The Effectiveness of Psychoeducational Interventions Focused on Sexuality in Cancer

The effect of psychosocial interventions for sexual health in patients with pelvic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore and evaluate the effect of psychosocial interventions in improving sexual health outcomes among post-treatment patients with pelvic cancer.

METHODS

Inclusion and exclusion criteria were pelvic cancer survivors; psychosocial interventions; studies with a control group and measures of sexual health. Five databases were searched for literature along with an inspection of the included studies' reference lists to extend the search. Risk of bias was assessed with the RoB2 tool. Standardised mean difference (SMD) with a random effects model was used to determine the effect size of psychosocial interventions for sexual health in patients with pelvic cancers.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included, with a total number of 1,541 participants. There was a large heterogeneity regarding the type of psychosocial intervention used with the source found in a leave one out analysis. Six studies showed statistically significant improvements in sexual health, while three showed positive but non-significant effects. The summary effect size estimate was small SMD = 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05 to 0.42, p = 0.01).

DISCUSSION

There is limited research on psychosocial interventions for sexual health in pelvic cancer patients. There are also limitations in the different pelvic cancer diagnoses examined. Commonly, the included articles examined physical function rather than the whole sexual health spectrum. The small effect sizes may in part be due to evaluation of psychosocial interventions by measuring physical dysfunction. Future research should broaden sexual health assessment tools and expand investigations to more cancer types.

The Effect of Psychoeducational Interventions on Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related fatigue is one of the most common symptoms of cancer patients. Psychoeducation is often used in the management of cancer-related fatigue.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to synthesize the effects of psychoeducational interventions on cancer-related fatigue.

METHODS

This article is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. The 11 electronic databases were searched, and studies using psychoeducational interventions to manage cancer-related fatigue were included. Data synthesis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 3.0. The random-effects model was used to pool the effect size for intervention. The subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of the characteristics of psychoeducational interventions. This study was reported according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention version 6.3 and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines.

RESULTS

This analysis included 10 studies with a total of 1369 participants. Most of the included studies compared the psychoeducational intervention group with the passive control group. Our meta-analysis revealed that psychoeducational intervention has a positive medium effect on improving cancer-related fatigue with a low quality of evidence. Subgroup analyses indicated no difference between group and individual interventions, between face-to-face and digital interventions, or between ≤3 and >3 sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychoeducational interventions can improve cancer-related fatigue. Additional well-designed randomized controlled studies are needed to upgrade the quality of evidence for psychoeducational interventions on cancer-related fatigue.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses may practice psychoeducational interventions to manage cancer-related fatigue and may use this study design for randomized controlled studies for psychoeducational interventions on cancer-related fatigue.

Nurse-patient sexual health communication in gynaecological cancer follow-up: A qualitative study from nurses' perspectives

AIM

To explore nurse-patient sexual health communication from the perspectives of nurses trained to address sexual health in gynaecological cancer follow-up.

DESIGN

A qualitative hermeneutic approach.

METHODS

Individual semi-structured interviews with 10 nurses at five different hospitals in Norway were conducted in March and April 2021. A Gadamerian-inspired research method was used in the analysis.

RESULTS

Three main themes with six sub-themes were identified. The three main themes were: (1) building relationships through communication, (2) practice makes perfect-the importance of experience and knowledge, and (3) personal attitudes as promoters or inhibiters of sexual health communication.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights into nurse-patient sexual health communication from the perspectives of nurses. The nurses in this study experienced the importance of having a good, respectful nurse-patient relationship as the foundation for sexual health communication. The professional confidence gained through experience and knowledge was emphasized, including the significance of how attitudes and taboos can influence sexual health communication.

IMPACT

The main findings of this study indicate that training in sexual health communication and the possibility of addressing sexual health repeatedly give nurses skills and professional confidence to address sexual health in cancer follow-up. Our study indicates that sexual health communication can be achieved in a clinical setting without being overly resource demanding. Our results may also motivate nurses to enhance their knowledge about sexual health in cancer follow-ups.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

A patient representative from the Norwegian Gynaecological Cancer Society have been involved in the planning of this study. She has given valuable contributions from the view of a gynaecological cancer patient.

Effectiveness of Dyadic Psychoeducational Intervention on Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dyadic psychoeducational intervention targets the dyads of cancer patients and caregivers as active participants in partnership, which can potentially address the needs and challenges faced by patients with cancer and their caregivers. However, there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of the intervention on psychological health and illness-related outcomes among the dyads.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically examine the dyadic psychoeducational intervention of cancer patients and their caregivers on psychological health and illness-related outcomes.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and 4 Chinese databases were searched from inception to May 29, 2022. Two investigators independently extracted data and evaluated methodological quality. RevMan 5.4 was used for meta-analysis; heterogeneity was evaluated using Higgins' I2 (%). Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the effects.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials that involved 1234 dyads were collected. Meta-analysis showed that the intervention was effective in reducing the dyadic depression (patients' SMD, -0.41 [95% CI, -0.78 to -0.04; P = .03]; caregivers' SMD, -0.70 [95% CI, -1.31 to -0.09; P = .03]). It also improved caregivers' quality of life (SMD, -0.29 [95% CI, -0.56 to -0.03; P = .03]), whereas no significant effect was found on patients' quality of life. Dyadic results including anxiety, self-efficacy, disease communication, and appraisals of illness/caregiving were observed.

CONCLUSION

Dyadic psychoeducational intervention reduced the dyadic depression. It also improved caregivers' quality of life.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses can apply dyadic psychoeducational intervention in clinical practice. More studies are needed to draw higher-quality conclusions and investigate the effects on psychological health and illness-related outcomes in cancer patients and caregivers.

Effectiveness of psychoeducation intervention among women with gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Psychoeducation interventions have been suggested to improve sexual functioning and quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the psychoeducation intervention on quality of life, sexual function, and psychological outcomes; and to identify the critical components of psychoeducation intervention for women with gynecological cancer. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoeducation interventions were searched using six English databases, eligible studies were extracted, and the risk of bias was evaluated by two authors independently. A random effects model was used to examine the intervention effects. We conducted subgroup analysis and meta-regression to assess the variables underlying the heterogeneity. In total, eight trials were identified, and 1128 participants were included. Women who received the psychoeducation intervention had better quality of life (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22, 0.97), sexual functioning (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.99), and psychological outcomes (i.e., anxiety and depression (SMD =  - 0.27, 95% CI: - 0.09, - 0.44)). Interventions that combined lecture-based, skill practical, discussion, and counseling were conducted using an online format and were delivered by a team of health professionals that had higher scores of qualities of life. Additionally, involving significant others in the intervention improved sexual functioning. Psychoeducation interventions effectively improve quality of life, sexual functioning, anxiety, and depression. Incorporating lecture-based, practical skills, discussion, and counseling through an online format and involving significant others are beneficial for improving the quality of life and sexual functioning among women with gynecological cancer.

Breast cancer patients' experience and wishes regarding communication on sexual health: the BEROSE study

BEROSE is a single-center observational study, which aimed to determine the proportion of women with breast cancer who received information on sexual health from health professionals throughout their whole care pathway. A total of 318 women with all stages of breast cancer (30% metastatic) and at different time interval from diagnosis (up to 7 years) participated to the survey. Sixty-five percent of women reported that they had not received any information about sexual health over the whole care. Increased awareness among the healthcare professionals and particularly the oncology community is needed to discuss sexual health in women with breast cancer.

A Pilot Intervention Study to Improve Sexuality Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors

Objective:

The main objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of the Permission, Limited information, Specific Suggestion, and sexual therapy (PLISSIT) model directly with breast cancer survivor (BCS) on sexual function and quality of life (QOL) domains.

Methods:

A pilot control trial was conducted comparing the PLISSIT model intervention to usual care. The intervention was delivered by two health professionals (nurse and professional sexual therapist) consisted of five sessions on counseling, genitalia anatomy, human sexual response, and sexual function. Data were collected before and 3 months after the intervention using the Female Sexual Function Index and the World Health Organization QOL-BREF questionnaire.

Results:

The sample consisted of 19 BCS (11 intervention, 8 controls) with a mean age of 54.5 8 years (standard deviation = 7.14) and the majority were married, Black or mixed Brazilian, received chemotherapy, radiation and/or hormonal therapy, and education varied from high school to college. There was significant improvement in physical health (P = 0.031), social relationships (P = 0.046), orgasm (P = 0.055), and pain (P = 0.049) over time and the intervention resulted in improved arousal (P = 0.038).

Conclusions:

The results suggest that the PLISSIT model may be an effective intervention for BCS in coping with and managing changes in sexuality and sexual function after treatment. It is important that nurses are aware of sexual intimacy concerns for BCS and integrate assessment into their nursing care.

Abordagem da sexualidade no cuidado ao paciente oncológico: barreiras e estratégias

Resumo Objetivo: Identificar os fatores intervenientes para a abordagem da sexualidade, pelo paciente e profissional, e descrever as estratégias empenhadas para a abordagem da sexualidade no cuidado ao paciente com câncer. Métodos: Revisão integrativa de literatura, baseada em etapas sistemáticas, nas bases de dados e ou bibliotecas eletrônicas: LILACS, PUbMed, MEDLINE, IBECS, ScIELO, UpToDate, BDEnf. As buscas ocorreram entre dezembro de 2016 a julho de 2017. Criterios de inclusão: estudos com pacientes oncológicos, idade acima de 18 anos; publicados nos últimos dez anos (2007-2017); disponíveis na íntegra; nos idiomas português, espanhol e inglês. Excluídos: teses, dissertações, revisões (sistemática, narrativa e integrativa), artigos de opinião e editoriais. Resultados: Incluídos 18 artigos, seis artigos referentes a fatores intervenientes e 12 artigos referentes a estratégias adotadas para abordagem da sexualidade. A maioria dos artigos evidenciou a dificuldade com a qual o tema é tratado na prática profissional, nas perspectivas da comunicação e das relações interpessoais entre pacientes e profissionais, reiterando a premissa que a saúde sexual do paciente é, normalmente, negligenciada. Os estudos que versavam sobre as intervenções empreendidas para sanarem as lacunas, demonstraram diferentes graus de positividade e demonstraram que é necessária a capacitação dos profissionais com estratégias de orientação e aconselhamento. Há modelos de intervenção disponíveis na literatura. Conclusão: A sexualidade é negligenciada no cuidado ao paciente com câncer. A atenção multidisciplinar em oncologia precisa reconhecer esta realidade e empreender, numa ação conjunta, atividades de educação e apoio psicossocial, para que esta necessidade humana básica seja satisfeita pelos pacientes.