Assessing Information Needs Regarding Metabolic Syndrome Among Gynecological Cancer Survivors: A Concurrent Mixed Method

A Qualitative Study of Knowledge of Metabolic Syndrome, Attitudes about Lifestyle Modifications, and Preferences for Lifestyle Interventions among Patients with Cancer and Metabolic Syndrome

Background

Nearly 60% of patients with cancer have metabolic syndrome, which increases the risk of mortality, but there is no clear guidance for oncology providers about its management. Here, we report on the qualitative component of a larger mixed methods study that aimed to understand cancer patients' knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding metabolic syndrome.

Methods

Adult cancer patients with metabolic syndrome were recruited during 2022-2023 in the MD Anderson General Internal Medicine clinic and participated in semistructured interviews focused on metabolic syndrome and lifestyle interventions. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants' demographic information was collected. Interviews were analyzed using hybrid thematic analysis and constant comparison involving deductive and inductive coding. Researcher triangulation and debriefing were used to ensure rigor.

Results

There were 19 participants, 12 female and 12 White. Eighteen had solid tumors, including gynecologic (n = 5), genitourinary (n = 4), colorectal (n = 3), and breast (n = 2). Analysis yielded 5 major themes: 1) patients' understanding of metabolic syndrome; 2) attitudes about and approaches to managing metabolic syndrome; 3) capacity and limitations regarding managing metabolic syndrome; 4) patient-led care; and 5) tailored intervention plans. Participants had limited knowledge of metabolic syndrome and its cancer-related consequences; most desired additional education. Many participants reported that their cancer or diabetes diagnosis motivated them to prioritize lifestyle Modifications. Participants expressed strong interest in personalized care plans focused on healthy lifestyle rather than simply weight loss. As part of their tailored intervention plans, participants desired clear communication with their medical team, coordination of care among team members, and collaboration with providers about treatment decisions.

Conclusion

Cancer patients with metabolic syndrome want collaborative, patient-centered care. Shared decision-making based on respect for patients' distinctive needs and preferences is an essential component of the development of such collaborative care. Tailored interventions, practical implementation strategies, and personalized care plans are needed for cancer patients with metabolic syndrome. The study findings contribute to filling the gap in knowledge regarding clear guidance for oncology providers on managing metabolic syndrome and will inform the development of future lifestyle interventions for patients diagnosed with metabolic syndrome.

User evaluation of a mobile education application for the management of metabolic syndrome among cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop a smartphone education application for managing metabolic syndrome among cancer survivors and obtain user evaluation based on quantitative and qualitative data.

METHODS

Ten cancer survivors and 10 oncology nurse specialists responded to a structured usability evaluation tool (Mobile Application Rating Scale: MARS). Quantitative data analysis was performed through descriptive statistics using SPSS version 25.0. We conducted semi-structured interviews of the cancer survivors and oncology nurse specialists. Qualitative data of interview responses were coded as the app's strengths and weaknesses, information, motivation, and behavioral change.

RESULTS

The overall usability evaluation score of the app was 3.66 ± 0.39 for cancer survivors and 3.79 ± 0.20 for oncology nurse specialists. Both cancer survivors and oncology nurse specialists scored the area of functionality as the highest and engagement as the lowest. Additionally, the qualitative usability evaluation suggested that the app should be visually improved by including figures and tables to enhance readability and providing videos and more specific guidelines to directly elicit behavioral change.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic syndrome in cancer survivors can be effectively managed by using the educational application developed in this study by improving the shortcomings of the app for cancer survivors.

Diet and nutrition information and support needs in pelvic radiotherapy: A systematic, mixed-methods review

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to review diet and nutrition information and support needs of cancer patients who receive pelvic radiotherapy to inform the development of interventions to improve this area of care.

METHODS

The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies of any design that assessed diet and nutrition needs after a pelvic cancer diagnosis. Narrative synthesis was used to integrate findings.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (12 quantitative, 15 qualitative, 3 mixed-methods) were included. Four themes, "content of dietary information"; "sources of information"; "sustaining dietary change"; and "views on the role of diet post-treatment," summarised evidence about provision of nutritional guidance following diagnosis, but also contrasting views about the role of diet post-diagnosis. Qualitative studies contributed considerably more to the synthesis, compared to quantitative studies. Included studies were of moderate to good quality; selection bias in quantitative studies and poor evidence of credibility and dependability in qualitative studies were highlighted.

CONCLUSION

There is some evidence of lack of nutrition support in pelvic cancer survivors, but methodological limitations of included studies may have had an impact on the findings. Future, prospective studies that focus on diet and nutrition needs post-diagnosis are warranted to improve care.

Oncology nurses' knowledge and awareness on metabolic syndrome in cancer survivors and the perceived barriers to the provision of related care: A mixed-method study

OBJECTIVE

To identify oncology nurses' level of knowledge and awareness of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in cancer survivors and the perceived barriers to the provision of MetS-related care.

METHODS

In this mixed-method study, 196 participants responded to a structured modified questionnaire that included items pertaining to MetS-related knowledge and awareness. Concurrently, 24 semi-structured interviews were conducted. A qualitative survey and quantitative interview were conducted between October 2018 and December 2018.

RESULTS

While oncology nurses had a high level of knowledge of MetS in terms of its individual components, they failed to accurately differentiate MetS cases from non-MetS ones. Further, they showed a high level of awareness of MetS-related care for cancer survivors but did not apply their knowledge in clinical settings. In the qualitative survey, the nurses cited various factors pertaining to their perceived barriers to the provision of MetS-related care, including the fact that cancer survivors are distinguished by the specificity of the subject and inpatient environmental constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncology nurses had a high level of knowledge of MetS but failed to accurately identify MetS cases. Thus, their level of knowledge should be improved, and strategies are needed to overcome the perceived barriers to the provision of MetS-related care.