samples are collected at various times via the endoscopic tube and then analyzed for bicarbonate, sodium, potassium, and chloride.

METHODS

Precision, linearity, method comparison, and stability studies were performed on the Beckman Coulter AU5822 chemistry analyzer with duodenal fluid. Comparison with the Vitros 4600 dry slide chemistry instrument was used to interrogate differences between methods.

RESULTS

All assays produced a CV <2% without any measurable effects from the endoscopy fluid matrix and showed acceptable imprecision near the limit of detection (CV < 5%). All analytes showed linear dilution across the analytical measuring range. All the calculated error biases from dilutions were within 50% of the CLIA-allowable error for serum for each of the respective analytes. The calculated slopes ranged from 0.841 to 1.274 when compared to the Vitros 4600. Stability studies demonstrated that sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate remained stable after storage at -20 °C and after multiple freeze-thaw cycles. The percent change for all analytes was <5% mmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

The AU5800 series demonstrated adequate performance for the analysis of bicarbonate in duodenal fluid and therefore can be used for assessment of exocrine pancreatic function. However, notable discrepancies were observed for sodium, potassium, and chloride between the AU5800 series and the Vitros 4600.

Automated spectrophotometric bicarbonate analysis in duodenal juice compared to the back titration method

OBJECTIVES

We have recently evaluated a short endoscopic secretin test for exocrine pancreatic function. Bicarbonate concentration in duodenal juice is an important parameter in this test. Measurement of bicarbonate by back titration as the gold standard method is time consuming, expensive and technically difficult, thus a simplified method is warranted. We aimed to evaluate an automated spectrophotometric method in samples spanning the effective range of bicarbonate concentrations in duodenal juice. We also evaluated if freezing of samples before analyses would affect its results.

METHODS

Patients routinely examined with short endoscopic secretin test suspected to have decreased pancreatic function of various reasons were included. Bicarbonate in duodenal juice was quantified by back titration and automatic spectrophotometry. Both fresh and thawed samples were analysed spectrophotometrically.

RESULTS

177 samples from 71 patients were analysed. Correlation coefficient of all measurements was r = 0.98 (p < 0.001). Correlation coefficient of fresh versus frozen samples conducted with automatic spectrophotometry (n = 25): r = 0.96 (p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of bicarbonate in fresh and thawed samples by automatic spectrophotometrical analysis correlates excellent with the back titration gold standard. This is a major simplification of direct pancreas function testing, and allows a wider distribution of bicarbonate testing in duodenal juice. Extreme values for Bicarbonate concentration achieved by the autoanalyser method have to be interpreted with caution.

Endoscopic pancreatic function test using combined secretin and cholecystokinin stimulation for the evaluation of chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Current endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT) methods use either secretin or cholecystokinin (CCK) to measure pancreatic function.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a novel ePFT protocol that includes both secretin and CCK stimulation and to assess which fluid parameters best discriminate patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP).

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional diagnostic study.

SETTING

Single, tertiary-care institution.

PATIENTS

Healthy volunteers and patients evaluated for CP were included.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent a combined secretin-CCK ePFT. Patients evaluated for CP also underwent EUS during the same endoscopic session.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Duodenal fluid bicarbonate, lipase, and amylase concentrations were measured after CCK and secretin stimulation. Results were compared based on the presence of CP detected by EUS (≥5 features).

RESULTS

Twenty healthy volunteers and 69 patients evaluated for CP completed the secretin and CCK ePFT. Patients with an EUS score of 5 or higher had significantly decreased peak bicarbonate concentrations (72 mmol) compared with patients with an EUS score lower than 5 (90 mmol) and healthy subjects (108 mmol) (P < .001). Peak concentrations of amylase and lipase and total fluid volume were not significantly different between patients with CP and controls. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that peak bicarbonate concentration had superior discrimination for CP (area under the curve [AUC] 0.738) compared with peak amylase (AUC 0.677) and peak lipase (AUC 0.627). The addition of enzyme concentration measurement did not improve discrimination compared with peak bicarbonate alone.

LIMITATIONS

Secretin and cholecystokinin endoscopic pancreatic function test (SC ePFT) results were not compared with those of single hormone ePFTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of CCK infusion and enzyme concentration measurement to a standard secretin ePFT does not enhance the diagnosis of CP.

Update on endoscopic pancreatic function testing

Hormone-stimulated pancreatic function tests (PFTs) are considered the gold standard for measuring pancreatic exocrine function. PFTs involve the administration of intravenous secretin or cholecystokinin, followed by collection and analysis of pancreatic secretions. Because exocrine function may decline in the earliest phase of pancreatic fibrosis, PFTs are considered accurate for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis. Unfortunately, these potentially valuable tests are infrequently performed except at specialized centers, because they are time consuming and complicated. To overcome these limitations, endoscopic PFT methods have been developed which include aspiration of pancreatic secretions through the suction channel of the endoscope. The secretin endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT) involves collection of duodenal aspirates at 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after secretin stimulation. A bicarbonate concentration greater than 80 mmol/L in any of the samples is considered a normal result. The secretin ePFT has demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity compared with various reference standards, including the "Dreiling tube" secretin PFT, endoscopic ultrasound, and surgical histology. Furthermore, a standard autoanalyzer can be used for bicarbonate analysis, which allows the secretin ePFT to be performed at any hospital. The secretin ePFT may complement imaging tests like endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis. This paper will review the literature validating the use of ePFT in the diagnosis of exocrine insufficiency and chronic pancreatitis. Newer developments will also be discussed, including the feasibility of combined EUS/ePFT, the use of cholecystokinin alone or in combination with secretin, and the discovery of new protein and lipid pancreatic juice biomarkers which may complement traditional fluid analysis.