Screening for Psychosocial and Family Risk in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Disorders

Special Considerations in the Systematic Psychosocial Screening of Youth with Type 1 Diabetes

Objective

The American Diabetes Association recommends psychosocial screening for individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The purpose of this study is to present (a) several high priority decisions that program developers may encounter when building a new psychosocial screening program and (b) both the screening development process and results of one mental health screening program within a multidisciplinary pediatric diabetes clinic, with particular emphasis on parent-youth screening agreement and changes to elevation status over time.

Methods

Youth with T1D ages 12–17 and parents of youth with T1D ages 8–17 were administered mental health screeners as a part of outpatient diabetes visits over a 1-year period. Youth depression and anxiety were screened using self- and parent proxy-report versions of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Results

Youth (n = 154) and parents (n = 211) completed mental health screening measures, such that 228 youth were screened. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between youth- and parent proxy-report agreement were good for the measures of depression (ICC = .787) and anxiety (ICC = .781), with parent proxy-reports significantly higher than youth self-reports of anxiety (p < .01). Of the 93 youth with follow-up screening data and no youth- or parent proxy-reported elevation on the initial screener, 16.1% had at least one elevated screener within 1 year.

Conclusions

Findings indicate that questions of who to screen and how often to screen may deserve increased scrutiny, as this screening program’s data suggest that there may be benefit to obtaining both youth- and parent report more often than annually.

The Esophageal-Atresia-Quality-of-life Questionnaires: Feasibility, Validity and Reliability in Sweden and Germany

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare malformation characterized of discontinuity of the esophagus, concurrent with or without a tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). We report the feasibility validity and reliability of a condition-specific quality-of-life (QOL) tool for EA/TEF children, the age-adapted EA-QOL-questionnaires, when used in Sweden and Germany.

METHODS

A total of 124 families of children with EA/TEF participated in the study; 53 parents completed the EA-QOL-questionnaire for children aged 2 to 7 years; 62 children/71 parents the EA-QOL-questionnaire for children 8 to 17 years. Feasibility was determined from the percentage of missing item responses. Based on clinical data and previously validated generic QOL-instruments (PedsQL 4.0, DISABKIDS-12), the final EA-QOL scores were evaluated against hypotheses of validity (known-groups/concurrent/convergent) and reliability (internal consistency/retest reliability of scores for 3 weeks). Significant level was P < 0.05.

RESULTS

In the questionnaire for EA/TEF children aged 2 to 7 years, 16/18 items were completed with missing values <6% (range 0%-7.5%), and in the questionnaire for 8 to 17-year-olds, 24/24 child-reported items (range 0%-4.8%) and 21/24 parent-reported items (range 0%-7.0%). In both age-specific EA-QOL-questionnaires, desirable standards for known-groups and concurrent validity were fulfilled; digestive symptoms and feeding difficulties negatively impacted EA-QOL-Total-scores (P < 0.001), and as hypothesized, in 2 to 7-year-olds, respiratory symptoms decreased EA-QOL-Total-scores (P = 0.002). Correlations between the EA-QOL and generic QOL questionnaires supported convergent validity. Internal consistency reliability was satisfactory. The level of agreements of EA-QOL-scores between the field- and retest study were good to excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall psychometric performance of the EA-QOL-questionnaires for EA/TEF children is satisfactory and can enhance outcome evaluations in future research and clinical practice.