1
|
McGrath KH, Collins T, Comerford A, McCallum Z, Comito M, Herbison K, Cochrane OR, Burgess DM, Kane S, Coster K, Cooper M, Jesson K. A clinical consensus paper on jejunal tube feeding in children. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2024; 48:337-344. [PMID: 38430136 DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Feeding problems are common in children with complex medical problems or acute critical illness and enteral nutrition may be required. In certain situations, gastric tube feeding is poorly tolerated or may not be feasible. When feed intolerance persists despite appropriate adjustments to oral and gastric enteral regimens, jejunal tube feeding can be considered as an option for nutrition support. METHODS A multidisciplinary expert working group of the Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition was convened. They identified topic questions and five key areas of jejunal tube feeding in children. Literatures searches were undertaken on Pubmed, Embase, and Medline for all relevant studies, between January 2000 and September 2022 (n = 103). Studies were assessed using National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines to generate statements, which were discussed as a group, followed by voting on statements using a modified Delphi process to determine consensus. RESULTS A total of 24 consensus statements were created for five key areas: patient selection, type and selection of feeding tube, complications, clinical use of jejunal tubes, follow-up, and reassessment. CONCLUSION Jejunal tube feeding is a safe and effective means of providing nutrition in a select group of pediatric patients with complex medical needs, who are unable to be fed by gastric tube feeding. Appropriate patient selection is important as complications associated with jejunal tube feeding are not uncommon, and although mostly minor, can be significant or require tube reinsertion. All children receiving jejunal tube feeding should have multidisciplinary team assessment and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen H McGrath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tanya Collins
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Annabel Comerford
- Nutrition Department, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Zoe McCallum
- Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurodevelopment and Disability, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michaela Comito
- Department of Nutrition and Food Services, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim Herbison
- Department of Paediatric Dietetics, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Olivia Rose Cochrane
- Department of Paediatric Dietetics, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Deirdre Mary Burgess
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, John Hunter Children's Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Kane
- Department of Dietetics and Food Services, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Keryn Coster
- Department of Nutrition and Food Services, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michele Cooper
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, John Hunter Children's Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kathryn Jesson
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, John Hunter Children's Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McSweeney ME, Mitchell PD, Smithers CJ, Doherty A, Perkins J, Rosen R. A Retrospective Review of Primary Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2021; 73:586-591. [PMID: 34259651 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000003236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy tube placement (LAP) has increasingly become the preferred method for placing gastrostomy tubes in infants and children. The goal of this retrospective review was to examine our institutional experiences with our transition from the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) procedure to LAP technique. METHODS All patients undergoing primary PEG or LAP gastrostomy at Boston Children's Hospital between January 2010 and June 2015 were identified. The primary aim was to compare complication rates within the first 6 months after tube placement; differences in total hospital procedural costs, hospital resource utilization, and postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease were examined. RESULTS Nine hundred and eighty-seven patients (442 PEG and 545 LAP gastrostomy tubes) were included. No differences in total complications within 6 months were seen. Patients undergoing PEG placement had more gastrostomy-related complications (PEG 30 [6.7%] vs LAP 13 [2.4%], P = 0.0007) and cellulitis (PEG 23 [5.1%] vs LAP 2 [0.4%], P = 0.03) within the first week of placement. Patients undergoing LAP procedures had more granulation tissue episodes (PEG 19 [4.4%] vs LAP 107 [19.8%], P = 0.005). No differences in emergency room visits, hospital readmissions, or postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease were seen, although transition to a gastrojejunal tube was higher in patients undergoing LAP procedure (PEG 20 patients [4.6%] vs LAP 51 patients [9.5%], P = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS Total complications were similar between patients undergoing PEG versus LAP gastrostomy tube placement. Patients with the PEG procedure had more complications within the first week of placement versus patients with the LAP procedure had more granulation skin complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul D Mitchell
- Clinical Research Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - C Jason Smithers
- Department of General Surgery, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL
| | - Ashley Doherty
- Information Services, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marpole R, Blackmore AM, Gibson N, Cooper MS, Langdon K, Wilson AC. Evaluation and Management of Respiratory Illness in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Front Pediatr 2020; 8:333. [PMID: 32671000 PMCID: PMC7326778 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of disability in childhood. Respiratory illness is the most common cause of mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life in the most severely affected children. Respiratory illness is caused by multiple and combined factors. This review describes these factors and discusses assessments and treatments. Oropharyngeal dysphagia causes pulmonary aspiration of food, drink, and saliva. Speech pathology assessments evaluate safety and adequacy of nutritional intake. Management is holistic and may include dental care, and interventions to improve nutritional intake, and ease, and efficiency of feeding. Behavioral, medical, and surgical approaches to drooling aim to reduce salivary aspiration. Gastrointestinal dysfunction, leading to aspiration from reflux, should be assessed objectively, and may be managed by lifestyle changes, medications, or surgical interventions. The motor disorder that defines cerebral palsy may impair fitness, breathing mechanics, effective coughing, and cause scoliosis in individuals with severe impairments; therefore, interventions should maximize physical, musculoskeletal functions. Airway clearance techniques help to clear secretions. Upper airway obstruction may be treated with medications and/or surgery. Malnutrition leads to poor general health and susceptibility to infection, and improved nutritional intake may improve not only respiratory health but also constipation, gastroesophageal reflux, and participation in activities. There is some evidence that children with CP carry pathogenic bacteria. Prophylactic antibiotics may be considered for children with recurrent exacerbations. Uncontrolled seizures place children with CP at risk of respiratory illness by increasing their risk of salivary aspiration; therefore optimal control of epilepsy may reduce respiratory illness. Respiratory illnesses in children with CP are sometimes diagnosed as asthma; a short trial of asthma medications may be considered, but should be discontinued if ineffective. Overall, management of respiratory illness in children with CP is complex and needs well-coordinated multidisciplinary teams who communicate clearly with families. Regular immunizations, including annual influenza vaccination, should be encouraged, as well as good oral hygiene. Treatments should aim to improve quality of life for children and families and reduce burden of care for carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Marpole
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - A. Marie Blackmore
- Research, Ability Centre, Perth, WA, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Noula Gibson
- Research, Ability Centre, Perth, WA, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Monica S. Cooper
- Department of Neurodevelopment and Disability, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Developmental Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Katherine Langdon
- Department of Paediatric Rehabilitation, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Andrew C. Wilson
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|