1
|
Zou Y, Zeng S, Chen M, Li S, Fu Q, Zhou S, Zhou J. Gut microbiota in children with split-dose bowel preparations revealed by metagenomics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13:1202007. [PMID: 37533931 PMCID: PMC10390731 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1202007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) is routinely used for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. This study aimed to investigate the composition of gut microbiota and its functions in pediatric patients undergoing split-dose PEG bowel preparation for colonoscopy to understand the stability and resilience of gut microbiota. Material and methods From September to December 2021, 19 pediatric patients were enrolled at Shenzhen Children's Hospital and 76 samples (4 time points) were analyzed using metagenomics. Time points included Time_1 (one day before bowel preparation), Time_2 (one day after colonoscopy), Time_3 (two weeks after bowel preparation), and Time_4 (four weeks after bowel preparation). Result Alpha diversity comparison at both the species and gene levels showed a decrease in community richness after colonoscopy, with little statistical significance. However, the Shannon diversity index significantly decreased (P<0.05) and gradually returned to pre-preparation levels at two weeks after bowel preparation. The genus level analysis showed six genera (Eubacterium, Escherichia, Intertinibacter, Veillonella, Ruminococcaceae unclassified, and Coprobacillus) significantly different across the four time periods. Additionally, at the species level, the abundance of Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and Veillonella parvula significantly increased at one day after colonoscopy before gradually decreasing at two weeks after bowel preparation. In contrast, the abundance of Intertinibacter bartlettii decreased at one day after colonoscopy but then recovered at two weeks after bowel preparation, reaching the preoperative level at four weeks after bowel preparation. Furthermore, five functional pathways (base excision repair, biosynthesis of ansamycins, biosynthesis of siderophore group nonribosomal peptide, flavonoid biosynthesis, and biosynthesis of type II polyketide products) were significantly different across the four time periods, with recovery at two weeks after bowel preparation and reaching preoperative levels at four weeks after bowel preparation. Conclusions Gut microbiota at the genus level, species level, and functional pathways are impacted in pediatric patients undergoing split-dose PEG bowel preparation and colonoscopy, with recovery two weeks following bowel preparation. However, the phylum level was not impacted. Modifications in gut microbiota composition and function may be investigated in future studies of bowel preparation. This study highlights the stability and resilience of gut microbiota among pediatric patients during bowel preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Sihui Zeng
- Division of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Moxian Chen
- Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China & Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Subtropical Forest Biodiversity Conservation, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sufang Li
- Nursing Department, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Qin Fu
- Nursing Department, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Shaoming Zhou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jianli Zhou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu R, Ji WY, Yang C, Zhan Q. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Low-Residue Diet Versus Clear Liquid Diet: Which Is Better for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy? Gastroenterol Nurs 2021; 44:341-352. [PMID: 34238885 PMCID: PMC8478318 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The goal of this systematic review was to compare the clear liquid diet and the low-residue diet to determine which is better for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. A literature search for randomized controlled trials on the effects of employing the clear liquid diet and low-residue diets before colonoscopy was conducted in major online English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid EMBASE). After the systematic review of all 16 studies, the outcomes including quality of bowel preparation, tolerance, willingness to repeat, and adverse effects were analyzed through meta-analysis. The statistical analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. No statistically significant difference was observed between the low-residue diet and clear liquid diet groups (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.19 [0.79, 1.81]; p = .41). There was no statistically significant difference between the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (standard mean difference [95% confidence interval] =-0.04 [-0.21, -0.14]; p = .68) Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (standard mean difference [95% confidence interval] =-0.04 [-0.19, 0.11]; p = .59) scores of the two groups. The quality indicators for colonoscopy of the two groups were not statistically significant. However, patient tolerance to the low-residue diet was higher (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.86 [1.47, 2.36]; p < .01). More patients in the low-residue diet group were willing to repeat the low-residue diet for bowel preparation (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 2.34 [1.72, 3.17]; p < .01). More patients in the clear liquid diet group experienced hunger, nausea, and vomiting. People who employed the low-residue diet before colonoscopy had the same quality of bowel preparation as those with clear liquid diet. Meanwhile, the tolerance of people with low-residue diet was better than people with clear liquid diet, and these people were more willing to repeat the colonoscopy with less adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Wu
- Rui Wu, MD, is a student, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China, and Department of Digestive Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Wen-ya Ji, MD, is a student, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
- Cheng Yang, MD, PhD, is a visiting staff, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
- Qiang Zhan, MD, PhD, is an archiater, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wen-ya Ji
- Rui Wu, MD, is a student, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China, and Department of Digestive Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Wen-ya Ji, MD, is a student, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
- Cheng Yang, MD, PhD, is a visiting staff, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
- Qiang Zhan, MD, PhD, is an archiater, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Cheng Yang
- Correspondence to: Cheng Yang, MD, PhD or Qiang Zhan, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, 299 Qingyang Road, Wuxi 214023, Jiangsu, China ( or )
| | - Qiang Zhan
- Correspondence to: Cheng Yang, MD, PhD or Qiang Zhan, MD, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital to Nanjing Medical University, 299 Qingyang Road, Wuxi 214023, Jiangsu, China ( or )
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Colonoscopy is an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool in evaluating and treating gastrointestinal tract pathologies. Adequate visualization of the intestinal lumen is necessary for detection of lesions, and thus bowel preparation is a key component of the process. It is estimated that over 25% percent of pediatric patients have sub-optimal bowel preparations, which can lead to longer procedure times, missed pathology, unsuccessful ileal intubation, and possibly repeat procedure/anesthesia. There is no universal protocol for bowel preparation in pediatrics and there is a wide variability of practices around the world. The purpose of this paper is to review the recent published literature regarding bowel preparations for pediatric colonoscopy with focus on published work in the last decade exploring a number of factors involved in bowel preparation including the role of patient education, types of bowel preparation, and their efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petar Mamula
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Noor Nema
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang X, Wu Q, Wei M, Ding Y, Gu C, Liu S, Wang Z. Low-residual diet versus clear-liquid diet for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:508-518.e3. [PMID: 32376331 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The aim of this study was to compare a low-residual diet (LRD) with a clear-liquid diet (CLD) for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases for randomized clinical trials comparing LRD with CLD for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The last search was performed on September 20, 2019. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation. The outcomes were compared using systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). RESULTS Twenty randomized controlled trials published between 2005 and 2019 with 4323 participants were included. LRD was comparable with CLD for adequate bowel preparation (P = .79; odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.29). The detection rates for polyps (P = .68; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86-1.27) or adenomas (P = .78; OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.86-1.23) were similar between the groups. There were significantly fewer advents in individuals in the LRD group: nausea (P = .02; OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.94), vomiting (P = .04; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98), hunger (P < .001; OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.53), and headache (P = .02; OR ,0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93). In addition, significantly more individuals in the LRD group found it easy to complete the diet (P = .01; OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.15-3.00) and showed willingness to repeat it (P = .005; OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.28-3.89). TSA demonstrated that the cumulative Z curve crossed both the traditional boundary and the trial sequential monitoring boundary for adequate bowel preparation. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated that LRD was comparable with CLD in the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy. More clinical trials are needed to confirm other outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xubing Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qingbin Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingtian Wei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yanling Ding
- Department of Cardiology, Anqing Municipal Hospital (Anqing Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University), Anqing, China
| | - Chaoyang Gu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Sheng Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Jiangyou Fourth People's Hospital, Jiangyou, China
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Different 1-Day Bowel Preparation Regimens for Pediatric Colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020; 2019:3230654. [PMID: 31915433 PMCID: PMC6935457 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3230654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Currently, there is no generally accepted universal protocol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy in children. Aim The aim of the study was to compare three different 1-day bowel preparation methods for a pediatric elective colonoscopy in terms of their efficacy, safety, and patient-reported tolerability. Material and Methods. The study was randomized, prospective, and investigator-blinded. All children aged 10 to 18 years consecutively referred to the tertiary pediatric gastroenterology unit were enrolled. The participants were randomized to receive polyethylene glycol 3350 combined with bisacodyl (PEG-bisacodyl group), or polyethylene glycol 4000 with electrolytes (PEG-ELS group), or sodium picosulphate plus magnesium oxide plus citric acid (NaPico+MgCit group). Bowel preparation was assessed according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). For patient tolerability and acceptability, questionnaires were obtained. Results One hundred twenty-three children were allocated to three age- and sex-matched groups. All of the patients completed colonoscopies with visualization of the cecum. There was no difference among the groups for the mean BBPS score. A total of 73 patients (59.3%) experienced minor adverse events. No serious adverse events occurred in any group. Nausea was the only symptom more frequent in the PEG-ELS group compared to the NaPico+MgCit group (p = 0.04), and apathy was the only symptom more frequent in PEG-bisacodyl than in the NaPico+MgCit group (p = 0.04). All of the patients were able to complete 75% or more of the study protocol, and 85.4% were able to complete the full regimen. The acceptability was the highest in the NaPico+MgCit group with respect to the patient's grade for palatability, low volume of the solution, and willingness to repeat the same protocol. Conclusion All bowel cleansing methods show similar efficacy. However, because of the higher tolerability and acceptability profile, the NaPico+MgCit-based regimen appears to be the most proper for colonoscopy preparation in children.
Collapse
|
6
|
Efficacy of Single- Versus Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol for Colonic Preparation in Children: A Randomized Control Study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2020; 70:e1-e6. [PMID: 31567887 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the most effective colon-cleansing agent but volume-related adverse effects are common. Though split-dose PEG is used in adults, no pediatric study so-far has compared split-dose with single-dose PEG. We aimed at comparing the efficacy and tolerability of split-dose versus single-dose PEG for bowel preparation in children. METHODS Consecutive children (1-18 years) were randomized into either single-dose or split-dose PEG. Single-dose group received 4000 mL/1.73 m PEG solution day before colonoscopy whereas split-dose group received half dose day before and the remaining half on the day of colonoscopy. Effectiveness of bowel preparation was assessed on Aronchik scale, by the endoscopist who was blinded to the type of preparation. Interobserver variability was analyzed by comparing with independent scoring by the blinded trained endoscopy-nurse. The trial was registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India (Trail number 2017/08/009303). RESULTS Of the 220 randomized children, 179 completed the study (split-dose: 93, single-dose: 86). The mean age of the study population was 11.51 (4.82) years (72.6% boys). The efficacy of bowel preparation was better with split-dose (satisfactory preparation:76.34% vs 43.02%, P < 0.001) with almost perfect inter-observer agreement (k = 0.803). Nausea, vomiting, and sleep disturbance were significantly less in split-dose than single-dose group (P < 0.05). Split-dose patients were able to drink PEG solution faster (P = 0.002). Total sleep duration and uninterrupted sleep duration was also better in split-dose group as compared with single-dose (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Split-dose PEG is more effective than single-dose regimen for bowel preparation with better tolerability and improved sleep quality in pediatric population.
Collapse
|
7
|
Özer Etik D, Suna N, Gündüz C, Bostan A, Özdemir A, Gürel BY, Yenişekerci E, Boyacıoğlu AS. Can a 1-day clear liquid diet with a split -dose polyethylene glycol overcome conventional practice patterns during the preparation for screening colonoscopy? TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2019; 30:817-825. [PMID: 31258137 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2019.19071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS A successful screening colonoscopy is closely linked to the quality of a bowel preparation. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of a 1-day clear liquid diet (CLD) compared to a 3-day combined diet (CMD) accompanied by a split-dose regimen of polyethylene glycol and electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) for screening colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study. Patients referred for screening colonoscopy were randomized to four groups as a 1-day CLD+PEG-ELS vs. a 1-day CLD+sulfate free (SF)-PEG-ELS and a 3-day CMD+PEG-ELS vs. a 3-day CMD+SF-PEG-ELS. An assessment of the quality of colon cleaning, tolerability to the preparation, and symptoms related to the preparation were recorded. RESULTS A total of 506 patients were enrolled in this study. The quality of bowel preparation was significantly inferior in the CMD+PEG-ELS group than CLD+PEG-ELS (p=0.004) and CMD+SF-PEG-ELS groups (p=0.007). There were no statistical differences among the groups in terms of the polyp detection rate. With respect to an easy rating of diet following and the consumption of laxative, there were no significant differences among the four groups. Gastric fullness and nausea/vomiting were pointed out much more, especially in the SF-PEG-ELS users (p=0.008 and p=0.004, respectively). CONCLUSION A 1-day CLD was not inferior to a 3-day CMD for colonoscopy preparation in terms of bowel cleaning, the polyp detection rate, and patient tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diğdem Özer Etik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuretdin Suna
- Department of Gastroenterology, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cemre Gündüz
- Department of Internal Disease, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Bostan
- Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|