Pediatric Endoscopy Practice Patterns in the United States, Canada, and Mexico

Pediatric advanced complex endoscopy team enhances endoscopy quality and provider satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic endoscopic procedures are increasingly necessary for children. Pediatric gastroenterologist training and experience with endoscopic hemostasis and other complex therapeutic endoscopy procedures are often limited. We evaluated the impact of the implementation of an advanced complex endoscopy (ACE) team, which provides 24/7 inpatient/outpatient back-up endoscopy support.

METHODS

We analyzed hemostasis quality outcomes in the 2 years before implementation of ACE (2018-2020) versus the year following the implementation of ACE (2020-2021). We analyzed pediatric gastroenterology provider satisfaction and perspectives with a survey that was distributed to faculty, fellows, and advanced practice providers 1 month before implementation of ACE and again 12 months following ACE implementation.

RESULTS

Endoscopy volume and outcome metrics for hemostasis procedures, including latency to endoscopy, need for reintervention, and administration/diversity of hemostatic therapy, including multimodal therapy, improved in the year following implementation of the ACE (p < 0.05 for each). Survey results demonstrated a positive impact on provider endoscopy experience and high utilization of ACE. Twenty-two percent of providers reported activating ACE in the prior month and 66% in the prior year. Most providers who activated ACE were very satisfied (85%) or satisfied (7.7%). Eighty-three percent noted ACE had a positive impact on inpatients, and 50% noted a positive impact on outpatient endoscopy. Provider anxiety with endoscopy diminished post-ACE implementation (62% vs. 28%). Respondents unanimously found ACE beneficial to patient care (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

ACE implementation was associated with improved provider perspectives surrounding endoscopy and significant improvement in hemostasis quality parameters, escalation of hemostasis procedure volume, and broadening the range of hemostasis interventions.

Pediatric ERCP: Evolving into an Outpatient Procedure

BACKGROUND

While most adult ERCPs are performed on an outpatient basis, pediatric ERCPs are typically performed on an inpatient basis, or with ERCP followed by at least one night inpatient admission. We have begun performing a substantial proportion of our pediatric ERCPs on an outpatient basis, using our clinical judgment to guide the decision process. In the present study, we compare patient characteristics, indications, and adverse events associated with outpatient vs. inpatient ERCP.

METHODS

Using our endoscopy database, we identified patients 18 years of age and under who underwent ERCP from 2019 to 2021. Demographics, hospitalization status, indications, findings, interventions, as well as available adverse event and clinical outcomes data were analyzed.

RESULTS

147 ERCP procedures were performed during the study period by one of two interventional endoscopists. A subset of 51 (34.7%) patients underwent outpatient ERCP. Comparison of the two groups (outpatient vs. inpatient ERCP) was notable for no statistically significant difference in patient age, range of indications, or proportion of index vs. subsequent ERCP. Overall rates of ERCP-associated adverse events were low and there was no statistically significant difference between adverse events in patients who underwent outpatient vs. inpatient ERCP.

CONCLUSION

We analyzed outpatient and inpatient pediatric ERCP patient demographics and ERCP characteristics to identify factors that guide decision to determine whether pediatric ERCPs are performed on an outpatient vs. inpatient basis. There was no significant difference in adverse events associated with outpatient vs. inpatient pediatric ERCPs, attesting to the safety of outpatient ERCP for this subset of patients in the studied context. This is an area worthy of future prospective and multi-center study.

Availability and utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at children's hospitals

OBJECTIVES

No study has explored whether availability of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is adequate and equitable across US children's hospitals. We hypothesized that ERCP availability and utilization differs by geography and patient factors.

METHODS

Healthcare encounter data from 2009 to 2019 on children with pancreatic and biliary diseases from the Pediatric Health Information System were analyzed. ERCP availability was defined as treatment at a hospital that performed pediatric ERCP during the year of service.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2019, 37,946 children (88,420 encounters) had a potential pancreatic or biliary indication for ERCP; 7066 ERCPs were performed. The commonest pancreatic diagnoses leading to ERCP were chronic (47.2%) and acute pancreatitis (43.2%); biliary diagnoses were calculus (68.3%) and obstruction (14.8%). No ERCP was available for 25.0% of pancreatic encounters and 8.1% of biliary encounters. In multivariable analysis, children with public insurance, rural residence, or of Black race were less likely to have pancreatic ERCP availability; those with rural residence or Asian race were less likely to have biliary ERCP availability. Black children or those with public insurance were less likely to undergo pancreatic ERCP where available. Among encounters for calculus or obstruction, those of Black race or admitted to hospitals in the West were less likely to undergo ERCP when available.

CONCLUSIONS

One-in-four children with pancreatic disorders and one-in-12 with biliary disorders may have limited access to ERCP. We identified racial and geographic disparities in availability and utilization of ERCP. Further studies are needed to understand these differences to ensure equitable care.

Pediatric endoscopy: how can we improve patient outcomes and ensure best practices?

INTRODUCTION

Strategies to promote high-quality endoscopy in children require consensus around pediatric-specific quality standards and indicators. Using a rigorous guideline development process, the international Pediatric Endoscopy Quality Improvement Network (PEnQuIN) was developed to support continuous quality improvement efforts within and across pediatric endoscopy services.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents a framework, informed by the PEnQuIN guidelines, for assessing endoscopist competence, granting procedural privileges, audit and feedback, and for skill remediation, when required. As is critical for promoting quality, PEnQuIN indicators can be benchmarked at the individual endoscopist, endoscopy facility, and endoscopy community levels. Furthermore, efforts to incorporate technologies, including electronic medical records and artificial intelligence, into endoscopic quality improvement processes can aid in creation of large-scale networks to facilitate comparison and standardization of quality indicator reporting across sites.

EXPERT OPINION

PEnQuIN quality standards and indicators provide a framework for continuous quality improvement in pediatric endoscopy, benefiting individual endoscopists, endoscopy facilities, and the broader endoscopy community. Routine and reliable measurement of data, facilitated by technology, is required to identify and drive improvements in care. Engaging all stakeholders in endoscopy quality improvement processes is crucial to enhancing patient outcomes and establishing best practices for safe, efficient, and effective pediatric endoscopic care.

Promoting Research that Supports High-Quality Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Defining and measuring the quality of endoscopic care is a key component of performing gastrointestinal endoscopy in children. The purpose of this review is to discuss quality metrics for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy and identify where additional research is needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pediatric-specific standards and indicators were recently defined by the international Pediatric Endoscopy Quality Improvement Network (PEnQuIN) working group through a rigorous guideline consensus process. Although the aim of these guidelines is to facilitate best practices for safe and high-quality gastrointestinal endoscopy in children, they highlight the pressing need to expand upon the body of evidence supporting these standards and indicators as predictors of clinically relevant outcomes. In this review, we propose and discuss ideas for several high-yield research topics to engage pediatric endoscopists and promote best practices in pediatric endoscopy.

Endoscopy and Pediatric Pancreatitis

Children and adolescents are increasingly impacted by pancreatic disease. Interventional endoscopic procedures, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and endoscopic ultrasonography, are integral to the diagnosis and management of many pancreatic diseases in the adult population. In the past decade, pediatric interventional endoscopic procedures have become more widely available, with invasive surgical procedures now being replaced by safer and less disruptive endoscopic interventions.

A Nationwide Survey on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Practice Patterns among Pediatric Endoscopists in South Korea

Purpose

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is an important tool for diagnosing and treating GI diseases in children. This study aimed to analyze the current GI endoscopy practice patterns among South Korean pediatric endoscopists.

Methods

Twelve members of the Korean Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition developed a questionnaire. The questionnaire was emailed to pediatric gastroenterologists attending general and tertiary hospitals in South Korea.

Results

The response rate was 86.7% (52/60), and 49 of the respondents (94.2%) were currently performing endoscopy. All respondents were performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and 43 (87.8%) were performing colonoscopy. Relatively rare procedures for children, such as double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) (4.1%), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (2.0%), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) (2.0%), were only performed by pediatric gastroenterologists at very few centers, but were performed by adult endoscopists in most of the centers; of all the respondents, 83.7% (41/49) performed emergency endoscopy. In most centers, the majority of the endoscopies were performed under sedation, with midazolam (100.0%) and ketamine (67.3%) as the most frequently used sedatives.

Conclusion

While most pediatric GI endoscopists perform common GI endoscopic procedures, rare procedures, such as DBE, ERCP, and EUS, are only performed by pediatric gastroenterologists at very few centers, and by adult GI endoscopists at most of the centers. For such rare procedures, close communication and cooperation with adult GI endoscopists are required.

Cholangioscopy in Children and Adolescents: Utilization, Outcomes, and Safety

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is increasingly utilized for management of biliary disorders in children and adolescents. Practice patterns surrounding cholangioscopy in pediatric patients, however, are largely uncharacterized.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all ERCPs in which cholangioscopy was performed on patients 18 and under at our tertiary care children's hospital from 2015 to 2020 using our institution's paper and electronic medical record system. Patient demographics, procedure indications, interventions, and associated adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 307 ERCPs were performed on 282 patients at our children's hospital. Cholangioscopy was performed in 36 procedures (11.7%) using the SpyGlass cholangioscope (Boston Scientific). Antibiotics to cover biliary organisms were administered to all patients precholangioscopy. Mean patient age was 13.6 years (range 7-18 years). The 2 most common indications for cholangioscopy included electrohydraulic lithotripsy for biliary stone disease and evaluation of biliary stricture (with incidental finding of biliary web in 2 patients and retained suture material in 2 patients). Adverse events were less prevalent in patients who underwent cholangioscopy relative to those who underwent ERCP. 0/36 (0%) developed post-ERCP pancreatitis, one patient had self-limited melena (possible self-limited postsphincterotomy bleeding). Patient care was enhanced by cholangioscopy in 30/36 (83.3%) of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These data attest to the safety and clinical utility of cholangioscopy in children and adolescents. Cholangioscopy was performed in just over 11% of pediatric patients who underwent ERCP at our academic medical center-rates similar to those reported in adult patients. The radiation-sparing nature of cholangioscopy, coupled with these data supporting its safety, make it particularly appealing for use in children. Further multi-institution evaluation of the utility, safety, and range of indications for cholangioscopy in other practice settings would be of great interest and help guide endoscopic care.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound in children

Gastrointestinal endoscopy is fundamental to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in pediatric gastroenterology. In the decades since endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease were introduced into clinical practice, there has been increasing interest in these procedures, and practice guidelines and position papers that clearly define the role of ERCP and EUS in children have been published. Based on the distinction of endoscopy between children and adults, this review focuses on the current state of ERCP and EUS procedures in children, including the types of endoscopes used in children, general anesthesia and radiation exposure, biliary and pancreatic indications, considerations of education and training for ERCP and EUS procedures in children, and expectations for development of endoscopes for children.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Resolution of a Symptomatic Pancreatic Rest in a Pediatric Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review

The pancreatic rest, aberrant, or heterotopic pancreas is a normal function pancreas found in the submucosal layer of the greater curvature of the gastric antrum and occasionally in the duodenum. Most of the patients are asymptomatic and the finding is usually incidental. We describe the case of a child with abdominal pain and history of recurrent ulcers that necessitated esophagogastroduodenoscopy and further evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound that confirmed a submucosal lesion consistent with a pancreatic rest. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed without complication, and complete symptom resolution was achieved after dissection of the pancreatic rest.

A Practical Approach to Management of Acute Pancreatitis: Similarities and Dissimilarities of Disease in Children and Adults

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and it substantially contributes to the healthcare burden of gastrointestinal disease and quality of life in children and adults. AP across the lifespan is characterized by similarities and differences in epidemiology, diagnostic modality, etiologies, management, adverse events, long-term outcomes, and areas in greatest need of research. In this review, we touch on each of these shared and distinctive features of AP in children and adults, with an emphasis on recent advances in the conceptualization and management of AP.

Nationwide Evolution of Pediatric Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Indications, Utilization, and Readmissions over Time

OBJECTIVES

To analyze outcome and utilization trends over time of pediatric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in an all-capture US population-level study.

STUDY DESIGN

Using the National Inpatient Sample (2005-2014) and National Readmission Database (2010-2014), we identified pediatric (age <20 years) hospitalizations during which ERCP was performed and assessed ERCP-associated readmissions. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify hospitalization diagnoses, comorbidities, and patient/hospital characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant predictors (P < .05) of 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 11 060 hospitalized pediatric patients underwent ERCP between 2005 and 2014. Most were female (n = 8859; 81%), aged 14-20 years (n = 9342; 84%), and white (n = 4230; 45%). Most (85%) of ERCPs were therapeutic, and leading indications were biliary (n = 5350; 48%) and pancreatitis (n = 3218; 29%). Thirteen pecent of patients were readmitted post-ERCP. Odds for 30-day readmission were highest for patients with a history of liver transplantation, age 0-4 years, male sex, and obesity (P < .001 for each). Patients in both urban teaching and urban hospitals had much lower odds than those in rural hospitals for prolonged length of stay associated with ERCP.

CONCLUSIONS

These data represent a comprehensive study of nationwide trends in age-specific volumes and outcomes following ERCP in the pediatric population and provide important insights into trends in pediatric pancreaticobiliary disease management, as well as practice setting, patient characteristics, and patient comorbidities associated with pediatric post-ERCP outcomes, including readmission and length of stay.

Initial Experience With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Coil Placement for Pediatric Gastric Variceal Hemostasis

BACKGROUND

Gastric variceal (GV) bleeding is among the most morbid sequelae of portal hypertension, with mortality ranging from 30% to 50%. Pediatric data focused on endoscopic approaches to management are needed. The present study represents the first pediatric case series of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided coil placement within feeding vessels as monotherapy for management of GV bleeding.

METHODS

Using our prospectively maintained endoscopy database, we identified patients 18 years and younger who underwent EUS-guided coil placement for management of GV bleeding from 2008 to 2018. Demographics, indication, procedural interventions/findings, and available clinical outcomes data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (median age 15, range 11-18 years) underwent EUS-guided coil placement for GV bleeding. All had portal hypertension, with EV in 58.3% and prior GV bleeding with attempted endoscopic management in 75%. Coil placement was accomplished using a linear echoendoscope and a 19-gauge needle. A mean of 2.75 (± 0.43) coils were placed in each patient (4, 6, 8, and 10 mm Nester Embolization Coils, Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana, USA). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in all patients, and 25% of patients developed recurrent gastric varices at a median of 5.5 months following the initial EUS-guided coil placement (range 4-6 months) over the median 12 month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study establishes the feasibility and efficacy of EUS-guided coil placement as monotherapy for GV bleeding in children and adolescents. The technique was technically successful, with primary hemostasis achieved in all patients. EUS-guided embolization with coils may represent an alternative to current approaches for management of highly morbid GV bleeding.

Fluoroscopy Time During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Performed for Children and Adolescents is Significantly Higher With Low-volume Endoscopists

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a fluoroscopy and endoscopy-based procedure important for diagnosis and management of pediatric pancreaticobiliary disorders. Patient, procedure, endoscopist, and facility characteristics have been shown to influence ERCP complexity and procedure outcomes as well as fluoroscopy utilization in adults; however, the extent to which this is true in pediatric patients remains under-studied and there are minimal data regarding fluoroscopy utilization in pediatric ERCP.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed ERCPs performed on patients <18 years of age at our tertiary care children's hospital from 2002 to 2017 using our institution's paper and electronic medical record system along with a prospectively maintained radiation exposure database. Procedure complexity was graded using the Stanford Fluoroscopy Complexity Score and the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Complexity scale. High-volume endoscopists (HVE) were defined as having a cumulative annual ERCP volume >100 and low-volume endoscopists (LVE) as <100 (pediatric + adult) ERCPs/year.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-five ERCPs performed on 321 patients were included in this analysis. The mean patient age was 13.4 years (+/- 4.2 years), 77% were index ERCPs (native ampullas), and 81% were performed with therapeutic intent (87% for biliary indication and 13% for pancreatic indication). Fluoroscopy times (FTs) varied between procedures and providers. Median FT was 4.85 (+/- 2.68) minutes. Endoscopist annual ERCP volume was the strongest predictor of FT (P < 0.001). In addition to endoscopist volume, procedure-specific predictors of increased FT included pancreatic indication for the procedure, biliary or pancreatic duct stricture, patient age <4 years or >16 years at the time of ERCP (P < 0.01 for each), and native ampulla. ERCP complexity rating based on the Stanford Fluoroscopy Complexity Score correlated with FT.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation exposure is higher than desirable for pediatric ERCP and varies with endoscopist as well as patient and procedure-specific factors. HVE perform ERCP with lower FT relative to LVE even though HVE procedure complexity was higher. The Stanford Fluoroscopy Score predicted FT for pediatric ERCP, but the ASGE ERCP complexity scale did not. Adaptation and refinement of pediatric-specific ERCP complexity scales including factors, such as patient size and age and indications/interventions more consistent with those encountered in pediatrics could be beneficial.

Evolution in the Practice of Pediatric Endoscopy and Sedation

The fields of pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy and sedation are critically important to the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) disease in children. Since its inception in the 1970s, pediatric endoscopy has benefitted from tremendous technological innovation related to the design of the endoscope and its associated equipment. Not only that, but expertise among pediatric gastroenterologists has moved the field forward to include a full complement of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures in children. In this review, we discuss the remarkable history of pediatric endoscopy and highlight current limitations and future advances in the practice and technology of pediatric endoscopy and sedation.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Infants: Availability Under Threat: A Survey on Availability, Need, and Clinical Practice in Europe and Israel

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in infants (younger than 1 year of age) is a highly specialized procedure. Since 2014 opportunities to maintain or purchase duodenoscopes for ERCP in infants have disappeared. In a survey among European hepatology centers (including Israel) we evaluated the availability, need, indications, and practice of ERCP procedures in infants. It shows that infant ERCP is a low-volume procedure (median 5 procedures/year) in the 14 centers that perform this procedure. Since 2014 several centers no longer have an infant ERCP duodenoscope due to breakdown. In addition, substantial differences exist between centers in indications, types of interventions performed, and practical execution of ERCP procedures in infants. We conclude that a concerted effort by the pediatric hepatology community is needed to secure the future availability of infant ERCP. In addition, consensus on the indications and optimal use of infant ERCP could improve the quality of ERCP care for infants.