Cost-effectiveness and Improved Parent and Provider Satisfaction With Outpatient Management of Pediatric Oncology Patients, With Low-risk Fever and Neutropenia

Budget impact analysis of TPMT and NUDT15 pharmacogenomic testing for 6-mercaptopurine in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

BACKGROUND

Pharmacogenomic testing identifies gene polymorphisms impacting drug metabolism, aiding in optimizing treatment efficacy and minimizing toxicity, thus potentially reducing healthcare utilization. 6-Mercaptopurine metabolism is affected by thiopurine methyltransferase ( TPMT ) and nudix hydrolase 15 ( NUDT15 ) polymorphisms. We sought to estimate the budget impact of preemptive pharmacogenomic testing for these genes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients from an institutional perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model was constructed to model the first cycle of the maintenance phase of chemotherapy for pediatric ALL patients transitioning between one of three health states: stable, moderately myelosuppressed, and severely myelosuppressed over 16 weeks, with each health state's associated costs derived from the literature. The patient's likelihood to experience moderate or severe myelosuppression based on metabolism phenotype was calculated from the literature and applied on a weekly basis, and the marginal budget impact of preemptive pharmacogenomic testing vs. no pharmacogenomic testing was calculated. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess parameter influence on results.

RESULTS

Preemptive pharmacogenomic testing of TPMT and NUDT15 provided savings of up to $26 028 per patient during the maintenance phase. In the sensitivity analysis, the cost of outpatient management of moderate myelosuppression had the greatest impact on the budget, resulting in cost savings ranging from $8592 to $30 129 when the minimum and maximum costs of management were used in the model.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive pharmacogenomic testing for TPMT and NUDT15 polymorphisms before initiation of maintenance therapy for pediatric ALL patients yielded considerable cost savings.

An analysis of the resource use and costs of febrile neutropenia events in pediatric cancer patients in Australia

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer generally requires in-hospital care, but low-risk patients may be successfully managed in an outpatient setting, potentially reducing the overall healthcare costs. Updated data on the costs of FN care are lacking.

METHODS

A bottom-up microcosting analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective using data collected alongside the Australian PICNICC (Predicting Infectious Complications of Neutropenic sepsis In Children with Cancer) study. Inpatient costs were accessed from hospital administrative records and outpatient costs from Medicare data. Costs were stratified by risk status (low/high risk) according to the PICNICC criteria. Estimated mean costs were obtained through bootstrapping and using a linear model to account for multiple events across individuals and other clinical factors that may impact costs.

RESULTS

The total costs of FN care were significantly higher for FN events classified as high-risk ($17,827, 95% confidence interval [CI]: $17,193-$18,461) compared to low-risk ($10,574, 95% CI: $9818-$11,330). In-hospital costs were significantly higher for high-risk compared to low-risk events, despite no differences in the cost structure, mean cost per day, and pattern of resource use. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was the only modifiable factor significantly associated with total costs of care. Excluding antineoplastics, antimicrobials are the most commonly used medications in the inpatient and outpatient setting for the overall period of analysis.

CONCLUSION

The FN costs are driven by in-hospital admission and LOS. This suggests that the outpatient management of low-risk patients is likely to reduce the in-hospital cost of treating an FN event. Further research will determine if shifting the cost to the outpatient setting remains cost-effective overall.

Can Risk Stratification Tools Be Utilized to Safely Discharge Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenic Patients from the Emergency Department?

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the more common oncological emergencies. Despite evidence in the oncology literature suggesting that low-risk cases of FN can be managed safely at home, most patients with FN who present to the emergency department (ED) are admitted. FN risk stratification methods, such as Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scores, may be useful when considering patient disposition. We sought to address whether the existing body of literature is adequate to support the use of these methods when treating patients with FN in the ED.

METHODS

A PubMed search from January 1, 2016 to March 19, 2021 was performed using the following search strategy: "febrile neutropenia" OR (fever AND neutropenia)) AND (emerg* OR outpatient) AND (admit OR admission OR hospitalization). General review articles and case reports were omitted. Each of the articles selected underwent a structured review.

RESULTS

The search yielded 371 articles, which were independently screened for relevance by two authors, and 23 articles were selected for inclusion. MASCC score was used in 10 of the identified studies and each of these studies concluded that the score was useful in the ED. Most of the identified studies found that CISNE score had a higher sensitivity than MASCC score (96.7% vs. 32.9%, respectively), but a lower specificity (22.2% vs. 89.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

FN risk stratifications tools, such as MASCC and CISNE scores, are supported by the existing literature and may be included as part of the decision-making process when considering patient disposition.

Pediatric Benign Neutropenia: Assessing Practice Preferences in Canada

Pediatric benign neutropenia is a self-limited condition with a benign clinical course. An approach to this condition is not well-defined in the literature. Our objective was to use a case-based survey to elucidate trends in the diagnosis and management of benign neutropenia among pediatric hematology/oncology practitioners in Canada. We received 46 completed surveys (response rate 66%). At initial presentation with fever and neutropenia, 67% of respondents recommended partial septic workup but 11% recommended no investigations. Nearly 70% recommended admission for empiric intravenous antibiotics, while 24% would discharge home without antibiotics. In a patient with fever and known neutropenia, respondents were more likely to pursue outpatient antibiotic therapy. For investigation of chronic neutropenia, most respondents (60%) do not use antineutrophil antibody testing. Common indications for bone marrow biopsy were severe infection, prolonged neutropenia, or before initiating granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Indications for granulocyte colony stimulating factor were based on severity and frequency of infection. Most respondents (84%) would not recommend antibiotic prophylaxis. Results demonstrate the considerable variability in management of benign neutropenia among pediatric hematology/oncology practitioners in Canada and highlight the need for prospective studies to establish diagnostic criteria for benign neutropenia and evaluate management of fever in this population.

Longitudinal Trends in Costs for Hospitalizations at Children's Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Children's hospitals are increasingly focused on value-based improvement efforts to improve outcomes and lower costs. Such efforts are generally focused on improving outcomes in specific conditions. Examination of cost drivers across all admissions may facilitate strategic prioritization of efforts.

METHODS

Pediatric Health Information System data set discharges from 2010 to 2017 were aggregated into services lines and billing categories. The mean annual growth per discharge as a percentage of 2010 total costs was calculated for aggregated medical and surgical service lines and 6 individual service lines with highest rates of growth. The mean annual growth per discharge for each billing category and changes in length of stay was further assessed.

RESULTS

The mean annual growth in total costs was similar for aggregated medical (2.6%) and surgical (2.7%) service lines. Individual medical service lines with highest mean annual growth were oncology (3.5%), reproductive services (2.9%), and nonsurgical orthopedics (2.8%); surgical service lines with highest rate of growth were solid organ transplant (3.7%), ophthalmology (3.3%), and otolaryngology (2.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Room costs contributed most consistently to cost increases without concomitant increases in length of stay. Value-based health care initiatives must focus on room cost increases and their impacts on patient outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of step-down to oral outpatient treatment versus inpatient antimicrobial treatment in pediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: A noninferiority multicenter randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that low-risk febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes can be treated in a step-down manner in the outpatient setting. This recommendation has been limited to implementation in middle-income countries due to concerns about infrastructure and lack of trained personnel. We aimed to determine whether early step-down to oral antimicrobial outpatient treatment is not inferior in safety and efficacy to inpatient intravenous treatment in children with low-risk FN.

PROCEDURE

A noninferiority randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in three hospitals in Mexico City. Low-risk FN was identified in children younger than 18 years. After 48 to 72 hours of intravenous treatment, children were randomly allocated to receive outpatient oral treatment (experimental arm, cefixime) or to continue inpatient treatment (standard of care, cefepime). Daily monitoring was performed until neutropenia resolution. The presence of any unfavorable clinical outcome was the endpoint of interest. We performed a noninferiority test for comparison of proportions.

RESULTS

We identified 1237 FN episodes; 117 cases were randomized: 60 to the outpatient group and 57 for continued inpatient treatment. Of the FN episodes, 100% in the outpatient group and 93% in the inpatient group had a favorable outcome (P < 0.001). The mean duration of antibiotics was 4.1 days (SD 2.5; 95% CI, 3.4-4.8 days) in the outpatient group and 4.4 days (SD 2.5; 95% CI, 3.7-5.0 days) in the inpatient group (P = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

In our population, step-down oral outpatient treatment of low-risk FN was as safe and effective as inpatient intravenous treatment. Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT04000711.

The cost of a "benign" condition: Healthcare utilization and infectious outcomes in young children with primary autoimmune neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune neutropenia (AIN) is a common cause of chronic neutropenia in childhood. Despite an expected benign clinical course, many patients undergo extensive evaluation. Data on healthcare utilization and rates of bloodstream infections in young patients with AIN are limited.

METHODS

All patients with a diagnosis code of leukopenia, neutropenia, or AIN followed within the outpatient hematology clinic of a single institution from 2014 to 2016 were identified. Patients aged ≤5 years with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤500/µL persisting for ≥3 months, a clinical diagnosis of AIN, and documented resolution of neutropenia were included. Data on clinical management, including infectious outcomes and emergency center (EC) encounters, were collected.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with AIN (18 male [42%], median age at diagnosis 12 months) met eligibility criteria. Children were followed by hematology for a median duration of 18 (range, 2-85) months. Diagnostic evaluations were variable. Thirty patients (70%) had ≥ 1 EC encounters for evaluation of isolated fever with a total of 113 EC encounters for the overall cohort. Patients with ANC < 500/µL and isolated fever were admitted for observation, which resulted in 24 hospitalizations in 16 patients. Of 138 blood cultures drawn, two were positive, both later determined to be contaminants.

CONCLUSION

At a large tertiary care center, no bloodstream infections were identified in a cohort of 43 children with AIN presenting to the EC for assessment of fever. A less-intensive, more cost-effective management paradigm, which continues to prioritize patient safety, among young children with AIN is needed.