Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid as a secondary malignancy after chemotherapy in a child with neuroblastoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the palate in a patient with a history of neuroblastoma: A case report and a review of the literature

Secondary neoplasms were reported as one of the complicated complications of childhood cancer treatment. Salivary gland carcinoma is rare, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most prevalent subtype. Secondary neoplasms following neuroblastoma are not often described due to poor long-term survival. The exact cause of these tumors in children, and adults is not clearly known, but they are often observed after head, and neck radiotherapy and mainly involve main salivary glands, especially the parotid. Hence, we report a case of MEC with telangiectasia in the salivary glands of a 20-year-old girl with complaint of a palatal swelling who was treated with chemotherapy (etoposide, G-CSF, cyclophosphamide) without radiotherapy since childhood (18 months) in terms of neuroblastoma. Based on our knowledge, only three cases of MEC following neuroblastoma have been reported before, all of which involved the major salivary glands. Survivors of primary neoplasms who were treated are at risk of secondary malignant neoplasms, which usually occur at a long interval from the primary neoplasm (5-15 years), which necessitates long and close follow-up.

Intraparotid Ganglioneuroma: A rare case report

Introduction: Ganglioneuromas (GNs) are slow-growing, benign tumors arising from Schwann cells, gangliocytes, and neuronal tissues. Case Presentation: We report a rare intraparotid ganglioneuroma in a 42-year-old female presented with a parotid mass. The onset of the lesion dated back to 2021, but the growth was remarkable only in November 2022. The FNA suggested a plexiform neurofibroma. The post-surgical microscopic examination of the excised lesion revealed neoplastic large, rounded cells with abundant, finely granular eosinophilic cytoplasm and a large, eccentric nucleus with a prominent nucleolus as well as fasciculated, with an elongated cytoplasm with fine fibrillar extensions. No mitosis or tumor necrosis was observed. The periphery of the tumor showed perineural entrapment. The immunohistochemical staining for S100 protein, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A were positive. However, the neoplastic cells showed no immunoreactivity for cytokeratin (CK5/6, CK7, AE1/AE3), epithelial membrane antigen, HMB45, Melan A, CD30, CD117 and p40. The case was signed out as mature intraparotid ganglioneuroma. Conclusion: The treatment of choice was surgical resection without adjuvant radiotherapy. No recurrence or post-surgical complications were hitherto reported. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of intraparotid ganglioneuroma. Caution should be taken not to diagnose this benign neoplasm as a metastasis (e.g. metastatic neuroblastoma) or to request unnecessary overtreatment (e.g., postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy).

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Is an Effective Diagnostic Tool in Paediatric Patients with Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma as Secondary Neoplasm

BACKGROUND

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant salivary gland tumour in paediatric population, accounting for 16% of all cases. Patients affected by a previous solid or leukaemic neoplasm during their childhood may develop a second different tumour during the follow-up. In this setting, salivary gland MEC is relatively frequent, accounting for 6% of the second neoplasms in paediatric patients. Consequently, the occurrence of salivary gland nodules in paediatric patients with a previous neoplasm should be considered an event with a high risk of malignancy that poses peculiar diagnostic challenges.

SUMMARY

This study was designed to define clinical and instrumental findings and morphological features of MEC on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) samples in paediatric patients with and without a previous neoplasm. Five patients under 19 years are included in this series. FNAC was performed in all patients on a parotid nodule. We have identified 2 groups of patients: (a) 2 cases with previous history of malignancy (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and Hodgkin lymphoma) and (b) 3 cases without previous malignant neoplasms. In all cases, a final diagnosis of MEC was rendered. Key Messages: MEC may occur as a second malignancy in paediatric patients. FNAC is certainly a valid and accurate diagnostic tool for this type of neoplasm, even in the paediatric age, allowing the correct management of the patients.

Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Objectives: Secondary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the head and neck is occasionally observed in childhood cancer survivors. The goal of this research was to compare the demographic and pathologic characteristics, as well as survival between primary and secondary MEC in children and adolescent patients. Methods: Pediatric patients (younger than 19 years old) with surgically treated MEC of the head and neck were retrospectively enrolled at the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Zhengzhou University and divided into two groups based on their cancer history. Demographic, pathologic, and survival characteristics between the two groups were compared. The main study interests were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results: The primary and secondary groups consisted of 63 and 15 patients, respectively. The two groups had similar distributions in terms of age, sex, tumor stage, neck lymph node stage, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, p53, Bcl-2, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, and Ki-67 index. The 10-year RFS rates for the primary group and secondary group were 80 and 71%, respectively, and this difference was not significant (p = 0.464). The 10-year DSS rates for the primary group and secondary group were 83 and 82%, respectively, and this difference was also not significant (p = 0.649). The 10-year OS rates for the primary group and secondary group were 74 and 51%, respectively; this difference was significant (p = 0.023). Further Cox model analysis confirmed the independence of a previous cancer history (p = 0.043) in decreasing OS. Conclusions: Pediatric patients with secondary MEC exhibit similar demographic, pathologic, and molecular characteristics as primary patients but worse OS. These findings indicate that special disease management approaches might be needed for secondary patients.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck in children

INTRODUCTION

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a rare malignant salivary gland neoplasm in the pediatric population. Few studies have discussed best practice with respect to diagnosis and treatment in children.

OBJECTIVE

To present our institution's experience with the evaluation and management of pediatric mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients under 20 years of age diagnosed with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck between 1998 and 2017. Data assessed includes demographics, clinical presentation, imaging examinations, histopathology, treatment, complications, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (10 female, 6 male) were identified with a median age of 12.9 (IQR: 10.9-15.0) years. Tumors were located within the parotid gland (n = 11, 68.8%), accessory lobe of the parotid gland (n = 2, 12.5%), palate (n = 2, 12.5%), and submandibular region (n = 1, 6.3%). In 9 patients (56.3%) a neoplastic etiology was suspected based on the clinical and/or radiographic findings and confirmed pathologically on biopsy or excision. All patients were treated surgically and five patients required adjuvant radiotherapy. One patient had recurrence requiring re-excision. Seven patients (43.8%) had transient facial paresis post-operatively and one had Frey syndrome. Median follow-up time was 59.7 months (IQR: 18.9-99.3).

CONCLUSION

The malignant nature of mucoepidermoid carcinoma requires comprehensive, multidisciplinary management. Imaging and tissue sampling by fine needle aspiration give clinicians the best insight into location and nature of the mass. Complete surgical excision with attention to preservation of facial nerve and achieving negative margins is desired.

Pediatric Salivary Cancer: Epidemiology, Treatment Trends, and Association of Treatment Modality with Survival

Objective To characterize the epidemiology of pediatric salivary cancer and associate patient, tumor, and treatment factors with treatment modality and survival. Study Design Cross-sectional analysis. Setting US national database. Subjects and Methods We identified 588 patients 19 years or younger diagnosed with salivary cancer in the National Cancer Database 2004-2013. We characterized patient, tumor, and treatment factors as proportions and associated these factors with treatment modality and overall survival via multivariable logistic regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively. Results In total, 588 patients were included. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma was identified in 234 of 588 patients (40%) and acinar cell carcinoma in 215 of 588 (37%). Parotid tumors were seen in 504 (86%) of patients. Surgery alone was used to treat 351 (60%) of patients; surgery plus adjuvant radiation was used to treat 145 (25%). Overall 5-year survival was 93%. Controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, treatment with surgery and radiation vs surgery alone was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.92; P = .041). High tumor grade was associated with decreased overall survival (HR = 33.17; 95% CI, 5.89-186.8; P < .001). Treatment with surgery plus radiation remained associated with improved overall survival in the subset of patients with high tumor grade (HR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.64; P = .014). Conclusion Tumor grade is an important predictor of survival in pediatric patients with salivary gland cancer. Surgery plus adjuvant radiation vs surgery alone is associated with improved overall survival and may be considered for high-risk patients, particularly those with high-grade tumors.

Primary cervical ganglioneuroblastoma

OBJECTIVES

Ganglioneuroblastomas represent a histological subgroup of the rare neuroblastic tumours with intermediate malignant potential arising from neural crest progenitor cells of sympathetic nerves. Diagnosis can often be difficult based on imaging alone. We describe 4 cases of children presenting with a solitary neck mass with histology ultimately revealing ganglioneuroblastoma.

METHODS

A retrospective case note review was carried out of all patients with cervical ganglioneuroblastoma seen at Great Ormond Street Hospital, UK.

RESULTS

Mean age at presentation was 5 years. Based on imaging, the initial diagnoses for three of the cases were: lymphatic malformation, carotid body tumour, paraganglioma, respectively, whilst the remaining case had an immediate incisional biopsy revealing the correct diagnosis. All cases were managed by surgical excision with no evidence of recurrence after a median follow up of 6 years.

CONCLUSION

Otolaryngologists should be aware of ganglioneuroblastoma when establishing the differential diagnosis of a child presenting with a neck mass. Biopsy is recommended as the gold standard investigation to avoid an incorrect diagnosis.