A Symptom Self-report Tool for Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBDnow)

Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms among autistic individuals, with and without co-occurring intellectual disability

Gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) are very common among individuals on the autism spectrum. Prior research reports mixed findings regarding whether individuals with autism and co-occurring intellectual disability (ID) have elevated risk of gastrointestinal symptoms relative to individuals with autism alone. GI symptoms can be challenging to assess in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and/or ID given challenges with language, communication, and interoception. Prior research has tended to only include individuals with documented presence or absence of GI symptoms or conditions, that is, to exclude observations in which there is uncertainty regarding presence of GI symptoms. Therefore, none of the prior autism studies reported the association between ID and the certainty regarding presence or absence of GI symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine differences in parental certainty and odds of reporting gastrointestinal signs and symptoms among children on the autism spectrum, with and without intellectual disability. Participants were 308 children (36% ID) with a clinical diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (6-17 years). Parents endorsed whether their child had experienced or displayed a range of signs or symptoms related to GI problems in the past 3 months. Parents of autistic children with ID were less certain about the presence of more subjective symptoms, including abdominal pain, nausea, and bloating. Conversely, certainty regarding more objective signs (e.g., constipation, diarrhea, spitting up, etc.) was not significantly different. More accurate measures for GI signs/symptoms are needed for this population.

Agreement Level of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Symptom Reports between Children and Their Parents

Purpose

Children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently undergo clinical assessments, involving triadic communication between clinician, parent, and child. During such encounters parents are traditionally the main communicator of information on their child's IBD, including subjective symptom reports. The level of agreement between children and their parents for IBD symptoms is poorly understood, and this study aimed to examine this factor.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study among children with IBD, and one parent. A validated paediatric IBD symptom report tool (IBDnow) enabled children and their parent to rate seven pain, well-being, and stool metrics, with dyads completing the tool concurrently. Results were assessed using: Individual agreement: proportion of identical symptom reports by each dyad (ideal score >0.7); Category agreement: percentage of identical reports for IBDnow metrics for the cohort; Inter-rater reliability: Gwet's AC1 coefficient with higher scores indicating better reliability (maximum=1).

Results

Seventy-four parent/child dyads participated; child's mean age 12.2 years (standard deviation [SD] 2.9, range 6-16), mean time since diagnosis 2.8 years (SD 3), 54% female, 73% had Crohn's Disease. Mean individual agreement level was 0.6, with 27% of dyads agreeing on ≥6/7 IBDnow metrics. Category agreement was reported by 61% of dyads, 20% of parents overestimated, and 19% underestimated, their child's symptoms. Inter-rater reliability ranged from fair to good.

Conclusion

These results should improve clinician awareness of how IBD symptom reports from parents may introduce bias. Children should be considered the most important source of symptom reports, and tools such as IBDnow utilised to enhance communication.

Nailfold Capillaroscopy as a Biomarker in the Evaluation of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive screening and disease monitoring are an unmet need in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) is a validated technique for microvascular surveillance in rheumatologic diseases. NFC uses magnified photography to examine nail bed capillaries called end row loops (ERL). We aimed to identify variations in NFC in pediatric IBD patients and their associations with disease activity.

METHODS

Pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) and healthy controls were recruited. NFC was performed on patients with newly diagnosed IBD prior to initiating therapy, patients with established IBD, and controls. ERLs were quantified along with a 3mm distance on 8 nailfolds. Serum biomarker levels of disease activity and symptoms activity indexes were correlated with average ERL density digits on both hands. Statistics were performed using chi-squared, ANOVA, and linear regression.

RESULTS

Fifty-one IBD patients and 16 controls were recruited. ERL density was significantly decreased in IBD (Control: 19.2 ERL/3mm vs UC: 15.6 ERL/3mm vs CD: 15.4 ERL/3mm; P < .0001). ERL density was lower in UC patients with lower albumin levels (P = .02, r ² = 0.29).The change in ERL density over time predicted the change in pediatric CD activity index among CD patients (P = .048, r ² = 0.58) with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate ERL density is reduced in IBD compared to controls. Lower albumin levels correlated with lower ERL density in UC. In newly diagnosed CD, ERL density increases over time as disease activity improves with therapy. NFC may be a feasible biomarker of disease activity and utilized for monitoring IBD.

Overview of Self-Management Skills and Associated Assessment Tools for Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Self-management is a multi-modal approach for managing chronic conditions that encompasses a number of different elements; knowledge, adherence, self-regulation, communication, and cognitive factors. Self-management has been shown to be beneficial for adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and for children with IBD it may help them learn to take control of their complex treatment regimens and lead to positive disease outcomes. The development of self-management skills for children with IBD is vital in order to maximize their potential for health autonomy, but it is still an emergent field in this population. This review provides an over-arching view of the self-management elements specific to children with IBD, and highlights outcome measures that may be used to assess skills within each field as well as the efficacy of targeted interventions.

An Overview of Tools to Score Severity in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background and Aims: The management of IBD entails the use of various treatments (nutrition, medications, and surgery) in order to induce and maintain remission. The assessment of IBD disease activity is based on a combination of symptoms, clinical findings, imaging, and endoscopic procedures. As in any disease, reliable assessment of disease activity or severity is required in order to plan relevant follow-up, decide on appropriate investigations, determine the best treatment option and subsequently assess response to treatment. It is important for proper documentation, follow-up, assessment of response to treatment and communication, especially in patients with IBD, to talk the same language by using validated and widely used scores for disease activity, endoscopic and radiologic activity, and patient reported outcomes both for clinical practice and research. This review aims to highlight key tools available for the assessment of disease activity or severity in individuals (especially children) with IBD. Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Pubmed, and the Cochrane Library with the last search date of August 2020. Tools evaluating disease severity across various aspects (clinical, endoscopic, and radiological) were identified and discussed. Those tools validated and specific for children with IBD were included were available. Results: Over time a number of scoring systems have been developed to quantify clinical, endoscopic and imaging assessments in individuals with IBD. While some are exclusively for children or adults, others appear to have relevance to all age groups. In addition, some tools developed in adult populations are utilized in children, but have not expressly been validated in this age group. Conclusions: Although some available scoring tools are appropriate for children with IBD, others require consideration. The development and use of pediatric-specific tools is relevant and appropriate to optimal care of children and adolescents with IBD.