Feasibility of Busulfan Melphalan and Stem Cell Rescue After 131I-MIBG and Topotecan Therapy for Refractory or Relapsed Metastatic Neuroblastoma: The French Experience

Timing and chemotherapy association for 131-I-MIBG treatment in high-risk neuroblastoma

Prognosis of high-risk neuroblastoma is dismal, despite intensive induction chemotherapy, surgery, high-dose chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and maintenance. Patients who do not achieve a complete metastatic response, with clearance of bone marrow and skeletal NB infiltration, after induction have a significantly lowersurvival rate. Thus, it's necessary to further intensifytreatment during this phase. 131-I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131-I-MIBG) is a radioactive compound highly effective against neuroblastoma, with32% response rate in relapsed/resistant cases, and only hematological toxicity. 131-I-MIBG wasutilized at different doses in single or multiple administrations, before autologous transplant or combinedwith high-dose chemotherapy. Subsequently, it was added to consolidationin patients with advanced NB after induction, but an independent contribution against neuroblastoma and for myelotoxicity is difficult to determine. Despiteresults of a 2008 paper demonstratedefficacy and mild hematological toxicity of 131-I-MIBG at diagnosis, no center had included it with intensive chemotherapy in first-line treatment protocols. In our institution, at diagnosis, 131-I-MIBG was included in a 5-chemotherapy drug combination and administered on day-10, at doses up to 18.3 mCi/kg. Almost 87% of objective responses were observed 50 days from start with acceptable hematological toxicity. In this paper, we review the literature data regarding 131-I-MIBG treatment for neuroblastoma, and report on doses and combinations used, tumor responses and toxicity. 131-I-MIBG is very effective against neuroblastoma, in particular if given to patients at diagnosis and in combination with chemotherapy, and it should be included in all induction regimens to improve early responses rates and consequently long-term survival.

Tandem high-dose 131I-MIBG therapy supported by dosimetry in pediatric patients with relapsed-refractory high-risk neuroblastoma: the Bambino Gesu' Children's Hospital experience

OBJECTIVE

131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) combined with myeloablative chemotherapy represents an effective treatment in children affected by relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma (NBL) for disease palliation and in improving progression-free survival. The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of tandem 131I-MIBG followed by high-dose chemotherapy with Melphalan.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (age range: 3-17 years) affected by relapsed/refractory NB, previously treated according to standard procedures, were included in the study. Each treatment cycle included two administrations of 131I-MIBG (with a dosimetric approach) followed by a single dose of Melphalan with peripheral blood stem cell rescue.

RESULTS

At the end of the treatment, ten patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia, two grade 3 and one patient grade 2, three patients presented febrile neutropenia and all needed RBC and platelets transfusions; one patient presented grade 4 mucositis, four grade 3 and one patient grade 2 mucositis. One patient showed progressive disease, eight patients showed stable disease and four patients showed partial response.

CONCLUSION

High-dose 131I-MIBG therapy combined with chemotherapy represent a well-tolerated and effective modality of treatment in heavily pretreated patients affected by relapsed/refractory NBL. However, further studies, including a wider cohort of patients, are needed.

A safety and feasibility trial of 131 I-MIBG in newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma: A Children's Oncology Group study

INTRODUCTION

¹³¹ I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (¹³¹ I-MIBG) is effective in relapsed neuroblastoma. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) conducted a pilot study (NCT01175356) to assess tolerability and feasibility of induction chemotherapy followed by ¹³¹ I^- MIBG therapy and myeloablative busulfan/melphalan (Bu/Mel) in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma.

METHODS

Patients with MIBG-avid high-risk neuroblastoma were eligible. After the first two patients to receive protocol therapy developed severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), the trial was re-designed to include an ¹³¹ I-MIBG dose escalation (12, 15, and 18 mCi/kg), with a required 10-week gap before Bu/Mel administration. Patients who completed induction chemotherapy were evaluable for assessment of ¹³¹ I-MIBG feasibility; those who completed ¹³¹ I-MIBG therapy were evaluable for assessment of ¹³¹ I-MIBG + Bu/Mel feasibility.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine of 68 patients (86.8%) who completed induction chemotherapy received ¹³¹ I-MIBG. Thirty-seven of 45 patients (82.2%) evaluable for ¹³¹ I-MIBG + Bu/Mel received this combination. Among those who received ¹³¹ I-MIBG after revision of the study design, one patient per dose level developed severe SOS. Rates of moderate to severe SOS at 12, 15, and 18 mCi/kg were 33.3%, 23.5%, and 25.0%, respectively. There was one toxic death. The ¹³¹ I-MIBG and ¹³¹ I-MIBG+Bu/Mel feasibility rates at the 15 mCi/kg dose level designated for further study were 96.7% (95% CI: 83.3%-99.4%) and 81.0% (95% CI: 60.0%-92.3%).

CONCLUSION

This pilot trial demonstrated feasibility and tolerability of administering ¹³¹ I-MIBG followed by myeloablative therapy with Bu/Mel to newly diagnosed children with high-risk neuroblastoma in a cooperative group setting, laying the groundwork for a cooperative randomized trial (NCT03126916) testing the addition of ¹³¹ I-MIBG during induction therapy.

Factors Modifying Outcome After MIBG Therapy in Children With Neuroblastoma-A National Retrospective Study

Background

Neuroblastoma is the most common pediatric extracranial tumor with varied prognoses, but the survival of treated refractory or relapsing patients remains poor.

Objective

This analysis presents the outcomes of children with neuroblastoma undergoing MIBG therapy in Poland in 2006-2019.

Study Design

A retrospective cohort of 55 patients with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma treated with I-131 MIBG in Poland in 2006-2019 was analyzed. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), cumulative incidence (CI) of second cancers and CI of hypothyroidism. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the cohorts by the log-rank test. Cox modeling was adopted to estimate hazard ratios for OS and EFS, considering factors with P < 0.2.

Results

Fifty-five patients with a median age of 78.4 months (range 18-193) with neuroblastoma underwent one or more (4 patients) courses of MIBG I-131 therapy. Fifteen patients were not administered chemotherapy, 3 children received standard-dose chemotherapy, and 37 patients were administered high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) (busulfan-melphalan in 24 and treosulfan-based in 12 patients). Forty-six patients underwent stem cell transplantation, with autologous (35 patients), haploidentical (6), allogeneic (4), and syngeneic grafts (1). The median time from first MIBG therapy to SCT was 22 days. Children with relapsing tumors had inferior OS compared to those with primary resistant disease (21.2% vs 58.7%, p=0.0045). Survival was better in patients without MYCN gene amplification. MIBG therapy was never curative, except in patients further treated with HDCT with stem cell rescue irrespective of the donor type. 31 patients were referred for immune therapy after MIBG therapy, and the 5-year OS in this group was superior to the untreated children (55.2% vs 32.7%, p=0.003), but the difference in the 5-year EFS was not significant (25.6% vs 32.9%, p=ns). In 3 patients, a second malignancy was diagnosed. In 19.6% of treated children, hypothyroidism was diagnosed within 5 years after MIBG therapy.

Conclusion

MIBG therapy can be incorporated into the therapeutic strategy of relapsed or resistant neuroblastoma patients as preconditioning with HDCT rather than stand-alone therapy. Follow-up is required due to the incidence of thyroid failure and risk of second cancers.

131 I-Meta-iodobenzylguanidine followed by busulfan and melphalan and autologous stem cell rescue in high-risk neuroblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Despite the progress in current treatments, the event-free survival of high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) patients does not exceed 40%-50%, and the prognosis of refractory or relapsed patients is poor, still representing a challenge for pediatric oncologist. Therapeutic Iodine-131 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (Th-¹³¹ I-MIBG) is a recognized safe and potentially effective treatment for NB.

MATERIALS

This retrospective study reports the outcomes of 28 MIBG-avid NB patients with advanced disease either refractory or relapsed, which was undertaken from 1996 to 2014. Th-¹³¹ I-MIBG was administered shortly before (median: 17 days) high-dose chemotherapy with busulfan and melphalan (HD-BuMel) and autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR) at the Gaslini Institute in Genoa, with the aim of analyzing the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this approach.

RESULTS

Engraftment occurred in all patients after a median of 14 (11-29) and 30 days (13-80) from ASCR for neutrophils and platelets, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were observed. The main high-grade (3-4) toxicity observed was oral and gastrointestinal mucositis in 78.6% and 7.1% of patients, respectively, whereas high-grade hepatic toxicity was observed in 10.7%. Two patients developed veno-occlusive-disease (7.1%), completely responsive to defibrotide. Hypothyroidism was the main late complication that occurred in nine patients (31.1%). After Th-¹³¹ MIBG and HD-BuMel, 19 patients (67.8%) showed an improvement in disease status. Over a median follow-up of 15.9 years, the three-year and five-year overall survival (OS) probabilities were 53% (CI 0.33-0.69) and 41% (CI 0.22-0.59), and the three-year and five-year rates of cumulative risk of progression/relapse were 64% (CI 0.47-0.81) and 73% (CI 0.55-0.88), respectively. MYCN amplification emerged as the only risk factor significantly associated with OS (HR, 3.58;P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Th-¹³¹ I-MIBG administered shortly before HD-BuMel is a safe and effective regimen for patients with advanced MIBG-avid NB. These patients should be managed in centers with proven expertise.

Upfront consolidation treatment with 131I-mIbG followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in high-risk neuroblastoma

Importance

¹³¹I‐metaiodobenzylguanidine (¹³¹I‐mIBG) has a significant targeted antitumor effect for neuroblastoma. However, currently there is a paucity of data for the use of ¹³¹I‐mIBG as a “front‐line” therapeutic agent in those patients with newly diagnosed high‐risk neuroblastoma as part of the conditioning regimen for myeloablative chemotherapy (MAC).

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of upfront consolidation treatment with ¹³¹I‐mIBG plus MAC and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in high‐risk neuroblastoma patients.

Methods

A retrospective, single‐center study was conducted from 2003–2019 on newly diagnosed high‐risk neuroblastoma patients without progressive disease (PD) after the completion of induction therapy. They received ¹³¹I‐mIBG infusion and MAC followed by HSCT.

Results

A total of 24 high‐risk neuroblastoma patients were enrolled with a median age of 3.0 years at diagnosis. After receiving this sequential consolidation treatment, 3 of 13 patients who were in partial response (PR) before ¹³¹I‐mIBG treatment achieved either complete response (CR) (n = 1) or very good partial response (VGPR) (n = 2) after HSCT. With a median follow‐up duration of 13.0 months after ¹³¹I‐mIBG therapy, the 5‐year event‐free survival and overall survival rates estimated were 29% and 38% for the entire cohort, and 53% and 67% for the patients who were in CR/VGPR at the time of ¹³¹I‐mIBG treatment.

Interpretation

Upfront consolidation treatment with ¹³¹I‐mIBG plus MAC and HSCT is feasible and tolerable in high‐risk neuroblastoma patients, however the survival benefit of this ¹³¹I‐mIBG regimen is only observed in the patients who were in CR/VGPR at the time of ¹³¹I‐mIBG treatment.

Feasibility and effectiveness of treatment strategy of tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in combination with 131 I-MIBG therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma

This study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tandem HDCT/ASCT combined with targeted radiotherapy using ¹³¹ I-MIBG for high-risk neuroblastoma. Patients with high-risk neuroblastoma were treated with 8 to 10 cycles of induction chemotherapy before tandem HDCT/ASCT. Patients received ¹³¹ I-MIBG treatment before the second HDCT/ASCT. Local radiotherapy and maintenance therapy were performed after tandem HDCT/ASCT. Between 2012 and 2016, 19 patients were diagnosed with high-risk neuroblastoma in our institution and 18 of them received tandem HDCT/ASCT combined with ¹³¹ I-MIBG therapy. For the first HDCT/ASCT regimen, 12 patients received busulfan/melphalan and six patients received melphalan/etoposide/carboplatin. The second HDCT included ThioCy. The median dose of ¹³¹ I-MIBG was 17.2 mCi/kg for the first eight patients, while 12 patients in the latter period of the study received reduced dose of 10.7 mCi/kg. The 5-year OS and EFS rates were 79% and 61%, respectively, for all 19 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, and 83% and 64%, respectively, for 18 patients who completed tandem HDCT/ASCT combined with ¹³¹ I-MIBG therapy. Six patients experienced disease relapse and five patients died. Treatment-related mortality was not observed. Among 15 evaluable patients, 11 patients (73%) developed hypothyroidism, six patients (40%) had CKD, and six patients (40%) had growth failure. Hypothyroidism and growth failure were less frequent in patients who received reduced doses of ¹³¹ I-MIBG therapy. Tandem HDCT/ASCT combined with HD ¹³¹ I-MIBG therapy could be feasible for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma with acceptable toxicity profiles and favorable outcomes.