Biopsy-Induced Duodenal Hematoma Is Not an Infrequent Complication Favored by Bone Marrow Transplantation

Complications and Utility of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An 11 Year Experience

OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is used to differentiate GI graft versus host disease (GI-GvHD), which requires escalation of immunosuppressive treatment (IST), from other conditions such as viral infection, which may require reduction of IST. The aim of this study was to establish the clinical utility of GI endoscopy post hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and the complication rate of these procedures.

METHODS

This was a single-center observational retrospective cohort study. Hospital pediatric endoscopy and HSCT databases identified patients between January 2010 and December 2020. GI-GvHD was diagnosed if there were positive histological findings and clinical context. Data collected included demographics, timing of endoscopy post-HSCT, clinical utility, and complications of endoscopy. The endoscopy was deemed to be "clinically useful" if it resulted in a change of clinical management or helped to narrow down the differential diagnosis for the clinical team.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-nine HSCT occurred in 320 children during the study period. Sixty-six of 339 (19%) HSCT needed an "endoscopy episode." One hundred nineteen endoscopies were performed (53 concurrent upper and lower GI endoscopies, 11 upper GI endoscopies, and 2 lower GI endoscopies). Four of 119 (3%) endoscopies had complications: septic shock (1), duodenal hematoma (1), GI bleeding (1), and colonic perforation (1). Four patients had incomplete records to assess utility of endoscopy. Fifty-seven of 62 (92%) endoscopy episodes were "clinically useful," and 41 of 62 (66%) had a change in IST.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical utility of endoscopy is high and in the majority of cases is associated with a change in patient management. Children post-HSCT are at high risk of complications from endoscopy; this should be made clear in the process of obtaining consent for procedures.

Dual-Energy CT for Accurate Discrimination of Intraperitoneal Hematoma and Intestinal Structures

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of dual-energy CT (DECT) with virtual unenhanced imaging (VNC) and iodine maps (IM) to differentiate between intraperitoneal hematomas (IH) and bowel structures (BS) compared to linearly blended DECT (DE-LB) images (equivalent to single-energy CT). This retrospective study included the DECT of 30 patients (mean age: 64.5 ± 15.1 years, 19 men) with intraperitoneal hematomas and 30 negative controls. VNC, IM, and DE-LB were calculated. Imaging follow-up and surgical reports were used as references. Three readers assessed diagnostic performance and confidence in distinguishing IH and BS for DE-LB, VNC, and IM. Diagnostic confidence was assessed on a five-point Likert scale. The mean values of VNC, IM, and DE-LB were compared with nonparametric tests. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by calculating receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The results are reported as medians with interquartile ranges. Subjective image analysis showed higher diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 96.7−100% vs. 88.2−96.7%; specificity: 100% vs. 96.7−100%; p < 0.0001; ICC: 0.96−0.99) and confidence (Likert: 5; IRQ [5−5] vs. 4, IRQ [3−4; 4−5]; p < 0.0001; ICC: 0.80−0.96) for DECT compared to DE-LB. On objective image analysis, IM values for DECT showed significant differences between IH (3.9 HU; IQR [1.6, 8.0]) and BS (39.5 HU; IQR [29.2, 43.3]; p ≤ 0.0001). VNC analysis revealed a significantly higher attenuation of hematomas (50.5 HU; IQR [44.4, 59.4]) than BS (26.6 HU; IQR [22.8, 32.4]; p ≤ 0.0001). DE-LB revealed no significant differences between hematomas (60.5 HU, IQR [52.7, 63.9]) and BS (63.9 HU, IQR [58.0, 68.8]; p > 0.05). ROC analysis revealed the highest AUC values and sensitivity for IM (AUC = 100%; threshold by Youden-Index ≤ 19 HU) and VNC (0.93; ≥34.1 HU) compared to DE-LB (0.64; ≤63.8; p < 0.001). DECT is suitable for accurate discrimination between IH and BS by calculating iodine maps and VNC images.

Endoscopic Approach in the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Acute Graft Versus Host Disease in Children

The objectives of this study were to describe clinical, histological, and endoscopic findings in children undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for symptoms of digestive acute graft-versus-host disease (a-GvHD), to evaluate the rate of steroid-resistant GvHD and transplant-related mortality, and to describe the feasibility and safety of the endoscopic procedure.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted, at the IRCSS Istituto G. Gaslini in Genova, Italy, in 26 children undergoing upper or lower GI endoscopy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between 2000 and 2017.

Results

Histology confirmed a diagnosis of a-GvHD in 73% of patients; it was frequently associated with steroid-resistant a-GvHD (P = 0.001) and with an increased transplant-related mortality. Additionally, one patient developed duodenal hematoma after endoscopy for a high-grade GI a-GvHD.

Conclusions

In our experience, the endoscopic approach in the diagnosis of GI a-GvHD in children was feasible and safe. Furthermore, the histological diagnosis of GI a-GvHD was associated with an increased risk of steroid-resistant GvHD and with high transplant-related mortality.

Large Duodenal Hematoma Causing an Ileus after an Endoscopic Duodenal Biopsy in a 6-Year-Old Child: A Case Report

Intramural duodenal hematoma (IDH) in children is a rare complication after esophagogastroduodenoscopy. It is commonly described in patients with additional disorders or risk factors, such as coagulopathy. We present a case of a previously healthy 6-year-old boy with a large obstructing intramural duodenal hematoma and concomitant pancreatitis after an elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The patient presented with typical symptoms of an IDH, such as abdominal pain and distension, nausea and vomiting. IDH was diagnosed using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging examination. Conservative management with gastric decompression using a nasogastric feeding tube, bowel rest, total parenteral nutrition and analgesia was performed. After three weeks, the patient was discharged from the hospital without any complaints. Interventional management of IDH in pediatric patients with a lack of response to conservative therapy or complicating IDH should be discussed in an interdisciplinary team.

Diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological- and retrospective assessment of histopathology-based gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease in children

BACKGROUND

No previous paediatric study has evaluated the frequency of diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological assessment (CSHA) and retrospective, independent, histopathological assessment (RIHA) of gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GI-GVHD) METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, based on gastrointestinal biopsies collected from allogeneic HSCT-treated children (<18 years) with symptom-based GI-GVHD, we evaluated; disagreement of histopathology-based GI-GVHD diagnosis in CSHA vs RIHA, and potential clinical consequences of differences between the assessments. The CSHA-based diagnoses were retrieved from histopathology reports. The RIHA was performed by one pathologist, blinded to the CSHA outcomes and based on the minimal criteria for histopathology-based GI-GVHD diagnosis by the NIH 2014.

RESULTS

Seventy children with 92 endoscopic occasions (including 22 re-endoscopies) were enrolled. GI-GVHD was observed in 73% (67/92) of the endoscopies in the RIHA and in 54% (50/92) in the CSHA (P = .014). The RIHA confirmed 94% (47/50) with GI-GVHD and 52% (22/42) with non-GI-GVHD diagnoses, established in the CSHA. Disagreement, that is endoscopic occasions with GI-GVHD solely detected in RIHA or detection of GI-GVHD in CSHA but not in RIHA, was observed in 20/42 (48%) and 3/50 (6%), respectively (McNemar's test, P = .0008). The risk of a subsequent re-endoscopy was higher in endoscopic occasions with GI-GVHD detected in RIHA but not in CSHA vs if non-GI-GVHD were detected in both readings (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in children with symptom-based GI-GVHD without histopathological confirmation in CSHA, a second, NIH 2014 based histopathological assessment should be considered before performing a re-endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the Neonate

Gastrointestinal endoscopy permits direct observation of the alimentary tract, acquisition of mucosal tissue for histopathologic examination, and other diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers. Endoscopes of appropriate size for many neonates and an expanding array of compatible tools and accessories have broadened what is possible, although few neonatal data exist to guide use. Evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, evaluation and dilation of fibromuscular congenital esophageal stenosis, and the bedside placement of gastrostomy tube have been described. Careful consideration of risks, benefits, and discussions between involved specialties permit patient-specific application of these tools and techniques to augment care of this vulnerable population.

Application of latent class analysis in diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease by serum markers after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in 25–70% of patients. The gold standard (GS) test to confirm the diagnosis of GVHD has some limitations. The current study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of three serum markers in diagnosing GVHD without a GS. 94 patients who were hospitalized for allogeneic transplantation were studied. Mean levels from day of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to discharge of serum uric acid (UA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatinine (Cr) were measured for all participants. We adapted a Bayesian latent class analysis to modelling the results of each marker and combination of markers. The Sensitivity, Specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for LDH were as 51%, 81%, and 0.70, respectively. For UA, the Sensitivity, Specificity, and AUC were 54%, 75%, and 0.71, respectively. The estimated Sensitivity, Specificity, and AUC of Cr were 72%, 94%, and 0.86, respectively. Adjusting for covariates, the combined Sensitivity, Specificity, and AUC of the optimal marker combination were 76%, 83%, and 0.94, respectively. To conclude, our findings suggested that Cr had the strongest diagnosis power for GVHD. Moreover, the classification accuracy of the three-marker combination outperforms the other combinations.

Pediatric Endoscopic Procedure Complications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current body of research, define high-risk patients and endoscopic processes, and outline evidence-based countermeasures aimed at minimizing the incidence of complications during endoscopy in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Significant complications of endoscopy requiring emergency department or inpatient admission in otherwise healthy children are unusual, but more common with therapeutic procedures; risk from procedures increases incrementally with preoperative coexisting conditions. Duodenal hematoma is predominantly a pediatric endoscopic complication and is more likely in hematology-oncology patients. Air embolism is a well-defined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complication in adults and is likely to increase in children with increased performance of pediatric ERCP. Increased physician expertise is the most often proposed countermeasure, especially in the context of endoscopy complications in the higher-risk patient and procedure. Endoscopy in children remains a very safe group of procedures, although a more detailed understanding of risk factors and ideal training and practice organization is lacking.

Acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut: considerations for the gastroenterologist

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is central to the management of many haematological disorders. A frequent complication of HSCT is acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a condition in which immune cells from the donor attack healthy recipient tissues. The gastrointestinal system is among the most common sites affected by acute GVHD, and severe manifestations of acute GVHD of the gut portends a poor prognosis in patients after HSCT. Acute GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract presents both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Although the clinical manifestations are nonspecific and overlap with those of infection and drug toxicity, diagnosis is ultimately based on clinical criteria. As reliable serum biomarkers have not yet been validated outside of clinical trials, endoscopic and histopathological evaluation continue to be utilized in diagnosis. Once a diagnosis of gastrointestinal acute GVHD is established, therapy with systemic corticosteroids is typically initiated, and non-responders can be treated with a wide range of second-line therapies. In addition to treating the underlying disease, the management of complications including profuse diarrhoea, severe malnutrition and gastrointestinal bleeding is paramount. In this Review, we discuss strategies for the diagnosis and management of acute GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract as they pertain to the practising gastroenterologist.

Upper Versus Lower Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Graft-Versus-Host Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The optimal endoscopic approach to patients with suspected gut graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is uncertain. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of upper and lower endoscopies performed in patients post-HSCT.

METHODS

We identified a cohort post-HSCT with acute and chronic GVHD who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopies for GVHD diagnosis. Hospital charts were reviewed and results were stratified according to patients' symptoms.

RESULTS

From 1990 to 2013 433 HSCTs were performed. Fifty-six patients underwent 141 endoscopies, of which 117 were done to evaluate for GVHD or an alternative diagnosis. A total of 28/43 (65%) of the lower endoscopies and 41/74 (55%) of the upper endoscopies diagnosed GVHD or an alternative disease process on pathology. A total of 15/43 (35%) of lower endoscopies were flexible sigmoidoscopies, and 11/15 (73%) of these diagnosed GVHD or an alternative diagnosis. Upper endoscopy performed in patients with diarrhea as their only symptom diagnosed GVHD in 44% and an alternative diagnosis in 11%. In comparison, lower endoscopy in patients with only diarrhea diagnosed GVHD in 50%, and 18% offered an alternative diagnosis. Upper endoscopy provided a diagnosis of opportunistic viral and fungal infections of the upper gastrointestinal tract in 7 patients, while lower endoscopy diagnosed pseudomembranous colitis in 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper and lower endoscopy had a similar diagnostic yield in patients with known or suspected GVHD involving the gut, even for patients presenting only with diarrhea. Because of its ease and safety upper endoscopy is the preferred initial endoscopic approach in patients with suspected gut GVHD, however flexible sigmoidoscopy is a reasonable other option.