Choice of Endoscopic Procedure in Children With Clinically Suspected Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-host Disease

Impact of the histologic grade of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease on outcomes in pediatric patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Introduction

Acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common life-threatening complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). We aimed to investigate outcomes according to the clinical, endoscopic, and histologic severity of gastrointestinal GVHD in pediatric patients treated with allogeneic HCT.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients who underwent sufficient endoscopic and histopathologic evaluation for clinically suspected acute gastrointestinal GVHD between 2010 and 2020.

Results

Fifty-one patients were included (male proportion, 68.6% [35/51]; median age at HCT, 6.4 years). When the patients were classified according to the histologic severity of gastrointestinal GVHD, the severe group had an earlier onset of GVHD symptoms and a higher proportion of patients with severe clinical gastrointestinal GVHD than the mild-to-moderate and "absent" groups. In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the groups with more severe clinical and histologic gastrointestinal GVHD showed a higher risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 58.3 and 36.4% in the mild-to-moderate and histologic gastrointestinal GVHD groups, respectively (p = 0.0384). Patients with higher clinical and histologic grades of gastrointestinal GVHD showed higher cumulative incidence of NRM.

Discussion

Our results demonstrated that histologic severity of gastrointestinal GVHD is a relevant factor affecting OS and NRM, and patients with mild-to-moderate or severe histologic gastrointestinal GVHD have worse outcomes than patients without histologic GVHD. These findings support the importance of assessing the histologic grade in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with clinical gastrointestinal GVHD.

Complications and Utility of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An 11 Year Experience

OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is used to differentiate GI graft versus host disease (GI-GvHD), which requires escalation of immunosuppressive treatment (IST), from other conditions such as viral infection, which may require reduction of IST. The aim of this study was to establish the clinical utility of GI endoscopy post hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and the complication rate of these procedures.

METHODS

This was a single-center observational retrospective cohort study. Hospital pediatric endoscopy and HSCT databases identified patients between January 2010 and December 2020. GI-GvHD was diagnosed if there were positive histological findings and clinical context. Data collected included demographics, timing of endoscopy post-HSCT, clinical utility, and complications of endoscopy. The endoscopy was deemed to be "clinically useful" if it resulted in a change of clinical management or helped to narrow down the differential diagnosis for the clinical team.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-nine HSCT occurred in 320 children during the study period. Sixty-six of 339 (19%) HSCT needed an "endoscopy episode." One hundred nineteen endoscopies were performed (53 concurrent upper and lower GI endoscopies, 11 upper GI endoscopies, and 2 lower GI endoscopies). Four of 119 (3%) endoscopies had complications: septic shock (1), duodenal hematoma (1), GI bleeding (1), and colonic perforation (1). Four patients had incomplete records to assess utility of endoscopy. Fifty-seven of 62 (92%) endoscopy episodes were "clinically useful," and 41 of 62 (66%) had a change in IST.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical utility of endoscopy is high and in the majority of cases is associated with a change in patient management. Children post-HSCT are at high risk of complications from endoscopy; this should be made clear in the process of obtaining consent for procedures.

Liver-Intestinal Involvement in Graft Versus Host Disease in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: Ten Years of Experience in 2 Centers of Latin America

To describe the behavior and characteristics of children with diagnosis of graft versus host disease (GVHD) with liver-intestinal involvement.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for diagnosis of GVHD with gastrointestinal (GI) or liver involvement, from 2 pediatric centers.

Results

Between 2007 and 2017, 57 pediatric patients presented with liver or intestinal GVHD; 74% with GI GVHD, 11% with liver GVHD, and 15% with liver-intestinal involvement. Diarrhea (96%) and abdominal pain (55%) were the most frequent symptoms. Endoscopies were performed in 88%, and 35% required a second procedure to confirm diagnosis. Normal-appearing mucosa was observed in 17% of upper GI endoscopies and in 29% of colonoscopies. Endoscopic pathological findings were observed mainly in colon (62%). There was greater severity on colonoscopic classification in those with liver-intestinal compromise than in those with GI compromise only. Overall mortality was 26%.

Conclusion

GI and liver GVHD diagnosis may present serious complications. GI involvement tends to manifest early, so it is appropriate to suspect it in the first days after transplantation, unlike liver involvement, which occurs late when other organs are involved. We did not observe a direct relationship between endoscopic and histological classification. Both GI and liver involvement in GVHD could predict greater target organ involvement.

Endoscopic Approach in the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Acute Graft Versus Host Disease in Children

The objectives of this study were to describe clinical, histological, and endoscopic findings in children undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for symptoms of digestive acute graft-versus-host disease (a-GvHD), to evaluate the rate of steroid-resistant GvHD and transplant-related mortality, and to describe the feasibility and safety of the endoscopic procedure.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted, at the IRCSS Istituto G. Gaslini in Genova, Italy, in 26 children undergoing upper or lower GI endoscopy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between 2000 and 2017.

Results

Histology confirmed a diagnosis of a-GvHD in 73% of patients; it was frequently associated with steroid-resistant a-GvHD (P = 0.001) and with an increased transplant-related mortality. Additionally, one patient developed duodenal hematoma after endoscopy for a high-grade GI a-GvHD.

Conclusions

In our experience, the endoscopic approach in the diagnosis of GI a-GvHD in children was feasible and safe. Furthermore, the histological diagnosis of GI a-GvHD was associated with an increased risk of steroid-resistant GvHD and with high transplant-related mortality.

Evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms in pediatric patients post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Ileo-colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy. A single-center experience and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative therapy used to treat high-risk hematological malignant disorders and other life-threatening nonmalignant diseases. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms post-HSCT might be due to GI graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or GI infections or both. GI endoscopy with biopsies is safe and beneficial in guiding the management of GI symptoms in children after HSCT, justifying the therapeutic management and contributing to improved outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including 16 children with malignant and nonmalignant diseases that underwent allogeneic HSCT who had 24 ileo-colonoscopies performed for GI symptoms. To facilitate an evidence-based approach to the endoscopic evaluation of GI symptoms in pediatric patients post HSCT, we examined whether a full ileo-colonoscopy, which includes right colon and terminal ileum (TI), as opposed to a limited sigmoidoscopy, was more accurate in the evaluation of GI symptoms in pediatric patients post HSCT.

RESULTS

Specific findings on the right colon/TI were found in nine out of 24 ileo-colonoscopies (38%, CI = 19%-59%). The macroscopic findings on ileo-colonoscopy were compared with the histopathologic findings. When macroscopic findings were present, there were matching histopathologic findings in 100% of cases. However, even in the absence of any macroscopic findings on ileo-colonoscopy, there were histopathological findings in 29% of the cases (p-value = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort favors ileo-colonoscopy over sigmoidoscopy, with systematic biopsy sampling, in evaluating GI symptoms in pediatric patients post HSCT.

[Management of patients developing acute gastro-intestinal graft-versus-host-disease: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the most common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with a frequency range of 30% to 50%. GVH is the leading cause of non-relapse-related deaths and a cause early mortality. Gastro-intestinal (GI) GVH results in digestive manifestations that involve the small intestine and the colon. The patient may then have diarrhea, intestinal bleeding, abdominal pain but also clinical signs such as nausea and vomiting may lead to anorexia. GI-GVHD promotes undernutrition as well as significant losses of vitamins and trace elements. In the case of post-transplant diarrhea, differential diagnosis can include GI-GVHD, infection and drug toxicity. Although, corticosteroids w/wo calcineurin inhibitors represent the standard of care in first line treatment, there is no consensus regarding salvage therapy in case of corticoresistant GI-GVH. In addition, assessment of early nutritional status would help combating undernutrition, which is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with GI-GVHD. In this workshop of the Fancophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) we focused on the management of patients developing GI-GVHD following allo-HCT.

Diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological- and retrospective assessment of histopathology-based gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease in children

BACKGROUND

No previous paediatric study has evaluated the frequency of diagnostic disagreement between clinical standard histopathological assessment (CSHA) and retrospective, independent, histopathological assessment (RIHA) of gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GI-GVHD) METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, based on gastrointestinal biopsies collected from allogeneic HSCT-treated children (<18 years) with symptom-based GI-GVHD, we evaluated; disagreement of histopathology-based GI-GVHD diagnosis in CSHA vs RIHA, and potential clinical consequences of differences between the assessments. The CSHA-based diagnoses were retrieved from histopathology reports. The RIHA was performed by one pathologist, blinded to the CSHA outcomes and based on the minimal criteria for histopathology-based GI-GVHD diagnosis by the NIH 2014.

RESULTS

Seventy children with 92 endoscopic occasions (including 22 re-endoscopies) were enrolled. GI-GVHD was observed in 73% (67/92) of the endoscopies in the RIHA and in 54% (50/92) in the CSHA (P = .014). The RIHA confirmed 94% (47/50) with GI-GVHD and 52% (22/42) with non-GI-GVHD diagnoses, established in the CSHA. Disagreement, that is endoscopic occasions with GI-GVHD solely detected in RIHA or detection of GI-GVHD in CSHA but not in RIHA, was observed in 20/42 (48%) and 3/50 (6%), respectively (McNemar's test, P = .0008). The risk of a subsequent re-endoscopy was higher in endoscopic occasions with GI-GVHD detected in RIHA but not in CSHA vs if non-GI-GVHD were detected in both readings (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in children with symptom-based GI-GVHD without histopathological confirmation in CSHA, a second, NIH 2014 based histopathological assessment should be considered before performing a re-endoscopy.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation a Review and a Pilot Study in Children Treated With Decidua Stromal Cells for Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are rare precursors in all organs of the body. MSCs have profound anti-inflammatory effects and reduce alloreactivity in vitro and in vivo. In pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), MSCs have mainly been used to treat acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). MSCs are commercially available for this indication in Canada, Japan, and New Zeeland. More rare indications for MSCs in pediatric patients include graft failure and chronic GVHD. MSCs from bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord, Wharton's jelly, placenta tissue, and decidua have been used, but the optimal clinical stromal cell source has not been compared in clinical trials. More experimental clinical indications using MSCs, such as sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, hemorrhages, pneumo-mediastinum, and neuroinflammation have primarily been explored in animal models or adult HCT patients. MSCs have almost no if any side-effects. In this pilot study we report the outcome of six children treated with decidua stromal cells (DSCs) for steroid refractory acute GVHD. At 6 months, complete response was seen in four patients and partial response in two patients. One child with high-risk ALL died from relapse and a boy with sickle cell disease died from a cerebral hemorrhage. Five-year survival was 67% and all survivors showed a Lansky score of 100%. To conclude, MSCs from various organs are well-tolerated and have shown an encouraging outcome for acute GVHD in pediatric patients.

Clinical relevance of endoscopy with histopathological assessment in children with suspected gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

Endoscopy with histopathological assessment is an established practice to confirm gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GI-GVHD). However, the clinical relevance of this approach in children is incompletely evaluated. In a retrospective cohort study, we investigated the frequency of treatment changes in response to histopathological findings in all children (<18 years) in Sweden who underwent endoscopy for suspected GI-GVHD (2000-2013) after receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Sixty-eight children with ninety-one endoscopic occasions were enrolled. At the time of endoscopy, anti-GI-GVHD treatment was ongoing in 71% (65/91). In 18% (12/65) with ongoing treatment, no histopathological evidence of GI-GVHD or another cause to justify anti-GI-GVHD treatment was found. In 48% (44/91), endoscopy with histopathological assessment led to changes in the treatment regimen. Re-endoscopy was more frequent among those with treatment changes, versus unchanged treatment, 39% (17/44) and 13% (6/47), respectively (P = .007). Histopathological findings generating treatment changes were as follows: GI-GVHD in 68% (30/44), normal histology in 25% (11/44), and an alternative diagnosis in 7% (3/44). In conclusion, this study supports that endoscopy with histopathological assessment should be considered in all children with suspected GI-GVHD.