Neurological Complications and Cataract in a Child With Thalassemia Major Treated With Deferiprone

Long-Term Effects of Iron Chelating Agents on Ocular Function in Patients with Thalassemia Major

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate eye structures and function in patients receiving iron chelating therapy and to assess whether a correlation exists between the onset of ocular alterations and the intake of iron chelating drugs.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed. Eighty-eight patients, composed of children and adults with thalassemia major (TM) who are taking or had taken iron chelating drugs (deferoxamine, deferiprone or deferasirox), have been initially enrolled in the study. The final sample featured 80 patients, including 18 children and 62 adults. These subjects received an eye examination to evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the presence of refractive defects, cornea, anterior chamber, lens, fundus oculi, visual field and mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Logistic regression model analysis was performed in order to assess any correlation. In addition, a literature search regarding the relation between iron chelating drugs and ocular adverse events was carried out to compare the results obtained with the evidence in the literature.

RESULTS

Logistic regression did not report a significant correlation between the intake of iron chelating drugs and the onset of anterior ocular segment alterations, lens opacities, retinal diseases, optical neuropathies, astigmatism, visual field and RNFL thickness defects. Logistic regression returned a statistically significant correlation between myopia and iron chelation therapy (p-value 0.04; OR 1.05) and also between presbyopia and total duration of therapy with deferoxamine (p-value 0.03; OR 1.21). Although intraocular pressure levels remained within the normal range, a significant correlation with the length of deferoxamine therapy has been found (p-value 0.002; association coefficient -0.12). A negative correlation between deferiprone and presbyopia has also been observed.

CONCLUSION

Iron chelation therapy is not associated with severe visual function alterations. Limitation of deferoxamine treatment can help prevent ocular complications. Deferiprone and/or deferasirox may be preferable, especially in patients over age 40 years.

Iron is neurotoxic in retinal detachment and transferrin confers neuroprotection

In retinal detachment (RD), photoreceptor death and permanent vision loss are caused by neurosensory retina separating from the retinal pigment epithelium because of subretinal fluid (SRF), and successful surgical reattachment is not predictive of total visual recovery. As retinal iron overload exacerbates cell death in retinal diseases, we assessed iron as a predictive marker and therapeutic target for RD. In the vitreous and SRF from patients with RD, we measured increased iron and transferrin (TF) saturation that is correlated with poor visual recovery. In ex vivo and in vivo RD models, iron induces immediate necrosis and delayed apoptosis. We demonstrate that TF decreases both apoptosis and necroptosis induced by RD, and using RNA sequencing, pathways mediating the neuroprotective effects of TF are identified. Since toxic iron accumulates in RD, we propose TF supplementation as an adjunctive therapy to surgery for improving the visual outcomes of patients with RD.

Safety profiles of iron chelators in young patients with haemoglobinopathies

BACKGROUND

This review describes the safety of deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone (DFP), deferasirox (DFX) and combined therapy in young patients less than 25 yr of age with haemoglobinopathies.

METHODS

Searches in electronic literature databases were performed. Studies reporting adverse events associated with iron chelation therapy were included. Study and reporting quality was assessed using AHRQ Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms. Prospective clinical studies were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.

RESULTS

Safety data of 2040 patients from 34 studies were included. Ninety-two case reports of 246 patients were identified. DFX (937 patients) and DFP (667 patients) possess the largest published safety evidence. Fewer studies on combination regimens are available. Increased transaminases were seen in all regimens (3.9-31.3%) and gastrointestinal disorders with DFP and DFX (3.7-18.4% and 5.8-18.8%, respectively). Therapy discontinuations due to adverse events were low (0-4.1%). Reporting quality was selective and poor in most of the studies.

CONCLUSION

Iron chelation therapy is generally safe in young patients, and published data correspond to summary of product characteristics. Each iron chelation regimen has its specific safety risks. DFO seems not to be associated with serious adverse effects in recommended doses. In DFP and DFX, rare, but serious, adverse reactions can occur. Data on combined therapy are scarce, but it seems equally safe compared to monotherapy.