Esophageal Capsule Endoscopy in Children and Young Adults With Portal Hypertension

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel wired transmission magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy system for upper gastrointestinal examination

BACKGROUND

Magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCCE) has recently increasingly been used for gastric examination. However, the image quality and esophageal observation is suboptimal. We developed a novel wired transmission magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (WT-MCCE) system and evaluated its feasibility through in vitro and in vivo experiments.

METHODS

A plastic stomach model and a pathological upper gastrointestinal model were used to evaluate the performance of WT-MCCE in vitro experiments. Twice of examination in the two in vitro models by WT-MCCE were performed by 5 endoscopists who were experienced in performing wireless capsule endoscopy. The examination of traditional gastroscopy (Olympus, GIF-HQ290) in the pathological upper gastrointestinal model was set as the control. In vivo experiments were performed in a live canine model by 3 endoscopists, in which WT-MCCE was inserted with the assistance of gastroscopy. Measurements included maneuverability, examination time, visualization of gastric mucosa, image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

WT-MCCE showed good performance in both in vitro and in vivo experiments with excellent visualization of mucosa (75-100%). The mean operation time is 17.6 ± 2.7 min, 22.3 ± 1.9 min and 29.3 ± 3.4 min in three models, respectively. In pathological upper gastrointestinal model, all lesions, including esophageal varices, one polyp, one foreign body, two gastric ulcers and one duodenal ulcer, were detected by both WT-MCCE and traditional gastroscopy by all endoscopists. For the observation of esophagus and stomach in the canine model, WT-MCCE also showed excellent maneuverability and good image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel WT-MCCE system performed well in evaluating upper gastrointestinal landmarks and lesions in two in vitro models, and showed good performance in a canine model. WT-MCCE may be potentially useful for diagnosis of esophageal and gastric diseases.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence rates of adverse events after digestive endoscopy in children

BACKGROUND

With the widespread use of digestive endoscopy in children, a variety of adverse events (AEs) have occurred after digestive endoscopy. However, there are notable differences in the incidence of adverse reactions in digestive endoscopy in children at present, which makes it difficult to assess the safety of digestive endoscopy in children.

METHODS

Studies related to digestive endoscopy in children were screened from January 2005 to October 2021 from PubMed, Web of Science, Spring, CNKI, and Science Direct databases. RevMan5.3 and Stata were employed to carry out meta-analysis on the incidence of adverse respiratory events, myoclonus, abdominal pain, fever, bleeding, chest pain, sore throat, vomiting, and delayed capsule discharge after digestive endoscopy in children. The article quality was evaluated by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The chi-square test and I² were adopted to test literature heterogeneity, and the article publication bias was assessed by displaying an inverted funnel plot as a funnel plot.

RESULTS

In all, 15 articles were included, involving a total of 27,770 children. In all, 15 articles were included, involving a total of 27,770 children. The risk ratio (RR) value of adverse respiratory events after digestive endoscopy in children was 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17 to 1.47, P<0.00001]; the odds ratio (OR) value of the incidence of myoclonus was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.46, P=0.04); the incidence of abdominal pain was 1.18 (95% CI: 1.11 to 1.27, P<0.00001); the incidence of fever was 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06 to 1.12, P<0.00001); the incidence of bleeding was 1.24 (95% CI: 0.94 to 1.64, P=0.13); the incidence of chest pain was 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.09, P<0.0001); incidence of sore throat was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.18, P=0.0004); incidence of vomiting was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.06 to 1.21, P=0.0001); and the incidence of delayed capsule expulsion was 1.18 (95% CI: 1.00 to 1.40, P=0.05).

DISCUSSION

The incidence of AEs after digestive endoscopy in children was low, which can be used in the diagnosis and therapy of digestive system diseases in children.

Comparison of sequential CT arterioportography-arteriosplenography with standard cross-sectional imaging and endoscopy in children with portal hypertension

In this study the diagnostic capability and additional value of sequential CT arterioportography–arteriosplenography (CT AP–AS) in comparison to standard cross-sectional imaging and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) in pediatric portal hypertension (PH) was analyzed. Patients with clinical signs of PH who underwent CT AP–AS in combination with additional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MR) and/or contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) were included. Two radiologists reviewed independently imaging regarding the capability to prove patency of (1) extrahepatic and intrahepatic main stem portal vein (PV), (2) intrahepatic PV system and (3) splenomesenteric venous axis. Imaging was reviewed for detection of abdominal varices and results were compared to UGE. Main venous supply of varices (PV and/or splenic vein system) and splenorenal shunting were evaluated. 47 imaging studies (20 CT AP-AS, 16 CE-MR, 11 CE-CT) and 12 UGE records of 20 patients were analyzed. CT AP–AS detected significantly more splenorenal shunts (p = 0.008) and allowed more confident characterization of the extra-/intrahepatic PV-system and splenomesenteric veins in comparison to CE-MR (p < 0.001). Extra- and intrahepatic PV-system were significantly more confidently assessed in CT AP–AS than in CE-CT (p = 0.008 and < 0.001 respectively). CT AP–AS was the only modality that detected supply of varices and additional gastric/duodenal varices. In this retrospective study CT AP–AS was superior to standard cross-sectional imaging concerning confident assessment of the venous portosplenomesenteric axis in pediatric patients. CT AP–AS detected additional varices, splenorenal shunting and supply of varices.

A Descriptive Analysis of Capsule Endoscopy Events in the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database

Introduction

The malfunction of capsule endoscopy (CE) devices is a significant reason for the failure of CE procedures, which could hinder and prevent diagnosis. Unfortunately, malfunction-related adverse events (AEs) caused by CE devices are rarely reported in publications. Although most malfunction-related AEs could not lead to physical harm, they could reduce the efficiency of medical care and increase medical costs. The manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database, a publicly accessible resource for patient safety, contains not only the common complications of CE but also valuable malfunction-related AEs, which have been underutilized. Therefore, the study aims to discover and analyze the possible AEs associated with CE and demonstrate the utility of the MAUDE reports to promote patient safety.

Materials and Methods

We acquired MAUDE reports of CE systems from January 01, 2008, to July 31, 2020, through a systematic search strategy. We utilized the manufacturers, brand names, and product codes as search terms from which medical device reports including structured data and narrative texts were extracted, followed by a manual review of the narrative texts, reporter occupation, device involved, event type and the phase of the event; finally, patient outcomes were recorded and analyzed as per CE categories and characteristics.

Results

A total of 377 CEs medical device reports were retrieved, and 342 reports were included after reviewing. There were 327 mandatory reports (96%) and 15 voluntary reports (4%). These reports referred to capsule endoscope (n = 213), sensing system (n = 66), patency capsule (n = 38), and capsule delivery device (n = 26). A total of 349 CE-related AEs were identified, including complications (n = 228), malfunction-related AEs (n = 109), and other events (n = 12). The composition of AEs was not the same for the CE devices. Complications were major AEs of capsule endoscope and patency capsule, but malfunction-related AEs were the most common in AEs of sensing systems and capsule delivery devices.

Conclusion

MAUDE serves as an invaluable data source for investigating malfunction-related AEs. In addition to common complications, malfunction of CE devices could threaten patient safety in CE procedures. Improving awareness of the malfunction of CE devices and raising adequate training for staff working in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic units could be critical and beneficial in preventing malfunction-related AEs.

The Role of Video Capsule Endoscopy in Liver Disease

In the setting of chronic liver disease, capsule endoscopy is safe and well tolerated, making it an appealing diagnostic procedure. It is used mainly for the surveillance of esophageal varices, investigation of anemia, and exploration of the small bowel for complications of portal hypertension. Capsule endoscopy is recognized as a viable alternative in patients unable or unwilling to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for investigations of esophageal varices. In evaluating the small bowel of patients with liver disease and unexplained anemia, capsule endoscopy increases recognition of mucosal abnormalities, although their clinical significance is often unclear.

Hepatic manifestations of cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) usually develops before puberty, is often asymptomatic and slowly progressive. Multilobular cirrhosis develops in approximately 5-10% of patients by the age of 18, and is a significant contributor to the morbidity and mortality. No therapy, including ursodeoxycholic acid and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator correctors or potentiators, has proven effective to prevent or halt the progression of liver disease towards cirrhosis and portal hypertension. This review provides the current knowledge in the epidemiology of CF liver disease and development of noninvasive tools to assess liver disease severity and progression overtime in order to optimize clinical management and therapeutic options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Liver disease not only develops during childhood but also later in the lifetime of patients with CF; the incidence of cirrhosis with portal hypertension increases progressively reaching 10% by age 30. Several noninvasive tools to measure liver stiffness as an indirect measure of fibrosis are being investigated, and show promising results for the assessment of early stages of liver fibrosis and disease progression.

SUMMARY

Identifying noninvasive biomarkers is fundamental to improving early diagnosis, monitoring disease evolution and measuring treatment effects. A prerequisite is the use of consistent definitions for CF- liver disease (LD) in clinical trials.