Exposure to Gastric Acid-Suppression Therapy Is Associated With Health Care- and Community-Associated Clostridium difficile Infection in Children

Clostridioides difficile detection and infection in children: are they just small adults?

Clostridioides difficile is a well-recognized healthcare-associated pathogen, with its significance widely recognized in adult populations. Despite this, there is limited data on the significance of detection within paediatric populations, both for individual patient management and wider transmission risk-based considerations. High rates of colonization are understood to occur in infants, with increasing levels up to 11 months, and colonization rates similar to adults by 8 years old. Sources of C. difficile are ubiquitous, with detection in companion animals and food sources, as well as within the clinical and wider environment. Due to the close interactions that occur between children and the environment, it is understandable that increasing recognition is afforded to the community acquisition of C. difficile in children. Other risk factors for the detection of C. difficile in children are similar to those observed in adults, including prior hospitalization and underlying conditions affecting gut health and motility. Recent studies have shown rising awareness of the role of asymptomatic carriage of C. difficile in healthcare transmission. Prior to this, paediatric patient populations were less likely to be screened due to uncertainty regarding the significance of detection; however, this increased awareness has led to a review of possible carriage testing pathways. Despite this increased attention, C. difficile infection remains poorly defined in paediatric populations, with limited dedicated paediatric data sets making comparison challenging. This is further complicated by the fact that infection in children frequently self resolves without additional therapies. Due to this, C. difficile remains a management challenge in paediatric settings.

Comparison of Different Antibiotics and the Risk for Community-Associated Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Case-Control Study

Background

Antibiotics are the greatest risk factor for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Risk for CDI varies across antibiotic types and classes. Optimal prescribing and stewardship recommendations require comparisons of risk across antibiotics. However, many prior studies rely on aggregated antibiotic categories or are underpowered to detect significant differences across antibiotic types. Using a large database of real-world data, we evaluate community-associated CDI risk across individual antibiotic types.

Methods

We conducted a matched case-control study using a large database of insurance claims capturing longitudinal health care encounters and medications. Case patients with community-associated CDI were matched to 5 control patients by age, sex, and enrollment period. Antibiotics prescribed within 30 days before the CDI diagnosis along with other risk factors, including comorbidities, health care exposures, and gastric acid suppression were considered. Conditional logistic regression and a Bayesian analysis were used to compare risk across individual antibiotics. A sensitivity analysis of antibiotic exposure windows between 30 and 180 days was conducted.

Results

We identified 159 404 cases and 797 020 controls. Antibiotics with the greatest risk for CDI included clindamycin and later-generation cephalosporins, and those with the lowest risk included minocycline and doxycycline. We were able to differentiate and order individual antibiotics in terms of their relative level of associated risk for CDI. Risk estimates varied considerably with different exposure windows considered.

Conclusions

We found wide variation in CDI risk within and between classes of antibiotics. These findings ordering the level of associated risk across antibiotics can help inform tradeoffs in antibiotic prescribing decisions and stewardship efforts.

Risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infection in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is considered an urgent threat to human health by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In recent years, C. difficile is increasingly being reported as a cause of gastrointestinal diseases in children, and the prevalence of hospital-acquired CDI (HA-CDI) and community-acquired CDI (CA-CDI) in children is increasing.

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in children.

METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, OVID, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang (Chinese), SinoMed (Chinese), and Weipu (Chinese) databases were searched from inception through January 12, 2022. Observational studies (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional) on CDI in children were included in the analysis. Data were pooled using a fixed or random-effects model, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.

FINDINGS

A total of 25 observational studies were included in the analysis. Prior antibiotic exposure (OR, 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-2.97), prolonged hospitalization (OR, 14.68; 95% CI, 13.24-16.28), hospitalization history (OR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.91-7.06), gastric acid suppressants (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.41-2.73), male gender (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32), neoplastic disease (OR, 3.40; 95% CI, 2.85-4.07), immunodeficiency (OR, 4.18; 95% CI, 3.25-5.37), solid organ transplantation (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 3.95-5.27) and enteral feeding (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.15-4.62) were associated with an increased risk of CDI.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis provides further evidence for the susceptibility factors of CDI to improve clinicians' awareness of CDI and effectively prevent C. difficile associated diarrhoea in children.

Initiation of acid suppression therapy for laryngomalacia

OBJECTIVE

Evidence supporting the use of acid suppression therapy (AST) for laryngomalacia (LM) is limited. The objective of this study was to determine if outpatient-initiated AST for LM was associated with symptom improvement, weight gain, and/or avoidance of surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was reviewed at a tertiary-care children's hospital. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with LM at ≤6 months of age, seen in an outpatient otolaryngology clinic between 2012 and 2018, and started on AST. Primary outcomes were improvement of airway and dysphagia symptoms, weight gain, and need for surgery. Severity was assessed by symptom severity.

RESULTS

Of 2693 patients reviewed, 199 met inclusion criteria. Median age of diagnosis was 4 weeks (range: 0-29 weeks). LM was classified as mild/moderate (71.4%) and severe (28.6%) based on symptom severity. Severity on flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FFL) was not associated with clinical severity. Weight percentile, airway symptoms, and dysphagia symptoms improved within the cohort. In total, 26.1% underwent supraglottoplasty (SGP). In multivariate analysis, only severe LM on FFL was predictive of SGP (OR: 7.28, 95%CI: 1.91-27.67, p = .004).

CONCLUSION

Clinical symptom severity did not predict response to AST raising the question of utility of AST in LM. Severity of LM based on FFL, not clinical severity, was associated with decision to pursue SGP. Prospective randomized trials are needed to better understand the role of AST in LM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Clostridioides difficile Infection in Children: A 5-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study

While there are numerous studies regarding Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in adults, literature on the pediatric population is scarce. Therefore, we performed a 5-year retrospective study between January 2014 and December 2018 in two referral centers in Rome, Italy. There were 359 patients tested for CDI who were enrolled: 87 resulted in positive and 272 in negative. CDI children had a higher number of previous-day hospital admissions (p = 0.024), hospitalizations (p = 0.001), and total hospital admissions (p = 0.008). Chronic comorbidities were more frequent in the CDI group (66.7% vs. 33.3%). Previous use of proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics was associated with CDI (p < 0.001). Among the antibiotics, only fluoroquinolones were significantly associated with CDI. Also, CDI children were more frequently exposed to antibiotics during the episode of hospitalization when children were tested. Our study provides an updated clinical and epidemiological analysis of children with CDI compared with a control group of children who tested negative. Further prospective studies could better define risk factors and preventive methods.

Community-Associated Clostridioides difficile Infection in Children: A Review of Recent Literature

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in children is more often acquired in the community than in the hospital. Community-associated Clostridioides difficile infection (CA-CDI) cases seem to be rising, although this is confounded by the unclear role of C. difficile in children 1 and 3 years of age and overreliance on nucleic acid amplification tests for diagnosis. Exposure to antibiotics, acid suppression medications, health care settings, and close contacts with CDI are associated with CA-CDI in children. These infections are more common in children with chronic medical conditions, especially those involving the gastrointestinal tract and immune suppression. Most CA-CDI in children are mild and managed in the outpatient setting, but a small subset requires hospitalization and can be quite severe. Approximately 10% of children with CA-CDI experience a recurrence. Infection control guidance focuses on the hospital setting and future studies on the best methods for preventing community spread of C. difficile are needed.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Immunocompromised Children

Clostridioides difficile infection is very common in immunocompromised children. Management is confounded by frequent asymptomatic colonization, multiple alternative etiologies for gastrointestinal symptoms, and high rates of relapse. Important considerations include indications for testing, appropriate choice of diagnostic tests, antibiotic therapy for initial and subsequent episodes, and primary and secondary prevention.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Community Associated Clostridioides difficile in Children

OBJECTIVE

To assess which risk factors are associated with community-associated Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in children.

STUDY DESIGN

This case control study was a retrospective review of all children 1-17 years of age with stool specimens sent for C difficile testing from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Cases and controls were children who had C difficile testing performed in the community or first 48 hours of hospital admission and >12 weeks after hospital discharge, with no prior positive C difficile testing in last 8 weeks, without other identified causes of diarrhea, and with clinical symptoms. Cases had positive confirmatory testing for C difficile. Controls had negative testing for C difficile and were matched to cases 1:1 by age and year of specimen collection.

RESULTS

The overall incidence rate of community-acquired CDI in this cohort was 13.7 per 100 000 children per year. There was a substantial increase in community-acquired CDI from 9.6 per 100 000 children per year in 2012 to a peak of 16.9 per 100 000 children per year in 2015 (Cochran-Armitage test for trend P = .002). The risk factors for community-acquired CDI included non-Hispanic ethnicity; amoxicillin-clavulanate, cephalosporin, and clindamycin use within the previous 12 weeks; a previous positive C difficile test within 6 months; and increased health care visits in the last year.

CONCLUSIONS

As rates of community-acquired CDI are increasing, enhanced antibiotic stewardship and recognition of health care disparities may ease the burden of community-acquired CDI.

Updated Management Guidelines for Clostridioides difficile in Paediatrics

Clostridioides difficile, formerly known as Clostridium difficile, causes infections (CDI) varying from self-limited diarrhoea to severe conditions, including toxic megacolon and bowel perforation. For this reason, a prompt diagnosis is fundamental to early treatment and the prevention of transmission. The aim of this article is to review diagnostic laboratory methods that are now available to detect C. difficile and to discuss the most recent recommendations on CDI treatment in children. Currently, there is no consensus on the best method for detecting C. difficile. Indeed, none of the available diagnostics possess at the same time high sensitivity and specificity, low cost and rapid turnaround times. Appropriate therapy is targeted according to age, severity and recurrence of the episode of infection, and the recent availability of new antibiotics opens new opportunities. De-escalation of antibiotics that are directly associated with CDI remains a priority and the cautious use of probiotics is recommended. Vancomycin represents the first-line therapy for CDI, although in children metronidazole can still be used as a first-line drug. Fidaxomicin is a new treatment option with equivalent initial response rates as vancomycin but lower relapse rates of CDI. Faecal microbiota transplantation should be considered for patients with multiple recurrences of CDI. Monoclonal antibodies and vaccines seem to represent a future perspective against CDI. However, only further studies will permit us to understand whether these new approaches could be effective in therapy and prevention of CDI in paediatric populations.

Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children

OBJECTIVES

To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction.

DESIGN

A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process.

METHODS

The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate.

RESULTS

The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 49 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 52 research priorities were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children

OBJECTIVES

To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction.

DESIGN

A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process.

METHODS

The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate.

RESULTS

The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 52 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 49 research priorities were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Children: A State-Of-The-Art Review

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a heterogenous and poorly understood entity characterised by an excessive growth of select microorganisms within the small intestine. This excessive bacterial biomass, in turn, disrupts host physiology in a myriad of ways, leading to gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptoms and complications. SIBO is a common cause of non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms in children, such as chronic abdominal pain, abdominal distention, diarrhoea, and flatulence, amongst others. In addition, it has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of stunting, a disease that affects millions of children worldwide. Risk factors such as acid-suppressive therapies, alterations in gastrointestinal motility and anatomy, as well as impoverished conditions, have been shown to predispose children to SIBO. SIBO can be diagnosed via culture-dependant or culture-independent approaches. SIBO's epidemiology is limited due to the lack of uniformity and consensus of its diagnostic criteria, as well as the paucity of literature available. Antibiotics remain the first-line treatment option for SIBO, although emerging modalities such as probiotics and diet manipulation could also have a role. Herein, we present a state-of-the-art-review which aims to comprehensively outline the most current information on SIBO in children, with particular emphasis on the gut microbiota.

Optimizing the Use of Medications and Other Therapies in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is the retrograde movement of gastric (and sometimes duodenal) contents into the esophagus. While the majority of GER is physiologic, for patients, it can be associated with symptoms. While some symptoms are merely bothersome (crying), others can be life threatening (cough, gagging, choking). The main driver of GER in infants is the frequent feedings that produce increased intra-abdominal pressure, which is known to trigger transient relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter. The recent 2018 clinical practice guidelines reported by the North American and European Societies for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN/ESPGHAN) have recommended non-pharmacologic management initially with subsequent consideration of brief trials with acid suppressants. The main target for these acid suppressants is the gastric parietal cells. Our review of the literature has revealed a paucity of data regarding the use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in infants. Despite the absence of well-controlled clinical studies, the prescription rate of these medications has increased internationally. Risks to patients of all ages have become increasingly recognized, with new associations being reported all too often. Here we report our review of all pharmacologic modalities as well as some non-surgical options.

Magnitude and direction of the association between Clostridium difficile infection and proton pump inhibitors in adults and pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a cause of increased morbidity and health care costs among hospitalized patients. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are mainly used for the treatment of acid-related upper gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of the study was to assess the risks associated with initial and recurrent CDI in adult and pediatric patients treated with PPIs.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using PubMed (Medline), Embase, and Web of Science with the following search terms: ("proton pump inhibitor," "PPI," or "acid suppression") AND ("infection," "diarrhea," "diarrhoea," "colitis," or "disease") AND ("Clostridium difficile"). Meta-analysis was performed using Revman5.3 software. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) presented as standard plots with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven eligible studies were selected. PPI use was significantly associated with risk of CDI (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.94-2.82; P < 0.00001). Pooled data from twelve studies demonstrated a significant association between PPI use and recurrent CDI (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.39-2.15; P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis revealed significant associations between PPI use and an increased incidence of CDI among adult (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.89-2.80; P < 0.00001) and pediatric (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.44-6.23; P < 0.00001) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI use was associated with CDI in adult and pediatric patients, and with recurrent CDI. Although many risk factors are associated with the occurrence and recurrence of CDI, consideration should be given to not administering PPIs at any age if they are unnecessary.

Attributable Cost of Clostridium difficile Infection in Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVES The attributable cost of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in children is unknown. We sought to determine a national estimate of attributable cost and length of stay (LOS) of CDI occurring during hospitalization in children. DESIGN AND METHODS We analyzed discharge records of patients between 2 and 18 years of age from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Kids' Inpatient Database. We created a logistic regression model to predict CDI during hospitalization based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Predicted probabilities from the logistic regression model were then used as propensity scores to match 1:2 CDI to non-CDI cases. Charges were converted to costs and compared between patients with CDI and propensity-score-matched controls. In a sensitivity analysis, we adjusted for LOS as a confounder by including it in both the propensity score and a generalized linear model predicting cost. RESULTS We identified 8,527 pediatric hospitalizations (0.53%) with a diagnosis of CDI and 1,597,513 discharges without CDI. In our matched cohorts, the attributable cost of CDI occurring during a hospitalization ranged from $1,917 to $8,317, depending on whether model was adjusted for LOS. When not adjusting for LOS, CDI-associated hospitalizations cost 1.6 times more than non-CDI associated hospitalizations. Attributable LOS of CDI was approximately 4 days. CONCLUSIONS Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized children is associated with an economic burden similar to adult estimates. This finding supports a continued focus on preventing CDI in children as a priority. Pediatric CDI cost analyses should account for LOS as an important confounder of cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1472-1477.

Risk Factors for Community-Associated Clostridium difficile Infection in Children

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the medication and other exposures associated with pediatric community-associated Clostridium difficile infections (CA-CDIs).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a case-control study using billing records from the US military health system database. CA-CDI cases included children 1-18 years of age with an outpatient International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic code for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) from 2001 to 2013. Each case was matched to 3 controls without CDI by age and sex. Children hospitalized at any time before their CDI were excluded. Outpatient pharmacy records were used to identify medication exposures in the preceding 12 weeks. In addition, we evaluated recent outpatient healthcare exposure, exposure to a sibling younger than 1 year of age, or to a family member with CDI.

RESULTS

A total of 1331 children with CA-CDI were identified and 3993 controls were matched successfully. Recent exposure to fluoroquinolones, clindamycin (OR 73.00; 95% CI 13.85-384.68), third-generation cephalosporins (OR 16.32; 95% CI 9.11-29.26), proton pump inhibitors (OR 8.17; 95% CI 2.35-28.38), and to multiple classes of antibiotics, each was associated strongly the subsequent diagnosis of CA-CDI. Recent exposure to outpatient healthcare clinics (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.31-1.39) or to a family member with CDI also was associated with CA-CDI.

CONCLUSIONS

CA-CDI is associated with medications regularly prescribed in pediatric practice, along with exposure to outpatient healthcare clinics and family members with CDI. Our findings provide additional support for the judicious use of these medications and for efforts to limit spread of CDI in ambulatory healthcare settings and households.

Clostridium Difficile Infection in Children: A Review

Clostridium difficile is a sporogenic, anaerobic, Gram-positive, emerging enteric pathogen. It represents the most common cause of health care-associated diarrhoea in the United States, with significantly associated morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Historically regarded as a little more than an innocent coloniser bystander of the gastrointestinal tract of children, C difficile has increasingly demonstrated its behaviour as a true pathogen in the paediatric age groups. This organism may be responsible for a broad spectrum of diseases in children, ranging from self-limiting secretory diarrhoea to life-threatening conditions, such as pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, intestinal perforation, and septic shock. The incidence and severity of C difficile infection are, however, not completely understood in this population. In particular, although asymptomatic carriage remains high among infants, the clinical significance of detecting C difficile in children aged 1 to 3 years is not fully understood. Moreover, recent epidemiological surveillance has demonstrated a rise in the incidence of C difficile infection, particularly in the community and in low-risk settings. Interestingly, such cases may not show the disease pattern to be associated with typical risk factors, such as recent exposure to antimicrobial drugs or on-going contacts with the health care system.The purpose of the present review is to present the features of C difficile infection that are unique to paediatric patients and to update paediatricians on information and recommendations regarding C difficile infection in children.